EU to unveil long-delayed 2040 climate target
Brussels is making the 2040 announcement as much of Europe roasts in an early summer heatwave -- which scientists say are becoming more intense, frequent and widespread due to human-induced climate change.
The target is a key milestone towards the European Union's goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050. The bloc says it has cut climate-warming emissions by 37 percent compared to 1990 levels.
After months of tough negotiations with EU capitals, the European Commission is finally set to stick to the objective it announced last year of cutting emissions by 90 percent by the year 2040.
But in a bid to appease more sceptical member states, the EU's executive arm will introduce some flexibility into the calculation, much to the chagrin of environmental defenders.
From 2036, the commission could allow the bloc's 27 member states to count carbon credits purchased to finance projects outside Europe towards their emission cuts, for up to three percent of the total, according to a draft document seen by AFP.
But climate groups are fiercely opposed to such a measure. Backed by scientific studies, they question the impact of such credits -- given for things like tree-planting or renewable-energy projects -- on reducing overall CO2 emissions.
'Three percent is not insignificant. These are potentially considerable sums that will be spent abroad instead of financing the transition' in Europe, said Neil Makaroff, an expert at the climate-focused Strategic Perspectives think tank.
'But there's a political compromise to be found,' he said. 'The challenge will be for the EU to establish a standard so that these international credits truly help cut emissions and not leave individual states to their own devices.'
'Don't strain ourselves'
EU environment ministers will discuss the objective at a meeting in mid-July before an expected vote on approving the measures on September 18.
It will only become law after EU lawmakers also sign off on the target.
The commission's hope is that the 2040 objective will be approved before the UN climate conference (COP30) in November in the northern Brazilian city of Belem.
But that gives little time for negotiations, which have been complicated by a rightward shift and rising climate scepticism in many European countries.
The EU's climate chief, Wopke Hoekstra, has spent months travelling across the bloc trying to find a compromise.
For some states, including the Czech Republic, the 90-percent target is unrealistic.
Meanwhile, others including Italy and Hungary worry about the burden of decarbonising heavy industry at a time when Europe is working to strengthen its industry in the face of fierce competition from the United States and China.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has suggested a target of 80 or 85 percent, while France has expressed doubts over how the EU will reach its objective.
French President Emmanuel Macron wants guarantees for the decarbonisation of industry and support for nuclear energy, the largest source of power in France.
But the commission can count on the support of other countries including Spain and Denmark, which took over the rotating EU presidency this week.
And the three-percent 'flexibility' -- which mirrors demands made in the new German government's coalition agreement -- should help keep the economic powerhouse on board.
When it comes to Europe's international commitments, Macron has also stressed that the bloc is only bound to present a midway target for 2035 at COP30 in Belem, and not the 2040 objective.
'Let's not strain ourselves,' Macron told reporters last week. 'If we have (a 2040 target) for Belem, great, but if it takes longer, let's take the time,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
4 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Building teams for nation building
I WAS delighted to be able to join the retreat of the IDEAS Autism Centre team in Melaka recently. Sometimes, these company getaways can seem superficial—a big checkbox for directors, managers and executives alike to show that they care about team building, welfare and spending the allocated budget—but this one was truly purposeful and heartfelt. In recognising staff who have been serving for a decade or more, it served as a reminder of the growth of the entire project, borne out of a piece of research about providing therapy and education to some of the most disadvantaged people in our society—children on the autism spectrum from B40 families. With hundreds of children's lives transformed for the better, the people of IDEAS Autism Centre continue to work hard to work with families, corporates and government to uplift this amazing community. With three branches now—in Rawang, Nilai, and Port Dickson—the gathering enabled us to better strategise not just team cooperation, but joint events for the children as well. At one of my more corporate outfits there has been a leadership transition, and at such times the importance of having strong bonds among colleagues becomes unmistakably clear. There is often a critical period where there are rumours about resignations, replacements, disagreements amongst directors or shareholders and so on, speaking concern that may prompt others to leave as well. Thankfully, when there is a high level of trust between board and management, such turbulence can be successfully ridden out, and the