
Malka Leifer: The cushy life a rapist headmistress enjoys behind bars is revealed - as her victims lash their abuser's 'shocking' prison perks
The former headmistress of a prestigious Melbourne school who was jailed for raping two of her students has reportedly been receiving special treatment behind bars.
Malka Leifer, 58, ran the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, which caters to the city's ultra-orthodox Jewish community, but fled back to Israel in 2008 after the allegations against her first arose.
Following a lengthy process to extradite her to Australia to stand trial, she was jailed for 15 years in 2023 for the rape and indecent assault of Melbourne sisters Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper.
A former inmate of the maximum security Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, in the outer Melbourne suburb of Deer Park, has now claimed Leifer is receiving perks other prisoners do not get while she is held in the protection unit.
'Malka has a microwave in her room, cooking equipment, gets special orders every Thursday,' she told news.com.au. 'She wanted an airfryer and had members of the Jewish community write authorities about it. She gets whatever she wants.'
The former inmate also said she is allowed to make challah, a special bread that is often baked for the Jewish Sabbath observed every Saturday.
One of her victims, Elly Sapper, was appalled to hear of the perks Leifer was getting.
'To hear that she's doing this brings back so much of the way she acted in court which was no remorse and arrogance. It kind of brings out this anger again. It's shocking,' she said.
According to the former inmate, Leifer is disliked by other prisoners because of her arrogance.
She previously claimed Leifer was in a relationship with conwoman Samantha Azzopardi, 36, who was jailed for fraudulently claiming compensation by posing as a sex trafficked 17-year-old from Belgium known as Hattie Leigh.
She alleged the pair would write each other notes and often spend time in a laundry area where there is no CCTV.
Leifer targeted the sisters between 2004 and 2007 when they were students and later in their first year as student teachers.
The offending occurred while the headmistress was aged between 37 and 41 while Ms Erlich was aged between 16 and 19 and Ms Sapper aged 17 and 18.
The sisters previously welcomed the sentence but said it would never be enough.
'The ruling of 15 years recognises the harm and pain that Malka Leifer caused each one of us to suffer over so many years,' Ms Sapper said.
'While no amount of years will ever be sufficient, we are relieved that Malka Leifer is now in prison for 15 years and cannot prey on anyone else.'
The sisters campaigned for years to bring Leifer to justice and Ms Erlich said it was because they had not given up that they were successful.
'While we know the onus of fighting for justice should not be up to survivors, this fight was never just for us,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bombshell new details revealed after two young boys found dead in their grandmother's house - rocking a regional Aussie community to its core
Two young boys found dead on a country NSW property had allegedly been drugged before they were smothered, an autopsy has revealed. Max and Sam Johnson, aged six and seven, were discovered in their Coonabarabran home, in northwest NSW, on May 5. Their grandmother Kathleen Heggs, 66, was subsequently charged with their murder. Police have now revealed a post-mortem examination carried out on the two boys' bodies found traces of a prescription medication in their systems, according to the Daily Telegraph. Police will allege Ms Heggs gave her young grandsons the medications before suffocating them with a pillow. The brothers were asleep in separate bedrooms of Ms Heggs' rural property when the alleged murders took place. Max and Sam's biological parents Troy and Samantha Johnson are making final plans for their sons' funeral this week, which is to be held in Port Stephens. Ms Heggs was the sole carer for the two boys and they had moved from near Port Stephens to Coonabarabran about a year ago. Mr and Mrs Johnson had not seen the boys for five years prior to their deaths. The boys' father revealed he and his wife decided to let Ms Heggs take care of their sons as they had been struggling with mental health issues. 'This is not how we were meant to get them back,' Mr Johnson said. 'We are completely broken... but those boys deserve a good send off, and that's what we are going to give them.' Mr Johnson said he was grateful to Coonabarabran locals for sharing their happy memories of his sons. The boys will be buried in their karate uniforms, along with the yellow belts they were set to receive the week they were allegedly killed. Last month, police raced to the Coonabarabran property after Ms Heggs allegedly sent a text message to the boys' school to say her the two boys were dead and she intended to take her own life. After arriving at the farm, police forced their way into the home and found the boys' bodies in different rooms and the woman suffering self-inflicted injuries. Ms Heggs was treated in a mental health facility for several days following the boys' death before being charged with two counts of murder. Tragically, the devastated grandfather of the boys told Daily Mail Australia he only discovered that his grandsons were dead when he heard it on the news. 'I had to find out off the news about what happened to them,' he said. He also said he was upset pictures of the boys had been circulated through the media. 'The photos should never have been released - because they were minors - that was wrong and it has been very upsetting.' Ms Heggs has not entered pleas and she will front court on July 10. NSW Police have been contacted for comment.


