logo
Russia's Trojan horse moment and why Ukraine's ‘Operation Spider's Web' upends scope of drone warfare

Russia's Trojan horse moment and why Ukraine's ‘Operation Spider's Web' upends scope of drone warfare

Indian Express3 days ago

In an audacious attack that was planned for over a year and half, Ukraine carried out large scale drone attacks on multiple Russian air bases, including one in Siberia that was some 4,000 km away from the frontlines. Under its 'Operation Spider's Web', a swarm of Ukrainian drones were unleashed on June 1 that attacked at least five military airbases deep inside Russia's borders and left some 41 bomber aircraft in flames.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the operation as 'an absolutely brilliant result' and said the Ukrainians' actions will 'undoubtedly be in the history books'. He said planning for the operation began 18 months ago, and those involved 'were withdrawn from Russian territory in time'.
The attack comes close on the heels of a stepping up of Russia's bombing of Ukrainian cities and was timed just ahead of crucial talks between the two sides. A new round of peace talks is scheduled to start in Istanbul on June 2.
Sources say specialised drones called FPV drones were smuggled into Russia, along with mobile wooden cabins. The cabins were carried by trucks with the drones hidden inside. The cabin roofs opened remotely – and then the drones took off, zoned in on the nearby bases to precisely mount the attacks.
Ukraine claimed the attack caused $7 billion in damage, with multiple combat planes destroyed in the attack. The Russian defence ministry on Sunday said Ukraine launched FPV drone attacks on five airbases across the Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur regions, adding that all strikes on the Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur airfields were successfully repelled.
'(For) All the long range missiles and fighter jets, but it was 150 drones in shipping containers or trucks that took out a reported 1/3 of Russia's strategic bomber fleet and unmanned surface drones that neutered the Black Fleet. Warfare as we knew it just a decade ago, is over,' according to Alex Plitsas, a nonresident senior fellow with the Middle East Programs' Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative who leads the Initiative's Counterterrorism Project and was formerly associated with Bridgewater Associates and NorthropGrumman.
There are at least five reasons why the attack changes the rules of battlefield engagement:
It was one of significant raiding actions in modern warfare, given that the mission was planned for 18 months. This differed from the sort of attacks Ukraine has mounted so far – larger fixed-wing drones attacking at night, closer to areas adjoining Russia's border with Ukraine. This upends that pattern entirely, given that small drones were used this time during the day, and this was done far away from the front lines and deep into Russian territory. In Irkutsk province in eastern Siberia, thousands of kilometres away from Ukraine, locals posted footage of small quadcopter drones emerging from the roof of trucks and then flying toward a nearby airfield, followed by the smoke after impact.
The attacks at these Russian airfields are said to have destroyed 41 aircraft, including A-50 early-warning planes and Tu-22M3 and Tu-95 strategic bombers, most of which are now out of production and extremely difficult to replace. Russia is estimated to have less than 100 strategic bombers, and around a third of that fleet is impacted with this attack.
These attacks were carried out by the SBU, Ukraine's main security agency. The agency released footage in which its chief, Vasily Maliuk, said: 'Russian strategic bombers… all burning delightfully.' Commentators on X aligned to Ukraine's security services indicated that over a 100 quadcopter FPV drones with bombs were smuggled into Russia for the operations. These were then meticulously housed in specially-built wooden cabins, loaded on top of lorries and then released after the roofs of the cabins were retracted remotely.
FPV or first-person view drones are smaller in size and have cameras built in on the front, which sends live video to the operator. This enables precise flying and manoeuvrability by the operator from a remote location, almost like an aircraft. The Economist reported that these drones used Russian mobile-telephone networks to relay their footage back to Ukraine, much of which then shared on social media.
It is entirely possible that the drivers of the trucks did not know what they were carrying. In that respect, analysts said this operation was similar to the 2022 attack on Kerch bridge, where a bomb concealed in a lorry destroyed part of the bridge linking Crimea with the Russian mainland.
The planning was elaborate. A source quoted by The Economist said that the Russians were first encouraged to move more of their planes to particular bases by Ukrainian strikes on other ones. Three days before this drone attack, dozens of planes were moved to the Olenya airfield in Murmansk province, according to reports published at the time. It was precisely here that the most damage was done after the June 1 attack.
The fact that Ukraine was able to destroy such a large number of Russia's aircraft deep inside Russia territory demonstrates the effectiveness of such deep-strike programmes and taking the possibilities of drone warfare to another level.
According to Thomas Shugart, an Adjunct Senior Fellow with the Defense Programme at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and someone who served for over 25 years in the US Navy, where he last worked in the Defense Department's Office of Net Assessment: 'Imagine, on game-day, containers at railyards, on Chinese-owned container ships in port or offshore, on trucks parked at random properties…spewing forth thousands of drones that sally forth and at least mission-kill the crown jewels of the [US Air Force]… would be 'entirely feasible'.
The America-specific warning issued by Shugart, who has previously written about the threat to airfields from drones and recommended specifically that key aircraft such as bombers should also have hardened shelters for just this sort of attack, could now resonate across geographies, including India.
Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Calls Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb 'Badass', But Has This Worry About Putin
Trump Calls Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb 'Badass', But Has This Worry About Putin

