Welcome back to Country: PM's big statement as parliament opens
As Parliament prepares to sit for the first time since the election, Mr Albanese has delivered to rebuke to ex-Liberal leader Peter Dutton,
Mr Dutton spent the dying days of the campaign whinging about the ceremony and claiming it was 'overdone.'
After securing a huge majority, the Prime Minister has made it clear he strongly supports the cultural practice.
'The welcome to country is such a powerful way to begin a new parliament,'' Mr Albanese said.
'Like a lot of the more positive things about our nation, we shouldn't take it for granted. This ceremony didn't take place until 2007 and was controversial in 2007.
'It is not controversial today. Nor should it be.'
Mr Albanese said it was a 'respectful' way of beginning the 48th Parliament.
'What a welcome to country does is holds out like a hand warmly and graciously extended. An opportunity for us to embrace and to show a profound love of home and country,'' he said.
'It is a reminder as well of why we all belong here together, that we are stronger together and we belong.
'We keep walking, together. With every step, we feel the echoes through history, the footsteps nearly a century distant from us now of every First Nations person who trekked to the opening of the first
Parliament House down the hill.
'The footsteps of the members of the stolen generations who came to this place 17 years ago now to hear the words that they needed to hear 'I'm sorry'.
Former Liberal leader Peter Dutton famously boycotted the National Apology to the Stolen Generations in 2008. He later apologised years later.
'Uttered by an Australian Prime Minister on behalf of the Australian nation. That was a day of catharsis, built on courage and grace,'' Mr Albanese said of Kevin Rudd's apology.
'Ultimately, it was a day of togetherness and a reminder of our great potential and promise as a nation.'
Liberal frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Peter Dutton have previously backed scaling back the use of Welcome to Country ceremonies, with Senator Price warning people are 'sick if it'.
Speaking at a Voice to parliament No campaign event in 2023, former Prime Minister Tony Abbott also said he is 'getting a little bit sick of Welcomes to Country because it belongs to all of us, not just to some of us'.
'And I'm getting a little bit tired of seeing the flag of some of us flown equally with the flag of all of us,'' he said.
'And I just think that the longer this goes on, the more divisive and the more difficult and the more dangerous that it's getting now.'
Senator Price has described the tradition as 'divisive'.
'There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,' she said.
'It's not welcoming, it's telling non-Indigenous Australians 'this isn't your country' and that's wrong. We are all Australians and we share this great land.'
She said 'around the country' there were some people whose 'only role, their only source of income, is delivering Welcome to Country'.
'Everyone's getting sick of Welcome to Country,'' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
10 minutes ago
- ABC News
Legal Practice Board of WA faces parliamentary inquiry amid 'detailed list' of complaints
The tables will be turned on WA's legal watchdog as it faces a parliamentary inquiry into longstanding concerns about its operations. The Legal Practice Board of WA (LPBWA) is the independent regulator for the state's legal profession, deciding who is admitted to practice law, issuing annual practising certificates and resolving complaints about lawyers' conduct. But the LPBWA itself has been the subject of complaints for years, according to the profession's peak body. "Concerns about the board's governance and processes have been building for some time," Law Society CEO Kate Wellington told the ABC. "We appreciate the nature of the board's regulatory role. The board's purpose is public protection. "The legal profession, too, serves a public purpose and it is important that its ability to fulfil that purpose is not hindered by barriers to effective practice." Late last month, the Law Society said it presented a report to the board "based on feedback shared with us in a profession-wide survey, which pointed to delays, service challenges and problematic regulatory processes". The chair of state parliament's Public Administration Committee, which will probe the LPBWA, said the survey contributed to the committee's decision to open its inquiry. "People were talking about the timeliness of responses, the manner of interactions, a lot of technical issues around applications," Labor MP Kate Doust said. "It's quite a detailed list. "We were quite surprised at the nature of the responses in the survey and certainly the number of responses to the survey." Ms Doust said given the role the Legal Practice Board played in WA's legal system, the committee felt it necessary to investigate those complaints. "You want to make sure that people have got appropriate access and timely responses to the matters they have to deal