Kohli 'got no support' from BCCI selectors, was told 'his spot is no longer there': They cited his form in last 5 years
Virat Kohli's Instagram post on Monday, which garnered close to 18 million engagements in the last 48 hours, did not provide any information on why he suddenly decided to retire from Test cricket. The BCCI and its selectors, too, are numb. Hence, the announcement, which happened just days before the scheduled selection meeting for the England Test tour, sparked a plethora of speculations.
Former India cricketer Mohammad Kaif reckoned Kohli had his plans intact for the England series, which will begin on June 20, and his claim was based on Kohli's commitment to play in the Ranji Trophy after returning from the Australia tour. However, he felt that Kohli lacked support from the Ajit Agarkar-led selection committee, who expressed concerns around his recent form and questioned his place in the Test line-up.
'I think he wanted to continue in the format. There must have been some internal talks with the BCCI, the selectors may have cited his form in the past 5-6 years and told him his spot in the team may no longer be there. We will never find out what happened, it is very difficult to guess what actually took place behind the scenes.'
"But given the last minute decision, having played the Ranji trophy, I definitely think he wanted to come back in the upcoming Tests. The developments in the last few weeks, he may have not gotten the support he thought he will get from BCCI and selectors which he may not have gotten," Kaif was quoted by NDTV.
The 36-year-old did experience a dip in form in the last five years, managing just 2028 runs in 68 innings with three centuries. The struggle even saw his career average drop to 46. Kohli showed signs of a comeback in the tour of Australia, where he scored a smashing ton in the Perth opener last November, but managed just 90 runs more in the rest of the tour as India lost 1-3.
Kaif felt Kohli's uncharacteristic approach in Australia was a sure indication that he was done with the format.
"In the Border Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25, he looked in a hurry to score runs. You have to stay out for hours and grind in Test cricket, which he has done in the past but the constant edging of the ball moving away from him while attempting to drive, made me feel his patience was a bit less," he added.
"Maybe he was thinking 'I am in the last phase of my career what's the point of scoring a gritty century, there used to be a different level of patience on display from him before, he used to leave the balls, take his time, tire the bowlers and then took them down but I did not see that from him in Australia'."
"That one method of dismissal at the slips perhaps shows that he was not ready to spend hours at the crease. The communication from BCCI and the self-realization in red-ball cricket may have led to the decision," he elaborated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Renaming the Pataudi Trophy: Understanding Why the Decision Matters
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Top Stories Renaming the Pataudi Trophy: Understanding Why the Decision Matters The Wire Analysis 39 minutes ago 'Tiger' Pataudi was pivotal in instilling national pride and unity in Indian cricket. Understanding his impact is crucial to appreciating why so many believe the trophy should continue to bear his name. Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi, the Pataudi Trophy and Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi. Photos: ICC/Facebook and Wikipedia. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now The renaming of the Pataudi Trophy to the Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy has sparked intense debate across the cricketing world. The renaming is not just a cosmetic change. It represents a deeper shift in how Indian cricket views its own history. At the heart of the controversy lies the legacy of Mansur Ali Khan 'Tiger' Pataudi, a captain who transformed Indian cricket's spirit and identity. Understanding his impact is crucial to appreciating why so many believe the trophy should continue to bear his name. While Tendulkar and Anderson are deserving icons, erasing the Pataudi name ignores the roots and relationships that have defined India-England cricket for generations. What was the Pataudi Trophy? The Pataudi Trophy was introduced in 2007 to commemorate 75 years of India's first Test series in England. It was named after the Pataudi family, specifically Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi (the only man to play Tests for both England and India) and his son Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, an iconic Indian captain known as 'Tiger' Pataudi. The trophy symbolised the shared legacy and complex history between the two nations. Traditionally, when India toured England, the series winner received the Pataudi Trophy. In India, the equivalent series has been played for the Anthony de Mello Trophy, named after a BCCI founder. Have they really renamed it? Yes. Earlier this month, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) jointly announced that the series would now be called the Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy. This new name honours Sachin Tendulkar, the world's most-capped Test cricketer (200 matches), and James Anderson, England's most successful Test bowler (188 matches and 704 wickets). The new trophy will be unveiled at Lord's before the World Test Championship final, just ahead of the five-Test series between India and England which starts on June 20. What was the reason given for the change of name? The ECB and BCCI have cited the achievements of Tendulkar and Anderson as modern legends of the game, aiming to make the rivalry more relatable to younger fans and to reflect the trend of naming series after contemporary icons. Officials argued that honouring these two players would boost engagement and keep the rivalry relevant for a new generation. Reports suggest that the MCC may have intervened behind the scenes, quietly discouraging the renaming of a trophy that they themselves had instituted. What is Tiger Pataudi's relevance for India and Indian cricket? Tiger Pataudi was pivotal in instilling national pride and unity in Indian cricket. Bishan Singh Bedi called him 'the best thing to have happened to Indian cricket,' crediting him for breaking regional barriers and creating a sense of 'Indian-ness' in the dressing room. Sunil Gavaskar and Erapalli Prasanna echoed this, with Gavaskar calling him 'the most charismatic cricketer of his generation' and Prasanna recalling how Pataudi taught players to put country above self, uniting them as Indians first. Have there been any reactions from the Pataudi family or ex-cricketers? The decision triggered immediate and widespread criticism. Sharmila Tagore, wife of the late Tiger Pataudi, called the move insensitive and questioned the erasure of the Pataudi legacy. She revealed that the ECB wrote to her son, Saif Ali Khan, about the change, but the family was not consulted. Sunil Gavaskar, former India captain who