
Equipment supplier Ashtead sees sales dip ahead of US listing switch
Equipment Group Ashtead saw revenues dip last year ahead of its primary listing switch from London to New York, amid weaker demand for used construction gear.
But Ashtead achieved record annual rental revenue and earnings thanks to activity related to hurricane relief and despite weakness in the US construction sector.
The industrial equipment supplier revealed that its rental turnover increased by 4 per cent to $10billion in the year ending April, although its total sales slipped by 1 per cent to $10.8billion.
Meanwhile, adjusted earnings before nasties rose by 3 per cent to $5billion and free cash flow skyrocketed from $216million the previous year to $1.8billion.
Growth was bolstered by volume and rate improvement across its North American general tool and specialty divisions.
Ashtead said hurricane response efforts contributed $25million to $30million in rental revenues for the former segment and between $60million and $70million for the latter.
The 2024 Atlantic hurricane season was one of the costliest ever, generating an estimated $124billion in damages, according to the National Hurricane Center.
Ashtead, whose product range includes diggers, refrigerated containers, and air conditioning units, gains higher demand for its goods following natural disasters in the US, where it trades under the name Sunbelt Rentals.
It also supplies equipment for Hollywood film and television productions, such as cameras, dollies, and lighting.
Brendan Horgan, chief executive of Ashtead, said: 'We continue to take advantage of strong secular tailwinds and structural progression, within our $87billion and growing industry.'
He noted that while trading in the local non-residential construction sector remained subdued, mega-project activity 'continues to be robust,' especially in regards to the data centre, semiconductor and liquefied natural gas industries.
Horgan added that Ashtead was due to switch its primary listing to New York in the first quarter of next year.
Ashtead initially announced its intention to move stateside last December, citing the desire to enhance liquidity in its shares and boost access to US investors.
The intended relocation represents another blow to the London Stock Exchange, which has struggled to attract new initial public offerings and seen many companies change their main listing in the hopes of higher valuations.
In recent years, Paddy Power owner Flutter Entertainment and building materials firm CRH changed their primary listing to Wall Street, while travel giant TUI opted for Frankfurt.
Just in the past month, drugmaker Indivior and fintech platform Wise said they would switch their main listing to New York.
Ashtead Group shares were 0.6 per cent lower at £43.55 on Tuesday morning but have shrunk by around 12 per cent since the year began.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why target-date funds are great IRA investments
Why do target-date funds make ideal IRA investments? Here to discuss this topic is Jason Kephart, a senior principal with Morningstar's manager research team. The interview has been edited for length and clarity. Q: Target-date funds tend to be great investments for an IRA, because if investors choose the target-date fund that fits their time horizon, then that IRA effortlessly fits in with the rest of a portfolio. Delve into that. A: Target-date funds are a great set-it-and-forget-it for investors who don't want to spend a lot of time thinking about: How much of my portfolio should be in stocks versus bonds? What funds should I pick to fill those buckets?The target date takes all that off the hands of investors. The other beauty is regular rebalancing, so your portfolio doesn't get out of whack. As you age and get closer to retirement, your portfolio should be getting a little bit more conservative—because you don't want to have a lot of risk at retirement, but you do want to have a lot of risk when you're young and have a huge time horizon in front of you. This takes care of all that for you, so it's a great option for anyone who doesn't want to spend a lot of time managing their investments. Q: Vanguard was in the headlines lately after making some sizable distributions from some of its target-date funds. Although Vanguard's distributions may have been big, target-date funds, in general, aren't great investments for taxable accounts. Talk about why. A: They'repredominantly designed for 401(k) plans, which is mostly where the assets are. And tax-advantaged accounts, like an IRA, aren'treally thinking about taxes. Sothe bond portfolio, which tends to be taxable bonds, that income is taxed at an ordinary rate. Also, we talked about rebalancing, which is when you sell your winners and buy your losers. Anytime you're selling your winners, that's going to trigger a taxable event. In a 401(k) or an IRA, you don't have to worry about those. In a taxable account, it could be kind of a headache. Q: A lot of investors already have a relationship with a brokerage or an asset manager. Can they feel comfortable going with whomever they already have that relationship with? Or does it pay to shop around? A: It always pays to look at your options, but I would caution that a lot of brokerages will take steps to steer you toward their own offerings. And that may mean additional fees may be charged if you pick a different target-date fund, which couldkind of kill the value proposition. What we've seen with target-date funds is that the return differences can be narrow, soadditionalfees could make a significant difference. Q: What are some key questions that investors should be asking before they invest in a target-date fund? A: You want to know what the glide path looks like and whether it fits your risk tolerance at different stages in life, which could be difficult to know early on. A 25-year-old probably isn't going to have a good sense of what their risk tolerance is going to look like at 60, but the shape of the glide path really does matter. You also want to understand the underlying funds. Are they index funds, actively managed funds, or a combo of both? Maybe you have a preference. The other thing you want to think about is fees. Fees matter, particularly in an IRA where you may not have the benefit of getting the cheapest share class like you would through a company 401(k). ____ This article was provided to The Associated Press by Morningstar. For more personal finance content, go to Jason Kephart is a senior principal of multi-asset strategy ratings for Morningstar. Susan Dziubinski is an investment specialist at Morningstar.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Musk's xAI in talks for $4.3 billion equity funding, Bloomberg News reports
June 17 (Reuters) - Elon Musk's AI startup xAI is in talks to raise $4.3 billion through an equity investment on top of its $5 billion debt funding plans, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing information shared with investors. Between its founding in 2023 and when the debt sale was launched this year, xAI raised $14 billion through equity fundraising, the report said. The Grok chatbot maker needs new funding, partly because it has already spent most of what it previously raised, according to the report. XAI did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ex-FTC lawyers form new firm targeting US antitrust enforcement ‘gaps'
June 17 (Reuters) - Three former U.S. Federal Trade Commission lawyers and a U.S. attorney who resigned in January opened a new plaintiffs law firm on Tuesday focused on unfair competition, price discrimination and other antitrust law violations. They are launching the New York-based firm, Simonsen Sussman, as private antitrust litigation has surged in recent years, and as the FTC has shed staff under the second Trump administration. Catherine Simonsen, Shaoul Sussman and Nicolas Stebinger, who departed senior roles at the FTC in recent months, formed the firm with Kate Brubacher, a former U.S. attorney for Kansas during the Biden administration. The firm said underutilized laws and institutional constraints at federal agencies have left "gaps" in antitrust enforcement that the lawyers hope to fill. 'We've seen courts starting to understand that corporate interests have gone too far,' Simonsen told Reuters. The FTC under Trump has sought to trim the agency's headcount by about 10%. FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson told Congress last month that 94 employees so far this year have departed the agency, leaving 1,221 full-time employees. The FTC in May abandoned a lawsuit accusing Pepsi of violating the decades-old Robinson-Patman Act. The law can restrict a seller from providing discounts, rebates and other pricing deals to some buyers, but not all. Ferguson questioned whether the case filed in the waning days of the Biden administration had been adequately investigated. Pepsi had denied any wrongdoing. Attorneys at the new firm said the Robinson-Patman Act was one example of where plaintiffs firms could use existing, underused laws to target alleged wrongdoing. They also pointed to California's powerful unfair competition law. A federal judge in California found Apple violated that state provision, but not federal antitrust law, in a high profile case lodged by 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games. Apple has denied any wrongdoing. Read more: FTC drops case against Pepsi alleging price discrimination US FTC chair seeks to trim agency by around 10% Fired FTC commissioners seek to fast-track case over dismissal Convenience stores sue Pepsi and Frito-Lay, alleging price discrimination