Niti withdraws paper on GM crops import from US, signals govt stand
Though the US, during its trade negotiations with India, considered the stand as one of the non-tariff trade barriers, India preferred not to open up its market for GM food items over biosafety concerns, notwithstanding its primary think tank arguing in favour of import of transgenic soybean and corn without harming domestic production.
The working paper on 'promoting India-US agricultural trade under the new US trade regime', released in May, had suggested that GM corn may be imported for ethanol blending and its by-products, like Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles.
"US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets," said the authors - Raka Saxena and Ramesh Chand - of the working paper.
Chand is member, Niti Aayog, while Saxena is senior adviser at the think tank.
Although the paper used a disclaimer terming the content as personal views of authors, its recent withdrawal from the think tank's website reflects govt's thinking on the issue of GM products.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World
5minstory.com
Undo
India currently allows commercial cultivation of only transgenic cotton, a non-food farm item.
Govt's stand is in sync with RSS-affiliate Swadeshi Jagaran Manch's opposition to the cultivation and import of GM farm products. In its opposition to transgenic food items, the SJM has even joined hands with several left-leaning farm groups in the past.
The working paper had pitched for a "dual-track" approach while negotiating the trade deal on agricultural items with the US and appeared keen on opening the country's market to specific non-sensitive imports of farm products that do not face direct competition from local producers, such as almonds, pistachios, and walnuts.
India has maintained a surplus in agriculture trade with the US and it has increased over time. India's agricultural exports to the US grew nearly fivefold between 2004 and 2024, from $1.18 billion to $5.75 billion, while imports however, grew faster - from $291 million in 2004 to $2,218 million in 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump again claims helping 'settle' tensions between India, Pakistan
Donald Trump claimed he settled issues between India and Pakistan. He mentioned a potential nuclear conflict and shot down planes. Trump linked trade to resolving the conflict. India maintains direct military talks led to de-escalation. Trump highlighted his efforts in resolving global conflicts. He cited Congo, Rwanda, Thailand, Cambodia, Serbia and Kosovo. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump repeated the claim that he got "things settled" between India and Pakistan following the four-day military conflict between the two countries that could have turned into a "nuclear conflict".Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump also claimed that five or six planes "got shot down" during the recent conflict between the South Asian US president did not specify whether the jets were lost by either of the two countries or if he was referring to combined losses by both Delhi has been maintaining that India and Pakistan halted their military actions following direct talks between their militaries without any mediation by the made the comments flanked by Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan after they inked a US-brokered peace agreement during a trilateral signing ceremony."As President, my highest aspiration is to bring peace and stability to the world. Today's signing follows our success with India and Pakistan.""They were going at it, they were going at it big and they were two great leaders that came together just prior to what would have been a tremendous conflict, as you know, a nuclear conflict, probably," Trump that he is settling conflicts through trade, Trump said, "I got things settled with India, Pakistan. I think it was trade more than any other reason. That's how I got involved.""I said, 'You know, I don't want to be dealing with countries that are trying to blow up themselves and maybe the world'. They are nuclear nations," he referred to the conflict between India and Pakistan twice during his remarks at the event, adding them to the nearly 35 previous occasions where he has claimed that he stopped the war between the two countries through trade."That was a big one, getting that one settled. I think you'd agree that was a big one," Trump said, turning to the Azerbaijani President."And they were going at it, you know, they were shooting airplanes out of the sky... five or six planes got shot down in their last little skirmish, and then it was going to escalate from there. That could have gotten to be very, very bad," Trump has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two the ceremony, Trump added that he is solving conflicts around the world because he wants to save a lot of lives."I love saving lives. That's what it's about. And you know, when you save lives, you really end up having a peaceful world. Usually that ends up pretty well."Trump also listed the conflicts between Congo and Rwanda, Thailand and Cambodia and Serbia and Kosovo that he said he helped to a question on the Ukraine war, Trump said, "I think we are getting close.""I think that a lot of things happened recently that would make this go forward. I'm not going to mention anything having to do with India, but maybe that had an impact. But what really had an impact was NATO has stepped up in terms of their spending on buying military equipment."Trump also said that no matter what he does, he will not be given the Nobel Peace Prize."I'm not politicking for it. I have a lot of people that would be a great honour, certainly, but I would never politick. I'm not doing it for that. I'm doing it because of I really, number one, I want to save lives. That's why I'm involved so much with Ukraine and Russia."
