Hindi in Maharashtra schools: CM reviews policy, says decision only after consultations with all stakeholders
The announcement came after a high-evel meeting at the CM's official residence, Varsha, late evening that was attended by Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, School Education Minister Dada Bhuse, Minister of State Dr Pankaj Bhoir, and senior education department officials.
According to officials, the meeting discussed the implications of the policy, especially under the new National Education Policy (NEP). It was decided that a comprehensive presentation will be prepared highlighting the linguistic situation across the state, ensuring that Marathi-medium students do not face any disadvantage.
The CM stressed that the presentation should be shared with all relevant stakeholders, including language scholars, writers, and political leaders, and a structured consultation process be launched. 'Only after this process is completed, a final call will be taken on the policy,' Fadnavis said.
As per the decisions taken, minister Dada Bhuse will now initiate the next phase of consultations.
On April 16, the state government issued a government resolution (GR) introducing third language from Class 1 to 5 and stated that Hindi will be mandatory as the third language in Marathi and English medium schools of Maharashtra State Board. Following major backlash, minister Dada Bhuse on April 22 declared that Hindi will not be mandatory and a new GR would be issued.
The revised GR issued on June 17 reignited the controversy by emphasising that Hindi will 'generally' be the third language and that students would be allowed to opt for another Indian language, provided at least 20 students are available for the same. According to officials, the review will focus on the logistical aspects of implementing the revised GR.
'Marathi remains compulsory in all schools, and there is no imposition of Hindi,' Fadnavis had said last week during his visit to Dehu for the Sant Tukaram Wari. He reiterated that the state was following the three-language formula laid down in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which he said is binding on all states.
On Monday, Maharashtra Cultural Affairs Minister Ashish Shelar clarified saying, 'In fact, our government has removed the earlier compulsion of teaching Hindi from Classes 5 to 8. Instead, we have made it (Hindi) available as an optional choice alongside several other languages. Therefore, the ongoing discussion around the issue is unrealistic, unreasonable and illogical.'
'We are staunch supporters of the Marathi language and equally committed to the interest of students,' said Shelar, who is also the Mumbai BJP president.
However, the Opposition has accused the BJP-led government of pushing a political agenda under the guise of education reforms, with Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray and MNS Chief Raj Thackeray claiming that the move was an attempt to impose Hindi on Marathi-speaking students.
Raj Thackeray also questioned why Maharashtra was implementing the policy when even BJP-ruled Gujarat had not made Hindi compulsory in schools.
(with PTI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As Sena (UBT), MNS eye tie-up, a question hovers: Is Raj Thackeray key to civic polls?
Amid talks of an alliance between the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Raj Thackeray-led Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), the Uddhav camp has fuelled this buzz by saying that both the Thackeray cousins would together contest the upcoming civic body elections in the state including the crucial Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) polls. Though no official announcement has been made by the once-estranged cousins, Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut said Friday, 'The Thackeray brothers will contest the civic polls together and they will win. Talks are already going on for several municipal corporations, including Mumbai, Thane, Nashik and Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. No evil force can now break the unity of the Thackerays.' Raj's political career has, however, been defined by frequent shifts in allegiance, and mixed signals to opponents as well as allies in Maharashtra. His meetings in recent months with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and other ruling Mahayuti alliance's leaders had triggered speculations of a tie-up with the BJP, which views Raj as a strategic disruptor who draws his support from the same Marathi-speaking electorate that forms Uddhav's core voter base. Though a Sena (UBT)-MNS alliance for the local body elections is still being negotiated, the MNS's electoral history shows its impact has been limited since it contested its first Lok Sabha and Assembly elections in 2009. In the Lok Sabha polls, the MNS has never won a seat so far. In the state Assembly elections, the MNS got off to a good start, winning 13 seats and 5.7% vote share in 2009. But its fortunes have since dwindled, with the party winning just one seat in 2014 and 2019 each, before dropping to zero in 2024. Still, with Raj's push for regional identity resonating with the urban Marathi electorate, the MNS has fared better in the three municipal corporation elections it has contested so far, and could boost the Sena (UBT)'s prospects. In the first set of municipal corporation elections contested by the MNS between 2006 and 2009, the party won 45 seats across the 12 corporations where it contested, with an overall vote share of 5.87%. There are a total 2,118 