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
British 'service person' is arrested on suspicion of rape near UK Army camp in Kenya where 'soldier murdered a local woman'
A British 'service person' who has been accused of rape near a British Army training camp in Kenya has been arrested. The alleged rape happened last month close to the British Army Training Unit Kenya (Batuk), near the town Nanyuki. The man was arrested after a group of soldiers visited a bar in the area, the BBC reports. On Sunday, a Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'We can confirm the arrest of a service person in Kenya. 'As the matter is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the Defence Serious Crime Command, we will not comment further.' It comes after after Defence Secretary John Healey went to Kenya in April and met the family of 21-year-old Agnes Wanjiru, who was allegedly murdered by a British soldier. Ms Wanjiru was last seen alive with British troops at a hotel in Nanyuki in March 2012. Two months later, her mutilated naked body was found with stab wounds dumped in a septic tank three months later near an army base. Her family said they had been subject to 'too many empty promises' regarding investigations into her death and that they were 'grateful' for the visit. Mr Healey said the Government would continue to help Ms Wanjiru's family 'secure the justice they deserve', and stressed his 'determination to see a resolution to the still unresolved case'. According to the Sunday Times, a soldier had allegedly confessed to Ms Wanjiru's killing and another soldier reported it to senior officers at the time - but no action was taken. In a report in 2021, the newspaper said a soldier accused of the murder had been named by his comrades. The Army has launched a service inquiry (SI) into allegations of unacceptable behaviour by UK service personnel in Kenya violating sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) policy which was introduced in July 2022. It is believed the aim is to understand the nature of allegations made regarding sexual exploitation and abuse, which includes Army culture and possible contact with sex workers. The SI can make recommendations to ensure that SEA policy is being complied with by UK personnel in Kenya. A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'The Defence Secretary recently visited Kenya to highlight our bilateral partnership and the important role of the British military presence - and personnel - in Kenya. 'He also clearly set out the high standards of behaviour we expect of our all our personnel. 'All soldiers who visit or train at Batuk have clear direction about how to behave, on and off duty, must complete mandatory training and attend compulsory briefings on conduct. 'We will have zero tolerance for unacceptable behaviour. 'To ensure the highest possible standards, the Army has launched a comprehensive service inquiry into allegations of unacceptable behaviour by UK Service Personnel in Kenya which would violate MoD and Army policy.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How did you get my number? Inside the shadowy world of data brokers
Priya Dev has a clue on how political spam ended up in her inbox during the 2025 federal election campaign. Like many Australians, Dev endured an unwanted flood of Trumpet of Patriots text messages – Clive Palmer has admitted to sending 17m of them. But it was email spam from one of the major political parties that she thought she could do something about. Political parties are exempt from privacy law, so they have no obligation to tell individuals how they find your data, and there is no way to opt out. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email But the Australian National University data science academic had a clue: the emails were addressed to a fake name she had used for online purchases years ago – a name also used when she received spam from one of the minor political parties in 2020. 'It looks like it's come from a transaction,' she says. 'It would likely be some sort of online e-commerce transaction, or energy transaction or something like that.' Tracking down how organisations gain access to individual contact information is 'really hard with political parties because they just ignore you,' Dev says. 'If I can find out the origin of my data from this mission, it would be really amazing.' It's the second time Dev has attempted to track how someone got her data, working through the labyrinthine web of data brokers who – often without our awareness – buy and sell information on the public to advertisers or others who want to know more about us. Last year, after receiving dozens of unwanted calls, Dev was able to track who held her phone number back to real estate giant CoreLogic Australia, who told her they had been able to legitimately buy her data from another data broker firm in 2023, who had bought her data from another data broker in 2016. That company told her it obtained her data through a 2014 marketing campaign and had probably passed on her information to at least 50 other companies. Dev's experience is not an isolated one. Crikey reported in April that a child's email address that was signed up for a charity fundraiser more than a decade ago received Liberal party political spam at the most recent election. The answer to