logo
Key US electricity price and output trends so far in 2025

Key US electricity price and output trends so far in 2025

Reuters23-07-2025
LITTLETON, Colorado, July 23 (Reuters) - The first half of 2025 featured a slew of U.S. electricity and power milestones, with generation, demand and retail prices all scaling records during January to June.
Below are key data points that track ongoing changes to the U.S. power and electricity sectors, which are being buffeted by historic swings in federal energy policies, rapid clean power deployment and surging consumer and business electricity demand.
U.S. electricity production during January to June hit a record in 2025 as output from solar and wind farms scaled all-time highs.
Total utility-supplied electricity production during January to June was 2,188 terawatt hours (TWh), which was the highest total on record for the January to June period and up 4% from the same months in 2024, data from Ember shows.
A 32% year-over-year surge in solar output, along with record wind farm generation, helped drive clean-energy electricity supplies up 6% from a year ago to 989 TWh.
Clean power sources secured a record 45.2% share of total electricity supplies during January to June, compared to a 44.2% share during the same months a year ago.
Fossil fuels generated 1,199 TWh of electricity during January to June, or 54.8% of the total.
Output from natural gas power plants, which are the largest single power source in the U.S., declined by 4% from the year before following a climb in gas prices early in 2025.
To compensate for that drop in gas power, utilities bumped coal-fired power output up 17% during January to June from the same months in 2024. Coal accounted for 16% of power generation, the highest levels for the opening half of the year since 2022.
U.S. retail electricity prices also scaled new highs this year, with the price across major U.S. cities averaging 18.2 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) during the opening half of the year, data from the U.S. Federal Reserve system shows.
A combination of factors has been driving U.S. electricity costs steadily higher in recent years, including sustained electricity demand growth from data centers, AI applications, electric vehicles and air conditioners.
The average electricity price in June 2025 was 6.7% above the rate in June 2024, which means that household electricity costs have climbed at more than twice the pace of overall U.S. consumer price inflation over that period.
In addition to reflecting rising power demand, electricity costs have also climbed due to soaring spending by utilities to upgrade aging power grids which are struggling to accommodate the higher loads as well as growing volumes of renewable power.
U.S. President Donald Trump has blamed the policies of previous president Joe Biden for fuelling much of the growth in electricity prices, arguing that the subsidized deployment of renewable power supplies has raised costs for utilities.
Republican lawmakers have cited the high electricity prices in California - which has the country's most aggressive clean energy targets - as proof that clean energy goals raise consumer energy bills, and as justification for gutting clean energy support in the latest government budget.
Yet electricity price trends so far in 2025 indicate that several states with above-average clean energy supply shares have seen prices fall from a year ago, while states with stout opposition to clean energy have seen prices rise.
In California, which has the highest electricity prices of all states, electricity costs have averaged around 31.5 cents/kWh this year compared to just over 32 cents/kWh in 2024, data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows.
Electricity prices have also declined from a year ago in Iowa, Kansas and Nevada, which have all sharply lifted the supplies of clean power in electricity generation so far this decade.
In contrast, states with energy systems that have stifled the growth of clean energy supplies have seen electricity costs rise by far more than the national average so far in 2025.
Average prices in Florida - which has banned wind power generation and restricts state support for solar power - have risen by 5% so far this year, to around 14.94 cents/kWh from 14.25 cents/kWh in 2024.
Indiana, Tennessee, South Carolina and Wisconsin have also seen electricity costs rise by more than the U.S. average so far this year, and have also posted much slower clean energy supply growth than California so far this decade.
On average, electricity prices in those states continue to hold below the national average, which was around 16.75 cents/kWh so far this year.
But with power demand rising in all states, all utilities will be on the hook to deliver much-needed grid upgrades over the coming years.
Some states with large supplies of power from solar and wind farms may be able to avoid further steep electricity price increases over the near term, as generation costs from renewables can be far lower than from fossil fuel plants.
But in areas with little to no clean power supplies, utilities may have no choice but to raise consumer electricity costs in order to fund the continued operations of their fossil power plants and make necessary system upgrades.
Those utilities will also likely increase their exposure to fossil fuel prices going forward as federal support for clean energy supplies are scrapped and remaining policy measures funnel power expansion options towards fossil fuels.
That means that any further increases in gas and coal costs due to rising power demand may also be passed on to consumers, and could further accelerate the rise in customer energy bills in areas that lack significant clean energy supplies.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain
Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain

