logo
New London mayor's $105M budget plan calls for tax rate decrease

New London mayor's $105M budget plan calls for tax rate decrease

Yahoo01-04-2025

New London ― Mayor Michael Passero's proposed 2025-26 city and school budget of $105.6 million would drop the tax rate by 0.30 mill through a series of austerity measures such as not increasing education spending, re-routing surplus funding and eliminating up to 15 municipal employees.
'The goal is to not raid our fund balance and not raise taxes,' Passero said Monday, hours before he unveiled his spending plan to the City Council.
As expected, Passero's budget keeps school district spending flat at $47.4 million. The Board of Education previously approved a $54.7 million budget with $22.5 million covered by state Educational Cost Sharing (ECS) monies. Since ECS funding is not increasing for next year, the school board's proposed budget increase of $7.3 million would be shouldered entirely by taxpayers, Finance Director David McBride said.
Passero is proposing a $58.2 million city budget that is $1.2 million higher than the current budget.
Digging out from a $1.5 million budget hole"
Passero and McBride said the city is grappling with the expected loss of $2.4 million in state funding under Gov. Ned Lamont's proposed biennial budget ― though the city hopes to recoup $1 million of that money ― coupled with another $1 million drop in motor vehicle reimbursements.
"Such a drastic cut in a single fiscal year is nearly impossible to overcome," Passero said.
In addition to the potential state funding loss, the city also has local increases to manage in the 2025-26 budget. For example, McBride said the city is budgeting nearly $500,000 in 2026 — compared to $50,000 this year — to help cover years of owed payments to Ocean Beach Park operators to offset revenue losses the city is required to subsidize.
The police department budget is increasing $1.1 million to $14.4 million due to contractual raises and the hiring of a new deputy police chief and two patrol officers. The fire department's budget is jumping by $526,000 due to contract re-negotiations, while union contracts for public works employees require a $290,000 increase in that department's salary budget.
To offset the increases, Passero's budget calls for funneling $1.75 million in excess revenue from 2024 into a new tax rate stabilization fund. That transfer would preclude poaching from a $24.6 million fund balance, which will contain $19.6 million after a series of planned transfers to a Board of Education non-lapsing fund and other designated areas. Another $500,000 is expected to be saved by not filling employee vacancies this fiscal year.
'That still leaves us with a $1.5 million hole,' Passero said.
City officials plan to institute a 'reduction in force' initiative that calls for working with various unions to identify those full-time workers ― police officers and firefighters are excluded ― willing to take early retirement by July 1. Those retirements will hopefully fill the $1.5 million gap, McBride said.
'The average city employee makes $80,000 a year, so it would take between 10 and 15 employees, once benefits, taxes and other things are included, to reach that goal,' McBride said. 'If there are employees making more than the average who opt to retire, it will require fewer retirements.'
If Passero's budget passes without changes, it would translate to a tax rate of 27.2 mills, down from 27.5.
Tax increase "not a reasonable option"
In his council address, Passero highlighted his administration's continued investments in neighborhoods, parks and open spaces, as well as a commitment to a 'green future' through solar panel projects at the high school and near Bates Woods. He said the city's stock of vacant downtown buildings and empty commercial spaces is giving way to a "thriving urban center" marked by new sidewalks and increased foot traffic.
Passero said said while the local and state housing markets presented challenges, New London has built 800 new units in the last six years, with another 1,300 permitted, planned or under construction.
'Despite our city's recent rise in influence and financial stability, the budget I deliver to you today is extremely grim,' Passero said. 'It requires that we adjust our expenses to match a substantial drop in projected revenues.'
Passero said it will require a "renewed commitment" to meet budgetary challenges. He said with 60% of New London families living paycheck to paycheck ― and 20% below the poverty line ― raising taxes was "not a reasonable option" this year, even to offset potential state funding losses.
"I intend to double-down on the strategy of growing the tax base and recruiting investment to ease the local property tax burden," he said. "The strategy will remain: more taxpayers, not more taxes.
The City Council's Finance Committee will meet with city department heads next week to discuss their respective budgets. The Finance Board will meet in late April ahead of the council approving a budget on May 12.
j.penney@theday.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Norfolk commonwealth's attorney race one of most expensive, divisive in city's history
Norfolk commonwealth's attorney race one of most expensive, divisive in city's history

