logo
New lawsuit challenges Trump's federal takeover of DC police department as crackdown intensifies

New lawsuit challenges Trump's federal takeover of DC police department as crackdown intensifies

Economic Times4 hours ago
The nation's capital challenged President Donald Trump's takeover of its police department in court on Friday, hours after his administration stepped up its crackdown on policing by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, with all the powers of a police chief.
ADVERTISEMENT District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb said in a new lawsuit that Trump is going far beyond his power under the law. Schwalb asked a judge to find that control of the department remains in district hands.
"The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call DC home. This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it," Schwalb said.
The lawsuit comes after Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi said Thursday night that Drug Enforcement Administration boss Terry Cole will assume "powers and duties vested in the District of Columbia Chief of Police."
The Metropolitan Police Department "must receive approval from Commissioner Cole" before issuing any orders, Bondi said. It was unclear where the move left the city's current police chief, Pamela Smith, who works for the mayor.
Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser pushed back, writing on social media that "there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official."
ADVERTISEMENT Chief had agreed to share immigration information Schwalb had said late Thursday that Bondi's directive was "unlawful," arguing it could not be followed by the city's police force. He wrote in a memo to Smith that "members of MPD must continue to follow your orders and not the orders of any official not appointed by the Mayor," setting up the legal clash between the heavily Democratic district and the Republican administration.
ADVERTISEMENT Bondi's directive came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's directive because it allowed for continued enforcement of "sanctuary policies," which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers.Bondi said she was rescinding that order as well as other MPD policies limiting inquires into immigration status and preventing arrests based solely on federal immigration warrants. All new directives must now receive approval from Cole, the attorney general said.
ADVERTISEMENT The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the US illegally.It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major US cities and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the administration has portrayed.
ADVERTISEMENT Residents are seeing a significant show of force A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments - to where was often unclear.Department of Homeland Security police stood outside Nationals Park during a game Thursday between the Washington Nationals and the Philadelphia Phillies. DEA agents patrolled The Wharf, a popular nightlife area, while Secret Service officers were seen in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood.Bowser, walking a tightrope between the Republican White House and the constituency of her largely Democratic city, was out of town Thursday for a family commitment in Martha's Vineyard but would be back Friday, her office said.The uptick in visibility of federal forces around the city, including in many high-traffic areas, has been striking to residents going about their lives. Trump has the power to take over federal law enforcement for 30 days before his actions must be reviewed by Congress, though he has said he'll re-evaluate as that deadline approaches.Officers set up a checkpoint in one of DC's popular nightlife areas, drawing protests. Troops were stationed outside the Union Station transportation hub as the 800 Guard members who have been activated by Trump started in on missions that include monument security, community safety patrols and beautification efforts, the Pentagon said.
Troops will assist law enforcement in a variety of roles, including traffic control posts and crowd control, National Guard Major Micah Maxwell said. The Guard members have been trained in de-escalation tactics and crowd control equipment, Maxwell said.
National Guard troops are a semi-regular presence in DC, typically being used during mass public events like the annual July 4 celebration. They have regularly been used in the past for crowd control in and around Metro stations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Washington DC takeover: Police Chief Pamela Smith says Trump's move ‘dangerous' threat to law and order
Washington DC takeover: Police Chief Pamela Smith says Trump's move ‘dangerous' threat to law and order

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Washington DC takeover: Police Chief Pamela Smith says Trump's move ‘dangerous' threat to law and order