with, their engagement with the board," she said. "There just seemed to be a fairly high rate of dissatisfaction with their engagement." The board's annual report for 2023-24 showed it failed to meet many of its time-based key performance indicators — for example, while it aimed to resolve 80 per cent of "consumer matters" within 90 days, it did so in just 42 per cent of cases. It also aimed to resolve 80 per cent of the "highest complexity significant investigations" within a year, but only met that timeframe 40 per cent of the time. The only time-based targets that were on track related to internal reviews of decisions. The committee is now calling for submissions to inform its wide-ranging investigation into "the operation and effectiveness" of the board. "This inquiry will give those impacted an opportunity to voice their concerns without fear," Ms Wellington said. In a statement, the board's executive director welcomed the opportunity to engage with the committee. "These are matters we take seriously. "Over the past 12 months the board has commenced a number of internal reforms aimed at improving service delivery, streamlining regulatory approvals and enhancing stakeholder engagement. "The board remains committed to maintaining the trust of the public, the legal profession and government." In May the LPBWA was hacked, resulting in "limited corporate correspondence" being taken, which it said included "minimal contact information" and "bank account details for the board and a very small number of third parties who have been directly notified". It forced the organisation to take some of its systems online and process lawyers' practising certificates manually.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Andrew Bolt lashes PM for ‘comforting terrorists' with Palestine recognition
Sky News host Andrew Bolt questions Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's policy on Palestine, likening it to recognition of Taiwan. 'Prime Minister, why are you recognising a Palestinian state but not recognising Taiwan?' Mr Bolt said. 'You know what's really going on. Australia, like so many countries, is terrified of offending the Chinese dictatorship by calling Taiwan a country. It might stop buying our stuff. 'Seriously, Prime Minister, isn't it time to stand for the truth, to stand for democratic allies and stop giving comfort to tyrants and terrorists?'

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
'Urgent' bans on abusive childcare workers to take up to 12 months, says attorney-general
Loopholes allowing child abusers to "shop around" childcare centres may not be closed for another year, the attorney-general has conceded, ahead of a meeting of ministers on Friday. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said child abusers were "clearly shopping around" to exploit gaps in Australia's patchwork police check system for the sector. She said creating a system to make sure workers "banned in one" state were "banned in all" would be the immediate and urgent concern of Friday's meeting of ministers. But she conceded it may not be in place for another 12 months. "It's a long time when you consider the fact of the fragmentation we have here, the complex IT systems that need to be done, but also different states have different laws and regulations here," Ms Rowland told the ABC. The nation's attorneys-general will meet on Friday, a month after revelations of another case of alleged widespread child abuse by a Melbourne childcare worker. Joshua Dale Brown faces more than 70 offences linked to a childcare centre in Point Cook, in Melbourne's south-west. Ms Rowland said Australians would be startled to learn that Australia's police check systems, which operate at a state level, do not have measures to ensure that if a childcare worker is banned in one state the ban automatically extends to every state. She said establishing information sharing to fix that would be today's "urgent" priority". "I would like to think this is something that is certainly capable of being done within certainly the next 12 months," Ms Rowland said. "If we can have a better sense of that following today's meeting, that would be a good thing. A National Working With Children Check system was one of the key recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse, made a decade ago. Ms Rowland acknowledged that change had not happened "quickly enough" due to a patchwork federal system where responsibilities sat with different ministers, IT systems were not compatible, funding sources differed and states each had different information standards. But she said Labor had begun work on changes last term in the wake of charges against Australia's worst paedophile, Ashley Paul Griffith, in 2022. Ms Rowland said a dedicated unit had been established within her department to ensure outcomes were met. Attorneys-general will also consider near-term changes to establish continuous monitoring and sharing capabilities at Friday's meeting, as well as longer term measures to lift the bar for workers to be excluded.