&w=3840&q=100)
LS adjourned till 4 pm amid uproar as Oppn demands discussion on Op Sindoor
As the House met at 2 pm on the first day of the Monsoon session, the Chair appealed to opposition members to allow the House to function. Amid continuous sloganeering, Sandhya Ray adjourned the proceedings till 4 pm.
Earlier in the day, the House was adjourned twice over the same issue.
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has assured the opposition MPs that the government is ready to have a long discussion on all issues which the Speaker agrees to.
"The government is ready to discuss any topic the opposition wants. Whatever time they need to discuss, the government is ready to answer all questions," Singh said.
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju appealed to the opposition members to place their demand during the meeting of the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) scheduled at 2:30 pm on Monday.
"The government is ready to reply to all the issues that the Speaker agrees to at the BAC meeting. But to raise slogans and not let the House function on the first day of the Monsoon session is unacceptable," Rijiju said in the House.
As opposition members continued to protest in the Well, Jagdambika Pal, who was in the Chair, asked them to return to their seats and assured them that Speaker Om Birla would allow them to raise all matters that they wanted to discuss.
With the opposition leaders not relenting, Pal said, "I appeal to the leader of opposition, I appeal to Rahul Gandhi to let the House take up Zero Hour. People of the country are watching the proceedings and seeing that the government is ready to discuss all issues, but the opposition does not want the House to function." When the Lok Sabha met at 11 am, after obituary references, opposition members led by the Congress were up on their feet as they insisted on a discussion on Operation Sindoor, under which Indian armed forces carried out attacks on terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack.
Birla said he was ready to allow the members to raise all issues, including Operation Sindoor, after Question Hour -- the first hour of the day when members raise questions related to different ministries and departments.
"I will allow you to raise all issues after Question Hour. The House will function only through rules and regulations. It cannot allow sloganeering and raising of placards," he said.
Birla said if the members give notice, he will allow them to raise all issues and give enough time to each of the MPs.
"Honourable members, this is Question Hour. We must try to maintain high parliamentary standards. We must try to fulfil the hopes and expectations of the people who have elected us and debate and discuss important issues of the country," he said.
"Go outside the House for sloganeering," he said.
"You want a discussion on Operation Sindoor, I will allow it after Question Hour. The government is ready to reply to all issues," he said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ravi Shankar Prasad: ‘Why is Congress, Opposition shying away from a debate?'
What do you have to say about the Opposition's uproar over Bihar voter rolls revision? The Opposition has got the right to ask questions, including occasionally creating ruckus as well. But how long will it continue? (LoP, Lok Sabha) Rahul Gandhi says he is not being allowed to speak but his party is in the forefront of creating a complete chaos in the House. Why is Congress and the Opposition shying away from a debate on any issue? Today is the third day. We go and sit and come back. It is agonising, painful and disgusting, to say the least. The whole nation watches us. You can question us in any powerful debate and make us uncomfortable, and we are equally competent to reply to all your debates to make you uncomfortable. Why don't you allow the debate to happen? And then you complain — 'meri awaaz shaant ki jaati hai (my voice is being silenced)'. Why is the debate not being taken up? The larger question is: are they interested in debate? Every debate has to be structured as per Parliamentary rules. Has 16 hours not been allocated for the Operation Sindoor debate, with nine hours in the Rajya Sabha? That is the way the House functions. You ask for a debate, it will be accepted, it will be prepared. You unleash a big attack, we will respond… As far as SIR is concerned, I will raise some questions. To be a voter you have to be a citizen of India – can the EC examine it or not? To be a voter you have to be an ordinary resident of an area. Can the EC examine that or not… Today there are lakhs of votes of people who are dead or have migrated to other areas… What is the problem if these things are being examined by the EC? They (Opposition) sometimes claim there is a faulty voter list. And now when revision is being done, they have a problem. Once the draft publication is done, you have a right to file objections, to appeal to the collector, to file a second appeal for revision before the Chief Electoral Officer. So many mechanisms are available. RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav has said the Mahagathbandhan may take a call to 'boycott Bihar polls' in view of the SIR exercise? I believe that is a casual comment. I will only tell him, 'young man, don't shy away from a fight.' As for Rahul Gandhi's venomous attack on the EC, I will say one thing in Hindi: 'Agar aap ko vote nahin milta to hum kya karein (What do we do if people don't vote for you)?' Even JD(U) MP Giridhari Yadav has questioned the SIR exercise… I don't want to make any comments on individual members. I know that Nitish Kumar, the whole JD(U) and the entire NDA is one. Some critics say in a state like Bihar the exercise can be a huge inconvenience and end up disenfranchising many voters… Haven't 98% of people already filled out the form? Or maybe 99%? Just tell me. People know their rights, people know their obligations and they are following it.


