
The Job Market Is Frozen
Only they didn't. More weeks and months went by, and the responses from employers became even sparser. I began to wonder whether my brother had written his resume in Comic Sans or was wearing a fedora to interviews. And then I started to hear similar stories from friends, neighbors, and former colleagues. I discovered entire Subreddits and TikTok hashtags and news articles full of job-market tales almost identical to my brother's. 'It feels like I am screaming into the void with each application I am filling out,' one recent graduate told the New York Times columnist Peter Coy last May.
As someone who writes about the economy for a living, I was baffled. The unemployment rate was hovering near a 50-year low, which is historically a very good thing for people seeking work. How could finding a job be so hard?
The answer is that two seemingly incompatible things are happening in the job market at the same time. Even as the unemployment rate has hovered around 4 percent for more than three years, the pace of hiring has slowed to levels last seen shortly after the Great Recession, when the unemployment rate was nearly twice as high. The percentage of workers voluntarily quitting their jobs to find new ones, a signal of worker power and confidence, has fallen by a third from its peak in 2021 and 2022 to nearly its lowest level in a decade. The labor market is seemingly locked in place: Employees are staying put, and employers aren't searching for new ones. And the dynamic appears to be affecting white-collar professions the most. 'I don't want to say this kind of thing has never happened,' Guy Berger, the director of economic research at the Burning Glass Institute, told me. 'But I've certainly never seen anything like it in my career as an economist.' Call it the Big Freeze.
Jonathan Chait: The real goal of the Trump economy
The most obvious victims of a frozen labor market are frustrated job seekers like my brother. But the indirect consequences of the Big Freeze could be even more serious. Lurking beneath the positive big-picture employment numbers is a troubling dynamic that threatens not only the job prospects of young college graduates but the long-term health of the U.S. economy itself.
The period from the spring of 2021 through early 2023, when employees were switching jobs like never before, was a great time to be an American worker. (Remember all those stories about the Great Resignation?) It was also a stressful time to be an employer. Businesses struggled to fill open positions, and when they finally did, their newly trained employees might quit within weeks. 'It's hard to overstate the impact this period had on the psyche of American companies,' Matt Plummer, a senior vice president at ZipRecruiter who advises dozens of companies on their hiring strategies, told me. 'No one wanted to go through anything like it again.' Scarred by the chaos of the Great Resignation, Plummer and others told me, many employers grew far less willing to either let go of their existing workers or try to hire new ones.
Even as they were still shaken by the recent past, employers were also growing warier about America's economic future. In March 2022, the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates to tame inflation, and the business world adopted the nearly unanimous consensus that a recession was around the corner. Many companies therefore decided to pause plans to open new locations, build new factories, or launch new products—all of which meant less of a need to hire new employees.
Once it became clear that a recession had been avoided, a new source of uncertainty emerged: politics. Recognizing that the outcome of the 2024 presidential election could result in two radically different policy environments, many companies decided to keep hiring plans on hold until after November. 'The most common thing I hear from employers is 'We can't move forward if we don't know where the world is going to be in six months,'' Kyle M. K., a talent-strategy adviser at Indeed, told me. 'Survive Until '25' became an unofficial rallying cry for businesses across the country.
By the end of 2024, the pace of new hiring had fallen to where it had been in the early 2010s, when unemployment was more than 7 percent, as Berger observed in January. For most of last year, the overall hiring rate was closer to what it was at the bottom of the Great Recession than it was at the peak of the Great Resignation. But because the economy remained strong and consumers kept spending money, layoffs remained near historic lows, too, which explains why the unemployment rate hardly budged.
Look beyond the aggregate figures, and the hiring picture becomes even more disconcerting. As the Washington Post columnist Heather Long recently pointed out, more than half of the total job gains last year came from just two sectors: health care and state and local government, which surged as the pandemic-era exodus to the suburbs and the Sunbelt generated demand for teachers, firefighters, nurses, and the like. According to an analysis from Julia Pollak, the chief economist at ZipRecruiter, hiring in basically every other sector, including construction, retail, and leisure and hospitality, is down significantly relative to pre-pandemic levels. Among the hardest-hit professions have been the white-collar jobs that have been historically insulated from downturns. The 'professional and business services' sector, which includes architects, accountants, lawyers, and consultants, among other professions, actually lost jobs over the past two years, something that last happened during the recession years of 2008, 2009, and 2020. The tech and finance sectors have fared only slightly better. (The rise of generative AI might be one reason the hiring slowdown has been even worse in these fields, but the data so far are equivocal.)
