
From nadir to zenith – a story that must be told
Fresh from the memories of Op Sindoor one was overwhelmed by the screaming headlines and got swept over by the avalanche of the 'breaking news (es)' that claimed to tell the story by the 'second'.
Amongst this high decibel imbroglio, one news that outdid all the rest was the news of the air defence warriors sounding a death knell to the enemy's air threat and one of their weapons that stole most of the limelight was Akash, our very own Short Range Surface-to-Air Missile ( SRSAM) system.
One heard repeatedly – Akash did this, Akash did that, Akash downed the deadly missiles and drones of the enemy. Clearly Op Sindoor was the validation of our 'pride' called the Akash
While all this was afoot, my memories went back some four decades. A bird chirped in my year…this story of Akash's journey from nadir to zenith must be told; that much for the caption.
I remember in the early eighties, it used to be professionally savvy for the young officers like me to be showing slides while our Commanding officers talked big about the acronym IGMDP with pride to the visiting dignitaries to the unit.
This longish acronym stood for Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme – the birthing ground of Akash. Actually IGMDP was a very ambitious programme of the Ministry of Defence for the R&D and comprehensive development of a series of SAMs- Prithvi, Trishul, Akash and Nag ( Agni was added later on) that started in 1982-83. I am sure; they could not have found a better Programme Director for IGMDP. Any guesses? Dr APJ Abdul Kalam! Need I say more?
I will pick up thread only for Akash and not for other SAMs, sticking to story.
The initial concentration of IGMDP was mainly on Prithvi. The Akash story picked up a few years into the programme. I remember we, the Air Defence Artillery then ( The Corps of Army Air Defence came into being in 1994) used to interact frequently with the first Project Director of Akash, Dr Prahalada; a charismatic person, a distinguished aerospace engineer and later a Padma awardee; above all a person with a 'never to say die' attitude.
To put it mildly, the initial years of Akash development were full of challenges and marked with failed deadlines year-on-year. There were multiple issues…a couple of times the missile would explode soon after leaving the launcher , in many other flight trials , the missile guidance radar will fail to 'gather' the article ( implying take it in its control for guiding it to the target). On many other occasions, the target lock would break, in some others the guidance would fail making the missile go astray midflight. Those were challenging times indeed.
Also, there were major challenges to perfect the design of the passive array radar that could guide multiple number of missiles on multiple targets at the same time. Even after multiple tests, the challenges remained daunting.
A situation was reached sometime around 2002-03 when there were opinions of even not accepting the weapon system in the Army. Project Trishul (another project under IGMDP for quick reaction SAM) was also treading rough shod beseeched with multiple developmental challenges ( a few years down the line in 2008 , Project Trishul faced a closure as a technology demonstrator).
Somehow Akash continued despite inordinate time and cost overruns and the single reason behind it was the spirit and confidence shown in the weapon system fundamentals by its successive Projectors.
Talking of Project Directors, Dr Prahalada was succeeded by one very knowledgeable Dr Panyam ( may God bless his soul). At the time when Dr Panyam took over, Akash was riddled with multiple challenges. Dr Panyam brought a new life into the system based on his extensive grip over the guidance , control and propulsion technologies. Challenges still started in the eye.
Around the same time the LRDE (and Radar Development Establishment) which was addressing the challenges of phased array and fire control radars started to see initial successes. Things were finally looking up as the missiles could now be gathered and there were no premature explosions, Once Dr Panyam passed , the reigns were taken over by Mr Chandramauli an equally competent Project Director.
The journey here onwards was on an upswing. The weapon system went though a series of successful flight trials. In 2007 Indian Air Force completed the user trials for the missile. The recommendations for various improvements to be incorporated in the weapon system continued to be tested and validated years later. The Army version on mobile launchers was still some distance away in 2007 as the challenges of mobility and quick deployment were very huge. The years 2008-13 saw multiple validation tests addressing various challenges for the Army version.
