
France celebrates 146th Bastille Day
France celebrated its biggest holiday Monday with 7,000 people marching, on horseback or riding armored vehicles along the cobblestones of the Champs-Elysees, the most iconic avenue in Paris. And there was also partying and pageantry around the country.
Parisians stormed the Bastille fortress and prison on July 14, 1789, a spark for the French Revolution that overthrew the monarchy. In the ensuing two centuries, France saw Napoleon's empire rise and fall, more uprisings and two world wars before settling into today's Fifth Republic, established in 1958.
Bastille Day has become a central moment for modern France, celebrating democratic freedoms and national pride, a melange of revolutionary spirit and military prowess.
The Paris parade beneath the Arc de Triomphe so impressed visiting US President Donald Trump in 2017 that it inspired him to stage his own parade this year.
The spectacle began on the ground, with French President Emmanuel Macron reviewing the troops and relighting the eternal flame beneath the Arc de Triomphe.
Each parade uniform has a touch of symbolism. The contingent from the French Foreign Legion was eye-catching, its bearded troops wearing leather aprons and carrying axes, a reference to their original role as route clearers for advancing armies.
Near the end of the parade, a Republican Guard officer fell from one of the 200 horses but the national gendarme service said the rider and horse were unhurt. Such incidents happen occasionally at the annual event.
The Paris event included flyovers by fighter jets, trailing red, white and blue smoke. Then the evening sees a drone light show and fireworks at the Eiffel Tower that has gotten more elaborate every year.
Every year, France hosts a special guest for Bastille Day, and this year it's Indonesia, with President Prabowo Subianto representing the world's largest Muslim country, which also a major Asian economic and military player.
Indonesian troops, including 200 traditional drummers, marched in Monday's parade, and Indonesia is expected to confirm new purchases of Rafale fighter jets and other French military equipment during the visit. Prabowo, who was accused of rights abuses under Indonesia's prior dictatorship, will be treated to a special holiday dinner at the Elysee Palace.
"For us as Indonesian people, this is a very important and historic military and diplomatic collaboration," the commander of the Indonesian military delegation, Brig. Gen. Ferry Irawan, said.
Finnish troops serving in the UN force in Lebanon, and Belgian and Luxembourg troops serving in a NATO force in Romania also paraded through Paris, reflecting the increasingly international nature of the event.
Among those invited to watch will be Fousseynou Samba Cisse, a 39-year old Paris man who rescued two babies from a burning apartment earlier this month and received a last-minute invitation in a phone call from Macron himself.
"I wasn't expecting that call," he told online media Brut. "I feel pride."
Beyond the military spectacle in Paris are growing concerns about an uncertain world. On the eve Bastille Day, Macron announced 6.5 billion euros ($7.6 billion) in extra French military spending in the next two years because of new threats ranging from Russia to terrorism and online attacks. The French leader called for intensified efforts to protect Europe and support for Ukraine.
"Since 1945, our freedom has never been so threatened, and never so seriously," Macron said. "We are experiencing a return to the fact of a nuclear threat, and a proliferation of major conflicts."
Security was exceptionally tight around Paris ahead of and during the parade.
It's a period when France bestows special awards — including the most prestigious, the Legion of Honor — on notable people. This year's recipients include Gisele Pelicot, who became a global hero to victims of sexual violence during a four-month trial in which her husband and dozens of men were convicted of sexually assaulting her while she was drugged unconscious.
Others earning the honor are Yvette Levy, a Holocaust survivor and French Resistance fighter, musician Pharrell Williams and designer for Louis Vuitton.
