First vape, next cake? The slippery slope of selective bans — Sim Tian Hong
JUNE 10 — The recent calls for a nationwide vape ban have been hogging the headlines. Just recently, Segamat MP R. Yuneswaran urged the Federal government to impose a blanket ban, citing rising healthcare costs and increasing youth vaping rates. Meanwhile, states such as Selangor, Kelantan, Johor, Negeri Sembilan and Terengganu have already moved ahead with bans of their own or are debating similar measures.
These moves are driven by understandable public health concerns. No one is questioning the motivations behind such calls. After all, nothing is more important than public health. However, are we approaching this issue in a consistent and coherent way?
If we are banning vape to protect public health, why are cigarettes — a product known to cause cancer, heart disease, and countless other illnesses — still legally sold and taxed? According to the Ministry of Health, tobacco use remains one of the most preventable causes of death in Malaysia. Yet, while vape is being banned or restricted in piecemeal fashion, cigarettes remain a fixture in convenience stores nationwide.
The recent calls for a nationwide vape ban have been hogging the headlines. — Picture by Raymond Manuel
This inconsistency becomes even more troubling when one considers the fragmented nature of the current policy response. Some states are imposing their own bans, others are not. The Federal government has yet to adopt a clear, unified stance. The result is a patchwork of differing rules across the country. This is bound to create confusion for the public, enforcement challenges for authorities, and opportunities for an illicit market to flourish.
There is also the risk of setting a questionable policy precedent. If the principle is that we should ban products that can harm public health, where do we draw the line? Should we also move to ban junk food, sugary drinks, or alcohol, all of which contribute to non-communicable diseases and healthcare costs? I am not suggesting that we ignore the risks associated with vaping. But we should be wary of making selective, reactive policy decisions that are not grounded in a consistent framework.
Rather than imposing outright bans in an uneven and fragmented way, there is a case for a more balanced and coherent approach. Stronger public education campaigns, tighter regulation of marketing and sales (especially to minors), and consistent enforcement across states may ultimately prove more effective than prohibition alone.
Above all, public health policy should be seen as fair, rational, and consistent. A strategy that appears to single out certain products while ignoring others with well-documented harms, risks undermining public trust. It may also distract from the broader effort to build a healthier society.
Public health must always come first. But in pursuing that goal, we should avoid the temptation to adopt inconsistent or populist measures that may generate headlines, but not necessarily better outcomes.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
What to know about Ozempic: Diabetes drug used off-label for weight loss sparks warnings
KUALA LUMPUR, June 11 — As global interest in weight loss remedies grows, the off-label use of diabetes medication Ozempic for shedding pounds in non-diabetic individuals has emerged as a trend. This rising popularity, fuelled by social media and anecdotal success stories, has prompted medical professionals to caution against its unsupervised use. Here's what you need to know about Ozempic, its side effects, and why expert supervision is essential before considering it for weight loss. What is Ozempic? Ozempic is a medication primarily approved for managing type 2 diabetes. Its active ingredient, semaglutide, mimics a hormone that targets areas of the brain involved in appetite regulation. Initially designed for diabetes treatment, Ozempic has gained popularity as a weight loss aid, even among non-diabetic individuals. Can Ozempic be used for weight loss? According to Universiti Teknologi MARA consultant endocrinologist Prof Dr Rohana Abdul Ghani, Ozempic is not intended for use as a weight loss medication for non-diabetic patients. 'Ozempic is approved in Malaysia specifically for managing type 2 diabetes. However, semaglutide's weight loss benefits have led some to seek it off-label for obesity treatment,' she said. For non-diabetic patients, semaglutide should be administered at a higher dose of 2.4mg weekly under another brand name, which is unavailable in Malaysia, she added. 'The off-label use of Ozempic among non-diabetic patients has led to a shortage for those with type 2 diabetes and reduced efficacy due to the lower dose,' said Dr Rohana. She also highlighted studies suggesting that regular use of weight loss drugs might establish a 'new normal' in the body, potentially leading to weight gain. One study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that low doses of semaglutide (between 0.25mg and 0.5mg) were linked to weight gain in some patients. What are the potential side effects? As with any medication, Ozempic comes with potential side effects. Dr Rohana said common gastrointestinal side effects include nausea, vomiting, constipation, or diarrhoea, which are typically self-limiting and subside within one to two weeks. She added that rare side effects include skin reactions at the injection site and worsening eyesight, particularly in patients with high blood sugar experiencing rapid improvement. 'Ozempic should not be used by patients with a history of thyroid cancer due to the rare risk of pancreatitis,' she said. Who shouldn't take Ozempic without medical advice? Dr Rohana stressed that no one should take Ozempic without consulting a doctor. 'Medications like Ozempic for obesity should be paired with proper diet and lifestyle changes. Without these, there's a risk of complications such as significant muscle mass loss or kidney issues from severe vomiting,' she said. 'These medications should only be prescribed by clinicians who are familiar with their effects and risks,' she added.
