Puducherry Chief Minister plays down differences with L-G
Interacting with reporters after a meeting with Nirmal Kumar Surana, BJP in-charge for the Union Territory at his residence in Gorimedu, the Chief Minister said differences between the elected government and the titular head were bound to arise considering the administrative apparatus in a Union Territory.
'There have always been differences between the elected government and the Lt. Governor in Puducherry due to the existing administrative system. Differences are there now as they have been earlier. As long as Puducherry remains a Union Territory, such differences are bound to happen. That is why all political parties want Statehood,' he said.
Asked about reports of him being disappointed with Mr. Kailashnathan over the appointment of Health Director, the Chief Minister said there were minor issues in the administration and they were being sorted out. 'We all want the NDA to come back to power again in Puducherry after the 2026 Assembly poll. Discussions are on to avoid such differences and a mechanism will be put in place to sort out things in future,' he said.
Denying any pressure from the BJP, Mr. Rangasamy said Prime Minister Narendra Modi had always showered him with respect even when he was heading a Congress government in Puducherry.
Referring to the period when he was Chief Minister of the Congress government in Puducherry and Mr. Modi was heading the BJP government in Gujarat, Mr. Rangasamy said, 'We have had a good relationship from those times. We have mutual respect for each other.'
The number of seats to be contested by BJP and AINRC in the 2026 Assembly poll will be decided at the time of election, the Chief Minister said, adding that people had voted the alliance to perform. 'We will continue to serve the people and return to power in 2026,' he said.
Mr. Surana said the meeting was just a routine affair and both the parties would work together to win the 2026 Assembly poll.
Minister for Public Works K. Lakshminarayanan, Deputy Speaker P. Rajavelou, AINRC legislators and Independents supporting the AINRC in the Assembly attended the meeting with Mr. Surana. On the part of BJP, Home Minister A. Namassivayam and party president V. P Ramalingam were present.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
AIADMK's Palaniswami Sparks Controversy With Temple Land Ownership Promise For Delta Residents
Tamil Nadu's opposition leader Edappadi K Palaniswami has ignited a fresh political controversy by pledging to grant formal land ownership rights to families residing on temple properties across the state's delta region, should his AIADMK party regain power. The promise has drawn sharp criticism from political commentators and sparked renewed debate over temple land management. Palaniswami defended his proposal by highlighting the long-term residence of numerous families on temple-owned land, arguing that his previous administration had initiated steps toward regularizing their occupancy. During his tenure as Chief Minister, he had announced a comprehensive scheme whereby the government would conduct land assessments, compensate temples appropriately, and subsequently issue ownership documents to current residents. The former Chief Minister acknowledged that legal challenges had previously derailed the initiative, with court interventions resulting in stay orders that prevented implementation. He expressed confidence that a future AIADMK government would successfully navigate these legal obstacles and complete the ownership transfer process for affected families. However, the proposal has faced immediate pushback from political analysts who question both its legality and appropriateness. Sumanth Raman, a prominent political commentator, strongly condemned the plan through social media, emphasizing that temple lands remain outside government ownership and cannot be arbitrarily redistributed. He characterized Palaniswami's promise as fundamentally flawed and politically irresponsible. The controversy extends beyond land ownership issues to broader questions about temple administration and fund utilization. During his ongoing statewide campaign, Palaniswami has consistently attacked the ruling DMK government's approach to temple management, accusing them of misappropriating religious institution funds for secular purposes. Palaniswami has specifically criticized the DMK's practice of using temple revenues to establish educational institutions, arguing that such expenditures represent improper diversion of religious funds. He contends that the state government should finance educational infrastructure through its own budget rather than utilizing temple resources designated for religious purposes. The DMK leadership has responded forcefully to these accusations, citing existing legal frameworks that explicitly permit such fund utilization. The HR&CE Act provides clear authorization for temple institutions to allocate surplus funds toward educational and charitable activities, making Palaniswami's criticism legally questionable. Chief Minister MK Stalin has characterized Palaniswami's position as reflecting BJP ideological influence rather than traditional AIADMK policies. This accusation suggests that the opposition leader has shifted toward more religiously conservative positions that align with national BJP narratives about temple autonomy and Hindu religious rights. Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin escalated the political rhetoric by labeling Palaniswami a "Sanghi," implying ideological alignment with RSS-BJP thinking rather than authentic AIADMK principles. This characterization represents an attempt to portray the opposition leader as abandoning his party's historical positions in favor of external ideological influences. The temple land ownership promise reflects broader political calculations about rural constituency appeals and religious sentiment mobilization. Palaniswami's strategy appears designed to attract support from families currently residing on temple properties while simultaneously positioning his party as protective of religious institutions against alleged DMK mismanagement.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Akhilesh Yadav's mosque visit sparks BJP outrage over political meeting and Dimple Yadav's attire
Akhilesh Yadav recently visited a mosque near Delhi's Parliament accompanied by his wife Dimple Yadav and other SP MPs, including Imam-MP Mohibullah Nadvi. The BJP has strongly condemned the visit, alleging that it disguised a political meeting and even calling the mosque an unofficial Samajwadi Party office. BJP leader Jamal Siddiqui also criticised Dimple Yadav's attire, claiming it violated religious norms and hurt Islamic sentiments globally. The BJP has threatened an FIR over the incident. In response, the Samajwadi Party denied all allegations, accusing the BJP of orchestrating a distraction from pressing national issues. Show more Show less
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
140 kilometres, 22 hours, a familiar destination – VS Achuthanandan's last journey
The mortal remains of former Kerala chief minister and veteran CPI(M) leader V S Achuthanandan, who died Monday at the age of 101, will be consigned to flames at Valiyachudukadu burial ground in Alappuzha on Wednesday evening. The body of VS, which was taken by road in a flower-decorated low-floor bus from the state capital on Tuesday afternoon, reached Alappuzha on Wednesday morning. It took 22 hours to cover a 140 km distance as a sea of humanity waited along the entire route to pay tribute to the Communist leader. Although the cortege was scheduled to reach his house in Punnapra, Alappuzha, on Tuesday at 9 pm, the warmth of the people delayed the final journey. Those who had gathered showered flower petals in front of the bus carrying the body and raised slogans calling VS immortal. Many who came from far-flung regions waited for hours to give a final red salute to the leader, who lived for the ordinary people and their issues. When the cortege reached Harippad in Alappuzha, local legislator and senior Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala was waiting to pay homage. 'When the final journey of VS is passing through Harippad, I have to be here,' he said. After reaching Alappuzha, the body was taken to his Velikkakathu house at Punnapra, where senior party leaders, including CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby, state secretary M V Govindan and Indian Union Muslim League president Panakkad Sadiq Ali Shihab Thangal, were present. Later, in the afternoon, the body was taken to the Alappuzha district committee office of the CPI(M), which VS had turned into his second home during his early years of political life in the undivided Communist Party. The burial ground, which is close to communist hearts, is the resting place of hundreds of martyrs of the 1946 Punnapra-Vayalar uprising and several early leaders of the Communist movement such as T V Thomas, K R Gouriyamma, P T Punoose, R Sugathan and P K Chandranadan. The uprising, in which hundreds were martyred, had been a defining moment in the making of the organiser in VS. He was in charge of a camp to make sharpened lances out of arecanut tree planks to use against the weapons of the police force. Every year, VS used to pay tributes to the martyrs on the commemoration of the event in October. The last time he visited Valiyachudukadu was in October 2019, before he was bedridden following a stroke.