Bastille Day is also a time for family gatherings, firefighters' balls and rural festivals around France.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Hal Brands] A new chapter in US foreign policy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F15%2Fnews-p.v1.20250715.970144cfcc5b4de9b23bdcce80cf1af3_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Hal Brands] A new chapter in US foreign policy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Hal Brands] A new chapter in US foreign policy
Nearly six months into Donald Trump's presidency, a Trump Doctrine is coming into view. Contrary to the fears of his critics, and the hopes of some admirers, Trump is no isolationist. And contrary to those who claim Trump is simply a marvel of ac hoc-ery and inconsistency, there is a distinctive pattern to the policies he has pursued. This Trump Doctrine emphasizes using American power aggressively — more aggressively than Trump's immediate predecessors — to reshape key relationships and accrue US advantage in a rivalrous world. The isolationist label has long followed Trump, but it's never accurately described an idiosyncratic man. Yes, Trump disdains core elements of US globalism, from the international trade system America established to its promotion of democratic values and its defense commitments around the world. Yet Trump has also argued that America should assert itself more forcefully in a cutthroat world. And today, as Trump pursues a capacious view of presidential power at home, he is offering an equally ambitious conception of American power abroad. Trump rails against long, costly nation-building efforts. But he has nonetheless waged two short, sharp Middle Eastern conflicts: one to deter Yemen's Houthis from attacking US forces and Red Sea shipping, the other to roll back the Iranian nuclear program. Several US presidents pledged to use force to keep Tehran from crossing the nuclear threshold; Trump really did it. Meanwhile, Trump started trade wars against dozens of countries, in hopes of reshaping the international economy. He deployed diplomatic leverage, and explicit threats of abandonment, to remake the transatlantic bargain by getting European allies to spend much more on defense. Trump also wielded America's innovation power — its role in designing high-end semiconductors — to bring Saudi Arabia and the UAE into Washington's tech bloc and make them partners in his push for 'AI dominance.' Closer to home, Trump used veiled threats to pry Panama out of China's Belt and Road Initiative. He has demanded territorial concessions from Panama, Denmark and Canada. At the same time, Trump touts his Golden Dome missile shield, meant to protect the homeland and give America greater freedom of action against its foes. This isn't standard-issue, post-1945 American internationalism: It's hard to imagine prior presidents telling allies to yield their land. But neither is it a retreat into Fortress America. And by applying American power in such energetic, omnidirectional fashion, Trump has revealed much about the true state of world affairs. Policy journals brim with articles about American decline and the advent of multipolarity. But Trump, in his inimitable way, has reminded so many countries where power really lies. For example: The strike on Iran demonstrated America's unique global military reach and its ability, together with Israel, to reshape the Middle East while relegating Russia and China — nominally Iran's allies — to the sidelines. Trump's key insight is that the world's sole superpower has more muscle than commonly understood. Yet the Trump Doctrine nonetheless suffers from three big problems. First, its exercise of power is weakened by its dearth of strategy. Trump's trade war got off to a farcical start because he failed to consider how sky-high tariffs might wreck the US economy — a real-time discovery that forced a rapid, humiliating climb-down. A president who privileges the art of the deal over intellectual consistency sometimes pursues contradictory policies: Trump's tariffs against Indo-Pacific allies erode their prosperity and make it harder for them to spend more on defense. Second, a president who sometimes struggles to distinguish friends from enemies sometimes fails to point US power in the right direction. Trump delights in taking aim at US allies. He has been more reluctant to confront Russia, even as Vladimir Putin makes a mockery of Trump's desire for peace in Ukraine — and even though Putin's war economy is increasingly vulnerable to the commercial and financial coercion that Trump so often threatens to employ. Third, the best presidents build US power for the future, but Trump risks depleting it instead. Maybe the One Big Beautiful Bill will juice the economy — or maybe it will lock in structural deficits that constrain defense spending and growth. Slashing foreign aid saves little money but squanders US global influence; the war on universities threatens the research ecosystem that underpins America's economic and military might. Moreover, a policy of tough love toward allies could turn into mutually destructive hostility, and a superpower that regularly coerces its friends could wreck the soft power that lubricates key relationships. Trump revels in using US power, but he doesn't quite understand where it comes from. That's the central irony, and fundamental weakness, of the doctrine guiding his administration today. Hal Brands Hal Brands is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the Henry Kissinger Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
![[Kim Seong-kon] Standing before the sign, 'not a through street'](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F15%2Fnews-p.v1.20250715.28981b6633fa423198fb167545ca5422_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Kim Seong-kon] Standing before the sign, 'not a through street'](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Kim Seong-kon] Standing before the sign, 'not a through street'