Washington, DC's police department chief Pamela Smith has said that the Trump administration's order to install a federal official as its head is a 'dangerous' threat to law and order in the US capital. In a court filing on Friday, Smith said that if the Trump administration's order installing an 'emergency police chief' is allowed to stand, it would upend the command structure of the force. The police chief's statement came in a court filing as Washington seeks to block the federal takeover of its police department in court. Washington's top legal official is seeking an emergency restraining order on the US Attorney General Pam Bondi's order to remove the Metropolitan Police Chief. District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues the police takeover is illegal and threatens to 'wreak operational havoc.' 'The Bondi Order violates the Administrative Procedure Act because it is contrary to law, in excess of the Agency Defendants' statutory authority, arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance with the law,' the court filing said. 'Defendants' actions also exceed their authority under the DC Home Rule Act and violate the separation of powers, Take Care Clause, and District Clause of the Constitution,' it said further. On Thursday, Attorney General Bondi designated Terry Cole, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, as 'Emergency Police Commissioner,' effectively handing over all the powers and duties vested in the Metropolitan Police Chief to him. It also left the role of the current chief, Smith, who works for the mayor, unclear. Earlier, on Thursday, Police Chief Smith had told MPD officers to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. Washington has been in chaos ever since Monday, when President Trump signed an executive order requiring the city's mayor to give temporary control of the Metropolitan Police Department to the federal government. On Thursday, the Pentagon stated that all 800 National Guard troops who were ordered to Washington to aid law enforcement personnel have been mobilised. 'As of today, all 800 Army and Air National Guardsmen are mobilised… as part of Joint Task Force DC, and they are now here in our capital,' Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson told journalists. According to the Pentagon, the National Guard will not have the power to arrest anyone, but can still carry weapons and detain people temporarily.

Are you eligible for the AT&T settlement? Here's how to claim your share of $7,500
Are you eligible for the AT&T settlement? Here's how to claim your share of $7,500

Economic Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Are you eligible for the AT&T settlement? Here's how to claim your share of $7,500

Synopsis AT&T has agreed to a $177 million settlement following two data breaches in 2024 that compromised the personal information of millions of current and former customers. Affected individuals, including those in Pennsylvania and Delaware, may be eligible for compensation up to $7,500. Claims can be filed online by November 18, 2025, with the amount depending on the breaches' impact. Reuters Claims are open for millions of customers including Pennsylvania and Delaware residents affected by two massive AT&T data breaches in recent years. Millions of AT&T customers can now file claims in a $177 million legal settlement related to two data breaches and it could provide up to $7,500 in compensation per person. AT&T agreed to a $177 million settlement this year after a pair of data breaches were confirmed in 2024. Claims are open for millions of customers including Pennsylvania and Delaware residents affected by two massive AT&T data breaches in recent years. The first breach, disclosed in March 2024, compromised the personal details of 73 million current and former AT&T customers — including birth dates and Social Security numbers — after the data surfaced on the dark web. The second, revealed in July 2024, saw hackers infiltrate a third-party cloud platform, unlawfully downloading call and text records belonging to 'nearly all' of AT&T's mobile subscribers. ALSO READ: US citizens to receive stimulus check of $2,000 in August? What has Trump said about economic relief Information on the lawsuit was revealed this week, with the telecommunications giant agreeing to pay a total of $177 million to affected users. How do you know whether you are eligible for AT&T settlement or not? Customers affected by both data breaches are eligible to file a claim in the settlement, according to media reports. Victims of the first data breach confirmed in March 2024, which AT&T said affected 7.6 million current account holders and 65.4 million former account holders, can claim payments that top out at $5,000. On the other hand, victims of the second breach, confirmed in July of last year to have compromised the data of nearly every customer, can claim up to $2,500. Top-level claimants affected in both leaks could potentially receive up to $7,500 for verified claims. ALSO READ: Colorado Buffaloes' golden boy: All about Travis Hunter's supercars, lavish mansions and $6 million football fortune You can check if you're eligible by checking this website for customers who were involved. Click "submit claim" and you will be prompted to include a class member ID, email address, AT&T account number or full name. That will reveal your eligibility, and you will then be required to provide additional documentation to submit a you did not receive a confirmation code and notice ID, you can contact the Kroll Settlement Administration at 833-890-4930 for more information. You can file a claim in the AT&T settlement on this "submit claim" and you will be prompted to include a class member ID, email address, AT&T account number or full name. You will then be required to provide additional documentation to submit a claim. ALSO READ: $5,108 Social Security August payment arriving next week: Are you getting the amount this month? Check exceptions The deadline to file a claim is Tuesday, November 18, 2025. The claim can also be filed online, or be mailed and received or postmarked by the deadline can receive up to $7,500 if you were affected by both incidents. Those impacted by the March 2024 incident can claim up to $5,000 by providing materials for the documented loss cash payment option. The July 2024 breach could net you up to $2,500.