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump Calls Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb 'Badass', But Has This Worry About Putin

/ Jun 05, 2025, 09:11PM IST U.S. President Donald Trump has lauded Ukraine for its Operation Spiderweb, the military operation that destroyed more than 40 Russian strategic bombers across several airfields deep in Russia's territory. According to an Axios report, a source claimed that the U.S. President called the strikes as "strong" and "badass". However, Trump is concerned that the attack could prove to be a setback to his diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire.

After Trump-Putin call, Kremlin backs claim White House brokered India-Pakistan ‘ceasefire'
After Trump-Putin call, Kremlin backs claim White House brokered India-Pakistan ‘ceasefire'

The Print

time33 minutes ago

  • The Print

After Trump-Putin call, Kremlin backs claim White House brokered India-Pakistan ‘ceasefire'

'The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump,' the statement read. In a statement issued Wednesday, following a 70-minute phone call between Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin credited the US president with personally helping to de-escalate the four-day confrontation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. New Delhi: The Kremlin has publicly acknowledged US President Donald Trump's assertion that he played a key role in halting military escalation along the Line of Control (LoC) post-Operation Sindoor. The statement appeared to endorse a narrative that Trump has promoted in the past month repeatedly—his diplomatic efforts were instrumental in halting the armed military conflict between India and Pakistan. During a press conference earlier this week, Donald Trump, alongside Elon Musk, declared, 'We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned into a nuclear disaster.' The US President added that trade considerations played a role in persuading both countries to step back from the brink. The Kremlin's claim echoed remarks Donald Trump has also made during the recent US visit of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, where the American President again described his involvement as decisive in preventing a broader conflict between the two South Asian countries. The US government, in a court statement earlier, defended its right to presidential tariff powers by citing the use of trade incentives to end armed hostilities between India and Pakistan post-Operation Sindoor. The Donald Trump administration told a federal court on 23 May in New York that the President leveraged US trade access as a bargaining tool to help 'avert a full-scale war between India and Pakistan'. India, however, has flatly denied that the Trump administration played any formal role in ending the hostilities. New Delhi has maintained that Islamabad initiated the de-escalation talks on 10 May and that no third-party mediation was sought or required. In Washington, as part of a diplomatic delegation, Shashi Tharoor dismissed Trump's characterisation. 'We have enormous respect for the American presidency, but we have never particularly wanted to ask anyone to mediate,' Tharoor said. Indian officials have publicly released the details of high-level contacts with US counterparts during Operation Sindoor, emphasising the absence of any trade discussion. The disclosures show that US Vice President J.D. Vance spoke to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 9 May, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke to the Indian External Affairs Minister and the National Security Adviser on multiple occasions between 8 and 10 May. On the other hand, Islamabad has repeatedly acknowledged the mediation role of Donald Trump. Speaking at an event held in the US Embassy in the capital on Tuesday, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif commended the US President for helping de-escalate tensions with India and called on the US to play a more active role in facilitating a comprehensive dialogue between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. Russia-Ukraine conflict The Kremlin statement provided further details on the Trump-Putin conversation, which began with a discussion on the ongoing war in Ukraine. President Putin, talking about the outcome of the second round of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, accused the Ukrainian forces of targeting civilians while framing such actions as state-sponsored terrorism under international law. He emphasised the restraint Russia showed and noted that the talks produced memoranda, which would come under review in Moscow and Kyiv. Other topics of discussion mentioned in the statement were the stalled negotiations over the Iranian nuclear programme, with Trump reportedly asking for Russian assistance in reviving dialogue with Tehran. The two leaders also explored possibilities for restoring broader US-Russia cooperation, a goal both described as holding 'enormous potential'. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: IS Khorasan Province declares 'war' against Baloch groups, activists. What it means for Af-Pak

