Peace talks, debt issues top Dewan Rakyat Agenda today
Based on the Order Paper on the Parliament portal, the matter was raised by Rodiyah Sapiee (GPS-Batang Sadong) to the Prime Minister during Minister's Question Time.
In the same session, Datuk Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (PN-Kuala Kangsar) also sought clarification from the Prime Minister on whether the MADANI Government was managing the national debt responsibly.
Meanwhile, in the question and answer session, Isnaraissah Munirah Majilis (Warisan-Kota Belud) asked the Foreign Minister about the proposed Joint Development with Indonesia in the ND 6 and ND 7 Ambalat blocks.
She also wanted to know whether the same method would be used through the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Authority (MTJDA) or another method given that the rights of Sabah as well as Sarawak are protected under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
Datuk Che Mohamad Zulkifly Jusoh (PN-Besut) asked the Prime Minister to state the government's decision after a holistic engagement session with stakeholders regarding the status of the establishment of the Malaysian Ombudsman, as well as the next steps to expedite its establishment.
In addition, Jimmy Puah Wee Tse (PH-Tebrau) asked the Minister of Defence if the ministry had plans to integrate the use of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology in the country's air defence system.
The Dewan Rakyat sitting will then resume with the debate session on the 13th Malaysia Plan (RMK13) motion tabled by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim last Thursday.
This Dewan Rakyat session will last for 24 days until August 28. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
8 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'Business-to-business deals for Multi-Lane Fast Flow system, no cost for govt'
KUALA LUMPUR: There will be no financial implications for the government in implementing the Multi-Lane Fast Flow (MLFF) system, the Dewan Rakyat heard today. Deputy Works Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Maslan said the cabinet made this decision after the termination of an appointment between the government and the proposed company last December. He said the ministry was committed to implementing the MLFF toll collection system to prioritise the comfort and convenience of highway users. "On July 25, the ministry presented a cabinet paper on a new direction for the implementation of MLFF. "One of the key points is that service providers can now engage directly with 33 toll concessionaires on a business-to-business basis to facilitate implementation. "The second point is that the system will be implemented without any financial implications for the government. "The government has decided that this matter will be resolved on a business-to-business basis and there will not be a single cent of financial implication for the government. "As such, the issue of how many billions it will cost does not arise as the government will not bear any equipment or infrastructure costs when the MLFF system is implemented at 33 toll plazas," he said during the question-and-answer session at the Dewan Rakyat today. He was responding to a question by Shaharizukirnain Abd Kadir (PN-Setiu) on the status of the MLFF system and planned improvements for it. In February, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) recommended that the ministry and the Malaysian Highway Authority conduct a more detailed cost-benefit analysis for the MLFF project. PAC chairman Datuk Mas Ermieyati Samsudin had said the committee concluded that implementing the MLFF system would not fully resolve traffic congestion on toll highways. In response, the ministry said the MLFF system, to be implemented by PLUS Malaysia Bhd, would be an independent initiative by the highway concessionaire. Previously, implementing the MLFF system was estimated to cost RM3.46 billion. Commenting further, Ahmad said the government had set a two-year timeframe for the implementation of the MLFF system. "All 33 toll concessionaires are free to engage with any company they want to work with." On the issue of tailgating, he said additional enforcement mechanisms might be introduced to address this. He said the ministry was mulling restricting road tax renewals for motorists who evade toll payments once the MLFF system was implemented. "With MLFF, user discipline will be essential. We will use RFID technology and Automatic Number Plate Recognition.
New Straits Times
8 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Ruckus in Dewan Rakyat over use of Terengganu dialect term 'mambar'
KUALA LUMPUR: A heated exchange erupted in the Dewan Rakyat today over the use of the Terengganu dialect word 'mambar' by an opposition lawmaker to describe six Bersatu members of parliament (MPs) who had pledged support for the government. The incident began after Datuk Rosol Wahid (PN–Hulu Terengganu) asked Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul to clarify the status of the six MPs, and whether they should be considered part of the government or the opposition. Rosol described the position of the six MPs as 'mambar,' a term he said refers to something not solid or "in between". RSN Rayer (PH–Jelutong) then raised a point of order, calling the term inappropriate and disrespectful. Rosol responded by saying, "Even that is sensitive to you." Chong Zhemin (PH–Kampar) also raised an objection, calling on Rosol to retract his statement. "Everyone understands it is a subtle insult. It is unparliamentary," Chong said. Johari, unfamiliar with the term, said he could not make a definitive ruling. "I do not even know what it means, so I cannot consider it unparliamentary," he said, before asking Rosol to avoid using the word again to prevent confusion. The matter escalated further when Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (PN–Kota Baru) interjected, suggesting the term may have different meanings depending on the region. The debate then devolved into a shouting match between Rayer, Takiyuddin, and Radzi Jidin (PN–Putrajaya), which included a reference to an alleged insult to Islam by Takiyuddin. Johari ruled that while the term might be harmless in some regions, its meaning is not universally understood. "Everyone, please be seated. The term may have different meanings depending on the state. In Kedah, for instance, it can mean beautiful, great, or excellent," he said, concluding that the term should be avoided to prevent confusion.
Malay Mail
8 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals court rules EC acted unlawfully by barring voter in Johor polls over Covid status
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 6 — The Court of Appeal today ruled that the Election Commission's (EC) decision to bar a registered voter from casting his ballot in the 2022 Johor state election due to Covid-19 quarantine restrictions was unlawful. A three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Supang Lian, Datuk Wong Kian Kheong, and Datuk Ismail Brahim held that the EC had violated RK Tamileswaaran's constitutional right to vote under Article 119 of the Federal Constitution by preventing him from exercising his right to vote. 'The first respondent (EC) had committed an 'error of law' or an illegality in this case by denying the appellant's (Tamileswaaran's) right to vote in the election,' he said. In delivering the court's unanimous decision, Justice Wong said the High Court had erred in ruling that the EC's duty under Article 113 of the Federal Constitution to conduct elections was subject to the Covid-19 prevention SOP and the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988 (PCDA). 'The SOP and PCDA cannot restrain the EC's duty to conduct elections,' he said. Justice Wong issued a certiorari order to quash the EC's decision, and granted several declarations sought by Tamileswaaran. The court allowed Tamileswaaran's appeal to overturn the December 7, 2022, decision by the High Court in dismissing his judicial review. The court did not make any orders as to costs. While acknowledging that courts have the discretion to award monetary compensation for breach of the right to vote, Justice Wong said no constitutional compensation would be granted in this case. He said this was because the EC's decision was made based on the SOP in the interest of public health and safety, and its officers had acted in good faith in this case. In the judgment, Justice Wong held that the SOP and the PCDA regulations created by the Director-General of Health and the Minister of Health, respectively, are subsidiary legislation and not Federal law or an Act of Parliament. The court also dismissed arguments submitted by the EC and the government, represented by senior federal counsel Mohammad Al-Saifi Hashim and Fauziah Daud, that public policy considerations on public health and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic were sufficient grounds to dismiss the judicial review. 'A voter's right to vote is a constitutional right and not a statutory right,' added Justice Wong. In his judicial review application, R.K. Tamileswaaran claimed that he was on the sixth day of his Covid-19 quarantine and had tested negative on a self-administered test. He stated that he was barred from entering the polling station because his MySejahtera application displayed a high-risk status, and he had not obtained permission from the district health officer to vote. The court's decision was delivered via online proceedings. Tamileswaaran was represented by lawyers New Sin Yew and Nur Izni Syazwani Ahmad. — Bernama