company can achieve a renewed sense of purpose when the new chief executive signs the employment contract. At a session with one of the chambers of commerce of a European country, I was asked about the level of cohesiveness within Malaysian political parties. Thankfully I knew something about that country's history and politics, and could point out that individual self-interest, whether within the same or across opposing political parties, often emerges as the prime motivator for politicians anywhere in the world and at any point in history. And so, individuals switching allegiance to a different party within the same coalition, personalities condemning their party colleagues for exaggerating certain issues (being selective about race while doing so), or leaders failing to punish problematic individuals just because they are politically useful—all these are phenomena which the Malaysian public need to tolerate, while hoping that beneficial policies actually get designed and executed as the politicians clamber over one another while ascending the greasy pole. Even among that dirty profession there are bright spots though. Increasingly, I see backbench Members of Parliament from different sides working productively and intelligently towards common policy and legislative goals regarding children, refugees, or even political financing. However, when there is a particularly significant incident that catches national attention, such as the tragic death of teenage student Zara Qairina Mahathir at a religious boarding school in Sabah and the circumstances leading up to it—full of speculation but certainly involving weaknesses in processes and a pathetic response by the Ministry of Education—politicians cannot resist sliding back into hyperbole, with accusations against leaders bandied about on social media and lawsuits ensuing. I hope that in the matter of addressing bullying in our schools, political parties actively reach out to civil society organisations who have worked in education and with children, with expertise in mental health and programmes that have been proven to foster cohesion. In this and indeed all areas of public policy, we need to expand and solidify the ecosystem so that deliberate and toxic disruption to public policymaking is minimised. Political point scoring must not continue to be rewarded; rather, effective policymaking should be. Team building within civil society organisations is important, too, especially for a young and dynamic team in which some people enter and leave, pursue other careers and maybe come back. Transience and permanence of people have existed side-by-side for years at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS), and so I was happy to join the second edition of the badminton tournament. Complete with group and knockout stages, thoughtful pairings and seedings, the researchers and administrators of the think tank were joined by the teachers and therapists of the IDEAS Autism Centre for a day of enjoyable competitiveness. Sadly I did not repeat the achievement of the bronze medal, but my partner and I—an intern destined for a management consultancy—won the Best Doubles Partner Award. Apparently we high-fived a lot. With the annual extended fortnight of celebrations between Merdeka and Malaysia Day coming up, it's an apt time for us as Malaysians to think of team building not just as a company or organisational project, but a national one too. * Tunku Zain Al-'Abidin is Founding President of IDEAS.
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
For oil markets, the Ukraine outcome is insignificant
UNITED States President Donald Trump's high-stakes diplomacy to resolve the war in Ukraine is unlikely to jolt oil and gas markets, no matter the outcome. Russia has faced multiple rounds of Western sanctions and restrictions since its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which have dealt severe blows to the country's giant oil and gas industry. These measures have sapped Moscow of vital revenue and reshaped global energy markets. Russian gas now accounts for just 18 per cent of European imports, down from 45 per cent in 2021, while the bloc's oil imports from Russia have fallen to three per cent from around 30 per cent over that time. The European Union plans to fully phase out Russian energy by 2027. Kpler data shows Russian crude made up about 38 per cent of India's total crude imports in recent months, up from 16 per cent in 2021. China and Turkiye have also ramped up their Russian oil purchases. The war in Ukraine has left over a million dead or wounded, so its conclusion would be welcomed by many. Energy markets, however, are not apt to register much of a reaction unless there is a full ceasefire along with the lifting of all US and European sanctions. And that is a long shot. Given the more probable set of scenarios, oil and gas markets are unlikely to be rattled by the fallout from either last Friday's disappointing summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin or the US president's meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on Monday. Full peace in Ukraine remains highly improbable. Trump might pressure Zelenskyy into accepting a temporary or partial halt in fighting. But even then, Europe is unlikely to resume Russian energy imports while Putin remains in power. Before 2022, Europe accounted for nearly half of Russia's 4.7 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil exports and 75 per cent of its gas exports, according to the US Energy Information Administration. The Trump administration could attempt to ease some sanctions unilaterally, but this could face opposition in Congress unless a broad peace deal is reached. Perhaps the more likely scenario — Trump failing to broker a deal — also shouldn't have a major impact on energy markets. The US could tighten sanctions, particularly by targeting buyers of Russian energy, as Trump has already threatened. But the US president said on Friday he would delay so-called "secondary sanctions" on China due to what he described as "successful" talks with Putin. Of course, India already faces secondary tariffs over its Russian oil purchases. Earlier this month, Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, citing the country's continued oil imports from Russia. The new tariff, effective Aug 27, will bring total tariffs on Indian imports to 50 per cent. But even though Indian buyers already appear to be reducing their Russian oil purchases, the impact on global supplies has been minimal as China has increased its intake of Russian crude. Ultimately, China matters far more in this story, not least because it considers its relationship with Moscow to be strategic. Chinese and Russian oil producers, refiners and traders have already built a sprawling network of tankers and insurers to circumvent Western sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and Russia. Additionally, US tariffs on Chinese goods already average 55 per cent, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Additional tariffs could raise costs for US consumers, and Beijing could retaliate, potentially by withholding rare earths or other critical minerals, all outcomes Trump would want to avoid — and Beijing knows this. Crucially, oil and gas markets appear to be entering a period of oversupply, meaning any possible disruption in Russian volumes can easily be offset. The International Energy Agency expects oil supply to exceed demand by 1.76 million bpd this year and by three million bpd in 2026, driven by rising output from OPEC+ and the Americas. Global liquefied natural gas markets are also expanding rapidly, with new supply coming online in the coming years across the US, Qatar, Canada, and elsewhere. While Trump's foreign policy remains unpredictable, a few things seem clear. He can't, as he once claimed, end the Ukraine war in one day, and what he can do is unlikely to have much of an impact on oil and gas markets.
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Exclusive-Military options for Ukraine developed and will be presented to Western national security advisers
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump greets Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy upon his arrival at the White House, amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Alexander Drago/File Photo (Reuters) -Military chiefs from the United States and a number of European countries have completed military options on Ukraine and will now present the options to their respective national security advisers, the U.S. military said on Thursday. Reuters has previously reported that U.S. and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, following President Donald Trump's pledge to help protect the country under any deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine. "These options will be presented to each nation's respective national security advisers for appropriate consideration in ongoing diplomatic efforts," a U.S. military statement said. The meetings between the chiefs of defense for the United States, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and Ukraine took place in Washington, D.C., between Tuesday and Thursday. Reuters was first to report on the completion of the plans that will be presented to the national security advisers. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Trump's promise during a summit on Monday of security guarantees for Kyiv, but many questions remain unanswered. Officials have cautioned that it would take time for U.S. and European planners to determine what would be both militarily feasible and acceptable to the Kremlin. One option was sending European forces to Ukraine but putting the U.S. in charge of their command and control, sources have told Reuters. Russia's Foreign Ministry has ruled out the deployment of troops from NATO countries to help secure a peace deal. Trump has publicly ruled out deploying U.S. troops in Ukraine but on Tuesday appeared to leave the door open to other U.S. military involvement. U.S. air support could come in a variety of ways, including providing more air defense systems to Ukraine and enforcing a no-fly zone with U.S. fighter jets. Trump has pressed for a quick end to Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, and Kyiv and its allies have worried he could seek to force an agreement on Russia's terms after the president last week rolled out the red carpet for Putin. Russia says it is engaged in a 'special military operation' in Ukraine to protect its national security, claiming NATO's eastward expansion and Western military support for Ukraine pose existential threats. Kyiv and its Western allies say the invasion is an imperial-style land grab. (Reporting by Idrees Ali in Toronto; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Lisa Shumaker)
