
How to Limit Medical Debt's Impact on Your Credit
In the final days of President Joe Biden's term, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports. The goal was to 'reduce the burden of medical debt and ensure that patients are not denied access to credit for home mortgages, car loans, or small business loans due to unpaid medical bills,' according to the White House press release at the time. But under the Trump Administration, the CFPB flipped its stance on the rule, which had not yet gone into effect. And on Friday, a federal judge, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, vacated the rule, stating that it exceeded the CFPB's authority under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Roughly $88 billion of unpaid medical bills are in collections across the U.S., according to the CFPB, which estimates that the issue affects about one in five Americans.
JoAnn Volk, a research professor and co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, says the judge's ruling 'eliminates an important protection for families who are going to be shut out of credit because of this medical debt that they could not avoid.'
How medical debt impacts credit
CFPB research has indicated that medical debt on credit reports is 'a poor predictor' of whether a person will repay a loan, but still 'contributes to thousands of denied applications on mortgages that consumers would be able to repay,' the agency said at the time the Biden-era rule was finalized.
'We know from prior studies that medical debt does not have meaningful predictive power for people's credit worthiness. Part of the reason is that medical debt, more than any other form of debt, is the result of bad luck, not bad financial behavior,' says Neale Mahoney, an economics professor at Stanford University and director of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. 'Nobody plans to go to the hospital or have a kid slip and fall and need to be rushed to the ER and have to pay those medical bills; that is just bad luck.'
The Biden-era rule would have led to the approval of about 22,000 additional, affordable mortgages annually, and the credit scores of people with medical debt on their credit reports would increase by an average of 20 points, the CFPB estimated. Mahoney says vacating it will reduce credit access for people struggling with medical debt.
There are some steps that can be taken to mitigate that impact—though they're limited.
Financial assistance options
Mahoney advises people who find themselves faced with burdensome medical bills to first take advantage of their hospital's or physician's financial assistance program. Many hospitals have such programs, which are often listed on the back of the bill, that can reduce or sometimes even eliminate the cost depending on a patient's income or assets.
'It can be a slog to work through the process, but for many people, addressing the issue with the hospital is better than letting that issue fester and then become a medical debt with a debt collector,' Mahoney says. There are some organizations, like Dollar For, that help patients navigate these financial assistance programs.
The CFPB offers some general tips for people dealing with medical debt, such as confirming the unpaid bill with the appropriate source, contacting their insurer if they believe the service should have been covered, and disputing any errors in the bill or credit report.
Debt payment plans
If a person's debt has been sold to a debt collector and they're concerned about its potential impact on their credit score, Mahoney recommends that they try and negotiate a payment plan with the debt collection company.
Sometimes, a debt collector may be open to receiving a payment that is more within reach for the patient and, in turn, removing that debt from the credit report, he says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
As Starvation Rises, Israeli Minister Says Israel Is ‘Driving Out' Gazans
Amid rising starvation in the Gaza Strip, an Israeli government minister said on Thursday that Israel had no duty to alleviate hunger in the territory and was seeking to expel its population. Amichay Eliyahu, a far-right lawmaker who leads Israel's Heritage Ministry, said in a radio interview that 'there is no nation that feeds its enemies,' adding that 'the British didn't feed the Nazis, nor did the Americans feed the Japanese, nor do the Russians feed the Ukrainians now.' He concluded that the government was 'rushing toward Gaza being wiped out,' while also 'driving out the population that educated its people on the ideas of 'Mein Kampf,'' an antisemitic text written by Adolf Hitler. The office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declined to comment on whether Mr. Eliyahu's remarks had represented the government's official position. An Israeli military official, speaking on condition of anonymity to comment on Israel's political leadership, said Mr. Eliyahu's comments did not reflect military policy. Mr. Eliyahu oversees historical and archaeological sites and institutions in Israel and has no authority over the Israeli military. He does not participate in meetings of a small group of ministers who oversee security decisions. His office did not reply to requests for clarification. Mr. Eliyahu's comments were swiftly condemned by Israeli opposition politicians, who said the minister did not represent the Israeli mainstream. Polling suggests a majority of Israelis favor reaching a cease-fire to release hostages held by Hamas. Mr. Eliyahu's interview came amid increasing cases of starvation in Gaza. Israel — which controls all access to Gaza — blocked all food deliveries to the enclave between early March and late May. While Israel now allows some food into Gaza, it has drastically reduced the number of places from which food is distributed, forcing Palestinians to receive food aid from a handful of sites that are hard to access. In a crude form of crowd control, Israeli soldiers have repeatedly shot and killed scores of Palestinians along routes leading to the new food distribution sites, forcing civilians to choose between the risk of gunfire and the risk of starvation. After initially dismissing the reports of starvation, Mr. Eliyahu appeared to recognize its occurrence by blaming Hamas for it. 