seats spread across 22 corporations in Maharashtra. The MNS's best performances came in Nashik, where the party won 12 of the total 108 seats with a vote share of 12.97%, followed by wins in eight of Pune's 144 seats with a 7.74% vote share. The MNS recorded its second-highest vote share in the BMC at 10.43%, which was enough to win seven of its 228 seats. The undivided Shiv Sena and Congress were by far the dominant parties in Nashik and Brihanmumbai in terms of seats, while the undivided NCP was in pole position in Pune. In Nashik and Brihanmumbai, incidentally, the MNS's vote share exceeded that of the BJP's, at 10.44% and 8.69%, respectively, and was not far behind the NCP's 11.29% in Brihanmumbai. Of the nine corporations that fall within the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), the MNS managed to win seats in Brihanmumbai, Thane and Mira-Bhayandar. An analysis of the finishing positions in the 12 municipal corporation polls held from 2006 to 2009 shows that in the 45 total seats won by the MNS, the Shiv Sena and the NCP were its main rivals, finishing as the runners-up in 15 and 13 seats, respectively. However, the MNS placed second in a total 63 seats, of which 25 were won by the Shiv Sena, 13 by the Congress, 12 by the NCP and seven by the BJP. Going by the seat tallies in these elections, the MNS and Shiv Sena would have benefited most from an alliance, though their combined seats and vote shares would still not have been enough to seal outright majorities. The NCP was the only party that was able to win a majority on its own in two corporations – Navi Mumbai and Pimpri-Chinchwad – likely owing to the competitive nature of urban local body polls, where Independents and regional parties or fronts have a significant presence. The MNS followed up its debut outing with strong performances in the municipal corporation elections held from 2009 to 2014. The party, contesting all but two of the 26 corporations, won 162 of the total 2,543 seats that went to polls, securing a much-improved overall vote share of 12.43%. Much like the previous set of municipal corporation elections, the MNS's best showings were in Nashik, Pune, Brihanmumbai and Kalyan-Dombivli (the latter two fall within the MMR). With 40 seats and a 28.24% vote share, the MNS was the single-largest party in Nashik. Though it fell short of an outright majority in the 122-member body, it received enough external support to lead the corporation. Here, its main rivals were the undivided Shiv Sena and NCP, which won 19 and 20 seats respectively, though the Congress was not far behind at 15 seats. The party, which won seats across 17 corporations, also managed to win 29 of Pune's 152 seats, 28 of Brihanmumbai's 227 seats, 27 of Kalyan-Dombivli's 107 seats, 12 of Jalgaon's 75 seats, and seven of Thane's 130 seats. The MNS won seats in all but two of the corporations under the MMR. In Pune, which was again dominated by the NCP, the MNS managed to outperform the Congress's tally of 28 seats, the BJP's 26, and the Shiv Sena's 15. In Brihanmumbai, it won more seats than the NCP at 13, and wasn't far behind the BJP's 31; but the Shiv Sena and Congress remained in the lead at 75 and 52 seats, respectively. In Kalyan-Dombivli, only the Shiv Sena, at 31 seats, was ahead of the MNS. In Jalgaon, where regional parties dominated, it won the second highest number of seats among the major parties, behind only the BJP at 15. In vote share terms, the MNS recorded its best performance in Kalyan-Dombivli at 28.72%, well ahead of every other party despite trailing the Shiv Sena in terms of seats. Its 28.24% vote share in Nashik was the party's next highest tally and the most among all the parties in the corporation. The MNS was the second-highest vote-getter in Brihanmumbai and Pune, with vote shares of 20.67% and 20.6%, respectively. It had the third highest vote shares in Thane at 15.41% and Jalgaon at 13.22%. In the total 162 seats won by the MNS, its main rivals who finished as runners-up were the Shiv Sena in 56 seats, NCP in 33, BJP in 28, and Congress in 25. But in the 255 seats where the MNS was the runner-up, it was largely trumped by the Shiv Sena, which won 92 of these seats, followed by the NCP at 56, BJP at 44, and Congress at 37. Going by these figures, an alliance of the MNS with the Shiv Sena may have proven more beneficial than one with the BJP, though neither combination would have together crossed the majority mark in any corporation, except in Kalyan-Dombivli, where the MNS and Shiv Sena's combined seat would have reached an outright majority. In the most recent set of corporation elections from 2014 to 2019, the last held in Maharashtra, the MNS suffered a major setback, raising questions on its political clout in urban regions. The party, contesting across 21 of the 27 corporations, won just 26 out of a total 2,736 seats with an overall vote share of 3.56% – both tallies well below even its civic poll debut almost a decade prior. The MNS's seat tally fell in all but one corporation while its vote share fell in all but two. Its best performance, with just nine seats, came in Kalyan-Dombivli, followed by seven seats in Brihanmumbai, and five seats in Nashik. While the Shiv Sena and BJP were neck-and-neck in the lead in Brihanmumbai and Kalyan-Dombivli, with the seat tallies at 84-to-82 and 52-42 respectively, the BJP was the clear front-runner in Nashik with 66 seats. The only other corporations where the MNS won seats were Chandrapur and Pune with two seats each, and one seat in Pimpri-Chinchwad. The MNS's relatively