SC closes proceedings before MP HC against Vijay Shah for his remarks on Col Sofiya Qureshi
The Supreme Court halted proceedings against Madhya Pradesh minister Vijay Shah in the High Court regarding his remarks against Col Sofiya Qureshi. The court is now overseeing the matter and has requested a status report from the SIT formed to investigate the case. Interim directions, including the stay of Shah's arrest, have been extended, with further hearings scheduled for July.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered closure of proceedings before the Madhya Pradesh High Court against state minister Vijay Shah for his remarks against Indian Army officer Col Sofiya Qureshi , saying it is now looking into the matter. A partial working day bench of Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta asked for a status report from the special investigation team (SIT) that was constituted by the Madhya Pradesh government in compliance with the top court's earlier order.The SC noted that the SIT has seized some devices and started its investigation.The bench was informed by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that parallel proceedings were going on before the high court against the minister.The top court said that since it is now seized of the matter, the proceedings before the high court stand closed. The interim directions passed on May 19, including the stay of arrest of Shah, stand extended, it said.It posted the matter for further hearing in the second week of July.The bench refused to allow any intervention in the matter, saying it does not want to politicise the issue.On May 19, the top court chided Shah and constituted a three-member SIT to probe the FIR lodged against him.Shah came under fire after a video, which was circulated widely, showed him allegedly making objectionable remarks against Col Qureshi, who gained nationwide prominence along with another woman officer, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, during the media briefings on Operation Sindoor.The Madhya Pradesh High Court rebuked Shah for passing "scurrilous" remarks and using "language of the gutters" against Col Qureshi, and ordered police to file an FIR against him on the charge of promoting enmity and hatred.After drawing severe condemnation, Shah expressed regret and said that he respects Col Qureshi more than his sister.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Central Empowered Committee to inspect Mohali villages over forest, wildlife violations
Acting on a complaint regarding violation of forest and wildlife laws in villages, such as Karoran, Nada, Masol, and adjoining areas in Mohali district, the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), constituted by the Supreme Court, is scheduled to visit the region on Monday at 9 am. The CEC will assess the extent of damage caused to forest land, wildlife and the local environment. It will also evaluate the timely action taken by government departments, and based on its findings, will recommend appropriate measures. The said villages under scrutiny fall within areas governed by the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), 1900. These areas are also protected under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and the Supreme Court's orders. Even during the process of delisting certain areas from protected status, the court had explicitly banned any commercial activity without prior approval from the Government of India. Despite these restrictions, large-scale violations—particularly illegal hill-cutting—have allegedly continued unabated for several years. These activities have led to the degradation of ecologically sensitive and biodiversity-rich areas in the Shivalik Hills. Environmentalists and local residents have accused the forest department, district administration and urban agencies like Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA), along with panchayati raj institutions, of failing to prevent these encroachments, raising concerns over the alleged influence of the land mafia in the region. The Shivalik forests are known for their ecological significance, and are home to many endangered plant and animal species, several of which are listed as threatened under the (International Union for Conservation of Nature) IUCN Red List. The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) was constituted by the Supreme Court of India in 2002 (and reconstituted in 2008) to assist in matters related to forest, wildlife conservation and flag cases of official non-compliance with its orders related to conservation. It reports to the Union environment ministry. The committee came into existence after a landmark Supreme Court judgment, dated December 12, 1996, in a 1995 case. The apex court ruled that the term 'forest' should be interpreted in its dictionary sense, regardless of land ownership. This means any land that is forest in character on the ground must be treated as such and cannot be used for non-forest activities without prior approval from the Government of India, in accordance with the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and other applicable laws.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bargari sacrilege: Justice denied, says AAP MLA Kunwar Vijay