David Frum: How Trump lost his trade war
A job market with few hiring opportunities is especially punishing for young people entering the workforce or trying to advance up the career ladder, including those with a college degree. According to a recent analysis by ADP Research, the hiring rate for young college graduates has declined the most of any education level in recent years. Since 2022, this group has experienced a higher unemployment rate than the overall workforce for the first sustained period since at least 1990. That doesn't change the fact that college graduates have significantly better employment prospects and higher earnings over their lifetime. It does, however, mean that young college graduates are struggling much more than the headline economic indicators would suggest.
For job seekers, a frozen labor market is still preferable to a recessionary one. My brother, for example, eventually found a job. But the Big Freeze is not a problem only for the currently unemployed. Switching from one job to another is the main way in which American workers increase their earnings, advance in their careers, and find jobs that make them happy. And indeed, over the past few years, wage growth has slowed, job satisfaction has declined, and workers' confidence in finding a new job has plummeted. According to a recent poll from Glassdoor, two-thirds of workers report feeling 'stuck' in their current roles. That fact, along with a similar dynamic in the housing market —the percentage of people who move in a given year has fallen to its lowest point since data were first collected in the 1940s—might help explain why so many Americans remain so unhappy about an economy that is strong along so many other dimensions.
This is a warning sign. The historical record shows that when people are hesitant to move or change jobs, productivity falls, innovation declines, living standards stagnate, inequality rises, and social mobility craters. 'This is what worries me more than anything else about this moment,' Pollak told me. 'A stagnant economy, where everyone is cautious and conservative, has all kinds of negative downstream effects.'
According to economists and executives, the labor market won't thaw until employers feel confident enough about the future to begin hiring at a more normal pace. Six months ago, businesses hoped that such a moment would arrive in early 2025, with inflation defeated and the election decided. Instead, the early weeks of Donald Trump's presidency have featured the looming threat of tariffs and trade wars, higher-than-expected inflation, rising bond yields, and a chaotic assault on federal programs. Corporate America is less sure about the future than ever, and the economy is still frozen in place.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Duolingo CEO says controversial AI memo was misunderstood
While Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn was loudly criticized this year after declaring that Duolingo would become an 'AI-first company,' he suggested in a new interview the real issue was that he 'did not give enough context.' 'Internally, this was not controversial,' von Ahn told The New York Times. 'Externally, as a publicly traded company some people assume that it's just for profit. Or that we're trying to lay off humans. And that was not the intent at all.' On the contrary, von Ahn said the company has 'never laid off any full-time employees' and has no intention of doing so. And while he didn't deny that Duolingo had cut its contractor workforce, he suggested that 'from the beginning … our contractor workforce has gone up and down depending on needs.' Despite the criticism (which does not seem to have made a big impact on Duolingo's bottom line), von Ahn still sounds extremely bullish about A.I.'s potential, with Duolingo team members taking every Friday morning to experiment with the technology. 'It's a bad acronym, f-r-A-I-days,' he said. 'I don't know how to pronounce it.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
GM's quarterly results illustrate the folly of tariffs
General Motors, a cornerstone of American industry, is suffering the consequences of President Trump's unconstitutional 25 percent tariffs on imported vehicles and auto parts. In the second quarter of 2025, GM suffered a $1.1 billion tariff blow to its operating income, slashing the company's profit margin from a healthy 9 percent to just 6.1 percent. Net income plunged by 36.1 percent from the prior quarter and by a staggering 40.7 percent compared to a year ago. Although the estimated tariff impact for the full year of $4 billion to $5 billion is less than 3 percent of GM's overall revenue, that cost represents more than half of the typical annual income for the company over the past decade. The consequences extend far beyond GM's balance sheet. Tariffs, paid by importers to the federal government, are partly absorbed by companies and partly passed to consumers. We've especially seen this in import-sensitive sectors including furnishings, appliances, clothes and toys. Men's shirts and sweaters, for instance, rose 4.9 percent in June alone. When businesses 'eat' the cost, as GM tried