negligible seat tallies meant that it played only a marginal role in determining the outcomes, even where it put in its strongest performances. For instance, in Brihanmumbai and Nashik, neither the BJP nor the Shiv Sena would have had an outright majority even if the MNS's seats were added to its tally (a Shiv Sena-MNS combine, however, would have fallen short by one seat in Kalyan-Dombivli). But in Nashik, the MNS's best outcome, the BJP alone was able to secure an outright majority. In terms of vote shares, the MNS topped out at Kalyan-Dombivli at 10.31%, followed by Nashik at 10.01%, Brihanmumbai at 7.73%, Pune at 6.44%, and Thane at 5.57%. In 12 corporations, the party failed to cross the 1% vote share mark. In some corporations, the MNS's vote share decline from the previous polls were precipitous. In Kalyan-Dombivli, its vote share fell by 18.41 percentage points, and in Nashik by 18.23 percentage points. While in Pune it fell by 14.16 percentage points, the decline was 12.94% in Brihanmumbai. These figures highlight the declining popularity of the MNS, even in corporations where it held significant influence just five years prior.
New Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Tushar Gandhi slams governors for acting as ‘Super Chancellors'
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Tushar Gandhi, great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi and noted author, on Saturday lashed out at governors, alleging they have turned into super chancellors and misuse their position to obstruct the functioning of elected governments. He alleged that governors were being used as political tools of the Centre to weaken state administrations. Speaking at a national seminar organised by the Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad (KSSP) on challenges in higher education, Gandhi said, "Now the governors are acting as super chancellors. Those in BJP-ruled states enjoy retirement, while those in opposition states are tasked with making governance difficult," he remarked. Gandhi also came down heavily on the National Education Policy (NEP), warning that it would create enslaved minds by curbing rational thought and academic freedom. He argued that education had lost the freedom it once enjoyed, with teachers forced into a system that discouraged questioning. "If primary education itself is shackled, the future will suffer. We need state-oriented education models instead of a one-size-fits-all union policy," he said. Expressing concern over the decline of rational thinking in society, Gandhi said even educated people were falling prey to irrational claims spread on social media. Citing an example, he said, "One of my relatives, a former IIT professor, forwarded a photo of a circular rainbow calling it 'Brahma Danush'. Natural phenomena are now being projected as miracles to fuel irrational practices. These are propaganda tools of fascist forces."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
32 minutes ago
- Business Standard
100 days of Pope Leo XIV: Calm, controversy-free papacy takes shape
When Pope Leo XIV surprised tens of thousands of young people at a recent Holy Year celebration with an impromptu popemobile romp around St. Peter's Square, it almost seemed as if some of the informal spontaneity that characterised Pope Francis' 12-year papacy had returned to the Vatican. But the message Leo delivered that night was all his own: In seamless English, Spanish and Italian, Leo told the young people that they were the salt of the Earth, the light of the world. He urged them to spread their hope, faith in Christ and their cries of peace wherever they go. As Robert Prevost marks his 100th day as Pope Leo this weekend, the contours of his pontificate have begun to come into relief, primarily where he shows continuity with Francis and where he signals change. Perhaps the biggest takeaway is that after 12 sometimes turbulent years under Francis, a certain calm and reserve have returned to the papacy. Leo seems eager above all to avoid polemics or making the papacy about himself, and wants instead to focus on Christ and peace. That seems exactly what many Catholic faithful want, and may respond to what today's church needs. He's been very direct and forthright but he's not doing spontaneous press hits, said Kevin Hughes, chair of theology and religious studies at Leo's alma mater, Villanova University. Leo has a different style than Francis, and that has brought relief to many, Hughes said in a telephone interview. Even those who loved Pope Francis always kind of held their breath a little bit: You didn't know what was going to come out next or what he was going to do, Hughes said. An effort to avoid polemics Leo has certainly gone out of his way in his first 100 days to try to heal divisions that deepened during Francis's pontificate, offering messages of unity and avoiding controversy at almost every turn. Even his signature issue confronting the promise and peril posed by artificial intelligence is something that conservatives and progressives alike agree is important. Francis's emphasis on caring for the environment and migrants often alienated conservatives. Closer to home, Leo offered the Holy See bureaucracy a reassuring, conciliatory message after Francis's occasionally authoritarian style rubbed some in the Vatican the wrong way. Popes come and go, but the Curia remains, Leo told Vatican officials soon after his May 8 election. Continuity with Francis is still undeniable. Leo, though, has cemented Francis's environmental legacy by celebrating the first-ever