
How to Limit Medical Debt's Impact on Your Credit
In the final days of President Joe Biden's term, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports. The goal was to 'reduce the burden of medical debt and ensure that patients are not denied access to credit for home mortgages, car loans, or small business loans due to unpaid medical bills,' according to the White House press release at the time. But under the Trump Administration, the CFPB flipped its stance on the rule, which had not yet gone into effect. And on Friday, a federal judge, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, vacated the rule, stating that it exceeded the CFPB's authority under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Roughly $88 billion of unpaid medical bills are in collections across the U.S., according to the CFPB, which estimates that the issue affects about one in five Americans.
JoAnn Volk, a research professor and co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, says the judge's ruling 'eliminates an important protection for families who are going to be shut out of credit because of this medical debt that they could not avoid.'
How medical debt impacts credit
CFPB research has indicated that medical debt on credit reports is 'a poor predictor' of whether a person will repay a loan, but still 'contributes to thousands of denied applications on mortgages that consumers would be able to repay,' the agency said at the time the Biden-era rule was finalized.
'We know from prior studies that medical debt does not have meaningful predictive power for people's credit worthiness. Part of the reason is that medical debt, more than any other form of debt, is the result of bad luck, not bad financial behavior,' says Neale Mahoney, an economics professor at Stanford University and director of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. 'Nobody plans to go to the hospital or have a kid slip and fall and need to be rushed to the ER and have to pay those medical bills; that is just bad luck.'
The Biden-era rule would have led to the approval of about 22,000 additional, affordable mortgages annually, and the credit scores of people with medical debt on their credit reports would increase by an average of 20 points, the CFPB estimated. Mahoney says vacating it will reduce credit access for people struggling with medical debt.
There are some steps that can be taken to mitigate that impact—though they're limited.
Financial assistance options
Mahoney advises people who find themselves faced with burdensome medical bills to first take advantage of their hospital's or physician's financial assistance program. Many hospitals have such programs, which are often listed on the back of the bill, that can reduce or sometimes even eliminate the cost depending on a patient's income or assets.
'It can be a slog to work through the process, but for many people, addressing the issue with the hospital is better than letting that issue fester and then become a medical debt with a debt collector,' Mahoney says. There are some organizations, like Dollar For, that help patients navigate these financial assistance programs.
The CFPB offers some general tips for people dealing with medical debt, such as confirming the unpaid bill with the appropriate source, contacting their insurer if they believe the service should have been covered, and disputing any errors in the bill or credit report.
Debt payment plans
If a person's debt has been sold to a debt collector and they're concerned about its potential impact on their credit score, Mahoney recommends that they try and negotiate a payment plan with the debt collection company.
Sometimes, a debt collector may be open to receiving a payment that is more within reach for the patient and, in turn, removing that debt from the credit report, he says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
21 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Joe Biden's Book Is Bound to Be Dull
The news that Joe Biden sold his presidential memoir to the Hachette Book Group for an advance of about $10 million raises a question: What will Hachette get for its money? Mr. Biden's approach to his presidency suggests that a Biden memoir is likely to combine many of the worst characteristics of previous presidential memoirs gone wrong. The first challenge with such memoirs is that ex-presidents often aren't particularly interested in writing after being president. When Lyndon B. Johnson left the White House, he told a friend, 'I'm going to enjoy the time I've got left.' Johnson probably had a good book in him, but he apparently didn't want to share it. Instead, he produced a lackluster memoir that was published in 1971, and also worked on another tepid book with biographer Doris Kearns Goodwin, which was published after his death. According to Ms. Goodwin, Mr. Johnson would tell his team fascinating and earthy anecdotes but then get mad when he saw them on the page, saying, 'Get that vulgar language of mine out of there. What do you think this is, the tale of an uneducated cowboy? It's a presidential memoir, damn it, and I've got to come out looking like a statesman, not some backwoods politician.' This illustrates another challenge with presidential memoirs—the temptation to revise history to reflect well on the author. Mr. Biden, who is significantly older than Johnson was when he was putting together his memoirs, is likely to have even less interest in sitting down to do the hard work of writing. This means that the book is almost certain to be ghost-written, which can diminish its authenticity. As Robert Caro, who knows something about writing compelling presidential history, has said: 'Most presidential memoirs are pretty canned. If they're not written by somebody else, they seem like they are.' This was the case with Ronald Reagan's clearly ghost-written memoir, 'An American Life.' The book was a commercial disappointment, and it failed to give readers real insight into Reagan.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Americans spend nearly half their day online — whether it's work or play — ‘eye-opening' poll shows
Wired Americans spend nearly half their day online — splitting that time almost evenly between watching videos or TV shows and working, browsing and shopping, according to a new survey. 'This new survey was eye-opening,' said Eric Bruno, senior vice president of product management for Optimum, whose telecommunications firm interviewed 2,000 US residents who have a home Internet subscription with any company for the poll. 'We were amazed to see how many hours folks are watching, shopping and browsing online on a daily basis,' Bruno told The Post. Americans are spending nearly half of their day on the internet, according to a new survey. Dusan Petkovic – 'It underscores how important a strong, affordable, and reliable Internet has become in today's world.' On average, screen-zombie Americans spend more than 10 hours daily accessing the Web. They spend 5.4 of those hours browsing, working, gaming, looking at social media, reading email or paying bills, the survey found. They spend another five hours streaming video or TV content. A majority of the people — 55% — use their television to stream shows or movies, followed by 20% with mobile phones and 25% combined using laptop or desktop computers or tablets. For general Internet consumption, a majority of customers access service from their mobile phones or computers, while 44% do so from their TV. Besides streaming videos and TV shows, nearly 80% of customers said they use the Web to browse or pay bills, 73% scour social media, 72% shop online, 37% handle work assignments and 20% complete school work. The online survey of 2,000 adults ages 18 and over who subscribe or use home Internet service was conducted between May 6-14.


UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
State Department to burn birth control worth $9.7M meant for poor nations
The U.S. government plans to destroy $9.7 million of contraceptives for poor nations, mainly in Africa, after the nation "explored all possible options to prevent the destruction." UPI file photo | License Photo July 27 (UPI) -- The U.S. government plans to destroy a stockpile of contraceptives worth $9.7 million for poor nations, mainly in Africa, after the State Department "explored all possible options to prevent the destruction." The contraceptives include nearly 2 million doses of injectables, 900,000 implantable devices and more than 2 million oral packets, according to internal auditing in April obtained by The Washington Post. Chelsea Polis, a researcher with Guttsmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights, told the newspaper that the contraceptives could provide more than 650,000 women with pregnancy protection for up to one year and 950,000 women for three years. U.S. laws and rules prohibit sending U.S. aid to organizations that provide abortion services, counsel about the procedure or advocate for the right overseas. "The State Department confirms that a preliminary decision was made to destroy certain abortifacient birth control commodities from terminated Biden-era USAID contracts," a spokesperson said in a statement. "Only a limited number of commodities have been approved for disposal. No HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed." The destruction will cost $167,000, the spokesperson said. Most contraceptives have less than 70% of shelf life before expiration, the spokesperson said. The Guardian contacted an aide who visited the warehouse in Belgium and found the earliest expiration date was 2027. Two-thirds didn't have any labels. Belgium, the United Nations and humanitarian groups said they unsuccessfully stopped the destruction plans for the contraceptives. The U.S. Agency for International Development, which Trump disbanded and merged into the State Department, was to have distributed them. They are part of a $9.5 billion program over 10 years to provide aid to more than 40 nations. The government said it based its decision on a policy that restricts funding for reproductive-related actions in the Mexico City Policy and the Kemp-Kasten amendment. President Ronald Reagan instituted the policy in 1985 and it has become a political issue. It has rescinded by Democratic presidents and reinstated by Republicans several times, including by President Donald Trump when he returned to office in January. A bipartisan group of U.S. legislators doesn't want the contraceptives to be destroyed, including Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Democrats Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Brian Schatz of Hawaii. "This is a waste of U.S. taxpayer dollars and an abdication of U.S. global leadership in preventing unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions and maternal deaths," said Shaheen, who in June sent a letter to the Secretary of State Marco Rubio about the matter. The U.N. Population Fund and the International Planned Parenthood Federation were interested in receiving the contraceptives. "UNFPA was in conversation with Chemonics about purchasing the contraceptives but didn't receive an answer from them," UNFPA spokesman Eddie Wright said. "It's the height of hypocrisy for a government to preach efficiency and cutting waste, only to turn around and recklessly destroy lifesaving supplies when the need has never been greater," Micah Grzywnowicz, regional director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network, said in a statement MSI Reproductive Choices offered to pay for shipping and repackaging. MSI provides abortion services. "The complete dismantling of the world's largest donor for international family planning has been a catastrophe for the global supply chain of contraceptives," said Sarah Shaw, associate director of advocacy and for the organization. Sub-Saharan Africa has experienced an increase in teen births, according to a study at Columbia University in 2024. The number of births climbed from 4.5 million births in 2000 to 6.1 million in 2021as they decreased in the rest of the world. In Africa, 30% of all woman use birth control but more than half would use it if available, according to DebboAfrica, a healthcare company for African women. Worldwide, around half of women of reproductive age of 15-19 use some form of contraception, according to Focus2030. Foreign aid cuts could lead to more than 14 million additional deaths by 2023, including two-thirds children, according to a study published in Lancet earlier this month. Congress earlier this month passed legislation to remove $8 billion in foreign assistance. The Atlantic reported earlier this month that 551 tons of emergency food were expiring and will be incinerated rather than being fed to almost 1.5 million children in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Almost 800,000 Mpox vaccines to be sent to Africa also are not usable because they are past their expiration date, Politico reported earlier this month.