90% radioactive iodine gone: Scientists use AI to crack code on nuclear waste cleanup
A research team in South Korea has used artificial intelligence to discover a powerful new material that can trap radioactive iodine, specifically isotope I-129, one of the most persistent and dangerous byproducts of nuclear energy that poses serious environmental and health risks.
With a half-life of 15.7 million years, I-129 is highly mobile in the environment and notoriously difficult to remove from contaminated water.
Developed by researchers from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) in collaboration with the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT), the breakthrough material belongs to a class called Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs).
These compounds are known for their structural flexibility and ability to trap negatively charged particles like iodate (IO₃⁻), the form radioactive iodine most often takes in aqueous environments.
Instead of testing thousands of LDH combinations manually, which would be difficult to search through conventional trial-and-error experiments, the team turned to machine learning to identify optimal iodate adsorbents.
Starting with experimental data from 24 binary and 96 ternary compositions, they trained a model to predict the most promising candidates from a vast pool of metal combinations.
The team focused on the fact that LDHs, like high-entropy materials, can incorporate a wide range of metal compositions and possess structures favorable for anion adsorption.
The AI model guided the researchers to a quinary compound made of copper, chromium, iron, and aluminum, named dubbed Cu₃(CrFeAl).
This material showed over 90 percent efficiency in removing iodate from water, outperforming traditional silver-based absorbents, which often fail to trap iodate effectively.
Remarkably, the team only needed to test about 16 percent of all possible material combinations to find the optimal one, demonstrating the power of AI in reducing both time and cost in nuclear environmental research.
"This study shows the potential of using artificial intelligence to efficiently identify radioactive decontamination materials from a vast pool of new material candidates," said KAIST professor Ho Jin Ryu.
'It is expected to accelerate research for developing new materials for nuclear environmental cleanup.'
The research team has filed a domestic patent application for the developed powder technology and is currently proceeding with an international patent application. They are also working to improve the material's stability under real-world conditions.
The team is now looking for academic and industrial partnerships to develop iodine-absorbing powders and water filters that can be used in contaminated nuclear sites to trap radioactive iodine.
The study was led by Professor Ho Jin Ryu from the Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering at KAIST, in collaboration with Dr. Juhwan Noh of the Digital Chemistry Research Center at KRICT.
Dr. Sujeong Lee, a graduate of KAIST's Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Dr. Noh were listed as co-first authors on the paper.
The findings were published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
For Some Patients, the ‘Inner Voice' May Soon Be Audible
For decades, neuroengineers have dreamed of helping people who have been cut off from the world of language. A disease like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or A.L.S., weakens the muscles in the airway. A stroke can kill neurons that normally relay commands for speaking. Perhaps, by implanting electrodes, scientists could instead record the brain's electric activity and translate that into spoken words. Now a team of researchers has made an important advance toward that goal. Previously they succeeded in decoding the signals produced when people tried to speak. In the new study, published on Thursday in the journal Cell, their computer often made correct guesses when the subjects simply imagined saying words. Christian Herff, a neuroscientist at Maastricht University in the Netherlands who was not involved in the research, said the result went beyond the merely technological and shed light on the mystery of language. 'It's a fantastic advance,' Dr. Herff said. The new study is the latest result in a long-running clinical trial, called BrainGate2, that has already seen some remarkable successes. One participant, Casey Harrell, now uses his brain-machine interface to hold conversations with his family and friends. In 2023, after A.L.S. had made his voice unintelligible, Mr. Harrell agreed to have electrodes implanted in his brain. Surgeons placed four arrays of tiny needles on the left side, in a patch of tissue called the motor cortex. The region becomes active when the brain creates commands for muscles to produce speech. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Meta's Superintelligence Dream Team Will Be Management Challenge of the Century
Meta Platforms Inc. is spending a fortune to assemble the brightest minds in artificial intelligence. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg may want to note: Research suggests that packing a team with too much genius can backfire. So far, more than a dozen engineers from OpenAI have defected to Meta, joined by notable experts from Anthropic and Google's DeepMind. Zuckerberg's wager is that by concentrating top talent and giving them unlimited resources, he can gain ground on rivals and fast-track the development of AI systems so advanced that they will approach 'artificial general intelligence,' the hypothetical point at which the model surpasses human-level capacities.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The worst drinks for microplastic contamination revealed
Microplastics are all around us – in the air we breathe, in seas and rivers, they're found in the guts of sharks, and inside growing plants. They're also inside humans, too: in our blood, accumulating in our brains, and even in our testicles. So it is perhaps unsurprising to learn that one of the key means of entering the body is through the fluids we drink. Previous studies have established that microplastics are present in both tap water and bottled water, but new research has revealed that hot drinks may be an even bigger source of microplastics than was previously realised. A research team at the University of Birmingham tested 155 common soft drinks, including hot and cold drinks, for microplastics to get a picture of average human exposure through a realistic spectrum of daily drinks available in one country. The study, believed to be the first of its kind, found the highest concentrations of microplastics were in hot tea and hot coffee. The study also tested iced tea and coffee for microplastics, but found significantly less, suggesting the high temperatures and processes used for making hot drinks contribute to the levels of microplastics which end up in the product. The team assessed 31 different types of drinks in total from popular UK brands, all bought from supermarkets and coffee shops in 2024. These included hot and iced coffee, hot and iced tea, juices, energy drinks, and soft drinks. The samples were filtered, and then microplastic counts were determined through microscope imaging. Cold drinks were filtered immediately, while hot drinks were allowed to cool for 30 minutes before analysis. Hot tea in disposable cups contained the highest level of microplastics (MPs), averaging 22MPs per cup, compared to 14MPs per cup for glass cups. More expensive teabags leached the greatest amount of plastic, the study found, averaging 24 to 30MPs per cup. Similarly, the research team said that for hot coffee, their findings "strongly suggest that the disposable cup material is a primary source of [microplastics] in our hot coffee samples'. As not all samples were cup-sized, the team expressed their overall findings in microplastics per litre. Hot tea: 49 to 81 MPs per litre Hot coffee: 29 to 57 MPs per litre Iced tea: 24 to 38 MPs per litre Iced coffee: 31 to 43 MPs per litre Fruit juice: 19 to 41 MPs per litre Energy drinks: 14 to 36 MPs per litre Soft drinks: 13 to 21 MPs per litre The authors said their study "proves for the first time that assessment of exposure via drinking water only may substantially underestimate the risk" posed to humans by higher microplastics prevalence in other drinks. The same team published research in 2024, revealing the average microplastics concentration in tap water (24 to 56 MP per litre) was 'statistically indistinguishable" from that in bottled water (26 to 48 MP per litre). Professor Mohamed Abdallah from the University of Birmingham, who was one of the lead authors of the new research, told The Independent: "We noted that a lot of research in the microplastics sphere is focusing on drinking water – tap water, bottled water – and we've also released a paper from the UK on water. But we realised that people don't only drink water during their day. You drink tea, coffee, juices... "We found a ubiquitous presence of microplastics in all the cold and hot drinks we looked at. Which is pretty alarming, and from a scientific point of view suggests we should not only be looking at water, we should be more comprehensive in our research because other sources are substantial." He added: "We're consuming millions of teas and coffees every morning so it's something to definitely look at. There should definitely be legislative action from the government and also from international organisations to limit human exposure to microplastics … they're everywhere." The authors said the new research "serves as a critical step towards better understanding of the extent of MPs exposure under real-life scenarios, and advocates for more comprehensive studies for accurate risk assessment of MPs intake via dietary sources, to enable broader environmental and public health interventions". Solve the daily Crossword