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As Rahul, Tejashwi get set for Bihar Yatra, INDIA closes rank, SIR to ‘vote chori' row
With the Opposition displaying rare unity in Parliament over the Election Commission (EC)'s special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar and applauding him for his presentation on alleged 'vote chori (theft)' in Karnataka, Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi now seems to be keen to capitalise on this new-found bonhomie in the INDIA bloc, which has for long been in a state of limbo. At a dinner for top INDIA alliance leaders in Delhi on Thursday evening, Rahul and LoP in the Bihar Assembly Tejashwi Yadav invited all of them to attend a rally to be held by the Congress and the RJD in Patna on September 1. If they all turn up for the rally, it would mark a rare event when the Opposition bloc leaders would be sharing a dais. Even during the 2024 Lok Sabha poll campaign, the parties had been unable to come together on one stage. The previous instances when the Opposition alliance leaders came together was during rallies in Delhi and Ranchi to protest the arrests of ex-Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren. If the top brass of the bloc comes together once again on a stage, it would mark a new chapter in coordination among the Opposition parties outside Parliament. It would also be interesting since two states where the INDIA bloc's constituents are rivals – Kerala and West Bengal – are headed to the Assembly polls in about eight months. In Kerala, the Congress will take on the CPI(M)-led Left, while in West Bengal, the Trinamool Congress (TMC) will be up against the Congress and the Left parties. But that electoral compulsion apart, there seems to be an agreement in the alliance as of now that the 'electoral malpractice' issue that Rahul has been raising as well as the SIR in Bihar were critical for the parties necessitating their unity. Sources said there was much bonhomie between Rahul and TMC general secretary Abhishek Banerjee at the dinner meet the former hosted at his residence. The two were engaged in a long conversation and the TMC too is said to be happy with the hospitality shown by the Gandhis. The TMC always stresses on a distinction between itself and the other INDIA parties, stating that while others are electoral allies of the Congress, the TMC is not. Sources said Rahul extended an invitation to Abhishek and West Bengal CM and TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee for the September 1 Patna rally. It is in many ways a rapprochement of sorts between the Congress and TMC. The Congress, which has been on the receiving end of taunts and attacks by its allies for failing to take the initiative to keep the INDIA bloc alive, has finally decided to take charge. Before the start of Parliament's Monsoon Session last month, the Congress convened an online meeting of the Opposition's floor leaders, which it had not done in the previous sessions after the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. And in the last fortnight, both Rahul and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge have chaired multiple meetings of INDIA parties to ensure smooth floor coordination. The SIR is, of course, the new-found glue. For many Opposition parties, it is the prospect of a nation-wide electoral roll revision that is of key concern. And that is what is uniting them. Even the Kejriwal-led AAP, which had walked out of the INDIA bloc, is with the other Opposition parties in raising the issue and paralysing Parliament with protests. The Patna rally would mark the conclusion of a fortnight-long yatra planned by the Congress and RJD. Rahul and Tejashwi are expected to launch the hybrid yatra – called the 'Matdata Adhikar Yatra' – from Sasaram on August 17. Said to be an idea floated by the Congress, the yatra will cover around 100 Assembly constituencies in Bihar's Seemanchal and Mithilanchal regions, and would serve to launch the Mahagathbandhan alliance's campaign for the Bihar Assembly elections due in barely three months. The Mahagathbandhan believes the SIR has huge resonance on the ground in Bihar and hopes to carry forward its narrative against it till the Assembly elections. The yatra was originally scheduled to start from August 10, but was postponed by a week following JMM patriarch and ex-Jharkhand CM Shibu Soren's demise. On August 11, the INDIA bloc MPs will also take out a march to the EC's office from Parliament. Meanwhile, the CPI(M) Politburo has issued a statement urging the EC to take 'remedial measures to restore public confidence in the electoral process'. 'In recent times, serious questions have been raised about the fairness of elections – ranging from irregularities in the preparation of electoral rolls, particularly the SIR process in Bihar, to malpractices witnessed in the state elections of Maharashtra and Karnataka – which appear to favour the ruling party,' the CPI(M) stated. 'It is the duty of the EC to conduct thorough inquiries into the issues raised by the Opposition… and to demonstrate to the people that it is a transparent and impartial constitutional body.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Tariff tirade to Cold War: Trump risks undoing 3 decades of India-US partnership
