Germany: Baboons fed to lions and tigers after zoo culling – DW – 08/04/2025
Nuremberg Zoo has confirmed that baboons killed to keep down numbers were fed to predators, amid public criticism after it was revealed the animals had been dismembered after death.
News of the culling sparked complaints from animal groups over zoo ethics, animal welfare, and culling practices, with the animals decapitated and some having their hands and feet removed.
Deputy zoo director Jörg Beckmann told the DPA news agency that the skulls and brains from the bodies were separated for scientific purposes.
Six of the 12 Guinea baboons, which were culled due to overcrowding, were then fed to lions, tigers, maned wolves and marbled polecats. Hands and feet were removed "out of respect for visitors" who would see the carnivores feeding, Beckmann said.
Skeletons of four baboons are being prepared for museum display, the zoo said. Two baboons died during sedation and were sent for pathology rather than being used as feed.
Beckmann said the zoo had openly communicated in advance that the baboons would be used as food.
"We continue to be transparent and stand by that decision," he said. He explained that whole-animal feeding provides crucial dental health benefits for carnivores, as bones and fur help prevent tartar buildup, unlike processed food. "Unlike many pets, our animals don't need tartar removal under general anesthesia."
He also emphasized the behavioral benefits of such feeding practices, which mimic natural hunting conditions.
"Evolution equipped them with claws and teeth for this. There's no nature documentary about big predators where they don't spectacularly hunt or feed on a carcass."
The zoo had said the baboons were killed because the enclosure was chronically overcrowded and no longer met welfare standards. Attempts to rehome the animals failed, and contraceptive measures for the females had not worked as hoped.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In a statement last week, the zoo said it acknowledged the emotional impact of the move, saying it understood that many people are "confused, affected, or angry."
The zoo explained that the group had grown to more than 40 animals—far exceeding the enclosure's intended capacity of 25 adult baboons.
Animal welfare groups reacted strongly. The Nuremberg-Fürth public prosecutor's office confirmed it had received hundreds of criminal complaints over the allegedly unlawful killings and is now reviewing the case.
The activist group Animal Rebellion began setting up a protest camp near the zoo on Monday. The camp is expected to remain until the following Monday, with organizers demanding an immediate halt to further killings and an end to breeding programs.
In a statement, the zoo said: "Every protest that remains peaceful is acceptable to us."
Why did the zoo says the baboon cull was necessary?
Nuremberg Zoo said the culling was a last resort after years of trying to control the baboon population through non-lethal means, with contraception having only a limited effect and disrupting natural group dynamics.
Despite outreach to many institutions, no suitable home was found for the surplus animals.
Expanding the facility again wasn't feasible due to space and funding priorities. The zoo said it could not stop breeding entirely without undermining its long-term conservation role, which requires maintaining healthy, reproducing populations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 days ago
- DW
US scientists discover trees host up to 1 trillion microbes – DW – 08/06/2025
Healthy trees contain more than one trillion different bacteria, fungi and viruses, a new study has found. These wood microbiomes could hold clues about forest health and climate change. A new study has discovered that trees contain a rich and diverse microbiome inside their tree trunks, much like humans do in our bodies. An average tree contains approximately one trillion microbe cells, according to data acquired from sampling the DNA of 150 trees and published today in the journal . It found that healthy trees contain distinct microbiomes specialized to different parts of the tree and rich in fungi, bacteria, and viruses. The authors believe these could play a vital role in tree health. "Our study shows that each tree species hosts its own distinct microbial community that has evolved alongside the tree," said study co-author Jon Gewirtzman at Yale University, US. Katie Field, a plant biologist at Sheffield University, UK, who was not involved in the research, said the study "helps reredefine how we see trees — not just as standalone organisms, but as complex, integrated ecosystems that include a vast network of microbial life." "In the same way that human microbiomes are important for our health, this work suggests we may need to start thinking similarly about trees. It opens a whole new frontier for environmental microbiology, forest science, and even biotechnology," Field told DW. Microbes are an important part of plant life. The discovery of a 'wood-wide web' — a network that connects fungal filaments and tree roots in underground soil — led to the idea that other organisms aid plant growth and defence against pathogens. But little is known about the microbes living inside healthy wood. "The three trillion trees on Earth represent the world's largest pool of biomass, much of which hosts unique ecosystems we've never studied," said Gewirtzman. The researchers set out to study the microbiomes of trees in the Yale-Myers Forest in Connecticut, US. They took multiple samples from 150 trees across 16 species, including oaks, maples, and pines. Soil samples were also taken. They then extracted DNA from the wood and soil and analysed the data for evidence of DNA from bacteria, fungi, and viruses. They found that trees contain huge numbers of different microbe species — roughly one microbe for every 20 plant cells. This translates to between 100 billion and one trillion microbial cells on average, which is still far fewer than the 39 trillion inside humans. "This study provides some of the clearest evidence to date that the wood of living trees hosts distinct and adapted microbiomes, different to those of the surrounding soil, leaves, or tree roots," said Field. To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio Microbes weren't equally distributed through the tree — specialized microbial communities existed in different parts of wood. The inner heartwood and outer sapwood contained completely different microbial communities. Denser heartwood was dominated by microbes that don't need oxygen, while the sapwood contained more oxygen-requiring microbes. Different microbiomes were also found in different tree species. Maple trees, for example, contained high abundance of microbes that are adept at breaking down sugars. Further experiments showed that different communities changed gas concentrations inside these woods. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Whether these specialized microbiomes affect the health of their tree hosts is unclear. More studies are needed to understand how microbiomes affect wider forest health, but the authors believe there is a link. "We know that certain microbes promote growth in certain model plants, including in major cereal crops and poplar trees, but there are thousands [of microbes] that we do not know the function of," Gewirtzman told DW via email. The study may also open new questions. For Field, this includes investigating the roles microbiomes play in tree aging, defence and decay. "There is also clear potential to explore whether managing or modifying wood microbiomes could help improve forest resilience or carbon cycling," said Field. Gewirtzman suggests it could also answer big picture questions about how climate change impacts trees, or whether tree microbiomes could be deployed for other purposes. "How will climate change affect these internal ecosystems and forest health? And can we harness these microbes for new forest management or biotechnology applications?" But Michael Köhler, a botanist at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, told DW it's far too early for Gewirtzman's group to start monitoring tree microbiomes to measure climate impacts and forest health. "We're investigating this at the moment — how climate change is affecting the microbiome of seeds and seedlings in grasslands," he told DW.
DW
4 days ago
- DW
Germany: Baboons fed to lions and tigers after zoo culling – DW – 08/04/2025
Nuremberg Zoo killed 12 baboons due to overcrowding and dismembered six of them before feeding them to predators — removing heads, hands, and feet. The move has triggered widespread upset and legal complaints. Nuremberg Zoo has confirmed that baboons killed to keep down numbers were fed to predators, amid public criticism after it was revealed the animals had been dismembered after death. News of the culling sparked complaints from animal groups over zoo ethics, animal welfare, and culling practices, with the animals decapitated and some having their hands and feet removed. Deputy zoo director Jörg Beckmann told the DPA news agency that the skulls and brains from the bodies were separated for scientific purposes. Six of the 12 Guinea baboons, which were culled due to overcrowding, were then fed to lions, tigers, maned wolves and marbled polecats. Hands and feet were removed "out of respect for visitors" who would see the carnivores feeding, Beckmann said. Skeletons of four baboons are being prepared for museum display, the zoo said. Two baboons died during sedation and were sent for pathology rather than being used as feed. Beckmann said the zoo had openly communicated in advance that the baboons would be used as food. "We continue to be transparent and stand by that decision," he said. He explained that whole-animal feeding provides crucial dental health benefits for carnivores, as bones and fur help prevent tartar buildup, unlike processed food. "Unlike many pets, our animals don't need tartar removal under general anesthesia." He also emphasized the behavioral benefits of such feeding practices, which mimic natural hunting conditions. "Evolution equipped them with claws and teeth for this. There's no nature documentary about big predators where they don't spectacularly hunt or feed on a carcass." The zoo had said the baboons were killed because the enclosure was chronically overcrowded and no longer met welfare standards. Attempts to rehome the animals failed, and contraceptive measures for the females had not worked as hoped. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In a statement last week, the zoo said it acknowledged the emotional impact of the move, saying it understood that many people are "confused, affected, or angry." The zoo explained that the group had grown to more than 40 animals—far exceeding the enclosure's intended capacity of 25 adult baboons. Animal welfare groups reacted strongly. The Nuremberg-Fürth public prosecutor's office confirmed it had received hundreds of criminal complaints over the allegedly unlawful killings and is now reviewing the case. The activist group Animal Rebellion began setting up a protest camp near the zoo on Monday. The camp is expected to remain until the following Monday, with organizers demanding an immediate halt to further killings and an end to breeding programs. In a statement, the zoo said: "Every protest that remains peaceful is acceptable to us." Why did the zoo says the baboon cull was necessary? Nuremberg Zoo said the culling was a last resort after years of trying to control the baboon population through non-lethal means, with contraception having only a limited effect and disrupting natural group dynamics. Despite outreach to many institutions, no suitable home was found for the surplus animals. Expanding the facility again wasn't feasible due to space and funding priorities. The zoo said it could not stop breeding entirely without undermining its long-term conservation role, which requires maintaining healthy, reproducing populations.
