logo
Income-Expenditure Gap in Retirement

Income-Expenditure Gap in Retirement

Whether there will be an income-expenditure gap in retirement depends on several factors, including your current income, lifestyle, savings, investments, inflation, and post-retirement expenses. This gap is a concern due to rising life expectancy, increasing healthcare costs, and no social security.
When you are about 10 years away from retirement ask yourself these questions:
- How much is your monthly expenses on electricity, society charges, food, travel, fuel, salaries to cook, servants, driver, etc.,
- How much do you really spend on buying food, eating out, etc.
- Expenses on special occasions -marriage of siblings, children of siblings, other events, festivals, etc.
- Vacations and other annual expenses – insurance, etc.
Income Sources in Retirement:
Pension : Limited to government or organised sector employees
Investments : Returns from fixed deposits, mutual funds, dividends, or rental income.
Savings : Withdrawals from savings accounts, PPF, NPS.
Other : Part-time work, family support, or annuity plans.
Most Indians rely on personal savings or family support.
Expenditure in Retirement:
Regular Expenses : Food, utilities, rent/housing maintenance.
Healthcare : Costs rise with age (e.g., medicines, hospitalisation, insurance).
Lifestyle : Travel, hobbies, or supporting family.
Inflation: In India, inflation averages 5-7% annually, eroding purchasing power over 20 years of retirement.
The Gap:
If your post-retirement income (pension + investment returns) is less than your expenses, a gap emerges.
Example: A retiree with a monthly expense of ₹50,000 but only ₹30,000 from pension and investments faces a ₹20,000 monthly gap.
Factors like medical emergencies or unexpected expenses (e.g., home repairs) widen this gap.
How to fill the Income-Expenditure gap
To bridge this gap, you need a combination of savings, investments, and income-generating strategies. First of course, retire as late as possible. If you retire at 65 years instead of retiring at 60, it means you will need say 25x your expenses instead of 35 years if you retire at 60.
Build a Retirement Corpus:
Estimate Needs : Assume you need ₹50,000/month (in today's value) for 35 years post-retirement at age 60, with 6% inflation. Using the 4% safe withdrawal rule, you'd need a corpus of about ₹3 crore.
Start Early : Invest in long-term instruments like Equity Mutual Funds or NPS for higher returns.
Rental Income : Invest in real estate for steady rental yields.
Dividend Stocks/Mutual Funds: Invest in high-dividend stocks or mutual funds.
Optimise for Inflation and Taxes:
Equity Investments : Allocate 50-60% of your portfolio to equity mutual funds or stocks for inflation-beating returns
Tax-Free Instruments: Use Senior Citizens' Savings Scheme (SCSS) or tax-free bonds for stable, tax-efficient income.
Manage Healthcare Costs:
Health Insurance : Buy a comprehensive health plan early to cover hospitalisation and critical illnesses.
Emergency Fund : Keep 6-12 months' expenses in a liquid fund or fixed deposit for emergencies.
Part-time Work : Leverage skills for consulting, freelancing, or teaching.
Reverse Mortgage : If you own a house, use a reverse mortgage scheme to get monthly payments while retaining ownership.
Downsize Lifestyle : Move to a smaller home or Tier-2 city to reduce costs.
Budgeting: Use the 50-30-20 rule (50% needs, 30% wants, 20% savings) even in retirement to manage cash flow.
Family support: Many retirees depend on children, but this is less reliable with nuclear families and rising costs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US, China and Russia: Navigating the superpower trilemma
US, China and Russia: Navigating the superpower trilemma

Time of India

time9 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US, China and Russia: Navigating the superpower trilemma