Apple is suing another fruit-named company — Apple Cinemas — in an attempt to get the small theater company to change its name. Apple Cinemas has reportedly signed a lease to take over a historic cinema and a retail space in San Francisco that had previously been operated by AMC Theaters and CGV Cinemas. The purchase is part of Apple Cinema's overall goal of expanding to 100 locations across the country over the next 10 years. Apple entered a lawsuit on Friday in Massachusetts alleging that the theater company is infringing on its trademark and using its brand to trick consumers into thinking they're attending a cinema operated by the tech company. Apple does have a cinema division — Apple Studios — which it began in 2019, but Apple has been offering movie-adjacent entertainment since 1999 via its QuickTime Movie Trailers. The tech company also held cinema events, including some in connection with the Tribeca Film Festival. The cinema company began its operations in 2013 when it opened its first theater in Massachusetts. The company says its name is from it's initial plans to open its first theater in the Apple Valley Mall in New England, according to the Hollywood Reporter. The company primarily operated in the northeast until it laid out its plans to expand to San Francisco and other parts of the country in 2024. Sand Media — Apple Cinema's parent company — filed an application for the name "Apple Cinematic Experience" but was denied. A trademark examiner ruled that the name might cause confusion between Apple Cinemas and the tech company. Apple responded to that branding attempt by sending Sand Media a cease and desist letter. It further claims that Apple Cinemas began using a stylized apple for its logo and began focusing its expansion on malls and shopping centers where Apple Stores were already present. According to the lawsuit, the similar names resulted in landlords at these locations assuming that Apple Cinemas was affiliated with the tech brand. Apple alleges that Apple Cinemas was given favorable deals to open in some areas as a result of the presumed connection. Further driving the tech giant's lawsuit are claims that some customers have had negative experiences with Apple Cinemas. Some customers have complained that the theaters are "greasy," "dirty" and "grungy" and are at times beset by technical issues. 'Consumers should not go to an 'Apple Cinemas' theater thinking it is connected to the famous Apple brand, with all its goodwill and brand equity,' Miranda Means, an attorney representing Apple, stated in the lawsuit. Apple's goals with its lawsuit are to force the theater chain to stop using the word "Apple" in its name. It is also seeking damages, though the amount was unspecified.

Trump set to fill Fed board vacancy by week's end, has narrowed chair search to four
Trump set to fill Fed board vacancy by week's end, has narrowed chair search to four

Reuters

time9 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump set to fill Fed board vacancy by week's end, has narrowed chair search to four

WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he will decide on a nominee to fill a coming vacancy on the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors by the end of the week, and had separately narrowed the possible replacements for Fed chair Jerome Powell to a short list of four. "I'll be making that decision before the end of the week," Trump said of his plans to name a replacement for Fed governor Adriana Kugler, who last week unexpectedly announced she was leaving as of this Friday to return to her academic position at Georgetown University. Trump, in comments to reporters at the White House, distinguished between picking Kugler's replacement for a term that only lasts until January, and the selection of Powell's replacement once he leaves the top Fed job in May. But with the Fed board's other seats occupied with people, including Powell, whose terms run for years longer, Trump's choice of Kugler's replacement could have implications for his selection of a chair, a process Trump said has been narrowed to economic adviser Kevin Hasset, former Fed governor and Trump supporter Kevin Warsh, and two other people. Trump did not name those people, but one is thought to be current Fed governor Christopher Waller. "We're also looking at the Fed chair, and that's down to four people right now ... Two Kevins and two other people," Trump said. Trump earlier in the day said in an interview with CNBC that he had removed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent from consideration for Fed chair because Bessent wanted to remain in the top Treasury job. In the CNBC interview, Trump said Kugler's decision to vacate her seat early was a "pleasant surprise" that gives him an immediate opening to fill with a person who could also be promoted to take Powell's place. Kugler's replacement would, at least initially, by appointed for just the few months remaining in Kugler's term. But Trump could be explicit that he plans for that person to then be nominated to a full 14-year term after that time, and to also be his choice to replace Powell - giving his nominee several months and several policy meetings to begin to influence the policy debate. "A lot of people say, when you do that, why don't you just pick the person who is going to head up the Fed? That's a possibility too," Trump said in the CNBC interview. The president has been critical of Powell for not cutting interest rates since Trump returned to power in January, and contemplated trying to fire him, even as Fed policymakers balance evidence of both a slowing economy and a weakening job market against the fact that inflation remains well above the central bank's 2% target and is expected to move higher. The Fed is charged by Congress to maintain stable prices and maximum employment, and is potentially facing a situation where the two goals conflict with each other - posing a painful set of tradeoffs. The nominee to fill Kugler's seat will need to be confirmed by the Senate, and would require another Senate vote for a full 14-year term early next year. The nomination for the next Fed chief would require a separate Senate confirmation process. Kugler's departure was announced the same day that Trump, angered over data that showed job growth slowing in the first months of his administration, fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer while alleging without evidence that BLS was manipulating the jobs data to make him look bad. Economists have warned since Trump returned to the White House in January that his combination of import tariffs and erratic trade policy would likely lead to a labor market slowdown and higher inflation, a broadly shared outlook that has been among the factors keeping the Fed from lowering rates until the inflation impact becomes clearer. The central bank last week held its policy rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range, though Waller dissented on the grounds that the inflation risk from tariffs appeared modest at best, while the job market and growth in general appeared to be weakening. The release on Friday of the jobs report for July, with weak monthly employment gains and downward revisions to prior months, appeared to validate those concerns and led to increased market bets the Fed would cut rates at its September 16-17 meeting. The firing of the BLS commissioner touched off a global wave of concern about the continued integrity of U.S. government data, with Trump's actions being given a fire-the-messenger interpretation by much of the economics and statistics community. The president's choice now to head the statistics agency and potentially to lead the Fed will be scrutinized all the more carefully, said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. "Imagine if one of your concerns is that there's a lackey in charge of the agency and the numbers are fake. That's ... another level of problems," Strain said of the BLS. "Maybe he sees this independence thing really matters. Maybe he's got somebody from the outside saying 'Look, Mr. President, if you appoint somebody who's perceived to be a lackey as the Fed chair, take the BLS freakout and multiply by 1,000."

News Corp beats quarterly revenue estimates on digital subscription growth
News Corp beats quarterly revenue estimates on digital subscription growth

Reuters

time9 minutes ago

  • Reuters

News Corp beats quarterly revenue estimates on digital subscription growth

Aug 5 (Reuters) - Media conglomerate News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab beat expectations for fourth-quarter revenue on Tuesday, driven by a rise in digital subscriptions and strong performance at its Dow Jones unit. The company benefited from strong circulation and subscription revenues at its Dow Jones division, which includes brands such as The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, MarketWatch and Investor's Business Daily. Dow Jones reported a 6.7% increase in quarterly revenue, with total average subscriptions to its consumer products rising 7% to nearly 6.3 million from a year earlier. Finance chief Lavanya Chandrashekar said that digital circulation revenues grew by 10%, as more customers shifted from promotional to higher-priced packages. "Their fiscal Q4 earnings, particularly the performance at Dow Jones, underline how valuable premium sources of news and information still are," Emarketer analyst Max Willens said. Revenue at the news media segment, which includes UK's The Times and The Sun along with the New York Post, fell 3.7% due to soft advertising conditions. The company announced earlier this week it plans a West Coast expansion with the launch of The California Post in early 2026. News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson said that the company is not "seeing any particular negative trends" from new search formats and is in the "midst of advanced negotiations with several AI companies." The company's book publishing unit, which consists of HarperCollins, saw its revenue fall 3.5% due to slower consumer spending and a weaker slate of new titles. News Corp's digital real estate services unit, which includes its majority-owned REA Group ( opens new tab, posted strong results driven by price increases, with revenue rising 4% in the fourth quarter. Total revenue in the quarter came in at $2.11 billion, compared with analysts' estimates of $2.10 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Excluding items, the company earned 19 cents per share, compared with an estimate of 20 cents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store