When I lived in New York a long time ago, I frequently saw street signs marked 'dead end' here and there. While I stayed in Provo, Utah, for one year, I saw 'cul-de-sac' road signs before dead-end alleys. Now I am living in Hanover, New Hampshire, where I frequently see another sign: 'not a through street.' 'Dead end' sounds intimidating because it implies that there is no way out and you are stuck there. Naturally, you are likely to be frustrated, dismayed and may even despair when you reach a dead end. 'Cul-de-sac,' which means 'bottom of the bag' in French, metaphorically suggests the 'end of the road.' Compared to them, 'not a through street' sounds much more neutral, just inferring that you need to turn around and come back on the same pathway if you enter. These days, many Koreans who support conservatism seem to feel that South Korea is now facing a 'dead end,' perhaps due to the ramifications of losing the recent presidential election. It is undeniable that South Korea is now confronting unprecedented crises, both domestic and overseas. For example, the country is currently caught at a crossfire between two superpowers that ask sternly, 'Whose side are you on?' South Korea also must survive the technological challenges from its neighboring countries that would directly affect its economy. Undoubtedly, two of the most urgent issues South Korea must tackle today are, firstly, the heavy tariffs the US wants to impose on Korean products and, secondly, the cost-sharing of the US troops stationed in Korea, which will be astronomical if the Korean government consents to the demands of Washington. Both will hurt the Korean economy severely if negotiations are protracted and enter a dead-end alley. South Korea is also concerned about the change of status of the US troops in Korea, from countering North Korea to expanding its operations to East Asia. All in all, the future voyage of South Korea seems to be perilous due to hidden reefs and torpedoes in its passages. However, not everything is grim and gloomy. For example, Reuters recently reported that the US wants South Korea to join efforts to counter its adversary in shipbuilding. If so, shipbuilding will surely bridge South Korea and the US in the future. In the cultural sphere, the future of South Korea looks bright, too. In Travel + Leisure, Thessaly La Force wrote about her experience at the international art fair in Seoul. The title of her article was 'Asia's New Art Capital Is Flashier and More Fabulous Than Miami or Basel — Here's What to Know.' The worldwide popularity of Hallyu, too, assuages the Korean people's anxiety about the future of their country. Recently, I came across a YouTube video in which the YouTuber introduced the touching story of Olivia Sinclair, a features writer and video journalist for the BBC. She flew to South America to cover the K-pop concert held in Sao Paulo, Brazil, with her cameraperson, Nigel. Sinclair was an advocate of individualism, 'high art' and highbrow Western culture. Naturally, she was critical of K-pop, which, she thought, was tainted by noise, uniformity and totalitarianism. During the concert, the steel arch structure supporting the big screen on stage collapsed, causing Nigel to become seriously wounded. He required an immediate blood transfusion. The problem was that he had hemophilia and Rh-AB blood. Unfortunately, Rh-AB blood was not available. But while Sinclair agonized in despair, Koreans in Brazil came in as saviors: using social media, they tried very hard to locate Koreans who had the rare Rh-AB blood and finally succeeded in bringing several people to the hospital just in time and saved Nigel's life. Watching their sincere and tremendous efforts to help strangers, Sinclair was deeply moved by the Korean 'bonding' with and 'jeong' for others who needed help. The YouTuber said that Sinclair's experience in Brazil changed her perspective completely. In the past, Sinclair found in K-pop concerts nothing but factory-made smiles, mechanical movements and collective action that did not allow individuality. Now, she realized that Korean unity was, in fact, a beautiful human bond among individuals. She discovered that Korean unity had diversity and thus a nicely accomplished harmony. In Sinclair's eyes, the group-friendly culture of Korea creates 'fences' for individuals to protect them, not to oppress them. At the K-pop concert, therefore, Sinclair found 'harmony,' instead of 'noise,' and the 'community spirit,' instead of 'totalitarianism.' Just like Sinclaire did, we, too, should perceive positive things in our country, instead of negative things. If our culture brings empathy, sympathy and harmony to the globe, we cannot give up our hope for the bright future of South Korea just yet. We may not have entered a 'dead end" road yet. Perhaps we are simply standing before a sign marked, 'not a through street.' If so, we can turn back and take a broad street instead, which will take us to our destination safely.


Korea Herald
19 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Korea may ease age ban on US beef as tariff deadline nears
South Korea may lift its ban on US beef from cattle over 30 months old, using the move as a potential bargaining chip to defuse looming "reciprocal" tariffs from Washington, according to sources on Tuesday. Amid stalled trade talks with the US over 25 percent tariffs set to take effect Aug. 1, Korea appears increasingly willing to relent on the non-tariff barrier. 'We're under heavy pressure to scrap the age limit on US beef, and it's becoming harder to hold the line,' a government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Last week, US President Donald Trump sent a tariff-focused letter to Korea, addressed to President Lee Jae Myung, calling the duties necessary 'to correct the many years of Korea's Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers,' and pressing for meaningful progress on trade grievances. The beef age rule is among key non-tariff barriers the US has pushed to eliminate, alongside restrictions on rice imports and high-resolution mapping data exports. Washington has characterized the restriction as an outdated trade barrier that places unnecessary costs and burdens on American exporters. Korea and the US agreed to limit imports in 2008, only allowing beef from cattle under 30 months old, in an effort to ease public fears over bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease. Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo, who traveled to Washington on July 5 for six days of tariff talks, signaled that agricultural concessions could be on the table, saying Korea had entered 'a period of decisions and strategic choices.' 'There are areas we must protect,' Yeo said at a press conference Monday, 'but also areas where we can be flexible.' He emphasized that agricultural issues require strategic judgment, adding, 'We must protect sensitive sectors, but also take into account the broader framework of the negotiations.' Even so, US beef remains a fraught issue, with domestic farmers warning of market disruption. The Hanwoo Association, a nonprofit representing Korea's beef industry, lashed out at the government over its potential easing of the ban, calling it a betrayal of local cattle farmers. 'While other industries have grown on the back of sacrifices from the agricultural sector, farming and livestock have continued to decline," the association said in a statement Tuesday. 'Among them, the hanwoo industry has suffered the most, but what has the government done so far?' The group noted that Korea imported 221,629 tons of US beef last year, nearly half of the country's total beef imports of 461,027 tons. 'With tariffs set to fall to zero next year, American beef will become even more price-competitive and capture a larger share of the market," they argued.