ecologically inspired Mass. He has furthered that legacy by giving the go-ahead for the Vatican to turn a 430-hectare field north of Rome into a vast solar farm that should generate enough electricity to meet Vatican City's needs and turn it into the world's first carbon-neutral state. He has fine-tuned financial transparency regulations that Francis initiated, tweaked some other decrees to give them consistency and logic, and confirmed Francis in deciding to declare one of the 19th century's most influential saints, John Henry Newman, a doctor of the church. But he hasn't granted any sit-down, tell-all interviews or made headline-grabbing, off-the-cuff comments like his predecessor did. He hasn't made any major appointments, including to fill his old job, or taken any big trips. In marking the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki last week, he had a chance to match Francis's novel declaration that the mere possession of nuclear weapons was immoral. But he didn't. Compared to President Donald Trump, the other American world leader who took office in 2025 with a flurry of Sharpie-penned executive decrees, Leo has eased into his new job slowly, deliberately and quietly, almost trying not to draw attention to himself. At 69, he seems to know that he has time on his side, and that after Francis' revolutionary papacy, the church might need a bit of a breather. One Vatican official who knows Leo said he expects his papacy to have the effect of a calming rain on the church. Maria Isabel Ibarcena Cuarite, a Peruvian member of a Catholic charismatic group, said it was precisely Leo's quiet emphasis on church traditions, its sacraments and love of Christ, that drew her and upward of 1 million young people to Rome for a special Jubilee week this month. Ibarcena said Francis had confused young people like herself with his outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics and approval of blessings for same-sex couples. Such gestures went beyond what a pope was supposed to do and what the church taught, she thought. Leo, she said, has emphasised that marriage is a sacrament between men and women. Francis was ambiguous, but he is firm, she said. An Augustinian pope From his very first appearance on the loggia of St. Peter's Basilica, Leo has insisted he is first and foremost a son of St. Augustine. It was a reference to the fifth-century theological and devotional giant of early Christianity, St. Augustine of Hippo, who inspired the 13th-century religious Augustinian order as a community of mendicant friars. Like the other big mendicant orders of the early church the Franciscans, Dominicans and Carmelites the Augustinians spread across Christian Europe over the centuries. Today, Augustinian spirituality is rooted in a deep interior life of prayer, living in community, and journeying together in search of truth in God. In nearly every speech or homily since his May 8 election, Leo has cited Augustine in one way or another. I see a kind of Augustinian flavour in the way that he's presenting all these things, said Hughes, the theology professor who is an Augustine scholar. Leo joined the Augustinians after graduating from Augustinian-run Villanova, outside Philadelphia, and was twice elected its prior general. He has visited the Augustinian headquarters outside St. Peter's a few times since his election, and some wonder if he will invite some brothers to live with him in the Apostolic Palace to recreate the spirit of Augustinian community life there. A missionary pope in the image of Francis Leo is also very much a product of the Francis papacy. Francis named Prevost bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, in 2014 and then moved him to head one of the most important Vatican jobs in 2023 vetting bishop nominations. In retrospect, it seems Francis had his eye on Prevost as a possible successor. Given Francis's stump speech before the 2013 conclave that elected him pope, the then-Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio essentially described Prevost in identifying the church's mission today: He said the church was "called to go outside of itself and go to the peripheries, not just geographic but also the existential peripheries. Prevost, who hails from Chicago, spent his adult life as a missionary in Peru, eventually becoming bishop of Chiclayo. He is the incarnation of the unity of difference,' because he comes from the centre, but he lives in the peripheries, said Emilce Cuda, secretary of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. Cuda said during a recent conference hosted by Georgetown University that Leo encapsulated in word and gesture the type of missionary church Francis promoted. That said, for all Leo owes to Bergoglio, the two didn't necessarily get along. Prevost has recounted that at one point, when he was the Augustinian superior, the then-archbishop of Buenos Aires expressed interest in assigning an Augustinian priest to a specific job in his archdiocese. And I, as prior general, said I understand, Your Eminence, but he's got to do something else' and so I transferred him somewhere else, Prevost told parishioners in his home state of Illinois in 2024. Prevost said he naively thought Francis wouldn't remember him after his 2013 election, and that regardless , he'll never appoint me bishop due to the disagreement. Bergoglio not only made him bishop, but he also laid the groundwork for Prevost to succeed him as pope, the first North American pope following the first South American. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