DW
6 days ago
- DW
German nursing homes see cost for care explode – DW – 08/02/2025
Long-term nursing care is becoming unaffordable in Germany. What can be done to help older people pay for their care? The cost of a stay in a nursing home has risen to an average of €3,248 ($3,760) per month, according to the German Association of Nursing Homes (vdek), an association that represents the interests of several statutory health insurance providers. This is likely to be a crippling sum for many Germans, considering that the average pension in Germany is around €1,100 per month. German Health Minister Nina Warken (CDU) believes there's an urgent need for reform of long-term care insurance. "The gap between income and expenditure has now diverged dramatically. This cannot continue," she told the Funke Media Group newspapers. Statutory long-term care insurance has been part of the German social security system for 30 years, as part of a compulsory insurance policy shared by employers and employees. Currently, 3.6% of income is due for this contribution. However, long-term care insurance covers only a part of the costs. Almost one in three nursing home residents relies on welfare payments to supplement their income. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Beate Linz-Esser, the managing director of the Erikaweg senior citizens' center in Hilden, North Rhine-Westphalia, told DW there was great uncertainty among the residents in her facility. "These constantly rising care costs are a heavy burden for our residents," she said. "Then there's the constant fear of not knowing how long their own income or assets will be sufficient to cover the costs." Residents must contribute to the care costs with their income or savings. The average life expectancy is rising for Germans, currently standing at 79 years for men and 84 for women. In December 2023, around 5.7 million people were in need of care, according to the Federal Statistical Office, a number that is expected to increase by 37% by 2055 due to the aging population. Around 85% of elderly people are cared for at home by relatives and outpatient care assistants. The nursing care insurance fund pays them between €350 and €990, depending on the level of care required. However, many people in need of care live in nursing homes, where costs have been rising sharply for years. Children are only required to contribute to their parents' care costs if their annual gross income exceeds €100,000. This does not apply to most people, as the average annual income in Germany is around €55,000. Back in 2018, care home residents had to pay only €1,772 a month. Health care economist Heinz Rothgang said the increase can be explained primarily by two factors: "For a long time, nursing was a poorly paid profession. But over the past 10 years, wages in nursing have risen more sharply than in the rest of the economy; by roughly double," he told DW. Added to this is an increase in the number of nursing staff in care homes. Care home residents have to pay not only for care, room and board, but also for maintenance and nursing training. Of the €3,248 in nursing care costs, this accounts for €1,488. And all these costs continue to rise. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Linz-Esser is particularly annoyed that almost half of the monthly fee goes into training and maintenance. "It is unacceptable that the residents have to pay for the training of nursing staff," she said. "And the investment costs — in hospitals, the state or federal government covers that. Our residents have to pay for that, too." Over the years, however, the out-of-pocket costs that those in need of care have to pay have decreased, making stays in a nursing home gradually less expensive for the individual resident. But the system is on the verge of collapse. Health Minister Warken wants to set up a reform commission to come up with a plan. This year and next, the federal government will pay €2 billion into the long-term care insurance. But taxpayers' money will only help in the short term. Rothgang has two proposals for a fundamental reform: "One option is to introduce tax revenue into the system, federal subsidies like those already found in pension and health insurance," he said. "A second possibility would be to get people to pay more, especially those with higher incomes. One could say that all income would be subject to contributions, including capital or rental income, for example," he added. The Federal Audit Office is also sounding the alarm, predicting a financial shortfall for the current system of over €12 billion by view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 videoWhile you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
