Unpacking KwaDukuza budget red flags with the iLembe Chamber
Concerns over KwaDukuza municipality's proposed 2025/26 budget are mounting, with the iLembe Chamber of Commerce warning that key risks could impact the municipality's financial stability.
According to the chamber, one of the biggest issues is the ongoing shortfall in KwaDukuza's electricity department, with a projected deficit of R160.3-million for 2025/26. Despite plans to introduce smart metering and upgrade infrastructure, the chamber noted that no clear targets for reducing electricity losses had been set in the new budget.
In the past financial year, 25.67% of electricity distributed was lost through technical failures and theft, costing the municipality R321.2-million. This continued inefficiency not only erodes revenue but also threatens the municipality's sustainability.
The chamber warned that KwaDukuza's financial health remains heavily dependent on high revenue collection rates and the successful rollout of revenue-enhancement strategies.
Worryingly, the municipality's ongoing reliance on internal reserves to fund capital projects poses a long-term risk to its financial future.
Chamber CEO Cobus Oelofse said the projected 161.8% increase in cash reserves for 2025/26 appeared 'unrealistic' and would likely come at the cost of critical spending.
'Chasing cash reserve targets without investing adequately in capital projects, repairs and maintenance puts essential services at risk,' said Oelofse.
Capital investment plans also face major setbacks. The budget outlines a 76% drop in capital expenditure, reflecting falling national government grants and limited borrowing capacity. This despite deputy mayor Sicelinjabulo Cele's call for more infrastructure investment at last week's mayoral imbizo at Umhlali Prep.
Oelofse said declining capital spend, combined with missed infrastructure project targets and procurement delays, raised serious doubts about the municipality's ability to deliver on its own plans.
Repairs and maintenance spending also remains critically low, budgeted at just 2.6% of the value of municipal property and equipment – far below the 8% national benchmark.
The chamber also expressed disappointment over governance and security plans. Despite the major theft from KwaDukuza's bank account earlier this year, the budget shows no significant investment in strengthening internal audit capacity or IT security. Outsourced internal auditing has been reduced, and there is no mention of an IT system audit.
It was also noted that ratepayers would bear the cost of ongoing fraud investigations, with the investigation budget jumping from R1.5-million to R12-million.
The chamber warned that without urgent changes, the budget risks weakening essential services and undermining public trust.
Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news.
Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
13 hours ago
- eNCA
SIU freezes assets over R20m linked to irregular Transnet contracts
JOHANNESBURG - The Special Investigating Unit has frozen assets worth over R20-million linked to irregular Transnet contracts. The investigation targets three property valuation contracts worth 89 million rand, awarded between 2019 and 2022. The frozen assets include luxury vehicles and properties in Johannesburg's Bryanston, Fourways and Broadacres.
Eyewitness News
14 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Your WhatsApp messages could get you fired
Jonathan Lord, University of Salford ; Gordon Fletcher, University of Salford , and Saad Baset, University of Salford It's late evening and your phone vibrates with some banter from colleagues. You join the conversation and go to bed feeling part of the work community. You then wake up and have a feeling of apprehension as to how the messages will be perceived. WhatsApp might have started as a casual messaging app for friends, but it has now firmly become embedded in workplace communication – and increasingly in workplace conflicts, too. WhatsApp chats have also been used to corroborate or refute claims in employment tribunals. An employee might claim they were promised a pay rise or flexible hours via WhatsApp, for example. But on the other hand, employers have also used WhatsApp logs to prove misconduct. This evidence has included sharing confidential information. In the workplace, WhatsApp chats have replaced many casual real-life conversations. Colleagues create groups to coordinate work, message each other after hours and vent their frustrations in private messages. Although this feels informal, it can leave employees vulnerable. But when disputes escalate to legal action, these messages can help judges understand what really happened. Tribunals treat WhatsApp messages like any other document. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. We examined more than 2,000 cases brought to UK employment tribunals since 2019 that involved WhatsApp. The findings reveal a surprising range of ways in which these casual chats became evidence. WhatsApp conversations have increasingly played a crucial role in misconduct and discrimination disputes, being used as evidence of harassment or inappropriate behaviour. The messages are also cited in unfair dismissal and contract claims, especially where informal work communications and digital records were seen as central to the case. In 2018, 48 cases brought to employment tribunals involved WhatsApp messages. By 2024, that had climbed to 562. The cases span a wide range of jurisdictions, but unfair dismissal, contract breaches, harassment and discrimination were dominant. From the cases we examined, several themes were clear. 1. Removal or exclusion from a WhatsApp group In the case of Ms B Djagbo v Women's Health Dulwich Ltd, the claimant successfully brought a claim for unfavourable treatment due to pregnancy and maternity. This followed a series of incidents that took place after she informed her employer of her pregnancy. Several actions made her feel as though her employment was being prematurely ended, including being removed from the workplace WhatsApp group chat. The tribunal awarded her almost £20,000. 