logo
Thaksin's role in tariff talks raises questions

Thaksin's role in tariff talks raises questions

Bangkok Post14-07-2025
'I have to do something for the country. Regarding the economic situation today, if I do not poke my nose in, then who will?" so said former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra on Thursday during a forum held at the National Office.
Then, the following day, Thaksin was seen entering the Ban Phitsanuloke guest house to attend a meeting of "Team Thailand" for talks about Thailand's latest tariff proposal to the United States after the first round of tariff talks in Washington DC, which was a complete failure as the US did not cut the 36% reciprocal tariff rate originally imposed on Thai products imported to US market.
Even Cambodia had the rare chance of taunting Thailand, claiming it managed to outsmart Thailand by convincing the US to cut the tariff rate for Cambodian products from 49% to 36%, which is on par with the rate imposed on Thailand by the US.
Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira, who headed Team Thailand in the first round of the tariff talks, admitted he invited Thaksin to the meeting at Ban Phitsanuloke because the former prime minister was well-versed in the issue at stake and he might provide some valuable advice to the team. He is now under fire for a supposed ethics breach in extending the invitation.
Several other Pheu Thai heavyweights have hailed Thaksin for his economic acumen and expertise, although the former prime minister was not a trained economist, but has a degree in criminology.
They all believe Thaksin is the only person who can save Thailand from the punishing 36% tariff rate, which will wipe out Thailand's trade competitiveness in the US market compared to the other Asean nations.
Except for Laos and Myanmar, which are not major exporters to the US and are facing a 40% tariff rate each, other Asean countries are facing lower rates than Thailand: 20% for Vietnam, although it is not formalised yet; 25% for Malaysia, 20% for the Philippines, 10% for Singapore, and 32% for Indonesia.
Some critics have asked in what capacity was he at the meeting? Thaksin is not a member of the Pheu Thai Party because of his conviction on corruption charges.
For a man of strong character like Thaksin, one could guess that he would have sat at the head of the table, dictating the Team Thailand meeting similar to the way he has been pulling the strings behind the party and the cabinet.
It is such an open secret that even Thaksin himself does not bother to keep it under the rug, despite the party being at risk of dissolution for allowing an outsider to wield influence or control over the party.
Another failure by Team Thailand will be disastrous for the economy.
The Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking has estimated that revenue loss for Thai exports to the US market would be about 900 billion baht per annum if Thailand was hit with a 36% tariff.
Thai imports will be replaced by imports from Vietnam or Mexico. That means many small- and medium-sized enterprises may be closed and big manufacturers may cut production, resulting in mass layoffs.
Foreign direct investments will shrink drastically because Thailand will not be attractive any more, and manufacturers may consider relocating elsewhere, such as Vietnam.
Finding new markets for Thai products is easier said than done and near impossible.
India is touted as a potential market because of its huge population, but its purchasing power cannot be compared with that of American consumers.
If Thaksin is so smart and well-versed in trade and tariff issues, why didn't he volunteer to offer his valuable advice to Team Thailand from the beginning?
Thaksin's faithful supporters have bragged about his close connections with those around President Donald Trump, but why didn't he make use of his connections in the first place?
Will his involvement in the preparation of the revised tariff proposal work its magic this time?
Since Thaksin has decided to poke his nose in this crucial matter at his own initiative, should he be held accountable if the team fails this time?
But to be honest, most Thais, even those who despise Thaksin for his alleged abuses, special privileges and wrongdoing, do not want Team Thailand to fail because the high cost of failure is too much to bear.
Be realistic -- we do not expect a fair deal from the Trump administration, which has made clear that Thailand has enjoyed a substantial trade surplus with the US for a long time.
Regardless, we expect the US to treat us as a trusted ally, and the tariff rate should be adjusted to the point where Thai products can remain competitive in the US market.
That should be fine enough.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai cyber war room on alert for border-related attacks
Thai cyber war room on alert for border-related attacks

Bangkok Post

time43 minutes ago

  • Bangkok Post

Thai cyber war room on alert for border-related attacks

Thai authorities have established a 24-hour war room to monitor and respond to potential cyberattacks and other online misbehaviour arising from the conflict along the Thai-Cambodian border. The Ministry of Digital Economy and Society has found evidence of attempts by hackers to launch cyberattacks on Thailand through distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks targeting government websites, minister Prasert Jantararuangtong said on Saturday. The ministry is working with the Royal Thai Armed Forces and the National Cyber Security Agency (NCSA) to prevent any attempts to hack government websites. So far, no damage has been reported, said Mr Prasert, also a deputy prime minister. 'A 24-hour war room has been set up to closely monitor cybercrime attacks, both on the physical and cyber fronts. So far, the attacks have been contained, and the situation remains under control,' said Mr Prasert. He also warned of a growing campaign of disinformation, allegedly originating from Cambodian sources. However, AI-created deepfakes, hate speech and other forms of bad online behaviour are not limited to one country. 'We are maintaining round-the-clock surveillance of cyber warfare activities, both in real-time and in the digital domain,' said the minister. 'There have also been efforts to spread disinformation, such as false claims about a Thai F-16 being shot down or Cambodian forces reclaiming ancient temples from Thailand. These reports are untrue,' he said. The DE Ministry is actively countering false narratives by issuing clarifications and blocking the spread of disinformation across digital platforms. 'We are committed to ensuring the Thai public has access to accurate information,' said the minister.