how marketers and others find out your contact details and other personal information is a complicated one. Katharine Kemp, an associate professor who leads the public interest law and tech initiative at the University of New South Wales, says it often occurs through a data-matching service that joins up your personal information across different service providers who then sell that via data brokers. Kemp said she had the experience where a mortgage broker had called her asking if she was in the market for a mortgage – she suspects they got her information from a real estate agent during an open house visit. But finding out how they got that information can often be hard, Kemp says. When she asks those who contact her where they got her details, 'they will obfuscate or sometimes just immediately hang up or … give a silly answer, and then when you press them, they very quickly end the call.' The federal privacy commissioner, Carly Kind, describes the data broking industry in general terms as 'very opaque', with 'a very complex value chain of personal information'. 'So because people don't really know what's going on, they're not really empowered to complain about it,' she says. 'I think people find it creepy, the way in which their personal information has been passed around through data brokers and ends up in places that they don't expect.' One global data broker organisation has described its work as 'enabling the exchange of information between businesses in the consumer interest and in the support of Australian corporates and small businesses,' according to a 2023 submission to the Australian consumer watchdog's inquiry into data brokering. The kinds of information collected includes names, addresses, age, browsing behaviour, purchasing behaviour, financial status, employment, qualification, tenancy history and other socioeconomic and demographic information. A Australia report last year found the types of data bought and sold by brokers could include location and movements over time, sexual interests, financial concerns, banking and utility providers, personal problems, gambling or drinking habits, and recent online purchases. Data broker companies include credit reporting companies, fraud and identity verification companies, news corporations, property companies, tenancy data brokers, marketers, loyalty programs, and social media platforms. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found in its report last year on data brokering that privacy policies used by companies to allow the sharing of data can use 'ambiguous language', making it hard for consumers to identify who their data is being shared with and for what purposes. They also make it harder, the report found, for people to figure out who holds their data and to opt out of its collection. The average number of words in a typical privacy policy is 6,876 and it would take 29 minutes to read, the report found. Research conducted as part of the report found 74% of Australians are uncomfortable with the idea of their personal information being shared or sold. Some companies seek to downplay concern and privacy obligations – such as providing data held on a person by request – by de-identifying the data collected on consumers. Consumer group Choice found last year data brokers claimed to not hold data on consumers who were members of their loyalty programs, with names taken off the data held. Kind, the privacy commissioner, says the assertion that de-identified data may not be considered personal information under the Privacy Act could be 'creative interpretation' of the law by the companies collecting such data. The ACCC said de-identified data still carries risks of consumers being identified when combined with data points from other sources. Kind, speaking generally and without naming any companies in particular, said many Australians would find some of the practices of some data brokers to be 'quite uncomfortable to say the least, and often veering on affronting or outrageous'. 'The data is changing hands numerous times. So it is a very complex space, and I think undoubtedly, a big chunk of it is legitimate and in compliance with the [privacy] act. But that's quite fuzzy – where that stops and where less legitimate activity starts.' The ACCC report did not make any recommendations, but supported the implementation of strengthened privacy laws in Australia. Kind says the ACCC's work has cleared the way for her office to begin looking into the practices of the sector, saying the Privacy Act today 'has many elements which could be applied to data brokers to rein in their practices'. 'It's an issue that I'm keen to prioritise and my regulatory team is currently looking into potentially using our powers in this space,' Kind says. Dev says there needs to be a debate about extending the privacy obligations to political parties, which would force them to be transparent with the public about how they acquire personal data. The exemption means that political parties do not have to respond to her requests about what data they hold on her, Dev says. Kemp says she thinks there is some prospect of tighter rules around data brokering, but there will be no appetite from politicians to change the law on political party obligations. 'But I don't think we should give up on it as an issue in an area that requires reform.'