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Norfolk commonwealth's attorney race one of most expensive, divisive in city's history

NORFOLK — The race to be the city's next top prosecutor has been a divisive and expensive one, with both candidates on the attack and raising record amounts of money. And with just two Democrats vying for the position, voters won't have to wait until November to find out who gets the job. The race will be over next week, when the June 17 Democratic Primary is held. Competing for the seat are incumbent Rahim Fatehi, a longtime Norfolk prosecutor and former public defender who's seeking a second term, and John Butler, a former federal prosecutor and Navy judge advocate general running for elected office for the first time. Butler announced his candidacy in February, a few weeks after stepping down from his role as the managing assistant U.S. attorney in Norfolk. He has the support of several of Norfolk's top Democratic leaders, including Mayor Kenny Alexander, Sheriff Joe Baron, Treasurer Daun Hester, Commissioner of the Revenue Blythe Scott, and City Council Members Courtney Doyle and Tomy Smigiel. He's also been endorsed by the Norfolk chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police and the Norfolk Professional Fire Fighters group. Among those supporting Fatehi are U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott, Virginia House Speaker Don Scott, former state Attorney General Mark Herring, Norfolk City Councilman Rodney Jordan, and former councilmen Andy Protygou and Paul Riddick. Both candidates have raked in significant amounts in donations. As of the latest campaign finance filing deadline on Monday, Butler reported $742,000 in contributions, while Fatehi reported receiving around $870,000 in cash and in-kind contributions since he took office in 2022, with most all of it being gathered this year. Both are record amounts for a Norfolk commonwealth's attorney race. Butler's top contributors are some of the city's most powerful lawyers and business leaders, including attorneys Chuck McPhillips, Vincent Mastracco Jr., former Mayor Paul Fraim, Rusty Friddell, and Thomas G. Johnson Jr., as well as retired Norfolk Southern CEO David Goode, S.L. Nusbaum Realty Company CEO Miles Leon, and Landmark Communications founder Jane Batten and her son, Frank Batten Jr., chairman of Landmark Media Enterprises, the former owner of The Virginian-Pilot. Each have contributed anywhere from $12,000 to $20,000. Marathon Development Group, the real estate development company behind several downtown apartment complexes and run by developer Buddy Gadams, and Frank Batten Jr. are Butler's biggest donor, with each pitching in $20,000. Fatehi's top source of campaign income has been from three liberal super PACs largely funded by billionaire George Soros. Justice & Public Safety, Democracy PAC and New Virginia Majority have donated a combined total of around $400,000. Another significant source for Fatehi has been $320,000 in loans from himself and his brother. Fatehi said he obtained the money through a home equity line of credit and has since paid his brother back. And while Fatehi and Butler both say they're lifelong Democrats, Fatehi has repeatedly claimed in campaign mailers and speeches that Butler has 'MAGA allies' and is being funded by 'MAGA donors,' a reference to the Make America Great Again campaign slogan popularized by President Donald Trump. Some of the mailers have included a photoshopped picture, with Butler's head placed on someone else's body and the shadow of an elephant looming behind him. 'Don't Let Republicans Take Over the Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Office,' reads one of the mailers sent to Norfolk residents. 'Stop John Butler. Stop the GOP takeover.' Fatehi also pointed to a recent email sent by the Norfolk Republican Party, which urged its members to vote for Butler in the Democratic primary. John Sitka, chair of the Norfolk Republican Party, said the group sought approval from the state GOP party before sending it. The email says the local party is supporting Butler because it believes the city is less safe with Fatehi in the job. And without any Republicans or Independents in the race, the Democratic primary is the only chance voters have to weigh in, Sitka said. 'We all live in Norfolk and as citizens of Norfolk we care about the community, and not what party you're from,' he said. 'If you're a citizen of this city and you have strong feelings, you vote how your conscience tells you to.' Butler said he didn't coordinate with the local GOP party on the email, and didn't seek its support. 'Anyone in Norfolk is welcome to vote for me but they should do so knowing I will always stand up for Democratic values and that I am endorsed by Norfolk Democratic leaders,' he said. The former federal prosecutor called Fatehi's attempts to mark him as a MAGA candidate disgraceful and disgusting. 'He's trying to mislead voters about my record because he can't defend his own,' Butler said. 'Why would all these Norfolk Democrats be supporting me if that was true.' Butler said he was recruited to run by city leaders unhappy with the job Fatehi has been doing. He pointed to multiple news articles about 'missteps' Fatehi and his office have made since he took over, including plea deals rejected by judges for being too lenient, and murder cases ending in acquittals or a dismissal of charges. He also suggested that the 'mass exodus' of prosecutors who resigned from the office after Fatehi took over is another example of his poor leadership. 'I've had so many victims come up to me and say they felt they didn't get justice,' Butler said. 'This position requires leadership and competence and he has failed Norfolk.' Fatehi said he stood by his record and the work of his staff. Violent crime in the city is down 40%, property crime down 27%, and the jail's population has been cut in half, he said. Fatehi believes that because Butler hasn't prosecuted cases in state court, he's not qualified for the job. 'Federal prosecutors cherry pick the cases that they want to handle,' he said. 'We handle the cases that are tough, with reluctant witnesses, and evidence that is not as strong.' Jane Harper,

