logo
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?

Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?

When Democratic lawmakers fled Texas to try to prevent the Republican-led Legislature from redrawing the state's congressional districts, it marked the latest episode in a long national history of gerrymandering.
The word 'gerrymander" was coined in America more than 200 years ago as an unflattering means of describing political manipulation in legislative map-making.
The word has stood the test of time, in part, because American politics has remained fiercely competitive.
Who is responsible for gerrymandering?
In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts.
But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often.
In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas.
How does a gerrymander work?
If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage.
One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts.
Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts.
Why is it called gerrymandering?
The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison.
Is political gerrymandering illegal?
Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.'
The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims.
Are there any limits on redistricting?
Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts.
What does data show about gerrymandering?
Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering.
Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years.
But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further
‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further

"And worse than that, it's just not right," the MSNBC host says Texas Republicans are trying to gerrymander the state even further in their favor, and on Tuesday morning, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough could do nothing but scoff at how 'idiotic' their plan is, on top of being anti-democratic. During their discussion, the 'Morning Joe' hosts zeroed in on the fact that Texas Democrats deliberately left the state this week, to avoid Republicans forcing through a vote to redraw the districts and grab another five house seats. More than that, the MSNBC hosts scoffed at the response of Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, who angrily said that the politicians 'abandoned their posts and turned their backs on the constituents they swore to represent.' More from TheWrap 'Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at 'Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further | Video Jimmy Fallon Jokes Trump Fired the Weatherman So Now the East Coast Heat Wave Doesn't Exist | Video Roku Debuts Ad-Free Subscription Service Howdy in Partnership With Lionsgate, WBD, FilmRise Seth Meyers Leaves Jenna Ortega Speechless With Suggestion for Combatting Her 'Resting Bitch Face' | Video 'Oh, my goodness, it's almost like Lincoln talking to Congress at the beginning of the Civil War. The stakes are so high. Oh wait, no they're not Willie!' Scarborough mocked. 'To do what's right for the people of Texas? To take the vote away from anybody in Texas who's basically a Democrat by gerrymandering the districts?' Scarborough then explained how the redistricting would be 'so out of whack' that, even if state legislative races came down to a 50/50 split by voters, Republicans would still win handily. 'That guy, and the rest of the Texas legislature, and Greg Abbott want to rig the system,' Scarborough said. 'They want to make sure that Republicans are over-represented on election day. They want to rig the process. And so they're acting so indignant about it!' The MSNBC host then called out the 'short-sightedness' of the Republicans' plan, arguing that it would open the door for blue states to do the exact same thing. 'If Texas achieves what they want to achieve, then California will go back! And then they will draw up even more rigged lines that will help Democrats,' Scarborough said. 'And New York State will do it, and who knows? Maybe then Florida decides to — I mean, it really is, it's an idiotic thing to do.' 'They used to do it every 10 years, and now, I don't know if the President told them to do this or somebody else told them to do it, but it's just stupid,' he continued. 'And worse than that, it's just not right.' You can watch the full discussion from 'Morning Joe' in the video above. The post 'Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at 'Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker rallies with Texas Democrats, calls Trump a ‘cheater'
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker rallies with Texas Democrats, calls Trump a ‘cheater'

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker rallies with Texas Democrats, calls Trump a ‘cheater'

Joined by national and state Democratic leaders, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker accused President Donald Trump and Republicans of trying to cheat American democracy ahead of the 2026 midterm elections by redrawing Texas' congressional maps. The 60-year-old Illinois leader, a possible presidential contender, said Democratic governors cannot ignore Trump's aggressive steps, which under the Texas GOP plan would push as many as five House Democrats out of office. Such a move would provide national Republicans with a slightly heftier cushion next year to protect their slim majority in the House of Representatives as they prepare to defend Trump's agenda and other controversial moves. "Donald Trump is a cheater... and if they're going to cheat, then all of us have to take a hard look at what the effect of that cheating is on democracy, and that means we've all got to stand up and do the right thing," Pritzker said at an Aug. 5 press conference, flanked by Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin along with Texas Democrats and others. "So as far as I'm concerned, everything is on the table," he added. The comments underscore a noticeable shift within the Democratic ranks among even institutionally-minded party and elected leaders who have been hesitant to embrace the mantra of "fighting fire with fire." But many grassroots progressives and their allies have demanded for months that the party take a more aggressive approach, citing how the administration and its MAGA-aligned allies have been bending several U.S. institutions to their will since Trump's return to power. Asked if Texas is providing Democratic-controlled state leaders with a roadmap on how to draw their own maps, Martin told reporters at the press conference that the party will fight back in the same way. "Our constitution is under assault. Voting rights are being completely violated," he said. "Now is not the time for one party to play by the rules while the other party has completely ignored it." Earlier in the day, Trump, appearing on CNBC by telephone, said Republicans were "entitled" to the five new seats drafted by a Texas House committee on Aug. 2, and called out the group of Texas Democrats who fled to liberal-leaning states, saying those places have been using the same tactics when crafting their congressional districts. "Do you notice they go to Illinois for safety, but that's all gerrymandered," he said. "California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress. It's all gerrymandered." This story will be updated.

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing missiles at Israel if it intensifies operations in Lebanon
Hezbollah threatens to resume firing missiles at Israel if it intensifies operations in Lebanon

Los Angeles Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing missiles at Israel if it intensifies operations in Lebanon

BEIRUT — The leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah warned Tuesday that if Israel intensifies its military operations against his group, the Iran-backed armed faction will resume firing missiles toward Israel. Naim Kassem's comments came as Lebanon's Cabinet was meeting to discuss Hezbollah's disarmament. Beirut is under U.S. pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead. Since the war ended in November with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members. Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war. Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border. In a televised speech Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons. 'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' Kassem said. 'This defense will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel.' Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river. Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership. The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorized facilities starting with the area south of the river. Hezbollah maintains the deal only covers the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the U.S. say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon. Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese. 'No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty,' Kassem said. Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament. The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused damage worth $11 billion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store