White House says monthly US jobs report to continue despite accuracy concerns
The comment came days after Trump replaced the BLS commissioner, firing Erika McEntarfer on Aug 2, hours after the agency reported weaker-than-expected job growth for July and issued historically large revisions for May and June.
NOMINEE SUGGUSTED SUSPENSION
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: 'I believe that is the plan, and that's the hope,' when asked if the monthly 'Employment Situation' report would continue.
Trump's pick for commissioner, E.J. Antoni, told Fox News Digital on Aug 4, before his nomination was announced, that the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly report until data issues were corrected, while continuing to publish more accurate but less timely quarterly figures.
'Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences,' Antoni said.
Antoni, currently chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, must be confirmed by the US Senate. He has previously criticised BLS data quality under former president Joe Biden's administration.
KEY INPUT FOR FED POLICY
The monthly nonfarm payrolls report offers a snapshot of the US job market, including job creation, unemployment rates, wage growth and average hours worked. It is closely monitored by the Federal Reserve, which has a dual mandate to maintain low unemployment and low inflation when setting interest rates.
Its headline figures are revised twice after initial release to account for additional employer survey responses and seasonal adjustments, and are subject to an annual benchmark revision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
13 minutes ago
- Business Times
CK Hutchison's ports deal in focus as conglomerate reports 11% rise in H1 underlying profit
[HONG KONG] CK Hutchison posted a 11 per cent rise in first-half underlying profit on Thursday (Aug 14), as investors look for comments on the status of the Hong Kong conglomerate's US$22.8 billion ports business sale to a consortium. The ports-to-telecoms group said in a filing that underlying profit climbed to HK$11.3 billion (S$1.9 billion) on a post-IFRS 16 basis. It compares with UBS forecast of a 6 per cent rise. However, including one-time non-cash accounting loss, including from the merger of 3UK and Vodafone UK, the net profit dropped 92 per cent from a year ago to HK$852 million. CK Hutchison is due to discuss its interim results with analysts, offering the first opportunity to quiz the management about the plan to sell the ports business since it was announced in March. Departing from its usual practice, CK Hutchison did not brief analysts or media about its 2024 earnings, released in March after it made public its plan to sell the business, which includes two ports along the strategic Panama Canal. Since the plan to sell 43 ports in 23 countries to a group led by BlackRock and Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping firm MSC was announced, CK Hutchison has faced a firestorm of criticism from China. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In the latest announcement on Jul 28, the conglomerate said it was in talks with the consortium pursuing its ports business to add a Chinese 'major strategic investor' to the bid, after their exclusive talks ended. It said changes would be necessary to secure regulatory approval in relevant jurisdictions and that it would allow as much time as needed to achieve that. Sources have told Reuters the investor was Cosco – one of the world's dominant, vertically integrated marine transportation firms. They said Cosco was seeking a bigger stake while the other parties in the consortium were keen to keep it a minority. While any stake by Cosco is not yet clear, an inclusion of a Chinese investor would alleviate China's national security concerns and have its blessing, the sources and other experts have said. Cosco did not respond to a request last month for comment. US President Donald Trump had also earlier called for the removal of Chinese ownership in the Panama Canal. More than 40 per cent of US container traffic, valued at roughly US$270 billion annually, transits the Panama Canal. Shares of CK Hutchison closed down 0.4 per cent on Thursday ahead of the results, in line with the Hang Seng Index. Morgan Stanley rated CK Hutchison 'overweight' last month, citing potential strategic transactions, attractive valuation, and a strong balance sheet. REUTERS
Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Could Silicon Valley's Indian CEOs get the Intel treatment?
The Indian diaspora in the US should not look at Intel Corp CEO Tan Lip-Bu's attempts to win over US President Donald Trump with satisfaction or superiority as they might be next, says the writer. According to US President Donald Trump, the rise of Intel CEO Tan Lip-Bu is 'an amazing story'. That is as much payoff as Mr Tan can expect from his emergency meeting with Mr Trump, who last week had demanded he 'resign, immediately' because he was 'highly conflicted'. We do not know if Intel will be able to convince the administration to view its CEO with less disfavour. Some in Washington are concerned about the Malaysian-born Tan's long history supporting and investing in the Chinese tech sector. And questions about how Intel intends to live up to government controls on the export of high-end technology under his leadership are, given this history, not unreasonable.