Alderman seeks power to ban short-term rentals from Chicago precincts
Alderman seeks power to ban short-term rentals from Chicago precincts

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Alderman seeks power to ban short-term rentals from Chicago precincts

If a Far Northwest Side alderman gets his way, Chicago City Council members could gain the authority to block short-term rentals like Airbnb's from popping up in their wards. Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, is pushing forward legislation that would give aldermen the ability to unilaterally ban new rentals on a precinct-by-precinct level. The rental companies could overturn the bans by collecting signatures from 10% of the precinct voters, around 150 to 200 signatures, he said. Napolitano, whose ward includes Edison Park and surrounding areas near O'Hare International Airport, argued the amendment he seeks is about 'being able to advocate for your residents when it becomes a problem,' citing party complaints in particular. 'Because it doesn't exist right now,' he said. 'We can't advocate for them at all.' The City Council's License and Consumer Protection Committee is set to consider the legislation Wednesday. If it advances, it could face a full City Council vote next week. Airbnb criticized the proposed ban, arguing in a statement it threatens to destabilize short-term rental tax revenue earmarked to fight homelessness and aid domestic violence survivors. 'The proposed ordinance amendment is an unnecessary violation of Chicagoans' constitutional property rights and echoes the city's dark history of 'Restricted Residential Zones,' which once controlled who could visit, travel through, and own homes in certain neighborhoods,' Airbnb Public Policy Manager Jonathan Bucker said in the statement. There has been a 78% decrease in the rate of party reports made to Airbnb in Chicago since 2020, according to the company. Airbnb pointed to efforts to curb parties, among them reservation screenings and support lines. It also touted the $191 million Chicago hosts earned last year, as well as the tourist spending in neighborhoods the company says the stays generate. The city's current short-term rental ordinance allows for precinct-level bans only after 25% of the precincts registered voters have signed a petition requesting the ban. Some aldermen, like Southwest Side Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, have pushed forward with signature-collection efforts that have blocked Airbnb in large swaths of their wards. Napolitano said his measure 'flips the script' to place the onus on companies instead of residents. He likened the powers his ordinance would grant aldermen to the one they already have over new liquor licenses going into neighborhood businesses: 'Open it up, drop some in and close it again.' He said he would 'look at' a ban in problem areas immediately if the amendment passes, but would leave other spots untouched. Even after aldermen voted last month to require short-term rental companies to share more data with them, Napolitano said the added transparency is not enough because he does not have the power to fix issues 'in real time' when parties happen in his ward's single-family homes. 'It isn't fixed by Friday or Saturday, but they're gone by Sunday, and then the neighbors are left to deal with the problem, and then it pops back up two, three weeks later,' he said. Pre-existing short-term rental units would be allowed to continue operating if rentals were banned in a precinct, Napolitano said. He shared concerns that the rentals drive up housing costs or harm tax revenue brought in by hotels, but added that his goal is 'not to hurt Airbnb.' 'We can't go into this and destroy an industry,' he said. 'It does work in a lot of areas, it does work well, it does help some residents to keep a home because it brings a substitute income.' The one-bed, one-bath Airbnb that Jackeline Torres and her husband rent out from their Norwood Park home would be grandfathered in if Napolitano, Torres' alderman, banned rentals in her area. Still, the City Council effort to control where Airbnb's can go bothers Torres. The paralegal rents out the separate upstairs space to help pay for rising property taxes, she said. Short-term rental bans would be 'intrusive to my privacy' and rights, she argued. 'An alderman shouldn't restrict who I allow into my home and my freedom of allowing people to stay in my home,' Torres said. 'One person shouldn't determine that.' Her unit is rented out over half the year, she said. It's been available for three years. Most of the guests she welcomes are traveling professionals or tourists visiting nearby family. Safety is top of mind for the mother of three young children, and it has never been an issue while renting, she said. 'We always had a positive experience with the people who were staying here,' she said. 'It supplemented our already existing income and gave us a little extra cushion to make sure we were in a better financial position.' Three different guests have even decided to look for homes in the area after their stays, she added. But while Torres said her Airbnb rental has helped keep her in her home, Ald. Jessie Fuentes worries rentals might push her residents out of theirs. Parts of Fuentes' Northwest Side ward include some of the city's fastest-gentrifying neighborhoods, she said. And in pockets of her 26th Ward like East Humboldt Park, where many of the ward's short-term rentals are concentrated, Chicagoans are making the difficult decision to stay and face higher costs or leave, she said. 'When you begin to short up the amount of units in our communities because we're putting so many of them online for Airbnb, it sort of begins to also inflate those prices,' she said. Fuentes added that she gets 'a lot of concerns' from residents about rental parties that are 'disruptive to the natural ecosystem.' 'I am not anti-Airbnb,' she said. 'I just think there needs to be some form of regulation.'

