Trump tells Musk to 'go get' NASA astronauts who were 'left stranded' by Biden
Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore have been stuck on the International Space Station since June 2024 after their Boeing Starliner became beset with issues. The mission, which was intended to last eight days, has now lasted more than eight months.
Extending beyond Musk's remit as head of the non-governmental Department of Government Efficiency tasked with cutting $1 trillion from the federal budget, Trump called on his First Buddy to bring Williams and Wilmore back from the thermosphere.
'I have just asked Elon Musk and @SpaceX to 'go get' the 2 brave astronauts who have been virtually abandoned in space by the Biden Administration,' he wrote on Truth Social late on Tuesday, taking a swipe at his predecessor.
He continued: 'They have been waiting for many months on @Space Station. Elon will soon be on his way. Hopefully, all will be safe. Good luck Elon!!!'
Hours before Trump broadcast his request, Musk publicly accepted the challenge.
'The @POTUS has asked @SpaceX to bring home the 2 astronauts stranded on the @Space_Station as soon as possible,' the billionaire wrote on X. 'We will do so. Terrible that the Biden administration left them there so long.'
Responding to a comment that the Biden Administration hated Musk more than they wanted to rescue the astronauts, the MAGA loyalist replied, 'True'.
Though it wasn't immediately clear what the new timeline was, a SpaceX Crew-9 Dragon was originally planned to retrieve the astronauts in February, before it was moved to 'no earlier than late March 2025,' NASA said last month.
A previous SpaceX rescue mission faced problems, causing Musk's company to temporarily ground its Falcon 9 rockets in September.
Musk has been especially close with the president ever since endorsing the GOP candidate in July, after the first attempt on Trump's life during a Pennsylvania rally.
The Silicon Valley stalwart spent over $250m on political donations to help Trump retake the White House last week, primarily through donations to his super-political action committee, America PAC.
He continued to cozy up to the president at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, staying in a $ 2000-per-week cottage on its grounds ever since Trump defeated former Vice President Kamala Harris at the ballot box in November.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Time traveller' spotted in Trump and Putin photo with eerie similarity to 1959
US President Donald Trump shared two photos of meetings between American leaders and their counterparts from Russia and the Soviet Union, with many people noticing a striking similarity Eagle-eyed online sleuths have noted an odd detail involving an apparent "time traveller" in photos showing meetings between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and between Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev. US President Trump met with despot Putin for the Alaska summit last week where he hoped to squeeze out conditions for a peace deal with the Russian President. During the meeting, where Putin issued steep demands for peace, the two leaders appeared cordial and, at times, friendly. One photo from the meeting, shared by the US President on TruthSocial, showed Trump pointing his finger squarely at a smirking Putin's chest while an interpreter seemingly guiding the conversation between the pair. The snap was accompanied by another photo of then-Vice President Nixon and Soviet Union leader Khrushchev, with a similar finger pointing incident during the so-called "Kitchen Debate" in Moscow, in 1959. While Trump appeared to highlight the similarities between his gesture and his Republican predecessor, as an apparent show of strength, eagle-eyed people online noted another similarity. At the centre of both images were interpreters who appeared strikingly similar. The unidentified men were noted for having physical similarities including their hair, face shape and their clothes, namely a shirt, suit and tie. X/ Twitter user Carole Tahan said: "A time traveller from the Nixon/Khroutchev encounter (1959) to the Trump/Putin Alaska summit (2025). The striking resemblance of the 2 interpreters!" Another commenter, going by the handle @polymath1959 added: "2025 upper panel - Trump vs Putin 1959 lower panel - Nixon vs Khruschev. Weird fun fact? Same interpreter in both, not aged a day!" Body language expert Judi James also noted the similarity, telling The Mirror: "They even seem to have booked a double of the guy who stood between the leaders back then, to stand in the same spot with the same look of concern on his face, suggesting this is serious stuff." The US pursued a strategy of containment against the Soviet Union, which resulted in Washington DC challenging the emergence of communism in multiple countries, including Vietnam, as well as assisting its enemies, such as in Afghanistan. But Trump has struck up a more positive tone with Putin that had not been seen since Russia illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Putin last enjoyed cordial relations with a Republican when George W. Bush was President. The pair met in 2001, with the former President commenting he looked into Putin's eyes and "found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy, and we had a very good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul." Bush also said Putin "was a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country and I appreciate very much the frank dialogue and that's the beginning of a very constructive relationship." Trump has had a friendly relationship with Putin and has spoken warmly about him, even appearing to favour him in talks about ending the war in Ukraine.
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil edges up on stalled Russia-Ukraine peace talks, strong US demand
NEW YORK/LONDON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Oil prices edged up on Thursday as Russia and Ukraine blamed each other for a stalled peace process, and as earlier U.S. data showed signs of strong demand in the top oil consuming nation. Brent crude futures were up 56 cents, or about 0.8%, at $67.40 a barrel at 12:08 p.m. EDT (1608 GMT), having hit a two-week high earlier in the session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 53 cents, or 0.9%, at $63.24 a barrel. Both contracts climbed over 1% in the prior session. The path to peace in Ukraine remained uncertain, turning oil traders cautious after a selloff over the past two weeks on hopes that U.S. President Donald Trump would soon negotiate a diplomatic end to Russia's war with its neighbor. Both Moscow and Kyiv have since blamed each other for stalling the peace process. Russia on Thursday launched a major air attack near Ukraine's border with the European Union, while Ukraine claimed to have hit a Russian oil refinery. "Some geopolitical risk premium is slowly being pumped back into the market," oil trading advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates told clients on Thursday. The uncertainty in the peace talks means that the possibility of tighter sanctions on Russia has resurfaced, said Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates. Oil prices were also supported by a larger-than-expected drawdown from U.S. crude stockpiles in the last week, indicating strong demand. U.S. crude stockpiles fell 6 million barrels in the week ended August 15, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported on Wednesday, while analysts had expected a draw of 1.8 million barrels. Investors were also looking to the Jackson Hole economic conference in Wyoming for signals on a possible Fed interest rate cut next month. The annual gathering of central bankers begins on Thursday, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell scheduled to speak on Friday.
Western Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Appeal court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump
The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost the president more than 515 million dollars (£382 million) and rock his property empire, was 'excessive'. The president, in a social media post, claimed 'total victory', adding: 'I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State.' After finding that Mr Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay 355 million dollars (£263 million) in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped 515 million dollars. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organisation executives including Mr Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr — now exceeds 527 million dollars (£391 million), with interest. Judge Arthur Engoron (Shannon Stapleton/AP) 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T Renwick and Peter H Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Judge Engoron had also imposed other punishments, such as banning Mr Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during the appeal, and Mr Trump was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a 175 million dollar (£130 million) bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Judge Engoron imposed in its entirety while leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Mr Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last autumn. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York attorney general Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating and staggering fraud'. The president and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a months-long trial, Mr Trump said in January last year that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me'. He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by Ms James and Judge Engoron, who are both Democrats. The Justice Department has subpoenaed Ms James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. New York attorney general Letitia James (Yuki Iwamura/AP) Her lawyer Abbe D Lowell has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign'. Mr Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements were not deceptive because they came with disclaimers noting they had not been audited. The defence also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, low estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, the president's lawyers said many of the case's allegations were too old, a claim they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defence also says Ms James misused a consumer protection law to sue Mr Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Mr Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state says the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others boost their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rested on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comported with Mr Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favourable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was one of several legal obstacles for Mr Trump as he campaigned, won and started a second term as president.