2. Discriminatory messages or harassment via WhatsApp In the Mr D Robson v NGP Utilities Ltd case, the claimant is a gay man and brought a complaint of harassment. This included a series of inappropriate and offensive incidents at work, notably, a WhatsApp group message from a colleague. The message was part of a wider pattern of jokes targeting gay colleagues. The employment tribunal awarded him more than £36,000. 3. Termination of employment via WhatsApp The case of Miss J Hodkinson v B&R Care Ltd highlights a pregnant care worker who was awarded more than £40,000 in compensation after being unfairly dismissed via WhatsApp. The fact the dismissal was carried out informally and insensitively supported the tribunal's findings of 'procedural and substantive unfairness'. 4. WhatsApp communications submitted as evidence The Mr M D Black v Alain Charles Publishing Ltd tribunal noted that the claimant's evidence was consistent with WhatsApp message screenshots included in the evidence bundle. As a result, compensation of almost £100,000 was awarded. WhatsApp groups can also offer a window into workplace culture. Tribunals have seen examples of co-workers using WhatsApp to share sexist and racist jokes or to gossip about colleagues. With remote and flexible working, these chats illustrate a growing tension between constant connectivity and work burnout. The tribunal cases show just how deeply WhatsApp has become part of working life, blurring the line between personal and professional. Colleagues chat the way friends do. But when working relationships sour or rules are broken, each of these informal chats carries legal weight. What someone thought was a single throwaway remark in a private conversation can later be dissected as part of a wider body of evidence. There have been cases where an employer was ordered to hand over work-related WhatsApp exchanges, and others where an employee's own messages were used against them. It's a clear lesson. Privacy in digital communication is never guaranteed. Even encrypted messages can become public in a courtroom. WhatsApp dos and don'ts The volume of references to WhatsApp in tribunal cases frames some key lessons for both employees and employers. In a nutshell, if you wouldn't write it in a company email or say it in a meeting, don't put it into WhatsApp. Jokes can be misinterpreted and offensive remarks don't just go away. Many have learned this the hard way. Using WhatsApp to share instructions and decisions might seem convenient, but it shouldn't replace formal process. And for employers, it's time to update communication policies, including guidelines on after-hours messaging, the use of group chats and respecting expectations of inclusivity. Banning WhatsApp might not be practical, but setting out expectations is important. Even a policy stating that any work-related communication on personal messaging apps should adhere to the company's expected code of conduct is a start. Many people are unaware that a private chat can reappear as evidence. Knowing that a tasteless joke on WhatsApp could support a harassment claim potentially costing an unlimited fine, or that ignoring a late-night work message might be used as evidence of poor performance, will harden most people to conduct more mindful communication. Jonathan Lord, Lecturer in Human Resource Management and Employment Law, University of Salford ; Gordon Fletcher, Associate Dean, Research and Innovation, University of Salford , and Saad Baset, Associate Lecturer & Researcher, Salford Business School, University of Salford This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Meat prices set to surge amid SA supply crisis
Eskort CEO Arnold Prinsloo warns that South Africa's meat industry is heading into a 'perfect storm' that could drive prices out of reach for millions. Speaking to BusinessTech , he said that a combination of beef shortages, a ban on chicken imports from Brazil, and the collapse of a major poultry producer has put the country's food security at serious risk. The warning comes after a confirmed outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease at a Gauteng feedlot owned by Karan Beef, South Africa's largest beef producer. The facility has been placed under quarantine, slashing slaughter volumes by nearly 75%. 'If the quarantine drags on or the disease spreads, beef supply will shrink and prices will rise,' Prinsloo said. Adding to the pressure is the recent ban on chicken imports from Brazil, imposed on 15 May after an avian flu outbreak. According to The Citizen , Brazil supplies South Africa with 19 000 tonnes of mechanically deboned meat (MDM) per month. This meat is used in low-cost processed products like polony and Viennas. Local producers can supply only 100 tonnes. 'Some smaller producers have already run out of raw materials. This ban alone threatens 400 million affordable meals per month,' Prinsloo warned. Meanwhile, Daybreak Foods, one of South Africa's largest poultry producers, has gone into business rescue and recently culled 350 000 chicks due to feed shortages. 'This will squeeze chicken supply even further and drive up prices across the board,' Prinsloo said. Prinsloo, alongside industry groups like AMIE and the South African Meat Processors Association, has urged Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen to review the import ban. They want the restriction narrowed to the affected region of Brazil rather than the entire country. 'This would preserve supply chains, protect public health, and safeguard thousands of jobs,' he said. Prinsloo stressed the urgency of the situation. 'This triple threat livestock disease, import bans, and production failures demands immediate government action,' he said. 'If we wait until shelves are empty and prices skyrocket, it'll be too late.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
