Indonesian military's security protection for Attorney General's Office draws flak
JAKARTA: The Indonesian Military's (TNI) expanded deployment of personnel to provide security protection for prosecutors nationwide has once again landed the institution in hot water for stoking fears of military intervention in the judicial realm.
The military is dispatching its soldiers to guard all prosecutors' offices nationwide in order to ensure smoothness and security for prosecutors in their work following a telegram message signed by TNI chief Gen Agus Subiyanto on May 5.
The telegram message instructed the deployment of 30 military personnel for every provincial prosecutor's office and 10 for every district level office.
Attorney General's Office (AGO) spokesperson Harli Siregar said on Monday that the security protection shows the TNI's support for the prosecutors and is based on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated April 6, 2023, that aims to bolster cooperation between the two institutions.
The military dispatch has alerted human rights activists who see it as a hint toward the military's growing presence in the civil sector during the administration of President Prabowo Subianto, particularly after the recent controversial amendment to the TNI Law.
'This kind of deployment further strengthens the military's intervention in the civilian sphere, especially in the law enforcement area,' a coalition of 20 rights groups, including the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI) and the Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence (Kontras), said in a statement on Sunday (May 11).
The coalition called on the military to revoke the letter of deployment, as it warned that the military's defense duties could degrade the independence of Indonesia's law.
Usman Hamid, executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, said the order violates the Constitution and a number of laws, including the law governing the AGO and the TNI Law itself, which was revised in March despite public protest against provisions many believe pave the way for TNI's expansion into civilian roles.
Army spokesperson Wahyu rebuked the claim, saying that the TNI law stipulates that the AGO is among the state institutions that active military personnel can be assigned to.
But Institute for Security and Strategic Studies (ISESS) cofounder Khairul Fahmi said that the provision applies only to those who work at the office of the assistant attorney general for intelligence (Jampidmil).
'The law simply cannot be used as a basis for troop deployment,' Khairul said.
Usman of Amnesty noted that this deployment order 'further strengthens public suspicion that the TNI will return to its dwifungsi [dual function] following the amendment to the TNI law', referring to the military rule of the New Order authoritarian regime under late president Suharto which led to dozens of human rights violations.
The last time the military deployed its personnel to guard the AGO headquarters in Jakarta was in May of last year following an alleged attempt by members of the National Police's anti-terror unit Densus 88 to spy on the agency's top prosecutors.
The latest dispatch, however, was not based on any 'special needs', Army spokesperson Brig. Gen. Wahyu Yudhayana said.
'This is only part of a routine and preventive security cooperation, as has been done previously,' Wahyu said on Monday, adding that the military will continue to be professional in carrying out their tasks.
Harli of the AGO stopped short of revealing whether the AGO requested the military dispatch or not but said his office had 'no certain urgency to do so', Rizal Darma Putra, executive director of the Indonesia Institute for Defense and Strategic Studies (Lesperssi), warned that the military could set a bad precedent if it put its troops at the AGO under no special circumstances.
'If the AGO is not facing a combatant threat, maintaining its security is certainly not the military's task. If the TNI cannot explain the urgency of ordering the dispatch, this could pave the way for more troop deployment in civilian affairs in the future,' Rizal said.
Harli of the AGO dismissed the concerns about intervention, describing the security protection offered by the TNI as 'a collaborative effort' between the two institutions. - The Jakarta Post/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
8 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Prime Minister is not above the law
Hamzah Zainudin. KUALA LUMPUR - Opposition leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin has reminded that the Prime Minister is not above the law and should not use his position to shield himself from legal proceedings, especially in the eyes of both the people and the international community. In a statement on Friday, Hamzah stressed the importance of upholding justice, saying that dignity and accountability go hand in hand for any national leader. He criticised the move by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's legal team to file an extraordinary application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including the matter of immunity in a civil lawsuit filed by former aide Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. Hamzah criticised the move by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's legal team to file an extraordinary application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including the matter of immunity in a civil lawsuit filed by former aide Muhammed Yusoff Rawther (in white).. 'Defending the honour of a leader, particularly the Prime Minister, is important because it reflects the authority of the nation. However, at the same time, the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law must be upheld 'Those in power must never abuse the justice system because doing so would erode public trust in the leadership and the country's legal institutions,' he warned. He reminded that the courts are the rightful avenue for individuals to defend themselves fairly under the law, and any failure to uphold justice could lead to perceptions of double standards. He warned that such a scenario would erode public trust and send a signal to foreign investors that the country operates without proper legal order. The Larut Member of Parliament (MP) added that such actions could have a lasting impact on Malaysia's stability and economic growth. Citing Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, he said: 'All individuals are equal before the law and entitled to equal protection under it. If this right is denied, the people will rebel and the system will collapse. 'The position of Prime Minister does not provide immunity from the law. In this case, he must defend his personal honour and the integrity of the Prime Minister's institution, not seek immunity from the court. 'The role of Prime Minister is a trust given by Allah SWT, for which one will be held accountable not only in this world, but also in the hereafter,' he said. More Like This
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has set Wednesday (June 4) for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date on Tuesday (June 3) after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings. Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. "The plaintiff's (Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties," Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR president, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.- Bernama
The Sun
14 hours ago
- The Sun
PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today set tomorrow for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Muhammed Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings today. Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. 'The plaintiff's (Muhammed Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties,' Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Muhammed Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Muhammed Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR President, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Muhammed Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.