India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
India-UK Trade Deal Brings New Hope, Boosts Crop Exports And Income: Farmers
New Delhi: Farmers on Thursday welcomed the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA), calling it a major boost for Indian agriculture and a turning point for the farming community. Gurmeet Singh, a farmer who shared his thoughts on the deal, said it will not only raise incomes but also help farmers move away from traditional cropping patterns towards more profitable options like horticulture and oilseed cultivation. "This is a very good decision. It will help us solve crop-related problems and water scarcity. If we grow good-quality fruits and export them, we will get better returns. Crops like mustard and soybean will also bring big benefits,' Singh told IANS. The landmark trade agreement, signed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his UK counterpart Keir Starmer, promises zero-duty access to 99 per cent of Indian exports, including a wide range of agricultural products. This is expected to improve price realisation for Indian farmers and bring their products on par with European competitors in the UK market. Singh highlighted that many farmers are stuck in the cycle of cultivating cumin seeds and sugarcane, leading to stagnant earnings. Another farmer said that "now, with better prices available through exports, we can explore more profitable crops. It's time we move beyond the same crops again and again". He also noted that promoting oilseed crops will reduce pressure on water resources and improve sustainability. "Mustard, soybean, and fruits grown for export will not just boost our income but also support India's overall development," he added. The deal is also expected to open up the UK market for horticulture products, with reduced tariffs and faster regulatory clearances. "With easier access and improved competitiveness, Indian farm exports like spices, fresh fruits, processed foods, and oilseeds will now reach more global customers," another farmer stated. Signed during PM Modi's visit to the UK, the FTA is set to increase bilateral trade by about $34 billion and enhance India's economic engagement with one of the world's major economies.


India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
Bad news for Trump, as China is making close ties with US ally, offers its most dangerous weapons used during Operation Sindoor against India, it is…, country is…
Saudi Arabia has long been regarded as a strong ally of the US. However, in recent years, it has appeared to forge stronger ties with China. The US has reconfigured its efforts to engage with Saudi Arabia by offering NATO-like security arrangements in return for Saudi Arabia's recognition of Israel. But the long war in Gaza has stalled negotiations on this front. On the other hand, China has enhanced its outreach to Saudi Arabia by offering military cooperation. For its part, China has offered to provide J-10 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, the same aircraft Pakistan falsely claimed was used to shoot down India's Rafale during Operation Sindoor. Which US Ally Is Moving Closer to China? This disinformation was heavily propagated by China, Turkey, and the USA, all acting in their strategic interests. None of these countries could provide any actual evidence for this. China is now taking this same narrative to market its weapons. It has labelled the J-10 fighter jet as a combat-verified aircraft. Despite its effort, no country—including Saudi Arabia—has yet made any formal commitment to purchase the J-10 jets. While speaking to a researcher specializing in Middle East affairs at China's Northwest University stated, 'One of the reasons why Saudi Arabia prefers western weapons over its Chinese equivalent is because Chinese weapons have not seen combat in recent years.' Furthermore, he stated, 'This may change now that the Chinese-made J-10 fighter jet has drawn its first blood.' What Deal Has China Offered? Saudi Arabia has consistently relied on the United States for both its security needs and the sustainability of its petrodollars-driven economy. Due to this, Saudi Arabia remained one of the largest defense buyers of America. However, in recent years, there has been tension in the relationship between the two countries. During Joe Biden's presidency, the U.S. appeared willing to distance itself from Saudi Arabia, most notably by stopping support for its fight against Houthi rebels; even though, at Washington's request, Saudi Arabia had created a military coalition against the Houthis. The U.S. further stressed the relationship by removing air defense systems from the Middle East in order to bolster European security because of the situation with Russia. Consequently, Saudi Arabia has sought alternative partners for defense cooperation to lessen its reliance on Washington. Meanwhile, turning fully away from the dependency on Washington and towards China is still complicated. Seeing an opening, China's intensification in its outreach has included offers of military equipment (i.e., ballistic missiles, drones, howitzers, and air defense systems), at competitive prices and unconditional options. So far, however, Saudi Arabia has exported most of its new defense systems from the United States. In May, the United States and Saudi Arabia finalized a $142 billion arms deal that the White House declared was the 'largest defense sales agreement in history.' The agreement was completed during President Donald Trump's visit to the Kingdom; this visit was the first stop on a four-day tour of the Gulf. It was the first example of the transactional nature of the foreign policy pursued by Trump.