Analysis reveals Cambodia as primary escalator in Thai border conflict
Analysis reveals Cambodia as primary escalator in Thai border conflict

Bangkok Post

time2 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

Analysis reveals Cambodia as primary escalator in Thai border conflict

An analysis has revealed Cambodia initiated the majority of escalatory actions leading to deadly border clashes with Thailand, according to detailed evidence compiled by Australian defence expert Nathan Ruser. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute analyst examined data from February to July, identifying 33 Cambodian escalatory events versus 14 Thai actions. His timeline, based on observable military developments, shows Cambodia systematically fortified border positions months before clashes that killed 12 people on Thursday. Mr Ruser clarified that the identification of military equipment and units moving towards the Cambodian border came from official situation reports, not from satellite imagery. Early fortification evidence Satellite imagery detected the first Cambodian tactical improvements between Feb 23 and 28, when troops cleared and upgraded a frontline road at Sam Yaek Lao junction in Chong Bok. This marked the beginning of sustained military preparations visible from space. By mid-March, imagery showed Cambodian forces constructing access roads to the strategic Phnom Prasitthi hilltop, directly opposite Thai positions. Between March 18 and 23, satellite data revealed heavy fortification of this strategic base. Further fortified positions appeared on satellite imagery throughout March, including a substantial outpost at Hill-641 within 300 metres of the border by March 25. Aerial photography later confirmed the extensive nature of these fortifications. Escalating military deployment Following a May 28 firefight that killed a Cambodian warrant officer, satellite tracking detected massive troop movements. Within 24 hours, imagery showed Cambodia deploying about 800 to 1,000 troops, including elite forces, rocket artillery and armoured units, to border areas. By May 30, satellite data confirmed deployment of approximately 12 SH-1 155mm self-propelled artillery vehicles from Preah Vihear command to frontline positions – nine to Ta Muen Thom sector, three to Chong Bok. Satellite imagery from June 5 revealed around 30 T-55 tanks positioned near Preah Vihear temple, stationed at the intersection between the temple and Phnom Prasitthi outpost. Landmine deployment detected Satellite analysis identified systematic explosive device placement beginning July 1. Imagery showed Cambodian Engineering Battalion 392 planting over 120 PMN-2 landmines on Hill 570's eastern slopes, expanding to over 300 mines by July 3. Additional satellite data detected another 100 landmines planted in the Emerald Triangle area by July 10. These weapons later caused casualties among Thai forces, with two separate incidents resulting in soldier amputations. Weapons positioning evidence June satellite imagery confirmed deployment of short-range air defence vehicles to Chong Bok sector on July 4. Earlier imagery from June 14 supported Thai military claims that Cambodia had positioned long-range artillery targeting the Thai town of Kantharalak. The final escalation occurred on Thursday when widespread artillery attacks in the Ta Muen Thom temple area killed 11 Thai civilians and one soldier, with Ruser's heatmap showing concentrated Cambodian military activity throughout the day. Timeline verification Ruser's satellite-based analysis covers the complete escalation period, beginning with the Feb 13 temple incident through the July 24 clashes. The imagery evidence supports his assessment that Cambodia conducted systematic military preparations whilst diplomatic efforts proceeded. Key satellite-verified developments include road construction, hilltop fortifications, artillery positioning, tank deployments, and explosive device placement – all observable through overhead imagery analysis. The satellite expert, whose work on conflict zones including Ukraine and Myanmar has gained international media recognition, concluded that observable military evidence clearly shows Cambodia as the primary escalator in the border dispute.

Thai army confirms shells on Lao side did not come from Thailand
Thai army confirms shells on Lao side did not come from Thailand

Bangkok Post

time3 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

Thai army confirms shells on Lao side did not come from Thailand

Artillery shells found on the Lao side, which damaged property, were not fired from Thailand, Royal Thai Army spokesperson Maj Gen Winthai Suvaree said on Saturday. Thailand's Second Army Region posted an evidence document from Laos on its Facebook page. The Lao translation stated that 10 shells from the border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia landed in Lao territory on Friday, damaging premises at Laem Pa Paek and Laem Makham Pom. It remained unclear which side fired them. The Thai army expressed deep regret over the damage but confirmed the shells did not originate from Thai forces. "Thailand has used weapons with utmost care to prevent effects outside military targets," it stated. Maj Gen Winthai reaffirmed that Thailand controls its weaponry strictly in accordance with international protocols. He also accused Cambodia of employing long-range support weapons against civilian targets since Thursday, suggesting this was a deliberate act to mislead international observers regarding Thailand's role. The spokesman said the incident in Laos, considering its distance and direction, was likely orchestrated by Cambodia to sow confusion among Lao officials. He condemned the action, calling for Cambodia to cease and warning it could harm their international reputation. The Royal Thai Army will continue to coordinate closely with Lao authorities to uphold Thai-Lao relations, Maj Gen Winthai added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store