
Five products to be hit by Trump's incoming tariffs
Economists have warned that steeper US tariffs, paid for by importers of foreign products, could add to business costs and trickle down to households.
The risk is a dampening of consumption – a key driver of the world's biggest economy.
Trump's tariffs could impact everything from coffee beans and rice to cocoa, seafood or even electronics.
Here are some examples of products in the crosshairs:
Over 99 per cent of America's coffee is imported, according to the National Coffee Association. It told AFP that two-thirds of US adults drink coffee daily.
Top suppliers of coffee beans include Brazil, Colombia and Vietnam, according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
But Brazil, which accounted for over 30 per cent of such imports in recent years, faces a 50 per cent tariff threat come August 1.
In a letter to Brazil's leadership, Trump cited a judical "witch hunt" against his right-wing ally, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, in unveiling the rate.
Imports from Vietnam, meanwhile, face a 20 per cent additional tariff even after a deal the Southeast Asian country recently struck with Trump.
Clothing like shirts and sweaters could also become pricier.
China, Vietnam and Bangladesh accounted for more than half of US apparel imports from January through May this year, said the American Apparel & Footwear Association.
All three countries face different tariff levels under the Trump administration.
Chinese goods, which account for nearly a third of apparel imports, were hit by a fresh 30 percent duty this year – piling atop existing ones.
If an existing truce expiring August 12 is not extended, tariffs on products from China could surge even higher, causing companies to halt imports or be forced to pass on more costs.
Vietnamese goods accounted for nearly 20 per cent of clothing imports while those from Bangladesh made up about 11 per cent, the association said.
Trump has threatened to impose a 35 per cent duty on Bangladesh goods.
The United States is the biggest rice importing country in the Western Hemisphere, bringing in some 1.3 million tons, according to the USDA.
More than 60 per cent of the country's rice imports are aromatic varieties, mostly jasmine from Thailand and basmati from India and Pakistan.
Thailand faces a prospective 36 per cent tariff come Friday, India 26 per cent and Pakistan, 29 percent.
The United States also takes in smaller quantities of medium and short-grained rice from Asia and some products from South America.
US imports of cocoa beans – mostly from places like the Ivory Coast and Ecuador – averaged over $1.1 billion annually from 2017 to 2021, according to the USDA.
Among them, the Ivory Coast faces a 21 per cent tariff.
Cocoa butter shipments were valued at US$576 million annually and mainly supplied by Indonesia and Malaysia, facing fresh duties of 19 per cent and 25 per cent respectively.
Besides tariffs on imports from specific countries, Trump has also threatened a 50 per cent duty on copper imports come August 1.
Consulting firm BCG warned that this would add US$8.6 billion to the cost of raw copper and refined copper imported into the country – and more if tariffs extended into derivative products.
BCG expects material costs to jump for the construction industry – which uses 42 per cent of copper products consumed domestically – and makers of electronics goods.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump signs order implementing additional 40% tariff on Brazil, White House says
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks after signing the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein


New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Oil shock looms as Trump cuts Russia deadline to 10 days
UNITED States President Donald Trump unexpectedly shortened his deadline for hitting Russia with the most severe sanctions on its oil exports to date. While the market has called the president's bluff thus far, the sheer scale of the threat may force investors to start pricing in this meaningful tail risk. Speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland on Monday, Trump said he was giving Moscow only 10 to 12 days to reach a deal to end the war in Ukraine before he would impose so-called secondary sanctions on its oil exports, cutting short his previous 50-day timeframe set on July 14. The sanctions would slap 100 per cent tariffs on buyers of Russian oil, with the biggest customers being India and China. This move has the potential to disrupt global oil supplies, given that Russia exported 4.68 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil in June, around 4.5 per cent of global demand, as well as 2.5 million bpd of refined products, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Going through with the secondary tariffs on Russia risks causing a severe spike in oil prices that could put upward pressure on US inflation, an outcome that could stay Trump's hand, even if he is "disappointed" in Russian President Vladimir Putin. And there have been several headline-grabbing moments in recent months where the Republican president has rowed back on his threats, including the "reciprocal tariffs" originally announced on April 2 that he quickly toned down in the face of market pressure. But Trump has also made good on some of his threats, most notably the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities on June 22. Unlike his initial announcement on secondary tariffs, which investors appeared to shrug off, oil prices rose by nearly three per cent on Monday. So his erratic Russia policy may make some investors wary of writing off the risk altogether. The next question is, would secondary tariffs — a relatively untested, blunt financial weapon — be effective? The answer is probably yes. One of Russia's key customers, India — the largest importer of seaborne Russian crude in June at 1.5 million bpd — is currently engaged in tense trade talks with the US. New Delhi is, therefore, unlikely to want to exacerbate trade tensions with Washington and thus may be apt to ditch Moscow in favour of new, though undoubtedly more expensive, energy sources. On the other hand, China, which imported around two million bpd of Russian oil in June via pipeline and by sea, is less likely to change its buying patterns since it already faces several layers of US tariffs and considers its ties with Moscow to be strategic. But the Kremlin's finances would still be squeezed regardless if India were to cease purchasing Russian oil, as China would likely be able to buy it even more cheaply. The scale of the potential new sanctions' impact on the global oil market is hard to gauge, given current supply and demand dynamics. World oil demand is expected to grow by 700,000 bpd this year, its lowest rate since 2009, while supplies are forecast to rise sharply by 2.1 million bpd to 105.1 million bpd, according to the IEA. The growth in supply has been driven in recent months mostly by output increases by the Saudi Arabia-led oil producing group collectively known as Opec+. The group in April started unwinding 2.2 million bpd of production cuts and upped the United Arab Emirates' (UAE) production quota by 300,000 bpd. The Opec+ production increases have led, naturally, to a decline in the group's spare production capacity, but Saudi Arabia still held, as of June, 2.3 million bpd of production it can bring on stream within 90 days, while the UAE and Kuwait held 900,000 bpd and 600,000 bpd of spare capacity, respectively. This means that the three Gulf producers could ramp up output relatively quickly in the event of a sudden supply disruption. But that knowledge is unlikely to be enough to calm markets should Trump impose his secondary sanctions, partly because of the uncertainty surrounding possible retaliatory measures by Moscow. Trump's latest threat could be an empty one, but it has shortened the fuse of a timebomb that oil markets might struggle to ignore.


New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
India committed to 'fair, balanced' trade with US
NEW DELHI: India on Wednesday said it was committed to negotiating a "fair, balanced" trade deal with Washington, after US President Donald Trump said Indian goods would face steep tariffs and New Delhi would be penalised for purchases of Russian weapons and energy. Months of trade negotiations between India and the United States have failed to seal a deal, with sticking points including Trump's sweeping demands and New Delhi's reluctance to fully open its agricultural and dairy sectors. Two days before Trump's August 1 tariffs deadline, the US president announced that imports from India would be hit with a 25 per cent tariff. The Indian government said it had "taken note" of Trump's announcement and was "studying its implications". "India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective," it said in a statement, also noting that it was determined to protect the welfare of Indian farmers and entrepreneurs. "The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK." - AFP