'We are starving them? They are starving them!' Mr. Eliyahu said in an interview with Kol Barama, a radio station popular among ultra-Orthodox Jewish Israelis. 'The day they return the hostages, there will be no hunger there,' he said. While Mr. Eliyahu's comments echo some made by other members of Mr. Netanyahu's ruling coalition, they were criticized by politicians outside the government. Yair Lapid, the centrist leader of Israel's political opposition, said in a public statement that Mr. Eliyahu's comments were 'a moral stain and a public diplomacy disaster. Israel will never convince the world of the justness of our war against terror as long as we are led by an extremist minority government with ministers who glorify blood and death.' Mr. Lapid added that Israeli soldiers 'do not fight, die, and get injured to erase a civilian population. They fight to return the hostages and ensure Israel's security.' A large majority of Israelis support a diplomatic deal to free the hostages held in Gaza, instead of continued military efforts to defeat Hamas, according to recent polling. Protesters were expected to gather in Tel Aviv on Thursday night to call for an immediate cease-fire and hostage release deal. Early in the war, Mr. Eliyahu attracted global attention for suggesting that Israel might drop a nuclear bomb on Gaza. Mr. Netanyahu condemned those comments and suspended him from the cabinet, before swiftly reinstating him. Myra Noveck contributed reporting.


CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
Texas AG Ken Paxton claimed three homes as primary residence, records show
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, are longtime owners of a $1.5 million house in a gated community in McKinney. In 2015, they snapped up a second home in Austin. Then another. The problem: Mortgages signed by the Paxtons contained inaccurate statements declaring that each of those three houses was their primary residence, enabling the now-estranged couple to improperly lock in low interest rates, according to an Associated Press review of public records. The lower rates will save the Paxtons tens of thousands of dollars in payments over the life of the loan, legal experts say. The records also revealed that the Paxtons collected an improper homestead tax break on two of those homes at the same time. It is a federal and state crime to knowingly make false statements on mortgage documents. It's also against the law in Texas to collect a homestead tax break on two separate properties. The mortgage revelations are sure to become fodder in the Republican primary for a U.S. Senate seat in which Paxton is seeking to topple the incumbent, John Cornyn. The situation is further complicated by the Trump administration's pursuit of Democrats over similar issues. President Donald Trump has accused two of his political foes — Sen. Adam Schiff of California and New York Attorney General Letitia James — of committing mortgage fraud in similar, though far less serious, circumstances. The Democrats have long been targets of Trump's ire for having led various investigations into his conduct as president and as a business executive. The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation of James. It received a criminal referral for Schiff last week from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. James' attorney, Abbe Lowell, urged the Trump administration to investigate Paxton instead. "If this administration was genuinely interested in rooting out fraud, it appears they should stop wasting their time on the baseless and discredited allegations against the New York Attorney General James and turn their attention to Texas," said Lowell, a prominent Washington attorney whose past clients include Hunter Biden and Ivanka Trump. In a statement, Marisol Samayoa, a Schiff spokeswoman, blasted the criminal referral as "a transparent attempt" by Trump "to punish a perceived political foe who is committed to holding him to account." It's unlikely that Paxton, a staunch Trump ally, will face the same federal scrutiny as James and Schiff. It's equally doubtful that Paxton will face much legal trouble in Texas: His office is one of the primary agencies tasked with investigating allegations of mortgage fraud. Ken Paxton and his spokesman did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Angela Paxton did not respond to requests made through her office. The Cornyn campaign released a statement Thursday that said in part, "At a time when millions of Americans are fighting to survive under high home mortgage rates, Ken Paxton lied to banks to amass a property empire making him a multimillionaire while on a government salary." Documents reviewed by the AP show the Paxtons hold mortgages on three homes — one in suburban Dallas, two in Austin — that are each listed as their primary residence. The designation comes with a considerable financial upside. Interest rates on primary homes are significantly lower than those for mortgages on secondary homes or investment properties, saving buyers tens of thousands of dollars — if not more — over the life of a loan. Legal experts say it's possible that the Paxtons' lenders prepared the documents and that the couple did not carefully review them before signing. Even if that were the case, some legal experts say that Paxton, as an attorney and Texas' top law enforcement officer, ought to have known better. "If he filled out lender documents knowing that they were false, then that is a false statement to obtain a mortgage on favorable terms. That would be actionable," said Arif Lawji, a veteran Texas real estate attorney. Low interest rates are not the only perk