Revealed: The car type that lies most about fuel consumption
The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) has released results from its Real-World Testing Program, a $14 million government-funded scheme that examines models for their fuel consumption and emissions standards.
New vehicle testing by the nation's peak motoring body has shown consumers cannot rely on the fuel consumption and emissions information provided at the point of sale.
Many cars use more fuel than manufacturers claim.
MORE: The hybrid delivering more for less
Of the latest 30 cars tested, 25 consumed more fuel than advertised. Among these vehicles, 11 cars were found to consume 10 per cent or more fuel than advertised.
Interestingly, hybrids exhibited the most significant discrepancy in fuel efficiency, consuming more than laboratory results.
The Hyundai Kona Hybrid showed the highest discrepancy, consuming 33 per cent more fuel on the road than its advertised laboratory figure.
Hyundai Kona Hybrid.
Following closely was the Kia Stonic, which recorded a fuel consumption that was 26 per cent higher than advertised, and the Hyundai i30 Hybrid, which showed a result that was 17 per cent more fuel-efficient than its lab results, indicating a discrepancy between real-world consumption and lab results.
AAA Managing Director Michael Bradley says the latest findings have revealed a concerning trend that indicates a widespread issue in the industry.
'It's becoming clear that carmakers continue to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing, meaning new cars are too often overstating their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance,' Michael said.
'Some vehicles perform as advertised, but most do not, and our Program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings.'
New data has revealed some cars in Australia consume more fuel than advertised. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Daniel Pockett
MORE: Japanese fav returns to Aus as a hybrid
The Australian Automobile Association says it has now tested 114 cars, vans, and utes since August 2023 and has found that more than 77 per cent use more fuel than advertised.
In addition to fuel consumption, the latest Real-World Testing results also discovered that six out of the 30 vehicles tested emitted more noxious emissions than allowed under the Australian standard.
Out of the 30 cars tested, 25 consumed more fuel than advertised. Picture: Nigel Hallett
MORE: The ugly truth about this new ute
These vehicles included the Ford Ranger, the Toyota Hi-Ace and the Toyota Fortuner.
The AAA Program plans to release its first electric vehicle results next month, which will test the distance vehicles can travel on a single charge in real-world driving conditions.
'Range anxiety continues to be a significant barrier to EV uptake, and we hope these independent results will give Australian car-buyers far greater confidence about the real-world range of new EVs on the market,' Mr Bradley said.
James Chung
Digital Content Creator
James is a Digital Content Creator at news.com.au and is part of the News Corp Australia's digital real estate team. His previous experience includes working for Sky News Australia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
28 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Australian Uyghurs launch legal action against Kmart over alleged forced labour links
While many people may think of slavery as a thing of the past, more people are living in slavery today than ever before. While large companies in Australia are required to report on how they're addressing modern slavery risks in supply chains, there are no real penalties for inaction. Now, an organisation of Uyghur women are taking matters into their own hands by launching legal action against major retailer Kmart. The group says they have a reasonable belief that Kmart is sourcing some products from supply chains linked to forced Uyghur forced labour camps. Jen Kanis, Principal Lawyer at Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, is representing the Uyghur group. "We filed a legal action in the federal court to determine if Kmart has engaged in misleading conduct about the use of forced labou r in their supply chain. And the reason why we've done that is because our client is concerned that Kmart is engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to what they say about their ethical sourcing claims." In a statement, Kmart say they have in place an Ethical Sourcing Program, which helps to identify and mitigate modern slavery risks, including the risk of forced labour. But with allegations of credible links made between their listed suppliers and factories linked to forced Uyghur labour, the legal action is calling on Kmart to share documents clarifying the matter. Ramila Chanisheff is the President of the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association, the group filing the legal action. She says that Kmart and other major retailers need to be transparent. "The ultimate aim is to know that Kmart doesn't engage with supply chains that have Uyghur forced labour or any slave labour. And that also goes obviously for other industries as well. Now Australia, it's illegal to have modern day slavery in Australia, and yet we find that the government legislations and laws in place are not strict enough. Are not strong enough to hold industries to account, and this is where it falls short, I think. We can prove or we can say, and we can provide credible evidence that could be or to force labour and supply chains, but if the government doesn't take it to the next level, it seems that industries are getting away with it." The Uyghur people are a majority Muslim, Turkic-speaking, ethnic minority living in an area of north-west China known officially as the Uyghur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang, or East Turkestan to its Uyghur population. Since 2017, it's estimated that Chinese authorities have arrested over one million Uyghur people from the region. The Chinese Government then detains them in what officials call re-education camps... but which some experts on the matter describe as more akin to concentration camps. The involuntary transfers and forced labour of Uyghur people are well documented, enforced by Chinese officials under the guise of vocational training and poverty alleviation. Ms Chanisheff says every person in the Uyghur community has either immediate or extended family taken to camps. "All of us have been affected in some way, whether it is like our close relatives or secondary relatives or family or friends. All of us have been affected in some way when these people, those who have been taken into the concentration camps, there wouldn't be any communication with them, whatsoever. But the communication that does happen are those who are obviously left outside and we do have people in the community and are able to contact them through WeChat, which is a Chinese government communication tool, which is heavily monitored." Most people in the camps are arrested without charge. Some of the reasons given for their detention include attending services at the Mosque, sending texts containing Quranic verses, and wearing religious attire. In addition to mass arrests and surveillance, it's reported that Uyghur people are frequently subjected to forced sterilisation, sexual violence, separation of families, and torture. While data