
Customers don't want pointless rebrands, they want decent service
The 'crprt ctstrph', or for those of us who still cling to the old-fashioned notion of keeping the vowels in sentences, the 'corporate catastrophe', is finally over. The asset management giant Aberdeen has decided to restore its 200-year-old name after it rebranded itself as Abrdn in one of the most widely mocked image overhauls of all time.
It is a welcome return of traditional values. But it is something else as well – a return to common sense and a defeat for a self-indulgent managerial class that ignored customer service, and returns for investors, in favour of a faddish modernity that did nothing for anyone. If it was meant to modernise the business it was not a great success. Four years ago, Aberdeen, heir to a long tradition of high-quality Scottish financial services, rebranded itself as 'Abdrn'. Even amid some stiff competition for the silliest corporate rebrand of all time, this one was right up there with the very worst of all time.
Stripping out the vowels from its name simply left an unpronounceable word soup that meant nothing to anyone. It was so widely mocked that the firm's chief investment officer, Peter Branner, was last year reduced to whinging about 'corporate bullying ' (or presumably 'crprt bllng'), as if the firm was being victimised for a disability instead of rightly criticised for a stupid decision.
This week, it has finally decided to restore the vowels to their right and proper place. Its new CEO John Windsor, who took over the top job back in December, conceded that the rebrand had been a 'distraction ', which is putting it mildly, and that the company would go back to its old name, spelt correctly. It is hard to see how it had much choice about that.
If the removal of the vowels was meant to turn it into a slick, high-powered money machine, it hadn't worked. The share price has fallen by 33 per cent over the last five years, while rivals such as M&G were up by 12 per cent. Savers were not rushing to put their money into a dynamic, forward looking asset manager. Instead, they started to suspect the company was run by people who were slightly weird, and a bit dim, and those are hardly the qualities you are looking for in someone who is looking after your pension or ISA.
It would be very easy to mock. Indeed, it should probably be compulsory. Making fun of corporations is one of the best ways of keeping them under control, and stopping them from becoming too arrogant. And yet, the return of Aberdeen's proper name is emblematic of something bigger and more important than just the restoration of the correct spelling, as important as that is.
In reality, the rebrand was the peak of a period of corporate self-indulgence. It was sadly typical of a managerial class that trashed the history for their own organisations, and was more interested in appearances than actual results. It came from the same mindset that gave us endless governance codes, that devoted huge amounts of time to ' unconscious bias' training sessions, that made diverse pronouns compulsory on email and name-badges, that debanked any one whose views it did not approve of, that took a fashionable stance on every passing cause, and that flaunted their woke progressivism at every opportunity they could.
Of course, customers never cared about any of that stuff, and nor did shareholders. They just wanted businesses to deliver a decent product at a fair price. Who knows, perhaps bringing the vowels back could be the start of bringing back plenty of other common sense ideas, like working from the office most days of the week, hiring people on merit and prioritising profits over social activism. If so, many companies might find their performance has started to improve. One point is certain. Now that it has been consigned to history, the Abrdn name won't be mssd.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
Independence campaigners react to John Swinney speech on independence
The First Minister insisted in a speech in Edinburgh on Tuesday that independence was 'within reach' and said the constitutional question was the 'defining choice for this generation'. But the SNP leader's comments, which come before a big party meeting this weekend, have been met with frustration from some corners of the independence movement. Robin McAlpine (below), head of strategic development at the Common Weal think tank, told The National: 'It is a truth universally acknowledged that an SNP leader in possession of an approaching party conference must be in want of a boilerplate speech about independence. It is the SNP National Council this weekend so regular as clockwork, here is the speech.' He added: 'As a professional political strategist I can tell you that you don't get to demand space in the political agenda, you need to earn space by having something to say that people want to hear, and that this isn't it. 'But you will have your own tolerance levels for how much longer this can go on with us pretending this is an adequate response. I doubt me telling you it is not will change much.' READ MORE: John Swinney launches report showing Scotland 'must take charge of own destiny' Kenny MacAskill, leader of the Alba Party, dismissed the speech as a 'damp squib'. He said: 'What we needed and what SNP activists, members and supporters are crying out for was a clear vision and action on independence what we got from the First Minister was a damp squib. 'The First Minister said that 'independence is the defining choice' facing the Scottish people but he has yet to set out the positive difference independence will make and back that aspiration with the political will to achieve it. 'Independence is not a nice to do at some point in the future; it is absolutely essential to save our manufacturing industry, prevent further closures and job losses and to deliver lower energy prices for people and businesses. John Swinney needs to pursue independence with the urgency that is required.' MacAskill reiterated calls for the SNP leader to contest next year's Holyrood election as an unofficial vote on independence, adding: 'John Swinney must unite the pro-independence parties and the wider independence movement by declaring that a majority of votes cast on the list for pro-independence parties will be the mandate for independence. 'Only then can he re-energise the independence campaign, put the fuel back in the tank and motivate independence supporters in the country.'