Business Times
44 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trump's data war risks creating false calm
POLITICAL pressure on government statisticians and private forecasters risks sending markets down a rabbit hole, which could suppress volatility today but lead to seismic reality checks in the future. US President Donald Trump has side-swiped both private and public sector economists this month, firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) boss for what he described as 'rigged' jobs data and then lambasting Goldman Sachs for tariff-related research he did not agree with. These moves seem alarming, even if there are some mitigating factors. Trump is hardly the first person to criticise BLS payrolls data. It has been under scrutiny for years, not because of fears of bias, but because of low survey response rates and delays, which have often resulted in large changes to past data. The most recent report contained one of the biggest downward revisions in decades. The BLS can argue that it has suffered from years of underfunding, but it is still not a good look. What is more, similar questions about data collection have been lobbed at the BLS regarding its compilation of monthly consumer and producer price reports, which are critical now in assessing the impact of Trump's tariff rises on inflation. These statistics, along with the US employment report, are the most important monthly updates for financial markets, mainly because they play a pivotal role in Federal Reserve thinking, given its dual mandate to maintain maximum employment and stable prices. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 3 pm Thrive Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve. Sign Up Sign Up Trump this week appointed Heritage Foundation economist EJ Antoni – a contributor to the controversial Project 2025 wish list of policies for a second Trump term – to run the BLS. Antoni recently suggested suspending the monthly payrolls report until data problems were fixed, which could result in long data gaps at a critical moment for the US economy, monetary policy and markets. Importantly though, the White House and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have pushed back on that idea. But then came Tuesday's (Aug 12) attack on Goldman boss David Solomon, with calls for him to appoint a new chief economist following the release of a report on Sunday by his colleague Jan Hatzius. The report estimated that US consumers had so far borne less than a quarter of the cost of tariffs, but could see that rise to two-thirds over time. This may simply be nothing more than Trump complaining about a forecast he does not like, but it is still a move that risks tinkering with one of the most basic market tenets: the plurality of views. Fantasy calm? There is an obvious concern that – intentionally or not – these public attacks could cause economic data, research and forecasts to become more pro-government or lead to self-censorship by those keen to avoid seeing their business or careers damaged by presidential opprobrium. To its credit, Goldman said it would keep doing its job regardless of the political pressure. But it would hardly say otherwise. Perhaps more telling was the lack of public outcry from other economists who might reasonably be concerned that Trump's attacks on unflattering forecasts represent a worrying trend for their profession and market transparency overall. Of course, they or their institutions may simply have thought it best to stay quiet, assuming the issue would blow over soon. Does any of this matter in the long term? To be sure, economic forecasting can hardly be held up as a sacred cow if accuracy is what matters. A University of California, Berkeley, study late last year looked at more than 16,000 forecasts by banks and large firms and concluded that while 53 per cent of forecasters were confident in their predictions, they were correct only 23 per cent of the time. But economists' forecasts still play a role, accurate or not. So any type of bias, even unintentional, could have a significant impact on market thinking. Of course, if there was a consensus that official data was likely to be biased to flatter the government, then the process of forecasting those official numbers may just be to mechanically move in that direction. But that would undoubtedly create confusion. To better capture what is really going on, investors may be more inclined to commission private economic data. And yet the cost of doing that on a frequent basis would be prohibitive for smaller players, meaning that big information gaps could open up, making markets less efficient overall. If political bias in official data and forecasting were to emerge in the current environment, one might expect to see firmer job creation and softer inflation read-outs. That could keep markets calm in the short term. But any weakness in the real economy would emerge eventually, likely resulting in a rude awakening for many, no matter what the official data says. REUTERS