on the matter is scarce due to a lack of transparency from the Chinese Government, it's believed that tens of thousands of Uyghurs have been shipped throughout mainland China to work, without pay, in factories. The Chinese Government denies these claims. Freya Dinshaw is the associate legal director at the Human Rights Law Centre, which is also representing the Uyghur group. She says Australia has a serious problem with forced labour entering the market. "We're obviously all connected by the clothes we wear and the things we buy. And it's estimated that $27 billion worth of goods that are at high risk of being made with forced labour are imported into Australia every year. So this problem is only increasing." In Australia, the Modern Slavery Act only requires companies to report on actions to address risks of forced labour in supply chains. Unlike the U-S, which says China's treatment of the Uyghur people amounts to genocide, Australia does not ban the import of products made in Xinjiang province, instead relying on a policy of transparency. Freya Dinshaw saysthe Modern Slavery Act is not strong enough and must demand stronger corporate accountability. "The Australian Modern Slavery Act should be about protecting the people who put the clothes on our back, who pick the food that we eat and make the goods that we all consume. Yet it is a fairly weak piece of legislation in terms of only requiring reporting and not going further to require action by companies. So there's an urgent need to ensure that Australian companies have a duty to prevent modern slavery so that they're legally required to investigate and address modern slavery in their supply chains and face hard if they don't. And Australia should also follow the lead of other countries like Canada and the US and banned goods made with forced labor from ending up on our shop shelves so that we can all be confident that the clothes we wear and the things we have aren't made at the expense of someone else's freedom." If, through the legal action, it is revealed that Kmart is knowingly sourcing products from factories with links to forced labor, they could then be found to have engaged in misleading marketing by advertising ethical sourcing of all its products. If this is the case, however, they would not face penalties for sourcing products made by slave labour, just for claiming they did not. Jen Kanis says while this legal action is only preliminary, it could have wider impacts on the retail industry. "So I guess the outcome of this case is about the documents, but what this case may lead to is a misleading and deceptive conduct claim. And I think that that has implications all retailers who make claims about ethical sourcing and being an ethical business. And it will mean that they won't be able to make those claims unless they can actually substantiate them." Ramila Chanisheff says cheap clothing and strong economic ties with China should not come at the cost of human rights. "We need to make sure that every product that hits our shelves is slavery free, and the owners should not be on the consumer because the consumer cannot do deep diving as to how this product is made. So it needs to sit with the industry, it needs to sit with the retailers, and it needs to sit with the government to ensure that Australian citizens or any other citizens, the world citizens, are not always questioning whether our product is being used at the expense of another person's life."
ABC News
41 minutes ago
- ABC News
WA businessman Ted Powell donates $100 million to Perth's Murdoch University and animal hospital
An animal-loving philanthropist has donated $100 million to Western Australia's only veterinary medicine school, the biggest donation ever received by a university in the state. Perth businessman Ted Powell gave the money to Murdoch University, which will enable it to rebuild its veterinary school and increase the number of vet students by almost 50 per cent. Mr Powell, who made his money running a Hong Kong-based firm that specialised in the creation and sale of offshore shelf corporations in low tax jurisdictions, said he was motivated in part by his late wife's passion for cats. He said the pair, who did not have children, wanted to contribute their assets to worthy organisations. "My wife was in particular a great cat lover and ... she'd be immensely proud of what I'm doing in this project," he said. Mr Powell said he did not want anyone else to deal with the burden of deciding what to do with the money if he died. "I'm going to have to ask you to believe me but having too much money is a problem also," he said. "You can't spend $100 million when you're 74. "The motivation was, if I die that means somebody, whose wealth it is not, has to decide what to do with it and that's all wrong. "The passing of my wife was the catalyst in making that decision." Mr Powell has had a long association with the university through his Ragdoll Foundation, which provides scholarships to those unable to afford to study, and said Murdoch was "first in line" when it came to donating. "I can't change the world, I can only do one thing and I've done it and Murdoch is first in the line," he said. Mr Powell said the decision to donate such a significant sum had been nerve-wracking. "Before I made it (the decision) I was scared, and once I'd given the money over, I was relaxed," Mr Powell said. "It was like a weight off my mind, I've done it." Mr Powell ran his business for 19 years before selling and semi-retiring in Perth. After relocating to WA, he became involved in developing the Richardson Hotel in West Perth. He hopes his actions would inspire others who have come into wealth to give back and invest in the community. "I'd like to take this opportunity to encourage anyone who's been able to accumulate wealth to consider responsible ways to give back and I hope that my gift to Murdoch will inspire others," Mr Powell said. "A good education is a gift to last a lifetime." Murdoch University vice chancellor Andrew Decks said he was speechless when Mr Powell told him of his decision. "Well I had to take my jaw off the floor and bring it back up," he said. He said the donation would transform the university. "It's bringing the facilities up to world class standards," he said. The new build is expected to take about five years and will allow the university to boost the number students wanting to train as vets from 105 to 150 per year.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Tassie's election repeat, phone bill stress + why Jacinda Ardern is hopeful
A new report found a bunch of phone companies have been denying customer requests when they're experiencing financial hardship. So, what can you do when you're struggling to pay your phone bill? And Tassie had an election, a hung Parliament, a no-confidence motion, an election, a hung Parliament, and now... a no-confidence motion. What? Plus, Dave's chat with Jacinda Ardern: on being optimistic, leaving the Mormon church, taking mat leave as PM, and what she regrets. Listen: 01:10 - What to do if you can't pay your phone bill 06:05 - Explaining the mess that was the Tasmanian election 10:10 - Jacinda Ardern on knowing when to quit Guest: Carol Bennett, CEO, Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Carol Bennett, CEO, Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Jacinda Ardern, former NZ prime minister Get the whole story from Hack:
