logo
Police make six arrests at protest outside London hotel housing asylum seekers

Police make six arrests at protest outside London hotel housing asylum seekers

Independent21 hours ago
Six people have been arrested following a protest outside a London hotel housing asylum seekers.
Demonstrators gathered at the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf on Sunday afternoon, with some seen setting off pink flares and waving England flags.
Some demonstrators carried a banner that said: 'We're not far right but we're not far wrong. Don't gamble with our lives. Stop the boats.'
The Metropolitan Police said six arrests were made for breaching Section 14 Public Order conditions, possession of Class B drugs, and assaulting an emergency worker.
In a post on X, the Metropolitan Police said: 'We have imposed conditions using Section 14 of the Public Order Act to prevent serious disruption at the protests in Canary Wharf.
'The group protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers have been instructed to remain on the pavement opposite the Britannia Hotel.'
The hotel has been the site of numerous anti-migrant protests in recent weeks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Criticism of UK's domestic abuse risk assessment prompts rethink
Criticism of UK's domestic abuse risk assessment prompts rethink

Reuters

time21 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Criticism of UK's domestic abuse risk assessment prompts rethink

LONDON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Britain's main domestic abuse risk-assessment questionnaire, DASH, is set to be updated by its lead author and leading charity SafeLives amid evidence its limitations may have contributed to deadly failures. Reuters reported last week that many people were failed by the questionnaire, which has been used by police, social workers, and others for more than 15 years to gauge domestic abuse risk. Following the report, The Telegraph said at least 55 women killed in domestic abuse cases had been graded by DASH as being at standard or medium risk. The Times said some victims were downgraded from high to medium risk before they were killed. SafeLives CEO Ellen Miller said the charity, which co-developed DASH with the form's lead author Laura Richards, had been tasked by the interior ministry with a project to scope "how a review could work through, how a bigger rewrite could happen." Miller, in a later statement, said SafeLives was not reviewing DASH for the government but would "look at the whole picture of how risk is identified and acted on," calling for a government-led review of the entire risk response. The interior ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Richards told Reuters she was "working with SafeLives to update DASH," saying such tools should "always be improved" to help save lives. The DASH system relies on yes-or-no answers and usually requires 14 "yes" responses before a person is classified as high risk and referred for extra support. SafeLives provides DASH training, which some critics say gives the charity a vested interest in protecting the tool. Miller said the organisation did not use DASH as a "cash cow." Reuters spoke with mothers whose daughters were classified as medium risk despite clear warning signs, and were later murdered by their partners. Like Miller, Richards said the problem was not DASH itself but how police used it and that more appropriate training was needed. The National Police Chiefs' Council said the College of Policing reviewed DASH in 2015 and identified inconsistencies, but a review of international literature at the time did not find a better alternative. As a result, it developed a new tool, DARA, which it says better captures controlling and coercive behaviour and incorporates open-ended questions. The tool has been recommended to police forces but its adoption is not mandatory.

Will a ‘war on newts' get Britain building again?
Will a ‘war on newts' get Britain building again?

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Will a ‘war on newts' get Britain building again?

Get ready for a new environmental battle royale. To kickstart our flagging economy, Rachel Reeves is said to be preparing an onslaught against protected species in order to accelerate infrastructure building. The chancellor is going beyond what has previously been proposed, in pursuit of her 'further and faster' economic growth agenda. She wants to tear up European regulations which developers blame for slowing construction projects. Already, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is wending its way through Parliament, will allow builders to bypass existing controls by paying into a nature restoration fund to improve habitats on other sites. While the full ramifications of that draft legislation have not sunk in – cue protests as campaigners argue that one habitat is being sacrificed while another benefits, and that the net result is reduced wildlife and fauna – her latest move will also provoke anger. Among the changes reportedly being mooted by Reeves are plans for a smaller, UK-only, list of safeguarded species. The new shortened line-up would afford more weight to creatures viewed as relatively rare in Europe but common in Britain. Another is the abolition of the EU 'precautionary principle' that requires constructors to show their projects will have no impact on protected natural sites. It would be replaced with a new test based on the risks and benefits of building. Also in Reeves' sights is said to be imposing limits on the legal challenges that can be brought by environmentalists. She has previously indicated as to where her thinking was heading. Speaking to the House of Lords economic affairs committee last month, Reeves said: 'The reason that HS2 is not coming to my city of Leeds anymore anytime soon, is because, I'm afraid, as a country, we've cared more about the bats than we have about the commuter times for people in Leeds and West Yorkshire, and we've got to change that. Because I care more about a young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails, and I care more about my energy bills and my constituents than I do about the views of people from their windows.' Strongly put – but also disingenuous. It is the case that HS2 did have to incur a £100m extra bill for a 'bat tunnel' to guarantee the wellbeing of bats on one section of the line in Buckinghamshire – but that is not the reason the fast-railway is not venturing to Leeds. It has more to do with the spiralling cost of the new service. If it had gone the distance to West Yorkshire, the final tally for that leg alone would have been £36bn. In that context, £100m on some bats is neither here nor there. The bats were also in the south, and had nothing to do with the Yorkshire extension. The fact is that these issues when they arise make ideal media fodder; they are a headline-writer's dream. So it is with the 'fish disco' at Hinckley Point C nuclear plant which plays sound to dissuade fish from entering the cooling system. Again, the expense is tiny, versus the overall price of a nuclear power station. It is true there are repeated problems for developers coming up against bats, newts and the like, and not just regarding large-scale national projects but on housing sites. Often, though, it's the time taken in deciding how to proceed that causes the issue. If Reeves could do something about that, rather than drive a bulldozer through the regulations which were introduced for a purpose, she might find it less controversial and that progress is smoother. It is also a distraction for another reason. While it sounds good and emotive to blame people for wishing to preserve the views from their windows, that is not, in the main, why so few young families are failing to get on the housing ladder. It's a contributory factor, but it is one of several, of which others are more significant – not least the sheer difficulty in obtaining a mortgage for first-time buyers, whatever the local council expects in offset, the need for roads and services, the provision of car parking, the pollution it will cause. These are just some, there are more.

Bradford AFC fans arrested over racism to staff at Luton match
Bradford AFC fans arrested over racism to staff at Luton match

BBC News

time22 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Bradford AFC fans arrested over racism to staff at Luton match

A Bradford City supporter has been arrested for racially abusing a security guard after he was asked to leave for shouting and swearing in the club said it was co-operating with police following the incident in the second half of the Luton Town match at the University of Bradford Stadium on 16 33-year-old was arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence and has been bailed pending further enquiries, West Yorkshire Police said.A 51-year-old supporter was also arrested and handed an out of court disposal for a public order offence which was not racially aggravated, in connection with the same incident at the League One fixture. A Bradford City spokesperson said the two fans had been suspended from attending the grounds while inquiries took place, and said they would be banned indefinitely if found guilty."We would like to reiterate Bradford City AFC has a zero-tolerance policy towards racism and all forms of discrimination," they in the match, a 51-year-old Luton Town supporter was removed from the ground and arrested for behaving in a threatening, abusive or disorderly manner likely to cause harassment alarm or Yorkshire Police said the man had been released on bail pending further of Bradford's players had allegedly been the target of the comments from the visiting supporters' section. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store