7 key lessons from Ray Dalio's ‘Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order'
Ray Dalio's iconic book, 'Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail', was first published in November 2021, it is a powerful tool for exploration and understanding of how global empires rise, reach their peaks, and then fall over time.
The book draws on over 500 years of research and data to identify repeating patterns in history. It tries to elucidate on what historical events mean for today's turbulent world of equity markets.
Ray Dalio focuses on presenting a 'Big Cycle' framework that helps readers clearly understand the currently ongoing geo-political landscape, particularly the growing rivalry between the United States of America and China. Combining historical analysis, economic theory along with personal investment thesis, the book provides both a stern warning and a sensible guide for navigating uncertain times.
Ray Dalio is the founder of Bridgewater Associates, one of the largest and most reputed hedge funds in the world. Admired for his analytical approach to economics and his sincere commitment towards economic transparency, Dalio has devoted decades to study markets, geo-politics and human psychology.
With this book he focuses on global sustainability, offering a prudent framework to deal with economic changes when we have a transition time of shifting tides of global power for a leading super power i.e., the US to an upcoming super power China.
Here are seven key lessons from this influential work:
Dalio believes that nations follow a common path i.e., a path that emerges through strong leadership and innovation, rising through economic and military might and then eventually declines under the weight of compounding debt and internal strife. 'The times ahead will be radically different from those we've experienced in our lifetimes, though similar to many times in history,' he writes.
One of Ray Dalio's core ideas is that long term debt cycles, especially when combined with money printing, often precede national decline. As money printing is nothing but adding more national debt on any nation's economy. 'Debt is a double-edged sword that fuels economic growth in good times and destruction in bad times,' he explains.
Ray elaborates on the crucial role of human capital in national development, economic growth and progress. He believes that education and innovation cumulatively provide strength to a civilisation and help in building powerful empires. 'The most powerful empires were those that achieved high levels of education, civility, and competitiveness,' he notes, linking societal progress, holistic development of the larger community with long-term prosperity.
Rising disputes and inequalities in a nation, political polarisation and cultural fragmentation are serious red flags. Such differences weaken the core of a country and make future investments and growth difficult. 'When the causes that people are behind are more important to them than the system, the system is in jeopardy,' Dalio further warns, highlighting growing divisions in the US and other major democracies are signs of long term structural weakness. Therefore, for economic prosperity, investments and growth it is crucial for the nation to gel as one and join hands to work together in achieving sustainable long term goals.
A nation's influence is backed not just by its economic power but also by its military might. Trade dominance, reserve currency status often correlate with strong and rigid defence capabilities. These elements holistically join to reinforce a nation's global leadership. Since 1945 i.e., the end of the second world war, the US has been the leader of global trade and world order, but now China is also only the podium according to Dalio and is challenging the US.
Dalio considers China's resurgence not a chance or a fluke, but as a natural part of historical power shift. 'The United States and China are now in the classic late stages of the big cycle where a rising power challenges an incumbent one,' he writes, stressing that the currently ongoing geopolitical tensions are part of a much larger historical trend.
The final point to take note of for individual investors is to focus on adaptability. Dalio recommends preparing for difficult and volatile times ahead by diversifying investments, having a long term vision and continuous learning. 'If you worry, you don't have to worry. If you don't worry, you need to worry,' he quips, stressing the value of proactive thinking in unpredictable environments.
Therefore, Dalio's latest book is more than just a lesson in history and economics, it is in fact a blueprint for the global economy. By studying the past he suggests we can be better prepared for what lies ahead economically, politically and even personally.
Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Russia's Trojan horse moment and why Ukraine's ‘Operation Spider's Web' upends scope of drone warfare
In an audacious attack that was planned for over a year and half, Ukraine carried out large scale drone attacks on multiple Russian air bases, including one in Siberia that was some 4,000 km away from the frontlines. Under its 'Operation Spider's Web', a swarm of Ukrainian drones were unleashed on June 1 that attacked at least five military airbases deep inside Russia's borders and left some 41 bomber aircraft in flames. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the operation as 'an absolutely brilliant result' and said the Ukrainians' actions will 'undoubtedly be in the history books'. He said planning for the operation began 18 months ago, and those involved 'were withdrawn from Russian territory in time'. The attack comes close on the heels of a stepping up of Russia's bombing of Ukrainian cities and was timed just ahead of crucial talks between the two sides. A new round of peace talks is scheduled to start in Istanbul on June 2. Sources say specialised drones called FPV drones were smuggled into Russia, along with mobile wooden cabins. The cabins were carried by trucks with the drones hidden inside. The cabin roofs opened remotely – and then the drones took off, zoned in on the nearby bases to precisely mount the attacks. Ukraine claimed the attack caused $7 billion in damage, with multiple combat planes destroyed in the attack. The Russian defence ministry on Sunday said Ukraine launched FPV drone attacks on five airbases across the Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur regions, adding that all strikes on the Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur airfields were successfully repelled. '(For) All the long range missiles and fighter jets, but it was 150 drones in shipping containers or trucks that took out a reported 1/3 of Russia's strategic bomber fleet and unmanned surface drones that neutered the Black Fleet. Warfare as we knew it just a decade ago, is over,' according to Alex Plitsas, a nonresident senior fellow with the Middle East Programs' Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative who leads the Initiative's Counterterrorism Project and was formerly associated with Bridgewater Associates and NorthropGrumman. There are at least five reasons why the attack changes the rules of battlefield engagement: It was one of significant raiding actions in modern warfare, given that the mission was planned for 18 months. This differed from the sort of attacks Ukraine has mounted so far – larger fixed-wing drones attacking at night, closer to areas adjoining Russia's border with Ukraine. This upends that pattern entirely, given that small drones were used this time during the day, and this was done far away from the front lines and deep into Russian territory. In Irkutsk province in eastern Siberia, thousands of kilometres away from Ukraine, locals posted footage of small quadcopter drones emerging from the roof of trucks and then flying toward a nearby airfield, followed by the smoke after impact. The attacks at these Russian airfields are said to have destroyed 41 aircraft, including A-50 early-warning planes and Tu-22M3 and Tu-95 strategic bombers, most of which are now out of production and extremely difficult to replace. Russia is estimated to have less than 100 strategic bombers, and around a third of that fleet is impacted with this attack. These attacks were carried out by the SBU, Ukraine's main security agency. The agency released footage in which its chief, Vasily Maliuk, said: 'Russian strategic bombers… all burning delightfully.' Commentators on X aligned to Ukraine's security services indicated that over a 100 quadcopter FPV drones with bombs were smuggled into Russia for the operations. These were then meticulously housed in specially-built wooden cabins, loaded on top of lorries and then released after the roofs of the cabins were retracted remotely. FPV or first-person view drones are smaller in size and have cameras built in on the front, which sends live video to the operator. This enables precise flying and manoeuvrability by the operator from a remote location, almost like an aircraft. The Economist reported that these drones used Russian mobile-telephone networks to relay their footage back to Ukraine, much of which then shared on social media. It is entirely possible that the drivers of the trucks did not know what they were carrying. In that respect, analysts said this operation was similar to the 2022 attack on Kerch bridge, where a bomb concealed in a lorry destroyed part of the bridge linking Crimea with the Russian mainland. The planning was elaborate. A source quoted by The Economist said that the Russians were first encouraged to move more of their planes to particular bases by Ukrainian strikes on other ones. Three days before this drone attack, dozens of planes were moved to the Olenya airfield in Murmansk province, according to reports published at the time. It was precisely here that the most damage was done after the June 1 attack. The fact that Ukraine was able to destroy such a large number of Russia's aircraft deep inside Russia territory demonstrates the effectiveness of such deep-strike programmes and taking the possibilities of drone warfare to another level. According to Thomas Shugart, an Adjunct Senior Fellow with the Defense Programme at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and someone who served for over 25 years in the US Navy, where he last worked in the Defense Department's Office of Net Assessment: 'Imagine, on game-day, containers at railyards, on Chinese-owned container ships in port or offshore, on trucks parked at random properties…spewing forth thousands of drones that sally forth and at least mission-kill the crown jewels of the [US Air Force]… would be 'entirely feasible'. The America-specific warning issued by Shugart, who has previously written about the threat to airfields from drones and recommended specifically that key aircraft such as bombers should also have hardened shelters for just this sort of attack, could now resonate across geographies, including India. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