played under Tiger, slammed the decision in his Sportstar column: 'It shows a total lack of sensitivity to the contribution made by the Pataudis to cricket in both England and India. Here's hoping that if an Indian player has been approached, he'll have the good sense to politely decline — not only out of respect for two former India captains but also to avoid the same fate of having a trophy named after him retired after he is gone.' Harsha Bhogle, well-known cricket commentator wrote on X: 'Having been an admirer of Anderson the player and, as is well known, of Tendulkar, both as a player and a person, I should have been happy with the series being played for a Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy. But it misses the deep connect that Pataudi had with our countries. Both father and son played for Sussex, Sr played for both England and India, Jr set schoolboy batting records in England. There was a very nice ring to the Pataudi Trophy.' Why is the decision wrong? The Pataudi Trophy was more than a name; it was a bridge between two cricketing cultures and histories, symbolising both colonial ties and post-independence pride. Removing it severs that connection. Moreover, replacing a trophy that honoured deep, historical figures with one named after recent stars risks reducing cricket's legacy to a popularity contest or marketing exercise. The Pataudi family and key cricketing voices were not properly consulted, leading to feelings of disrespect and alienation. If such legacy trophies can be retired at will, it undermines the value of all commemorative honours in cricket. Today it's the Pataudi Trophy; tomorrow, it could be another historic award. For example, England and Australia continue to battle for the Ashes, a symbolic urn steeped in satire and history. That tradition has been sustained since 1882. Will it be branded to Stokes–Smith Trophy for greater relevance? The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News What Women's Commissions Were Meant to Do, and What They Are Doing Now Watch | Does the SC Have the Power to Gag Ali Khan Mahmudabad or Has it Overreached Itself? Ashoka University Can't Call Its Refusal to Stand Up to BJP's Bullying 'Institutional Neutrality' Who Gets to Think in India? Founders of Ashoka Should Know that a University Can't be Equated With Hierarchies of a Corporate Office The Arrest and Trial of Professor Azaan M Free Speech on Eggshells: What the Ali Khan Mahmudabad Case Signals for All of Us Ali Khan Mahmudabad Has Fulfilled the Task of a Political Scientist Is Ashoka University the Next Target After Professor Ali Khan? About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Virat Kohli May Reverse Test Retirement On This 'One Condition', Australia Great Predicts
Former Australia captain Michael Clarke shared his views on the possibility of Virat Kohli making a retirement u-turn from Test cricket. Kohli announced his retirement from Test cricket last month, days ahead of the announcement of India's new captain and the squad for the upcoming five-match Test series against England. The 36-year-old bid adieu to the format with 9,230 runs in 123 matches at an average of 46.85. Kohli's announcement was a big shock for many, especially after India captain Rohit Sharma had also announced his Test retirement few days prior. However, Clarke suggested Kohli could come out of retirement if India get battered in England. "I believe this. If India go to England and get flogged, if they lose the series 5-0 for example, I think the fans will want Virat Kohli to come out of retirement and play Test cricket again. And I honestly, I think if he was asked by captain, selectors and supported by fans, if they get beaten big time in England, I think he'll come. He still loves Test cricket. I think his words, I think those words, like you could hear his passion for Test cricket is real," Clarke said on Beyond23 podcast. Clarke feels Kohli's absence might be felt in England as the 36-year-old still has a lot to offer, as far Test cricket is concerned. "He sees it as the pinnacle and he's still playing good enough cricket. He definitely made the decision to retire and whatever his reasons are, everybody comes to that time in their career. If that's the case, then so be it. But if they don't perform, if they get beaten, like I say, 5-0 in England, which I don't think they will. I think they can still win in England, even without Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma. I think this Indian squad is a good squad," he added. However, he did not rule out the possibility of India beating England in their own den. "India is a passionate cricket country. They want to see their team win. I think they can still beat England. There you go. I think they're a good enough team. But if they don't, if they get flogged, I think there'll be a push for Virat Kohli to come out of retirement," he said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Aakash Chopra's captaincy advice to Shubman Gill: ‘You can take inspiration from Virat Kohli's success, his hunger for runs, his leadership'
When Virat Kohli took over the Test captaincy in 2014 in Adelaide, the side was filled with youngsters. It was a period of transition and required someone to come in and give the identity for the next decade with grooming players at disposal, and that's exactly what Kohli did and succeeded. Statistically, he is the best Indian captain in the format, and through his tenure, India has won some remarkable series both home and away. However, 11 years later, the side is in a similar conundrum with the retirement of veterans Kohli and Rohit Sharma. Shubman Gill has been given the responsibility to create his mark on the team for the next few years with a lot of youngsters. 'You can take inspiration from Virat Kohli's success, his hunger for runs, his leadership—but not necessarily his batting number,' said Aakash Chopra, speaking on JioStar. With Kohli not present, who will take the number four slot is up for debate. 'That's a very individual choice. Similarly, Shubman should play where he contributes best,' said Chopra after few experts rooting for Shubman to take the number four slot for the future. 'Batting position isn't about copying someone—it's about where you fit in the team and how it benefits the side. Learn from Kohli's mindset, play with an extra bowler if needed. That's what leaders do—make sacrifices for the team,' Chopra further stated. Chopra also suggested that India should form a leadership group. 'Form a leadership group—bring 4–5 players together and build a core. Include Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Rishabh Pant, Jasprit Bumrah, and Mohammed Siraj. Create a pack of wolves. These are the guys who'll be with you today, in six months, and five years down the line.' 'With a young team, it's important that the captain grows with the group. Seniors and juniors often have different routines and circles—but with this new-look team, you have a chance to build a collective culture. It's a rare opportunity to create a bond and a story that the entire nation will be proud of,' he added.