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Living with HED: Unable to sweat, shadowed by stigma
KUALA LUMPUR, June 11 — Born with the rare genetic condition Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia (HED), Mohamad Syafiq Zulkarnain has grown accustomed to the curious stares he often attracts. While he has come to terms with his distinctive appearance — marked by sparse hair and widely spaced, pointed teeth — these features are not his greatest concern. What troubles him most is the relentless heat he must endure every day. 'HED prevents my body from producing sweat, which exposes me to the risk of heat stroke if my body temperature exceeds the normal range. So I have to frequently wet my body and avoid staying out in the sun for too long,' the 35-year-old man told Bernama recently. HED is a genetic disorder that affects the development of ectodermal tissues such as skin, hair, teeth, and sweat glands. According to the World Health Organisation, HED is among more than 7,000 rare diseases identified so far and affects about 3.5 to 5.9 per cent of the global population. However, HED patients in Malaysia face even greater challenges due to a lack of medical specialists to manage this incurable condition. This has led to delayed diagnoses, which in turn increases life-threatening risks. Early diagnosis Mohamad Syafiq, the eldest of four siblings, said he was fortunate that his mother, who worked in healthcare, recognised early on that something was amiss when he was still a baby. 'When I was a baby, my mother and grandmother noticed that I was always fussy in hot weather, crying every night, and only calm when I slept shirtless under a fan. 'They also noticed I would tire easily in the heat, did not sweat, and still had no teeth by the age of two. That was when they began seeking a diagnosis for my condition,' he said, adding that his first tooth only appeared when he was two and a half years old. This early diagnosis allowed his family to take preventive steps, especially during hot weather — measures that ultimately saved his life. 'I once lost a fellow HED patient to heat stroke during an outdoor activity. Like me, he couldn't sweat, and his body temperature spiked suddenly during a hike,' he said, adding that the incident made him extra cautious. This is why Mohamad Syafiq, who hails from Seri Manjung, Perak, doesn't mind the odd looks he gets when he sprays himself with water, even in public. 'I always carry a wet towel and a spray bottle wherever I go. The water spray acts as 'artificial sweat' to help cool me down when my body temperature rises,' he explained. His inability to sweat also makes his skin prone to severe dryness and eczema, requiring him to routinely apply moisturising lotion and steroid cream. He also has to be careful about what he eats due to his dental condition. 'I can't eat hard foods like nuts or chewy foods. Sometimes my speech is unclear. Many patients need special dentures or implants to overcome this limitation,' he added. Mohamad Syafiq Zulkarnain, the eldest of four siblings, said he was fortunate that his mother, who worked in healthcare, recognised early on that something was amiss when he was still a baby. — Bernama pic Stigma Recalling his school days, Mohamad Syafiq said that unlike his peers, he couldn't participate in sports and was given 'special treatment' — such as being seated in a classroom near the toilets so he could cool down and wet his body more easily. 'I rarely joined outdoor or sports activities that lasted long in the sun, due to the risk of heat stroke. Sometimes classmates thought I was the teachers' 'favourite' because of this,' he said. The stigma has followed him into adulthood. Even with a degree, finding a job has been difficult. 'I was unemployed for a long time because it was difficult to find a job suited to my condition. I often failed interviews as employers struggled to understand my speech, and when I explained my HED, they assumed I wasn't strong or productive enough,' said the holder of a Master of Science in Information Management from Universiti Teknologi MARA, who now works as a freelancer. The stigma isn't limited to the public; it also exists among professionals. 'I was once told that my life wasn't 'interesting enough' to be featured in the media because I didn't 'look bad enough',' said Syafiq, who also serves as a coordinator for the HED support group under the Malaysian Rare Disorders Society (MRDS). He added that public awareness of rare genetic diseases, including HED, is very low, with some patients only diagnosed in adulthood — missing the chance for early treatment and support. Strengthening the treatment system Meanwhile, Clinical Geneticist and Paediatric Consultant Dr Tae Sok Kun said one of the biggest challenges for patients with rare genetic diseases like HED is getting an accurate diagnosis early. 'I see this delay in getting an accurate diagnosis as a 'diagnostic odyssey' — a long and exhausting journey emotionally, mentally, and financially. 'Many parents don't realise that symptoms like delayed tooth growth or lack of hair are important signs. They think it's just normal delay and don't seek early treatment,' said the specialist from the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). She added that Malaysia also lacks specialists — currently only around 13 to 15 clinical geneticists nationwide — and the referral system is still unstructured. 'In fact, many general doctors themselves don't know where to refer cases like HED, which shows an urgent need to strengthen the referral structure and early exposure to rare diseases in medical training,' she said. 