Apartment broker fee ban to begin Wednesday after federal judge nixes suit to stop the new NYC law
Apartment broker fee ban to begin Wednesday after federal judge nixes suit to stop the new NYC law

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Apartment broker fee ban to begin Wednesday after federal judge nixes suit to stop the new NYC law

The city's new law banning broker fees will go into effect tomorrow, after a federal judge shot down a real estate lobby lawsuit to block the ban. Judge Ronnie Abrams ruled Tuesday that a federal lawsuit challenging the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses Act was mostly rooted in policy disagreements — not constitutional questions. 3 A new law banning broker fees starts tomorrow after a federal judge tossed a last-minute effort to pause the ban. Helayne Seidman 'Plaintiffs' discontentment with the Act, however, stems not from its effects on their constitutional rights, but from a fundamental disagreement with its underlying policy,' Abrams ruled. Her decision tossed all but one claim from the lawsuit, and denied a request to pause the law as the case plays out. The FARE Act — passed in City Council with a veto-proof majority of 42-8 on Nov. 13 — prohibits agents representing property owners from charging prospective renters a 'broker fee.' 3 The Real Estate Board of New York and other groups claimed that banning broker fees would 'destroy' the rental market, according to their suit. Helayne Seidman The lawsuit, filed a month later by the Real Estate Board of New York, a broker's association and various property groups, claimed that banning broker fees would 'destroy' the rental market. Abrams said the suit was asking 'the court to act as a 'superlegislature'' to nix laws they disagree with. 'The court declines that invitation,' Abrams wrote, adding that the 'remedy is through the political process, not in court.' 3 Judge Ronnie Abrams said the suit was asking 'the court to act as a 'superlegislature'' to nix laws they disagree with. Kbarnofsky/Wikipedia But while the judge said the act could result in higher prices for landlords, they were better positioned to absorb the cost by increasing rents. 'Tenants, by contrast, cannot pass the cost of brokers' fees to landlords,' she wrote. REBNY President James Whelan said he was 'disappointed' that their motion to pause the law was kiboshed. 'New Yorkers will soon realize the negative impacts of the FARE Act when listings become scarce, and rents rise. We will continue to litigate this case as well as explore our avenues for appeal.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store