AAP MLA from Amritsar North and former IPS officer Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh on Sunday raked up the 2015 Bargari sacrilege and also raised questions over the integrity of his own party's government on delivering justice. In a Facebook post, he shared a poster marking the sacrilege incident that took place at Burj Jawahar Singh Wala in Faridkot on June 1 and titled it 'Justice Denied'. 'Today marks 10 years since the beadbi (sacrilege) incident. Till now, it has not been decided which court will hear the case — whether the district court of Faridkot or that of Chandigarh. The investigation by the relevant SIT also remains incomplete,' he mentioned. He said, 'Similarly, the sacrilege incident in Bargari in September and October 2015 shook all of Punjab. The situation in that case is no different. The Kotkapura and Behbal Kalan police firing cases, which occurred on October 14, were also shelved.' 'Whenever I had the opportunity, I made every effort to raise this issue in the Punjab assembly. On October 9, 2021, after the high court's order regarding the Kotkapura firing, I resigned from my IPS position,' he said. According to Kunwar Vijay, 'Three months later, after Kejriwal assured me of justice, I joined the Aam Aadmi Party. If AAP's 92 MLAs were elected, the issue of sacrilege had big contribution to it. But today, I feel both ashamed and disheartened. In fact, I have faced constant oppression from the government machinery politically and if I am still alive today, it is only by God's grace.' 'There is, however, some solace for me and for the people of Punjab that the main accused admitted his guilt before the Akal Takht on December 2, 2024', he said. A former IPS officer who headed the SIT probing post-sacrilege police firing incidents that killed two Sikh protesters in 2015, Kunwar Vijay is known for his dissenting voice and raised questions over the AAP government publicly in past. He never misses an opportunity to take potshots at his party's government in Punjab, particularly targeting chief minister Bhagwant Mann. Recently, Singh questioned the arrest of Jalandhar Central MLA Raman Arora in a graft case, alleging the legislator was often seen hosting members of Mann's family. Prior to this, he had also criticised the state government over the deaths of 27 people due to the consumption of spurious liquor in the Majitha sub-division of Amritsar.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Mexicans elect judges in historic polls engulfed by the shadow of crime, corruption
The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system read more A man votes at a polling station during the world-first Mexican elections for all judges and magistrates in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua state, Mexico on June 1, 2025. AFP Mexicans chose their judges Sunday in unprecedented elections that sharply divided opinion in a country plagued by rampant crime, corruption and impunity. The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system. Arturo Giesemann, a 57-year-old retiree, said his main motivation for voting was 'the disgust I have with the current judiciary because of its corruption.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates. 'We are not very prepared,' said Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher. 'I think we need more information.' In the western state of Jalisco, 63-year-old housewife Maria Estrada said she used her 'intuition' as she did not know the candidates. Experts were concerned that the elections would politicize the justice system and make it easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery. While corruption already exists, 'there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organized crime than other methods of judicial selection,' Margaret Satterthwaite, the United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, told AFP. Hundreds of opponents of the reforms marched through Mexico City waving flags and banners with slogans including: 'Hands off our democracy' and 'No to electoral fraud.' The elections send the judiciary 'to its grave,' said Ismael Novela, a 58-year-old company worker. 'It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch.' 'Regime of corruption' President Claudia Sheinbaum hit back at her critics on the eve of the vote. 'Those who want the regime of corruption and privileges in the judiciary to continue say this election is rigged. Or they also say it's so a political party can take over the Supreme Court,' she said in a video message. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Nothing could be further from the truth,' she insisted. The run-up to the vote was not accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico. But 'it is logical that organized criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them,' said consultant Luis Carlos Ugalde, a former head of Mexico's electoral commission. Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers 'high risk,' including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman. Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the United States for drug crimes. 'Good reputation' Voters were tasked with choosing around 880 federal judges – including Supreme Court justices – as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027. Candidates are supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed 'a good reputation,' as well as no criminal record. To do a good job, voters 'would have to spend hours and hours researching the track record and the profiles of each of the hundreds of candidates,' said David Shirk, a professor at the University of San Diego. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He believes that most of the corruption in Mexico's judicial system is in law enforcement agencies and public prosecutor offices. 'If you can avoid being prosecuted, you don't have to worry about the judge,' said Shirk, who heads the Justice in Mexico research project. The judicial reforms were championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who frequently clashed with the courts before stepping down last year. The main reason for the elections seems to be 'because Lopez Obrador had a grudge against the judges,' Shirk said.