For decades, leaders across party lines in both India and the US have worked to shed the baggage of the Cold War to cultivate bilateral ties. With a full-scale economic war and an alliance with India's adversaries, US President Donald Trump is undoing that progress and setting the relationship back to the distrust of the Cold War. read more US President Donald Trump speaks with the press as he meets with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. (Photo: Jim Watson/AFP) For more than three decades, Indian and American leaders pursued a mutually beneficial relationship that built upon common grounds and sought middle grounds in case of divergences. But the principle of mutuality that underpinned the India-US relationship has now ended. With 50 per cent tariffs, unending verbal attacks, unleashing his minions to insinuations lacking factual bases, and a burgeoning alliance with India's adversaries, Trump has made it clear that he is not seeking a negotiated trade agreement but wants India to accept his diktats without question — and that he is up for getting his hands dirty in this pressure campaign. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is this approach, and not any unmanageable differences on trade or foreign policy, that has driven the India-US relationship to the lowest point in decades. Firstpost has learnt that India-US trade talks were going well until Trump abruptly dumped the progress and ramped up his demands to unrealistic levels. Even as Trump has claimed himself to be a master dealmaker, Firstpost has learnt that he has been a fickle in trade talks and has not been consistent in his terms. India-US trade talks were going well — then came Trump In July, Indian and American negotiators were close to finalising a draft for a trade agreement well ahead of the August 1 deadline, but Trump ramped up his demands out of nowhere and blew up the progress, Firstpost has learnt. It is not clear if it was a draft for the final trade deal or a 'mini deal' that negotiators were said to be looking forward to at the time. Firstpost learnt that India offered certain relaxations in trade talks, which would have helped American businesses, but that was not enough for Trump. It is understood that these relaxations concerned regulatory and compliance matters that would have created an enabling environment for American businesses looking to enter India. It is not understood to be acceptance of American demands on contentious issues like agriculture, dairy, and genetically modified (GM) crops. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Firstpost has also learnt that Trump was fickle in trade talks, offering India tariff rates of 10 per cent, 15 per cent, and 19 per cent at various points. ALSO READ: With tariffs & threats, Trump dashes hope of being India's top partner Such an unpredictable manner in serious bilateral trade pact talks suggests that President Trump is not negotiating in good faith and wants all gains from a deal for himself instead of a win-win deal, according to Ram Singh, a professor of international trade and business at the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT). 'India has always valued its autonomy. India will not agree to an unequal trade deal like Japan or South Korea, which are dependent on the United States for security. The current trade tensions and the way US officials have conducted themselves in unprecedented. Previously, they understood Indian positions. Now, they have a 'my way or the highway' approach and want everything for themselves,' Singh tells Firstpost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump risks decades of progress in India-US ties In India, Trump is already being compared to late Richard Nixon, the disgraced Cold War-era President of the United States who sided with Pakistan and deployed the 7th Fleet of the US Navy to intervene in the India-Pakistan War of 1971 on the side of Pakistan. That episode is seared into the Indian public memory and continues to serve as a reminder that the India-US relationship, which has become central to India's foreign policy, is not as old as it might appear. Instead, it is quite young — just over three decades old. With his tariff war and systematic undermining of India, Trump has put at risk the progress made post-1990s by all the presidents and prime ministers. President Trump has broken the trust in the India-US relationship, and it will take time and efforts on part of the Americans to rebuild trust, and the responsibility would likely fall on the next administration, says Yusuf Unjhawala, a scholar of geopolitics at the Takshashila Institute. 'For now, the India-US relationship appears to be frozen and that is expected to deal a blow to collaborations such as the Quad. However, this situation also brings opportunities for middle powers, including in the Indo-Pacific, to come together. I have long believed that India, Japan, and Australia should have a much closer partnership,' says Unjhawala. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As tariffs are just one way of needling India, Trump has strengthened the anti-India sentiment in the country and the government. Beyond tariffs, Trump has interfered in Jammu and Kashmir, undermined India on Operation Sindoor, equated Pakistan to India, aligned with Pakistan, and partnered with Islamist regimes of Syria and Turkey. This has reignited Cold War-era fears that the United States essentially wants to check India's rise. At least in the immediate future, there is merit in such fears. Some of the most vulnerable sectors from Trump's tariffs in the immediate futures are some of the most labour-intensive and politically sensitive, such as the marine sector (shrimp, prawn, etc), textile sector, and edibles (fruits, pickle), according to Singh, the international trade and business professor at IIFT. Any disruption in these sectors could have serious sociopolitical consequences.