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow heritage groups slam approval of O2 ABC site plans
They've also called on the Scottish Government to reverse the approval, which will see the building of a nine-story mixed-use development. The Glasgow School of Art has also called on Ministers to refuse the plans, stating that the approval "places their commitment to deliver the faithful reinstatement of the Mackintosh Building as a fully utilised purpose-designed art school at significant risk." The development was presented to the planning committee at a meeting today, June 17, and a vote of eight to two approved the plans. Stuart Robertson, director of the Charles Rennie Mackintosh Society, said, "I am really disappointed by the Planning Committee's decision to allow this proposal to go through. "It is a very poor design, and I feel the developers have pushed boundaries, submitting revised plans that, while seemingly minor, collectively have created a situation where the planning department had little option but to approve this development. Glasgow heritage groups slam approval of O2 ABC site plans (Image: Vita Group) "The Committee seemed to have reservations about the proposals, but were more concerned about leaving the area undeveloped. "Glasgow City Council has missed a trick here. There was an opportunity to create something truly special on this site. "The Scottish Government needs to step in and overturn this decision. "Mackintosh and Glasgow deserves better." READ MORE: Glasgow O2 ABC site plans approved for student accommodation READ MORE: 'So depressing': Glasgow reacts to O2 ABC site plan READ MORE: O2 ABC site owners clash with Glasgow School of Art Niall Murphy, director of Glasgow City Heritage Trust, echoed Stuart's disappointment at the approval. He said: "Given the acknowledged negative impact on Charles Rennie Mackintosh's Glasgow School of Art, Alexander 'Greek' Thomson's Grecian Chambers (now the CCA) and the Glasgow Central Conservation Area more broadly, I think this is a disappointing outcome for Glasgow's heritage. "Nevertheless, we live in a democracy, and the councillors on the Planning Applications Committee decided that the regeneration of Sauchiehall Street was more important to Glasgow. I must respect their decision. "Given the issues of national significance raised by Historic Environment Scotland, it will be interesting to see if Scottish Ministers call it in." The approved proposal (Image: Vita Group) Professor Penny Macbeth, director and principal of the Glasgow School of Art, also called on the government to reverse the approval. She said: "The objection by Historic Environment Scotland does now require the approval by Glasgow City Council to be referred to Scottish Ministers. "We hope that Ministers taking cognisance of the significant impact to the internationally important Mackintosh Building and its rebuilding, will exercise their powers purposefully, acknowledging that the setting, character and function of the Mackintosh Building is unacceptably compromised." Stuart Robertson previously told us that the proposal was "so depressing" and was not swayed by anything said in today's meeting. Stuart added: "As highlighted in my previous comments, this development is vastly over-scaled and does not meet development plan policy. "This approval places the commitment to the rebuilding of the Mackintosh Building at significant risk and will set a dangerous precedent for our built heritage. "Look at the M&S development. After securing planning permission, the developer puts it on the market. We could see the same happen here. "The student housing sector needs to have a more robust public oversight. "Rather than relying on speculative delivery and developer-led policy formation, it may be time to reassert a civic-led approach that places the needs of communities, students, and heritage on an equal footing." The cast iron pieces will be displayed in the new building (Image: Newsquest/Gordon Terris) Niall found a silver lining in one of the conditions set: that part of the portico of the O2 ABC would be displayed to the public in the development. He said: "On the positive side, I welcome the amended condition to see the incorporation of the Walter Macfarlane cast iron screen from the former ABC Cinema within the proposed development. "It will be interesting to see how the screen will be respectfully installed given the constrained height within the new building; however, it is a significant artefact with regards to Glasgow's cast iron technologies and has strong social value too. "Therefore, it being back on public display once more is worth celebrating."