the Paxtons secured, records show. In 2018, they simultaneously collected homestead property tax breaks on their family's home in McKinney, as well as on a $1.1 million home in Austin, property records and tax statements show. A homestead tax break is a property tax reduction that a homeowner is only eligible to collect on one property that is also their primary home. The suburban Dallas home is where the Paxtons' family has long resided. It's where Ken and Angela Paxton are registered to vote. It is located in the state Senate district that Angela Paxton represents in the Legislature, which Ken Paxton held before his election in 2014 to be attorney general. Lawji said the Paxtons' simultaneous collection of two homestead tax breaks appears to be a more clearcut violation. That's because one must obtain a form and submit it to taxing authorities to receive such a tax break, making it an "intentional act," he said. The tax break was worth several thousand dollars, a fact that confounded real estate lawyers. "Why would you try to do all of this," Lawji said, "when you are the attorney general? That's a bigger question to me than the money, when you are AG and have to enforce this law." Paxton's real estate dealings are in many ways distinct from those of James and Schiff, the Democrats targeted by the Trump administration. The investigation of James centers on forms she signed in 2023 while helping a niece buy a home. One form stated that James intended to occupy the home as her "principal residence." But in other documents, the New York attorney general made clear she had no intention of living there. An email to the mortgage loan broker two weeks before she signed the documents stated the property "WILL NOT be my primary residence." For over a decade, Schiff owned homes in Maryland and California, the state he represents, that were both designated as a primary residence. Schiff corrected the issue in 2020 — a step Paxton has not taken. Paxton's real estate dealings are not the first time he has drawn scrutiny for his conduct while in office. He spent roughly 10 years under state indictment on securities charges while serving as the state's top law enforcement official. The charges were eventually dropped in 2024. Other alleged misdeeds led to his impeachment by Texas' GOP-controlled House in 2023. He was acquitted in a trial by the Senate. What ultimately unleashed the impeachment push was Paxton's relationship with Austin real estate developer Nate Paul, who pleaded guilty this year to one count of making a false statement to a financial institution. In 2020, eight top aides in Paxton's office told the FBI they were concerned the state's top law enforcement official was misusing his office to help Paul.


New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
UnitedHealth Will Cooperate With Federal Probe of Its Medicare Billing Practices
After months of unconfirmed reports about a potential federal probe into its Medicare business, UnitedHealth Group, the giant health care conglomerate, announced Thursday morning that it was cooperating with the U.S. Department of Justice and responding to both formal criminal and civil requests. UnitedHealth said it had 'proactively reached out' to the Justice Department after news reports of a government investigation had surfaced, according to an unsigned company statement. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The probe appears to focus on the private insurance plans that UnitedHealth offers as an alternative to traditional Medicare. The company is the largest supplier of these Medicare Advantage plans, which are sold to millions of older Americans and to people with disabilities. The business has become a critical source of revenues to UnitedHealth as Americans have increasingly chosen to enroll in these plans instead of the government's program. But UnitedHealth, along with other major insurers, has come under sharp scrutiny from federal officials. Government investigators have claimed that the company has overbilled Medicare, and regulators have been looking into whether it also inappropriately boosted payments by diagnosing enrolled patients with additional conditions, logging them as sicker than they are. Medicare pays UnitedHealth more when patients are sicker. UnitedHealth owns UnitedHealthcare, the insurer that sells the Medicare Advantage plans, and also operates a vast network of doctors through its Optum unit. Many of these doctors treat patients who are enrolled in the company's plans. The Wall Street Journal has been investigating whether UnitedHealthcare was increasing Medicare payments by inappropriately coding patients with diagnoses. It recently reported that prosecutors had been interviewing former employees. Medicare officials have already cracked down on some potentially abusive practices. But the probe by the Department of Justice signals a broader interest by regulators into this historically lucrative business, which contributes significantly to the company's $400 billion in annual revenues. The Justice Department inquiry comes at a difficult time for UnitedHealth, which has been reeling from a series of challenges, including the brutal murder in December of its top insurance executive, Brian Thompson. In May, the company abruptly replaced its chief executive with its former chief executive, Stephen Hemsley, after the company reported disappointing results. Its stock has plummeted, and on Thursday the share price was down in early trading. In its statement, the company expressed 'full confidence in its practices,' and that it was 'committed to working cooperatively with the Department through the process.' It added that the company had 'a long record of responsible conduct and effective compliance' and that it was conducting an independent review of its practices. UnitedHealth 'is committed to maintaining the integrity of its business practices and serving as reliable stewards of American tax dollars,' the company said.