Bond markets are returning to normal but other fiscal numbers are a concern
A lot of people are worried about the level of US interest rates. 'I think we should be afraid of the bond market,' billionaire investor Ray Dalio said last week. To other observers, the bond market is 'barfing,' 'signaling a dire scenario for the economy,' 'shaking Wall Street,' 'sending a warning to Congress,' 'giving stock-market investors the yips,' 'worrying that something may be breaking beneath the surface' or just plain 'breaking.' I don't see what all the fuss is about. There is nothing unusual about the current level of interest rates or their recent movement. If anything, this is a yawningly normal interest rate environment. For perspective, the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield, at 4.5 per cent, is more than a percentage point lower than its historical average of 5.6 per cent since the 1950s (for finance wonks, a negative 0.3 sigma). Even if you remove the period from 1980 to 1985 in which the 10-year yield was persistently above 10 per cent, that historical average declines only modestly to 5.1 per cent, still well above the current yield. Nor is the recent interest rate volatility all that unusual. Yes, the 10-year yield has bounced around a bunch since the White House's tariff announcement on April 2. But similar — and always temporary — spikes in volatility were common throughout the 1970s and 1980s and have occurred regularly during every decade since then, including the current one. So, why all the griping about bond yields? One reason may be that people aren't used to a normal interest rate environment. The US only recently emerged from an unusually long period of low rates — the 10-year hasn't topped 5 per cent since before the 2008 financial crisis, even though it was higher than that about half the time since the 1950s. Also, there's always something to dislike about interest rates. When rates were at historic lows for more than a decade after the financial crisis, critics complained that cheap debt would encourage risk taking and overinvestment in sectors that rely heavily on borrowing, such as real estate and private equity. They were right. Low interest rates did encourage real estate investment, which, in the case of housing, drove up prices and constrained supply. Low rates also made private equity more lucrative, which allowed PE firms to raise trillions of dollars with which to gobble up broad swaths of the US economy. A normal interest rate environment should help wring out those distortions. It should also encourage the federal government to reckon with its own excesses. Deficit spending made sense when money was cheap, particularly for investment or to bolster the economy during the Covid pandemic. Now that rates are higher and the economy is growing, policymakers should trim the deficits and shrink the US's historically high debt relative to gross domestic product. If they don't, interest rates could rise to truly concerning levels. The Trump administration is taking two big gambles on rates. One is the budget bill making its way through Congress, which, in its current form, could add as much as $5 trillion in deficits over the next 10 years. The White House is betting that growth will more than offset additional deficits and bring down debt-to-GDP. A second gamble is that tariffs won't kick up inflation and thereby lift interest rates, either because the threat of higher levies will ultimately result in lower trade barriers or because companies will internalize the cost of tariffs rather than pass them on to consumers. The bond market will be the judge. If the 10-year yield drifts above its historical average and approaches, say, 7 per cent or 8 per cent, which would still be well within a normal historical range (roughly 1 sigma), that will be a sure sign that the market has lost confidence in Congress's ability to manage the debt or the White House's ability to execute a tariff war without stoking inflation. As things stand, though, interest rates need not interfere with sound fiscal policy. If the US can limit deficits to 3 per cent of GDP, as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has pledged to do, debt-to-GDP should drop to 80 per cent by 2050 from closer to 120 per cent today. That assumes nominal GDP growth of 5 per cent a year, comprised of the Federal Reserve's 2 per cent inflation target and 3 per cent real growth, or some combination of the two. Interest on the debt as a percentage of the federal budget would also decline significantly, even if rates stay where they are. Assuming an average interest rate of 5 per cent on federal debt, which is well higher than the most recent rate of closer to 3.3 per cent, interest payments as a percentage of the budget would fall to 16 per cent by 2050 from about 26 per cent today. That assumes a total budget of 25 per cent of GDP, roughly the size Congress is currently contemplating. Still, if the current 10-year Treasury yield seems too high, consider that there are good economic reasons why it has averaged around 5 per cent historically. The base of that rate is inflation, which, if things go according to the Fed's plan, will run somewhere in the range of 2 per cent to 2.5 per cent long term. The Fed also aims for a short-term interest rate that is about 0.5 to 1 percentage point above the inflation rate, which closely matches the historical average yield on three-month Treasury bills. To lend for longer, investors usually demand a premium, which has averaged 1.6 percentage points for 10-year Treasuries relative to T-bills since the 1980s. The sum of those variables is a 10-year yield in the range of 4 per cent to 5 per cent, precisely where we are today. The current 10-year yield, in other words, is a sign that the bond market is functioning normally. It may not stay that way given the gathering risks, notably credible estimates that deficits will continue to run well higher than 3 per cent of GDP. But for now, there's no reason to fear the bond market.
Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
7 key lessons from Ray Dalio's ‘Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order'
Ray Dalio's iconic book, 'Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail', was first published in November 2021, it is a powerful tool for exploration and understanding of how global empires rise, reach their peaks, and then fall over time. The book draws on over 500 years of research and data to identify repeating patterns in history. It tries to elucidate on what historical events mean for today's turbulent world of equity markets. Ray Dalio focuses on presenting a 'Big Cycle' framework that helps readers clearly understand the currently ongoing geo-political landscape, particularly the growing rivalry between the United States of America and China. Combining historical analysis, economic theory along with personal investment thesis, the book provides both a stern warning and a sensible guide for navigating uncertain times. Ray Dalio is the founder of Bridgewater Associates, one of the largest and most reputed hedge funds in the world. Admired for his analytical approach to economics and his sincere commitment towards economic transparency, Dalio has devoted decades to study markets, geo-politics and human psychology. With this book he focuses on global sustainability, offering a prudent framework to deal with economic changes when we have a transition time of shifting tides of global power for a leading super power i.e., the US to an upcoming super power China. Here are seven key lessons from this influential work: Dalio believes that nations follow a common path i.e., a path that emerges through strong leadership and innovation, rising through economic and military might and then eventually declines under the weight of compounding debt and internal strife. 'The times ahead will be radically different from those we've experienced in our lifetimes, though similar to many times in history,' he writes. One of Ray Dalio's core ideas is that long term debt cycles, especially when combined with money printing, often precede national decline. As money printing is nothing but adding more national debt on any nation's economy. 'Debt is a double-edged sword that fuels economic growth in good times and destruction in bad times,' he explains. Ray elaborates on the crucial role of human capital in national development, economic growth and progress. He believes that education and innovation cumulatively provide strength to a civilisation and help in building powerful empires. 'The most powerful empires were those that achieved high levels of education, civility, and competitiveness,' he notes, linking societal progress, holistic development of the larger community with long-term prosperity. Rising disputes and inequalities in a nation, political polarisation and cultural fragmentation are serious red flags. Such differences weaken the core of a country and make future investments and growth difficult. 'When the causes that people are behind are more important to them than the system, the system is in jeopardy,' Dalio further warns, highlighting growing divisions in the US and other major democracies are signs of long term structural weakness. Therefore, for economic prosperity, investments and growth it is crucial for the nation to gel as one and join hands to work together in achieving sustainable long term goals. A nation's influence is backed not just by its economic power but also by its military might. Trade dominance, reserve currency status often correlate with strong and rigid defence capabilities. These elements holistically join to reinforce a nation's global leadership. Since 1945 i.e., the end of the second world war, the US has been the leader of global trade and world order, but now China is also only the podium according to Dalio and is challenging the US. Dalio considers China's resurgence not a chance or a fluke, but as a natural part of historical power shift. 'The United States and China are now in the classic late stages of the big cycle where a rising power challenges an incumbent one,' he writes, stressing that the currently ongoing geopolitical tensions are part of a much larger historical trend. The final point to take note of for individual investors is to focus on adaptability. Dalio recommends preparing for difficult and volatile times ahead by diversifying investments, having a long term vision and continuous learning. 'If you worry, you don't have to worry. If you don't worry, you need to worry,' he quips, stressing the value of proactive thinking in unpredictable environments. Therefore, Dalio's latest book is more than just a lesson in history and economics, it is in fact a blueprint for the global economy. By studying the past he suggests we can be better prepared for what lies ahead economically, politically and even personally. Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
