Sig Sauer must face ICE officer's lawsuit over accidental gun firing
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said a trial judge erred by dismissing Keith Slatowski's lawsuit after excluding testimony from two experts about whether the gun's design could cause injury.
Sig Sauer and its lawyer did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The company has faced several lawsuits over alleged unintentional P320 firings.
Slatowski's gun discharged from within its holster after his hand hit the grip in September 2020 at a New Castle, Delaware firing range. A bullet went through his upper right hip and out his thigh.
While unsure whether debris or the holster itself caused the trigger to depress, the former Marine said the lack of an external safety to prevent unexpected firings made his gun unsafe. Slatowski sought $10 million in damages.
Writing for a three-judge appeals court panel, Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas said the trial judge properly excluded testimony from the two experts about whether Slatowski's gun caused his injury, because they hadn't done testing.
But the appeals court said testimony about possible design flaws should have been admitted.
It returned the case to U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick in Philadelphia for a possible trial.
"The P320's design is technical and probably needs explaining," Bibas wrote. "From there, ... Slatowski must rely on his lay eyewitness testimony. It may not prove persuasive. But that is up to the jury, not the judge."
Slatowski's wife is also a plaintiff. Their lawyer Robert Zimmerman said in an email: "Our clients are thankful for the opportunity to present their case to a jury."
The case is Slatowski et al v Sig Sauer Inc, 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-1639.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes loses defamation suit over Rachel Maddow claims
Devin Nunes, the former GOP lawmaker who now serves as chief executive for Donald Trump's media company, has lost his defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal over comments MSNBC star Rachel Maddow made about his interaction with a pro-Russian operative. In dismissing the lawsuit, which centered on remarks Maddow made during a March 2021 broadcast, U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel concluded that 'no reasonable jury could find' that Maddow engaged in 'constitutionally-defined actual malice' against Nunes in the segment, which focused on a package he received from Ukrainian businessman Andrii Derkach. When Nunes was still in Congress and served as the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee in 2019, Derkach – who intelligence agencies described as a Russian agent – addressed a package to Nunes. According to Nunes, the package was promptly handed over the the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In July 2020, however, Politico published a piece with the headline 'Democrats: Packets sent to Trump allies are part of foreign plot to damage Biden.' The outlet reported that Nunes 'declined repeated requests for comment' but that 'one person familiar with the matter said the information was not turned over to the FBI.' Eight months later, Maddow and her show's executive producer Cory Gnazzo relied upon that Politico article for a segment that covered an ODNI report and Nunes' conduct with the Derkach package. Furthermore, in a separate appearance on MSNBC the day before the Maddow segment, then-Rep. Sean Maloney (D-NY) remarked about Nunes: 'And the fact is that [the Russians] were so comfortable using people like Devin Nunes that Andrii Derkach, a known Russian asset, sent information to Devin Nunes at the Intelligence Committee. We literally had the package receipt.' Meanwhile, in the Maddow segment, the MSNBC host claimed that Nunes 'has refused to hand it over to the FBI, which is what you should do if you get something from somebody who is sanctioned by the U.S. as a Russian agent.' In the lawsuit, Nunes said that both Maddow and Gnazzo knew that he had handed the package over to the FBI right away, but they both asserted that they were unaware of other reporting that contradicted their segment. Maddow and Gnazzo were not named defendants in the case, as the complaint was instead directed at NBCUniversal, a division of Comcast. MSNBC will soon be spun off from NBCU into a separate company called Versant. Nunes, who left Congress in 2022 and is now the CEO of Trump Media & Technology Group, contended in his complaint that Maddow and the network harbored 'an institutional hostility, hatred, extreme bias, spite and ill-will' towards him. However, Castel said that there was no clear evidence that the 'defendant's admitted political bias caused defendant to act with a reckless disregard of the truth' or that Maddow was aware of 'probable falsity' as it related to a separate Politico article that reported the FBI received the package from Nunes. The Independent has reached out to Nunes and Trump Media. MSNBC declined to comment. Unlike his boss, Nunes hasn't been quite so lucky when it comes to his many defamation lawsuits against media organizations and personalities. Between 2019 and 2021, judges tossed out three other complaints that Nunes filed against CNN, the Washington Post, and two parody social media accounts that mocked him online. Derkach, meanwhile, was sanctioned by the Treasury Department in September 2020 for attempting to interfere on Trump's behalf in that year's presidential election. He was later indicted for sanctions violations by federal prosecutors in 2022.
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British man smuggled out of US migrant detention centre by Left-wing activists
A British man accused of being in the US illegally broke out of a migrant detention centre with the help of Left-wing activists. Ahmed Mohamed escaped from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody on Tuesday while being transferred to an immigrant detention centre in California. Mohamed, who has been charged with narcotics and weapons offences, was shackled and being frogmarched to an ICE facility in downtown Los Angeles when a masked man, understood to be a pro-immigration protester, helped him to escape while guards were distracted, Homeland Security sources told The New York Post. The suspect was then loaded into a waiting van and made his getaway with the help of other protesters, according to ICE. After a three-day manhunt, Mohamed was tracked down and 'swiftly arrested' on Friday by ICE agents in San Diego, who shared a social media post of the suspect. 'You can run from the law but you cannot hide,' the post read. 'After escaping ICE custody with the help of pro-illegal alien activists, Ahmed Mohamed of the UK was swiftly apprehended and placed back into ICE custody. 'On top of his charges and convictions for narcotics and weapons possession, he will now be charged with escaping from confinement.' Mohamed 'reunited with handcuffs' The agency signed off by thanking San Diego ICE staff for 'reuniting Ahmed with his handcuffs'. The detention centre was targeted by anti-ICE protesters in June, when rioters threw rocks at police and blocked off major roads in an attempt to push back against Donald Trump's deportation programme. Mr Trump responded by deploying 2,000 members of the National Guard and 700 marines to quell the protests, with Karen Bass, the LA mayor, accusing the president of acting like a bully. The administration's show of force sparked fury from Gavin Newsom, the state's Democratic governor, who warned that 'Democracy is under assault before our eyes'. Mohamed is the latest British citizen to be detained by ICE agents, after Orlando Duncan Da Silva Bain, 19, was arrested in New York in May. On entering the US, Da Silva Bain allegedly failed to declare his UK criminal record, which included child sex offences, according to ICE.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' loses bid for release from jail ahead of sentencing
NEW YORK, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Sean "Diddy" Combs on Monday lost his bid to be released from jail ahead of his October 3 sentencing, after the hip-hop mogul was found not guilty at his sex crimes trial of the most serious charges he faced. Combs' lawyers had asked U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian on July 29 to release Combs on a $50 million bond, arguing conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn were dangerous and that defendants convicted in the past of prostitution-related charges that were similar to Combs' were usually released before their sentencing. Prosecutors with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office countered in an August 1 court filing that staffing levels, medical services, and facility conditions at the MDC had improved since Combs was arrested in September 2024. They also said evidence of Combs' physical violence presented at trial showed he was a danger to the community. In a written ruling on Monday, Subramanian said Combs' arguments "might have traction in a case that didn't involve evidence of violence, coercion or subjugation in connection with the acts of prostitution at issue, but the record here contains evidence of all three." Combs' lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