Anchorage for empires? Putin eyes Trump's nod for victory and next invasion at Alaska summit
Anchorage for empires? Putin eyes Trump's nod for victory and next invasion at Alaska summit

First Post

time27 minutes ago

  • First Post

Anchorage for empires? Putin eyes Trump's nod for victory and next invasion at Alaska summit

Since the 1990s, Vladimir Putin has worked to restore the extension of the Russian empire that ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Now, he appears to be aiming to ride on Trump's shoulders to take over Ukraine, a potential steppingstone to go deeper into Europe. US President Donald Trump (left) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin shake hands before attending a joint press conference after a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, on July 16, 2018. (Photo: Yuri Kadobnov/AFP) Beyond ceasefires and territorial swaps, Vladimir Putin's top agenda for the summit in Alaska with President Donald Trump could apparently be his goal to restore the Russian empire — an aum that has shaped his every decision since the late 1990s. Ahead of the summit, Putin has made it clear that he does not seek to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine but secure Trump's seal of approval for the Russian victory in Ukraine. Once formally victorious in Ukraine, Putin could set his eyes on the next target in Europe that could be any country from Lithuania to Moldova. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even as Trump has talked of ceasefires, land swaps, and trade incentives, to reach a middle ground to end the war, Putin has not budged, and continued to press his maximalist demands. On the back of continued support from allies and battlefield gains in recent weeks, he has never felt stronger — and it shows. Every action taken by Russia indicates that Putin has no intention to halt offensive operations, says Kseniya Kirillova, a Russia analyst at Jamestown Foundation, a Washington DC-based think tank. 'The Kremlin appears to be genuinely convinced that Russia is winning and that its victory is already predetermined. One of the key drivers of its confidence is the substantial assistance from Iran and China in the production of drones. These drones are designed in Iran, powered by Chinese engines, and assembled in Russia. As a result, Putin is determined to bring Ukraine to its knees,' says Kirillova. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European partners have spent recent days urging Trump to not give in to Putin's demands. They have said that he has agreed to a principled approach and has backed Ukraine's demand for security guarantees. But Trump's word has never meant anything — particularly regarding Ukraine. He has repeatedly agreed with Ukraine and yet, whenever he has talked to Putin, he has come out of the conversation in agreement with him. In Alaska, something far bigger than the fate of the war in Ukraine is on the line — the future of Europe. Putin wants Russian empire, a trade deal wouldn't pacify him The Soviet Union has shaped Putin as much as he has shaped post-Soviet Russia. The collapse of the Soviet Union, and with it the end of the Russian sphere of influence in eastern Europe, was never acceptable to him. He had been clear about it even before he became the president. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Russia has been a great power for centuries and remains so. It has always had and still has legitimate zones of interest. We should not drop our guard in this respect, neither should we allow our opinion to be ignored,' said Putin in 1999. Groomed in the Soviet chekist ideology, which says that an external force —the secret police KGB in case of Soviet Union— controls all spheres of life and people don't have free will, Putin never recognised Ukraine's right to exist as a sovereign state. To him, Ukraine was always a part of Russia and Ukrainian language, culture, and symbols were abominations, and the country's rejection of the Russian sphere of influence was a result of a Western plot that had to be nipped. To him, intervening in Ukraine —and Georgia before it— over its rejection of Russian proxy leaders was natural. In 2008, Putin cited non-existent attacks by pro-Western Georgian leader Mikheil Saakashvili on ethnic Russians in the country to order the invasion of the country. Russia continues to occupy a fifth of Georgia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2014, Putin similarly saw his sphere of influence lost in Ukraine after a mass movement ousted President Viktor Yanukovych, a proxy. His soldiers invaded and occupied the Crimea region, and Putin later annexed it. He also inserted proxies in the eastern Donbas region that waged an armed insurgency against the Ukrainian government till 2022 when Russia launched the full-scale invasion — essentially making it the third Russian war on Ukraine in a decade. Unlike President Trump who thinks like a businessman and wants to make deals, Putin is driven by the ideological commitment to restore the Soviet era controls of Russia, and no incentive of a trade deal might convince him to abandon that commitment, says Kirillova, the Russia analyst at Jamestown Foundation. There are indications that Trump intends to offer Putin sanctions relief and joint US-Russia energy extraction ventures in exchange for an end to the war. 