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Glasgow heritage groups hit out over plans for 02 ABC site
They've also called on the Scottish Government to reverse the approval, which will see the building of a nine-storey mixed-use development. The Glasgow School of Art has also called on ministers to refuse the plans, stating that the approval "places their commitment to deliver the faithful reinstatement of the Mackintosh Building as a fully utilised purpose-designed art school at significant risk." The development was presented to the planning committee at a meeting today, June 17, and a vote of eight to two approved the plans. Stuart Robertson, director of the Charles Rennie Mackintosh Society, said: "I am really disappointed by the Planning Committee's decision to allow this proposal to go through. "It is a very poor design, and I feel the developers have pushed boundaries, submitting revised plans that, while seemingly minor, collectively have created a situation where the planning department had little option but to approve this development. Glasgow heritage groups slam approval of O2 ABC site plans (Image: Vita Group) "The committee seemed to have reservations about the proposals, but were more concerned about leaving the area undeveloped. "Glasgow City Council has missed a trick here. There was an opportunity to create something truly special on this site. "The Scottish Government needs to step in and overturn this decision. "Mackintosh and Glasgow deserves better." Niall Murphy, director of Glasgow City Heritage Trust, echoed Stuart's disappointment at the approval. He said: "Given the acknowledged negative impact on Charles Rennie Mackintosh's Glasgow School of Art, Alexander 'Greek' Thomson's Grecian Chambers (now the CCA) and the Glasgow Central Conservation Area more broadly, I think this is a disappointing outcome for Glasgow's heritage. "Nevertheless, we live in a democracy, and the councillors on the Planning Applications Committee decided that the regeneration of Sauchiehall Street was more important to Glasgow. I must respect their decision. "Given the issues of national significance raised by Historic Environment Scotland, it will be interesting to see if Scottish ministers call it in." The approved proposal (Image: Vita Group) Professor Penny Macbeth, director and principal of the Glasgow School of Art, also called on the Government to reverse the approval. She said: "The objection by Historic Environment Scotland does now require the approval by Glasgow City Council to be referred to Scottish ministers. "We hope that ministers taking cognisance of the significant impact to the internationally important Mackintosh Building and its rebuilding, will exercise their powers purposefully, acknowledging that the setting, character and function of the Mackintosh Building is unacceptably compromised." Stuart Robertson previously told us that the proposal was "so depressing" and was not swayed by anything said in today's meeting. Robertson added: "As highlighted in my previous comments, this development is vastly over-scaled and does not meet development plan policy. "This approval places the commitment to the rebuilding of the Mackintosh Building at significant risk and will set a dangerous precedent for our built heritage. "Look at the M&S development. After securing planning permission, the developer puts it on the market. We could see the same happening here. "The student housing sector needs to have a more robust public oversight. "Rather than relying on speculative delivery and developer-led policy formation, it may be time to reassert a civic-led approach that places the needs of communities, students, and heritage on an equal footing." The cast iron pieces will be displayed in the new building (Image: Newsquest/Gordon Terris) Murphy found a silver lining in one of the conditions set: That part of the portico of the O2 ABC would be displayed to the public in the development. He said: "On the positive side, I welcome the amended condition to see the incorporation of the Walter Macfarlane cast iron screen from the former ABC Cinema within the proposed development. "It will be interesting to see how the screen will be respectfully installed given the constrained height within the new building; however, it is a significant artefact with regards to Glasgow's cast iron technologies and has strong social value too. "Therefore, it being back on public display once more is worth celebrating."