Cut to Feb 2024, 21 Feb to be exact, the Akash Army version had come a long way and was now deployed for pre-induction trails at the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Chandipur Orissa. Four tests were planned 1. Low flying target at near; 2. A high altitude target at long range; 3. A crossing and approaching target and 4. A ripple firing test of two missiles from the same launcher on a receding target.
The trials were a success. The final hurdle before induction was crossed.
Few months later on 05 May 2015, dawned the day when Akash Missile system was finally inducted into the Army Air Defence. This humble self as the Director General of the Corps of Army Air Defence then, had the singular honour to receive the symbolic key of Akash from the then Chief of the Army Staff Gen Dalbir Singh Suhag.
A dream had come true, A journey of three decades and more which had the lows, as much lows as the non-acceptance of the weapon system in the Army had finally reached the Zenith.
Who knew at that time that this weapon system will prove its worth in the face of the enemy 10 year later!
Akashe Shatrun Jahi. Induction ceremony Akash Weapon system into Army Air Defence 05 May 2015
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
10 hours ago
- Hans India
SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar's conviction in defamation case
New Delhi: TheSupreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in the 2001 criminal defamation case filed against her by V.K. Saxena -- the now Lieutenant Governor of Delhi. A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh was dealing with a special leave petition (SLP) filed by Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar, challenging a Delhi High Court order that had maintained her conviction in the matter. However, in a bit of relief to Patkar, the Justice Sundresh-led Bench set aside the penalty imposed and directed that the supervision order would not be enforced. Earlier, on July 29, the Delhi High Court upheld Medha Patkar's conviction, rejecting her revision plea against a Saket court order that had dismissed her criminal appeal. A single-judge Bench of Justice Shalinder Kaur observed that Patkar failed to point out any procedural defect that would amount to a miscarriage of justice in the case, noting that her conviction was based on due consideration of the evidence and applicable law. However, Justice Shalinder Kaur had modified the probation condition requiring her to appear before the trial court every three months, permitting her to appear virtually or be represented by an advocate. In 2001, Saxena filed two defamation suits against Patkar -- one over allegedly derogatory remarks made during a television interview, and the other concerning a press statement. Senior Advocate Maninder Singh and lawyers Gajinder Kumar, Kiran Jai, Chandra Shekhar and Somya appeared for the respondent V.K. Saxena in the case. Sanjay Parikh, Senior Advocate, presented Medha Patkar's case in the court. The legal tussle arose from an earlier suit filed by Patkar in 2000, accusing Saxena of publishing defamatory advertisements targeting her and the NBA. In July last year, Metropolitan Magistrate Raghav Sharma sentenced Patkar to five months in jail and ordered her to pay Rs 10 lakh as compensation to Saxena. On appeal, Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Vishal Singh of the Saket Court upheld Patkar's conviction but ordered her to be released on probation of good conduct for a period of one year, subject to prior deposit of a compensation amount of Rs one lakh, which will be released in favour of the complainant (Saxena). It had opined that an insensitive approach towards others' reputation and abuse of the right to free speech must be met with criminal sanction, adding that Patkar, being herself a person of repute, must know the value of one's reputation and how defamation can result in loss of face and public esteem of the victim.


Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Navy's focus on combat readiness ensured ship deployment after Pahalgam attack: Govt to Parliament panel
New Delhi, The Indian Navy's focus on ensuring combat readiness enabled ships to be deployed at sea in the wake of the April 22 terrorist attack, the government has told a parliamentary panel. India launched Operation Sindoor early on May 7 to strike terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program In light of the "evolving threats and geopolitical dynamics" in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), the Committee of External Affairs has said that it was keen to learn about India's long-term strategy to ensure maritime security and maintain regional stability. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo The report on 'Evaluation of India's Indian Ocean Strategy' by the panel, headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, was presented in Parliament on Monday. The Defence Ministry, in its response to the panel's query, said that "India's long-term strategy in the maritime domain aims to counter threats like piracy, trafficking, illegal fishing, maritime terrorism, natural calamities and complex geopolitical dynamics by pursuing five distinct strategies". Live Events Building a combat-ready navy to meet India's future maritime security needs, and deterrence through "capability, posture, and communication of intent" were the other critical points mentioned by the ministry in its response. "The focus of the Indian Navy towards ensuring combat readiness, through successful surface, air and sub-surface firings, enabled ships to be deployed for 'Op Sindoor' within 96 hours of the terrorist attack, with hundreds of missiles embarked," the defence ministry told the panel. It further said the Navy's focus is on "building credible deterrence by modernising our fleet with capable multi-dimensional platforms while also integrating emerging technologies to monitor and secure critical SLOCs (sea lines of communication) and choke points". Operation Sindoor, carried out in the early hours of May 7, led to a four-day military conflict between India and Pakistan that was halted after an understanding was reached between the two sides on May 10. Director General of Naval Operations, Vice Admiral A N Pramod, on May 11, said that the Indian Navy's carrier battle group, submarines and aviation assets were immediately deployed at sea with full combat readiness in the aftermath of the Pahalgam strike. The naval forces remained forward deployed in the northern Arabian Sea in a "dissuasive and deterrent" posture, with full readiness to strike select targets at sea and on land, including Karachi, at a time of our choosing. The defence ministry, in its response to the panel, also mentioned India's vision for "shaping a favourable and positive maritime environment to enhance cooperation with maritime forces of friendly nations". "Additionally, IN (Indian Navy) will pursue its efforts to be the preferred security partner and first responder guided by the GoI's (Government of India's) vision of MAHASAGAR (Mutual and Holistic Advancement of Security and Growth Across Regions)," it said. Enumerating the key objectives that will guide India's naval and maritime policies in the coming decade, the Defence Ministry also stated that India's naval and maritime policies in the coming decade will be guided by the Indian Navy Vision 2047 . "These objectives also reinforce the overarching vision of 'MAHASAGAR', which signifies India's vision to expand its influence and impact globally, using the seas as a conduit," the report says.


Hindustan Times
20 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Decoding the threat in Munir's desperate talk
History is the best place to learn where Asim Munir's reckless nuclear boast is coming from. It's an established fact that Pakistani military dictators aren't particularly gifted with strategic intellect, political discretion, or a vision for their nation. They trade minor tactics for high strategy. In reality, they end up destroying themselves and damaging Pakistan. Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, and Pervez Musharraf make a straight line. The first launched a war in 1965 and lost. The second lost half his country. The third diminished Pakistan into the 'University of Jihad'. The fourth ruined the economy and globally affirmed Pakistan as a State sponsor of terrorism. The fifth, Munir, is now using language more alarming than his infamous predecessors, as first reported by ThePrint's Praveen Swami. Infamous and miserable in defeat, dishonour, exile, or assassination. Munir thinks fate is going to treat him better. But then, of course, he's much more of a true believer in scriptural dogma as he has interpreted it. He's saying that unlike others, he's willing to go for broke, even if it risks taking his country 'and half the world' down with him. To understand where he is coming from, I will pick 10 points. First, he's attempting to restore the nuclear blackmail that has vanished after Op Sindoor. It was defied in the post-Uri surgical strikes, challenged in Balakot, and Op Sindoor buried it. From where Munir sits, if his nuclear blackmail is gone, what has he got left? This closes his options in Kashmir. The Indian nuclear doctrine is publicly disclosed and adheres to the no-first-use principle. Pakistan has no such disclosure or commitment. The clearest articulation of the Pakistani nuclear threshold was given in 2002 (during Op Parakram) by its then director general of Strategic Plans Division (DG SPD) Lt Gen Khalid Kidwai. He sent out these thresholds under four heads: Space (significant loss of territory), military (loss of a significant portion of Pakistani forces and degradation), economic (strangulation or blockade threatening economic survival), and political (large-scale internal subversion or destabilisation). While this is sweeping and non-specific, it underlines an important doctrinal point: Pakistan fully sees its nuclear weapons as a loser's option. That's at least a rational view. Munir is now saying: Don't count on us being rational. Second, not only is he reminding India but also the rest of the world that Pakistan holds this destructive power and may be inclined to unleash it, whatever the consequences. Thereby, he is trying to shift the global emphasis from the threat in the subcontinent from cross-border terrorism to the fear of nuclear war. In many India-Pakistan crises since 1987, Pakistan has been the only side to hold out a nuclear threat. Third, Munir is worried India and the US have stopped worrying. He's, therefore, putting the gun to his head. He's taking us back, or at least trying to, to the summer of 1990, when the Pakistanis sent out a threat to the VP Singh government that they would start the war with a nuclear strike. IK Gujral recorded this in his memoir. Munir is now indicating a return to pre-emptive deterrence. In simpler English, it is the return of nuclear blackmail. Fourth, he's acknowledging that Pakistan has been left far behind by India. That's where what he calls a 'crude analogy' of a 'shining Mercedes driving like a Ferrari' versus a 'dump truck filled with gravel' comes in. So, won't you Indians lose more, is the argument. Fifth, we can see the bitter envy play out. Mark the reference to that 'tweet we had put out' with a line from the scriptures on how Allah sent birds to drop stones on enemy war elephants and reduce them to straw, with a picture of Mukesh Ambani. Four decades ago, Pakistan was way ahead of India in economic and industrial development. Today, it is far behind and sliding alarmingly for him. He has no solution to reverse this. He's only thinking of stopping India's march. Sixth, he has further elaborated on his director general of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG ISPR)'s boast to The Economist that, in the next conflict, Pakistan will begin with India's east. Some in India have hastily jumped to think of a collusive attack with Bangladesh. Think harder, especially now that Munir has elaborated on it. The east, where he says 'they keep their most valuable' assets. Now, we know that most of our big economic assets are along the west coast and in the south. What he's talking about isn't economic. What he is hinting at, I'd rather not talk about. Smart people in the establishment would know. Seventh, he knows that the Pahalgam move backfired. Even if there is no resumption of hostilities, the apprehension over Indus waters will remain. He's reassuring his base with the threat of 'firing 10 missiles and getting rid of a dam' that Indians 'build' on the Indus system. He knows no dam can be built overnight, or in his tenure, however long. He thinks he can brag safely right for now. Eighth is just a repetition of what he's been saying lately, beginning with that April 16 speech to an overseas Pakistanis' convention, that Pakistan was the only State founded on the Islamic Kalma after the Prophet's Medina. Therefore, the existence of massive minerals under its soil is preordained. This is the snake oil he has sold to Donald Trump. Ninth, and of the greatest immediate importance to him, he's signalling to his own population that they should know he's fully the boss now. That he hasn't yet taken over the presidency formally doesn't matter. Nor does it mean that he won't do so. Army chiefs always have a tenure, and those wasting away in the line of succession will get impatient at some point. The model that's worked in Pakistan is uniform with the presidency. And the tenth should set us thinking hard, even as we ridicule Munir. He's insecure. In Pakistan, insecurity doesn't just mean losing your job. You can't hand over to any next guy and go home to play golf. However his propaganda packages it, the world has seen pictures of his damaged air bases. A puffed-up bully is often a recent loser. That makes for a very dangerous combination in Pakistan. The final lesson, therefore, is for India: Be alive to not just the possibility, but the likelihood that he will be at our throats again. History tells us that every Pakistani war has been launched on us through one intellectually challenged man's miscalculation. (By special arrangement with ThePrint; podcast version on the author's YouTube show, CutTheClutter) Shekhar Gupta is founder and editor-in-chief, ThePrint. The views expressed are personal.