Today, Indian foreign policy discourse is mired in an important debate. Two key assumptions govern this debate: that New Delhi's ties with the US arguably constitute its most important relationship in the 21st century, and that any negotiations with Beijing are a signal of weakness. India-US relations are undergoing a tense phase. The tensions have primarily been instigated by US President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 25% tariff on India, and an additional, 'unspecified penalty' for continuing to buy energy resources from Russia. His social media comments have gone so far as to refer to both India and Russia as 'dead economies.' Naturally, this has called into question the time-tested nature of the partnership in the face of the 'China challenge'. With the US-China equation changing, India has to balance ties with both as well as work towards its own national interests Speaking of China, after a long period of severed dialogue, postures on both sides have slightly relaxed, though the road to stability vis-à-vis the border issue, or even China's backing of Pakistan, is long and winding. Nonetheless, communication and negotiation between the two neighbours is underway, and is perhaps a welcome break from the silent-but-violent treatment. Besides the volatility in New Delhi's ties with the two superpowers, there exists a bilateral dynamic between the US and China, which vitally impacts India. An intense back-and-forth of escalating tariffs ensued between the two economic giants earlier this year. Yet, Trump's recent statements seem to suggest that a trade deal with Beijing is in the works. So how does that affect India? So far, India has believed that Trump's continued dissatisfaction with Beijing will be a core aspect of mutual convergence between itself and the US. This definitely was the case under the Joe Biden administration. But if anything is certain about Trump, it is that nothing, indeed, is certain. So, the US and China may not be entering a friendly phase, but they sure are inching toward some semblance of stability. The dynamics of this fateful triangle require that India think in its national interests— sustained economic growth and security of its territory from both external and internal threats. And as PM Modi himself remarked in an interview in 2023, '[The] foremost guiding principle in foreign affairs is our country's national interest.' This begs the question: How should New Delhi balance the nuances of its ties with the US and China and the repercussions of their own thaw, while working to achieve its national interests? One way is not to believe that negotiations with China signal weakness. This anxiety is likely to play up as New Delhi and Beijing negotiate. Most recently, India has eased tourism rules, while China has opened up access for Indians to undertake the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra. To a great degree, India's geographical, economic and military constraints require that communication with Beijing continue for sustainable security to be achieved. This is not to say that India should give up its confident posture, or discontinue investments in de-risking or border security. It is also not a call for it to shed its affinity for the US. But the steps toward a thaw with Beijing — high-level political conversations, ministerial-level dialogues, and working mechanism consultations on the border — are necessary. And at a time when Trump seems to be prepared to meet the 'China challenge' alone, India must figure its own way out to do the same. Second, is to evaluate costs when it comes to fulfilling its energy requirements through purchases from Russia. The affordability of such purchases, and the historic nature of ties with Moscow (especially in defence), make it a vital partner to New Delhi. However, Trump is prioritising reciprocal access to the Indian market over having a vital partner in the Indo-Pacific. And in a world where the US is vastly more powerful than India — or in most aspects, even China — much of what Trump says, goes. So the question is, where is the common ground between India not shedding its friendship with Russia, not risking insurmountable tariffs from the US, and not enabling China's unchecked regional power? The intertwined interests of economic growth and stable security seem orthogonal in this situation. But it is important to face facts. If it wasn't buying oil from Russia, India would still get the tariff slap. If there was great openness in the Indian dairy and agricultural markets, which Trump consistently demands, there would still be an 'unspecified penalty' for trading with Russia. So, the acknowledgement that there is no absolute win-win, is essential. It boils down to assessing what is more harmful — not making any adjustments to the trade numbers with Russia, or the US. It is also important to acknowledge the trade-offs — if there is a significant reduction in the imports of oil and/or defence equipment from Russia, and the US becomes the preferred alternative source of imports, Moscow may become unabashed in its support for China in its disputes with India. If trade with Russia continues as is, India shall face agonistic tariffs under Donald Trump and an overall lack of support in regional geopolitics. It is indeed true that India's tariffs continue to remain high, market openness is low, and domestic innovation and production capability face challenges. Hence, is the first step to addressing the above mentioned dilemma to take difficult steps towards phased openness? Most likely. It may assuage Trump's concerns about the US's trade deficit, without creating many troubles in India-Russia relations. Finally, the worrisome trend of self-reliance across the globe is leaving fewer alternatives for India to replace its dependencies on the US, China, or Russia. Where it gets affordable imports, it faces controversial dilemmas. Where it sees a strong partner, it faces chiding and deriding. So, moving forward, even as the willingness to negotiate diplomatically must continue, India must invest in its own trajectory toward economic and military modernisation. Illustration credit: Illustration by Chad Crowe (USA) Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Punjab govt eases family pension rules for NPS employees
Punjab govt eases family pension rules for NPS employees

Time of India

time6 hours ago

  • Time of India

Punjab govt eases family pension rules for NPS employees

Chandigarh: Punjab finance minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Saturday announced that the finance department had withdrawn a key option clause for new pension scheme (NPS) employees to receive family or invalid pension. Terming it a move to support the families of state govt employees, he said this decision comes after the govt recognised the undue hardship caused to the families of employees who died in harness, as most did not formally exercise this option. In a press statement, Cheema said the govt previously extended additional relief in the form of a family or invalid pension to NPS employees who became disabled or died while in service through finance department instructions dated Oct 8, 2021. However, Clause 6 of these instructions required both existing and newly recruited employees to choose within a specific timeframe whether they wanted to receive the family or invalid pension or the benefits of the NPS scheme. He said that this condition created significant difficulties for families who were unaware of the requirement or were unable to complete the process. Cheema said the finance department has now deleted Clause 6 of the instructions on June 27, 2025, to rectify the issue. He said this change, which was initially implemented for Punjab govt NPS employees, has now been extended to include NPS employees of boards, corporations, public sector undertakings (PSUs), and state autonomous bodies (SABs). "This ensures that all employees under the NPS are now eligible for the additional relief without having to formally exercise the option," he added. MSID:: 123061299 413 | Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

Jindal hopes for 8 trillion dollar economy in 6 years
Jindal hopes for 8 trillion dollar economy in 6 years

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

Jindal hopes for 8 trillion dollar economy in 6 years

Hubballi: India will achieve an eight trillion dollar economy in the next six years, Parth Jindal, managing director of JSW Cement Limited and JSW Paints said. Addressing the 97th Founders Day of the Karnatak Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) here on Saturday evening, Jindal said that Indians need not worry about the US President Donald Trump's statement regarding a dead economy. "The Indian economy is the fastest-growing one. Since we have 75% of the youth force, we need to create 20 lakh jobs per year, whereas we are currently creating 10 lakh. We have plenty of investment opportunities in the manufacturing sector, which can boost our economy," he opined. He presented the Vanijya Ratna Awards-2025 to Jayanth Ashok Humbarawadi of Belagavi, Prakash S Bafna and G Devaki Yogananda of Hubballi, Siddanna Nalwad of Koppal, Sharanabasappa Gudimani of Gadag, and Ravindrakumar Beknal of Kalaburagi. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store