logo
Why Rasool believes Ramaphosa should be cautious in selecting a new ambassador

Why Rasool believes Ramaphosa should be cautious in selecting a new ambassador

IOL News5 days ago
Former South African Ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool.
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers
Ebrahim Rasool, the former South African Ambassador to the US, asserts that President Cyril Ramaphosa's cautious approach to appointing a new ambassador is not just wise—it's essential in the wake of recent diplomatic upheaval.
In an exclusive interview with Independent Media at the G20 Interfaith Forum (IF20) on Monday in Cape Town, Rasool said the question the country must ask itself is whether it wants to go through the embarrassment of nominating an ambassador, and then having them wait, which was the original plan by the Republicans with him.
Rasool said he was fortunate to have been credentialed by former US President Joe Biden in his last week of office.
'The question is, do we want to go through that embarrassment of the US making our ambassador stay in limbo for a few months, and then because we have nominally appointed an ambassador, it cuts other channels of communication.
'This (current) state shows that you can still pick up the phone, without going through the embassy. That is the one reason why it is correct to be cautious. The second reason is that you cannot allow the US to choose our ambassador to their country for themselves, because what you then do is that you get an echo chamber…then we have someone who goes 'Yes, Mr Trump, you are right'.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'Thirdly, if you choose even a mildly independent ambassador, you will not find such a person of integrity who, at some point or other, did not express disquiet about the direction of the United States under President Trump.'
Rasool touched on Mcebisi Jonas, Ramaphosa's special envoy to the US, who was rejected by Washington in May this year.
'Here is an astute business person, but his astuteness economically is also his astuteness politically, and therefore, you won't find a clean slate in terms of that.'
On who could replace the vacant position, he said that 'because people say a white skin can more easily go into the White House, (I've thought) that if you can find a white person with the right values, and in that regard, I threw out the name Marthinus van Schalkwyk.
'Someone whose growth from the National Party to the ANC I have watched, and I think that not him per se, but that that is the kind of person that we can use to satisfy two things - the love of a white skin in the White House, and the values that our country needs presently,' Rasool said.
Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.
Cape Argus
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments
The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments

South Africa has been criticised for its unclear foreign policy of non-alignment. The South African Communist Party (SACP) has come to the defence of South Africa's army chief, General Rudzana Maphwanya. This comes after the government distanced itself from controversial comments made by Mphwanya during his recent trip to Iran. Maphwananya came under fire for suggesting that South Africa and Iran have common goals. He also criticised Israel for its actions in the ongoing war in Gaza. In a statement on Saturday the SACP said there was nothing wrong with the comments Maphwanya made. 'The SANDF chief's comments in Iran regarding political and policy questions reportedly included South Africa's adopted and correctly articulated policy positions on Palestine.' it said. 'This reflects South Africa's international relations and cooperation policy, including solidarity.' The SACP believes that the government seems to be punishing Maphwanya for his comments. 'The government and the Presidency in particular, appears to have begun to act to isolate and punish the chief of the military for the alleged contravention of military code regarding political statements and policy statements made during the trip. 'This action is not an objective act of correcting the defence conduct of a soldier but is a political capitulation to Western-aligned imperialist, right-wing pressure directly influenced by the imperialists' political interests.' South Africa's foreign policy dilemma The SACP accused the South African government of mixed messages concerning its foreign policy. 'It clearly appears that the government is being cajoled to project itself as pro-West and anti-Iran.' Will action be taken against Maphwanya The party also said Maphwanya's comments should not be compared to the actions of DA MP Andrew Whitfield who went to the US on an unapproved trip during his time as deputy minister of trade, industry and competition. President Cyril Ramaphosa subsequently removed Whitfield as the deputy minister. 'This comparison is incorrect, as Maphwanya's visit took place within the framework of military regulations with the full knowledge of the Minister of Defence whereas Whitfield's visit was unauthorised. 'The SACP rejects the impending acts of isolation and scapegoating of Maphwanya to appease Western imperialist forces and their domestic agents. compromising South Africa's sovereign right to formulate and implement its own foreign policy, including on defence cooperation.' The party said any actions by the government towards Maphwanya as military chief must be based on strengthening the country's military institutions and their capabilities. 'The SACP rejects any attempt at dictating which nations South Africa may have bilateral relations with, including defence, trade and investment. 'We will defend our country's right to build relations based on mutual respect, equality and solidarity, free from the dictatorship of Washington, Brussels or their local political surrogates.' ALSO READ: Ministries distance themselves from SANDF chief's comments in Iran Tensions with the U.S The SACP's remarks come as South Africa is on a mission to reset relations with the US. The Trump administration has also slapped South Africa with a 30% tariff on exports. Relations with the US have been strained since the spreading of misinformation by some civic organisations. NOW READ: Ramaphosa unaware of 'ill-advised' Iran trip by SANDF chief – Magwenya

National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks
National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks

President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing delegates at the national convention, marking the opening of the National Dialogue. The constitution of the steering committee has been delayed by another two weeks. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media The establishment of the broad-based steering committee to oversee and guide the National Dialogue is expected to be finalised in the next two weeks. The National Dialogue's first national convention at the University of SA's main campus in Pretoria on Saturday could not finalise constituting the steering committee. Mandisa Khanyile, a member of the convention organising committee, said some formations or sectors are not yet ready to make a decision regarding who they are going to have as their steering committee nominees 'What we have decided to do is that we are going to allow a period of two weeks post this convening for those sectors to make that decision,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Khanyile added that sectors should provide two or three nominees for the steering committee or one of its subcommittees. She said organisations and sectors will meet over the next two weeks and include not just people present during the national convention. 'There was a complaint that there were people who are not in this room, that we haven't had access to, this is the time to bring them into the conversation,' Khanyile explained. She said the organising committee wanted the process to be made public. 'If you are going to, for example, have a meeting, that meeting must be available for people online who want to join so that they can see the transparency within the process,' Khanyile added. She clarified that this is a 100% voluntary engagement. 'No one is going to get remunerated for their time. You will not be paid to do this work. 'It is going to be up to you and your organisation and your personal pocket how you fund your participation in this process,' said Khanyile, adding that involvement will be based on ability to participate without necessarily needing compensation. The Rastafari Nation Council representing 26 organisations of Rastafarians and seven orders of the Church of His Majesty or the churches of Rastafari opposed capping the number of steering committee members at 50. A representative of the council from Limpopo said half of the social or civil society movements present at the national convention are already speaking on behalf of the process and there is overrepresentation on their side. 'We have a National Assembly of 400 people, so it shouldn't be a problem having a steering committee as widely representative as possible than to be limiting it to a particular number,' the Rastafari council representative stated. He explained that as long as there is broad representation and inclusivity, they will be happy with that. The Rastafaris claim to be a significant minority of about three million in South Africa. 'We would like to humbly request that we be defined as Rastafari, not grouped with faith-based communities, not grouped with any other groupings because faith plays a smaller role within that. We are also one of the communities which are very much historically marginalised,' the representative added.

The Le Roux Question: Millions shape media, courts, democracy?
The Le Roux Question: Millions shape media, courts, democracy?

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

The Le Roux Question: Millions shape media, courts, democracy?

The Millennium Trust funds initiatives in media, law, civil society, and politics across South Africa, supporting organisations such as Daily Maverick, amaBhungane, CASAC, Freedom Under Law, and Judges Matter. | These grantees are said to operate with full editorial and organisational independence, but the Trust's influence is said to be exercised indirectly through advocacy, investigative work, and legal reform efforts, rather than through direct control. | The Trust provides financial support to the Democratic Alliance Image: Sizwe Dlamini ECONOMIST Dr Séan Mfundza Muller has issued a stark warning about the growing power of South Africa's ultra-wealthy, spotlighting Michiel le Roux, co-founder of Capitec Bank, and his alleged behind-the-scenes influence on media, politics, and civil society through strategic funding, raising questions about accountability, transparency, and the integrity of democratic institutions. Speaking on Ntsiki Mazwai's Moya podcast, Muller said: 'Another South African billionaire, who I think is very interesting, is Michiel le Roux, who is one of the people behind Capitec. Now, as far as I know — and I heard this both from a private source and then I also came across a public source of this information — Le Roux is behind a trust called the Millennium Trust.' Muller explained that, according to his research and private discussions, the Millennium Trust, which was founded around 2010, supports a 'constellation of powerful voices in civil society', noting: 'The Millennium Trust funds the Daily Maverick, amaBungane, the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (Casac), Freedom Under Law, as far as I know … and I'm going from memory here.' He further said that the trust operated with a certain degree of opacity: 'But so you've got all these civil society organisations, all these media outlets being funded by this … trust. I mean, I've gone to look at the directors. You would never guess from the directors of this trust. You would not be able to find out who's behind it.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Muller described how he discovered the connection: 'I only found out because I stumbled across something online and because somebody who had direct knowledge … told me privately that Le Roux is behind this.' When reached for comments, the Millennium Trust said they would get the appropriate person to respond to questions from the Sunday Independent, but had not got back to us by the time of compiling this report. Attempts to get comments from Le Roux drew a blank. Regarding potential implications, Muller raised concerns about editorial independence and transparency, saying: 'While these funds support critical journalistic and civic activities, concerns persist about their impact on editorial independence. Newsrooms such as the Daily Maverick and amaBhungane maintain that funding does not dictate editorial control, yet the exact terms and amounts often lack full public disclosure, raising questions about transparency in media financing.' He also spoke about Le Roux's financial support to South Africa's main opposition party, the DA: 'Michiel le Roux funds the DA … so he also funds their court cases. He funds the civil society organisations that apply to the court to be friends of the court in court cases. And he funds the media houses that report on all of that.' Muller posed a rhetorical question on the ramifications for public understanding: 'Okay, now, how do you think as an ordinary person, you're going to be able to get accurate information on, for example, who's corrupt and who's not, who's good and who's bad?' He noted that Le Roux's donations reportedly exceeded R50 million between 2021 and 2023 through private companies such as Fynbos Ekwiteit and Fynbos Kapitaal, making him among the largest disclosed donors to the DA within that timeframe. Muller also commented on broader patterns of philanthropic influence: 'This is just one billionaire. When they control three, right, and those are just the ones we know about, right, that's not even like particularly covert. As soon as you know who's funding the trust, you can figure that out loud, right? There's a whole lot of other stuff that we know less about, what we have to find out about through private sources … like who's funding Rivonia Circle … which is another thing which I've raised over the last couple of years.' Reflecting on new civic movements and political projects, Muller observed: 'Rivonia Circle was really the platform that Songezo Zibi used to start Rise Mzansi, which eventually we discovered was funded by the Oppenheimers.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store