Putin wants puppet govt in Moldova to deploy troops in breakaway region Transnistria, warns PM
Putin wants puppet govt in Moldova to deploy troops in breakaway region Transnistria, warns PM

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Putin wants puppet govt in Moldova to deploy troops in breakaway region Transnistria, warns PM

Moldova's Prime Minister Dorin Recean has warned that Vladimir Putin wants to install a puppet government in the country so it can strengthen Russia's hold on the breakaway region of Transnistria. read more Vladimir Putin wants to install a puppet government in Moldova so it can strengthen Russia's hold on the breakaway region of Transnistria, the country's premier has warned. Moldova is sandwiched between Ukraine to the north, east, and south, and Romania to the west. Its border region of Transnistria has been controlled by a pro-Russia regime since 1990. With the Russian backing, the separatists fought and won a brief war with Moldova in 1992. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ahead of elections in the country in September, Moldovan Prime Minister Dorin Recean has told Financial Times that Putin is interfering in the country's politics so that he could replace the pro-European Union (EU) government with a pro-Russia, puppet government. If such a puppet government is elected, Putin would deploy 10,000 soldiers in Transnistria, said Recean. 'This is a huge effort to undermine Moldovan democracy' Recean has said that Putin's plot is a bid to undermine Moldova's democracy. 'This is a huge effort to undermine Moldovan democracy. They want to consolidate their military presence in the Transnistrian region,' said Reacan. Since 1992, when Russia intervened in favour of the separatist regime, its soldiers have been stationed in Transnistria. The number, however, is relatively small and it is not easy to deploy more soldiers as the region is landlocked and has no direct road link to Russia. Recean further said, 'You can imagine with 10,000 troops, what the leverage and pressure would be on the south-western part of Ukraine, but also close to Romania, which is a Nato member state.' Russia has long had eyes on Moldova This is not the first time that Russian interference has been reported in Moldova, formerly a part of the Soviet Union. In last year's referendum about the European Union (EU) membership, unprecedented Russian interference was reported in the form of propaganda dissemination, buying people's votes, and subversive activities like cyberattacks. A narrow majority of people voted to make way for Moldova's EU membership. The process to join the EU began last year and is expected to be completed by 2028-29. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For years, analysts have warned that Moldova could be the next target of Russian aggression after Ukraine as it is a former Soviet republic in Russia's extended neighbourhood and is neither a member of Nato nor the EU. This means the country has no external security blanket like some other countries in Russia's neighbourhood or extended neighbourhood, such as Finland and Romania. Moreover, unlike Ukraine, Moldova has a very small and poorly armed and trained military that is unlikely to withstand any invasion. The country is therefore considered a soft target for Russia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store