'Putin will not be deterred until pressure is applied on him. With no such pressure so far, he has not taken President Trump's threats seriously and hopes he can maintain his goodwill through flattery and promises,' says Kirillova. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There is no doubt that Russia is playing the long game and has eyes on the rest of Europe as well, according to Shreya Sinha, an associate fellow for European studies at the Vivekananda International Foundation (VIF). 'The recent build-up of infrastructure along the Finnish border is a clear indication that Russia is preparing not just for the next phase of the Ukraine war but also for a broader possible confrontation with Europe,' Sinha previously told Firstpost. 'With Finland now a new Nato member, Russia sees the writing on the wall and is pre-emptively reinforcing its western front. This is not just posturing. It is strategic groundwork for a future where the war in Ukraine might spill over or evolve into a more direct stand-off with European states,' she says. Putin has a clear agenda for Alaska summit Putin wants Trump to see the world from his point of view and help him win in Ukraine and use the country as a stepping stone to advance further in Ukraine. Trump and Putin have plenty of common ground and that has led to suspicions that the American president's recent outbursts regarding the Russian leader are a mere charade, and they remain allies behind the curtains. Ater all, both the leaders reject the free will of nations and have unabashed imperialist ambitions. While Putin evidently eyes dominance over eastern Europe for himself, Trump has declared he wants to annex Canada, Greenland, Panama Canal, and the Gaza Strip. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Throughout the war, and as early as last week, Trump has agreed with the Russian rationale and falsely blamed Ukraine for starting the war. But none of this proves Trump is actually in league with Putin. It could be that he simply does not know any better and is being played by Putin because of his incompetence. In any case, Putin would most likely present to President Trump conditions that are unacceptable to Ukraine, says Kirillova, the Russia analyst at Jamestown Foundation. 'Putin will use Ukraine's rejection of his terms to accuse Volodymyr Zelenskyy of sabotaging peace negotiations. This will allow him to continue the war while simultaneously currying favour with Trump by framing Ukraine as unwilling to seek peace,' says Kirillova. Will Trump give Putin a go-ahead to take over Europe? Putin's maximalist demands range from Ukraine's surrender of the entire eastern part of the country that he has claimed to constitutional changes that would essentially kill Ukrainian national identity. With Versailles treaty-like provisions, he has also sought to restrict the size, deployment, and equipment of Ukrainian military. If Trump would accept such demands and impose them on Ukraine, that would be a dream come true for Putin. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If Trump ends up imposing any such deal with brute force, a new war against a European country would just be a matter of time, says Kirillova. 'If a one-sided deal is struck that favours Russia, Putin will just buy time to launch another invasion a few years down the line to either annex the remainder of Ukraine or harass some other country, perhaps Poland or one of the Baltic nations," she says. Putin is completely committed to the idea of restoring the Soviet Union. He will not rest until he achieves it or loses while trying to achieve it,' says Kirillova. President Zelenskyy will not sign a deal that legitimises Russian gains, such as in Novopil in Donetsk, Vodolahy in Sumy, or Bilohorivka in Luhansk, Sinha, the Europe scholar at VIF, previously told Firstpost. 'These are not just pieces of land. They are proof that this war is still very much ongoing, to which Ukraine has given their all. Any future peace deal would likely hinge on international security guarantees and a long-term roadmap to reconstruction and political stability. But for now, full-scale concession is simply not on the table,' said Sinha. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store