'In terms of treatment, HED is a genetic disease with no cure, but early interventions and symptomatic treatment can help improve patients' quality of life. Managing body temperature is critical since patients are prone to hyperthermia due to a lack of sweat glands. Skin treatment, eye dryness management, nutrition, and activity monitoring are also recommended,' she said. The situation is further complicated by the fact that genetic testing needed to confirm a diagnosis still has to be sent overseas, adding cost and delaying treatment, said Dr Tae, noting that while Malaysia has basic facilities, local capacity remains insufficient. Social support Dr Tae also emphasised the importance of genetic counselling for at-risk families, as well as the use of technologies such as Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) through In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) to prevent the transmission of the HED gene to future generations. This counselling, she said, not only helps couples understand their risks and options, but also provides critical emotional support in facing this genetic challenge. With this approach, it is hoped that new cases can be reduced, thereby improving the quality of life for patients and their families in the long term, she added. In addition to medical challenges, HED patients also face a lack of social support, with most relying on general organisations like MRDS, which covers various rare diseases. Dr Tae also noted that the physical appearance of HED patients — such as sparse hair and missing teeth — has a significant psychosocial impact. 'Although patients' intellectual ability is normal, their appearance often leads to misunderstanding and marginalisation, causing emotional distress. In fact, there have been cases where patients required psychiatric treatment and incidents of suicide due to prolonged social pressure,' she said. Dr Tae further explained that although the government has listed rare diseases including HED in its official registry, related policies are still in draft form, hindering the allocation of special funding for treatment and support. 'Treatments like dental implants, which are vital for HED patients, are not fully covered by the government. Treatment costs can run into the thousands of ringgit, which is a heavy burden for patients and families,' she added. Another burden is that most health insurance providers do not cover congenital conditions. Dr Tae stressed that it is time for the government to take a systemic approach in managing rare diseases — covering policy, specialist training, social support, and financial protection. 'While the focus is often on major diseases like diabetes and cancer, the voices of rare disease patients can no longer be ignored,' she said. As for Mohamad Syafiq, he simply hopes the government will help provide treatment and targeted support for people like him — including job opportunities. 'We don't want sympathy, just a fair chance to be independent and contribute,' he said.
Malay Mail
20 hours ago
- Malay Mail
First vape, next cake? The slippery slope of selective bans — Sim Tian Hong
JUNE 10 — The recent calls for a nationwide vape ban have been hogging the headlines. Just recently, Segamat MP R. Yuneswaran urged the Federal government to impose a blanket ban, citing rising healthcare costs and increasing youth vaping rates. Meanwhile, states such as Selangor, Kelantan, Johor, Negeri Sembilan and Terengganu have already moved ahead with bans of their own or are debating similar measures. These moves are driven by understandable public health concerns. No one is questioning the motivations behind such calls. After all, nothing is more important than public health. However, are we approaching this issue in a consistent and coherent way? If we are banning vape to protect public health, why are cigarettes — a product known to cause cancer, heart disease, and countless other illnesses — still legally sold and taxed? According to the Ministry of Health, tobacco use remains one of the most preventable causes of death in Malaysia. Yet, while vape is being banned or restricted in piecemeal fashion, cigarettes remain a fixture in convenience stores nationwide. The recent calls for a nationwide vape ban have been hogging the headlines. — Picture by Raymond Manuel This inconsistency becomes even more troubling when one considers the fragmented nature of the current policy response. Some states are imposing their own bans, others are not. The Federal government has yet to adopt a clear, unified stance. The result is a patchwork of differing rules across the country. This is bound to create confusion for the public, enforcement challenges for authorities, and opportunities for an illicit market to flourish. There is also the risk of setting a questionable policy precedent. If the principle is that we should ban products that can harm public health, where do we draw the line? Should we also move to ban junk food, sugary drinks, or alcohol, all of which contribute to non-communicable diseases and healthcare costs? I am not suggesting that we ignore the risks associated with vaping. But we should be wary of making selective, reactive policy decisions that are not grounded in a consistent framework. Rather than imposing outright bans in an uneven and fragmented way, there is a case for a more balanced and coherent approach. Stronger public education campaigns, tighter regulation of marketing and sales (especially to minors), and consistent enforcement across states may ultimately prove more effective than prohibition alone. Above all, public health policy should be seen as fair, rational, and consistent. A strategy that appears to single out certain products while ignoring others with well-documented harms, risks undermining public trust. It may also distract from the broader effort to build a healthier society. Public health must always come first. But in pursuing that goal, we should avoid the temptation to adopt inconsistent or populist measures that may generate headlines, but not necessarily better outcomes. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