to do last quarter, the fallout is no less severe. Diminished earnings mean less capital for investment in better technology or expanded operations, slowing broader economic growth, fewer resources for pay raises or new jobs — hardly the boon for workers that tariff advocates promise. The data confirms this. Nationwide, 14,000 manufacturing jobs disappeared in the past two months, erasing all gains in 2025. In June, real average weekly earnings dropped by 0.4 percent, an annualized loss of nearly 5 percent. Shareholders are also feeling the pinch. Stock valuations track a company's expected future earnings. Since 2012, GM's stock price increased by more than 200 percent. GM's price-to-earnings ratio today stands at 6.83, almost identical to 2012 levels. Stock prices increased alongside earnings. A sustained $5 billion annual hit, wiping out over half of GM's annual net income, could erase more than $20 billion in market capitalization if valuations adjust. With tariffs eroding profits, is it any wonder that GM's stock has slid 8 percent since its post-2024 election peak and now languishes 13 percent off its 2021 highs? This affects millions of middle-class Americans and retirees with pensions and savings invested. More broadly, lower dividends and diminished returns discourage investment, starving companies of the capital needed to expand. The result: slower growth, fewer jobs and weaker wage gains. GM, to its credit, is fighting to offset 30 percent of this burden by boosting U.S. production, cutting costs and increasing domestic content to comply with the USMCA trade agreement's labyrinthine rules. Yet even if successful, the net impact of $2.8 billion to $3.5 billion will devour a significant slice of GM's already thin margins. Profit margins at GM — as in most other sectors — are far less than conventional wisdom. GM's net profit margin over the past decade has averaged less than 5 percent. In other words, a $30,000 vehicle yields less than $1,500 in profit. GM's plans to shift some production to U.S. plants and rework supply chains is a testament to private enterprise's resilience. But make no mistake: These shifts sacrifice efficiency for compliance. Restructuring operations in a free market in pursuit of efficiency yields more profit, consumer benefit and economic growth. Doing so under duress to escape arbitrary tariffs may result in survival, but without these benefits. Resources that could have fueled innovation or lowered prices are now squandered on navigating artificial trade barriers. As an important sidenote, roughly half the tariff's cost stems from GM's South Korean operations, a stark reminder of the folly of taxing trade with allies. Rather than strengthening ties with democratic partners through bold free-trade agreements, these tariffs risk pushing nations like South Korea toward China, America's chief adversary. Far from economic strategy, it is geopolitical shortsightedness. Politicians sometimes prefer tariffs to other forms of taxation because they are less visible than taxes on income or sales. This makes it easier to dodge accountability by blaming 'greedy' corporations. For this reason, Trump called Jeff Bezos to deter Amazon from listing tariff costs on purchases. The White House press secretary labeled this a 'hostile and political act by Amazon.' Regardless, protectionism is not cost-free. Sustained tariffs will raise prices, shrink profits, erode real wages and slow economic growth. GM's quarterly results are a warning.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The 9 Worst Restaurant Chains In 2025 (According To Customer Satisfaction)
The customer is always right, as the saying goes. So what better way to measure restaurants than through customer satisfaction? We've collected data from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), Consumer Affairs, Yelp, and discussions on Reddit to get a comprehensive conclusion of customer sentiment on fast casual chain restaurants. Based on our research, we've identified the nine worst restaurant chains based on customer satisfaction, and it goes beyond just the food. Fast casual dining is extremely popular in the U.S., and a customer's experience can be swayed by many things, including their experience with the waiter or waitress, the amount of time it takes to be seated, and even the general vibe of the restaurant. It's worth noting that all of these chains have several locations across the United States, and customer experience can vary drastically based on things like franchise ownership and management. However, the restaurants on this list are repeat offenders, with several customers noting the same issues across locations. Considering everything from rude waitstaff and poor food quality to long wait times and unclean restaurants, customer reviews say that these are the worst chains out there. Read more: 10 Steakhouse Chains That Are Going To Take Over The US Denny's It seems the famous Super Slam breakfast plate is not enough to keep customers satisfied with Denny's. According to the American Consumer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), Denny's is the worst-rated full-service restaurant chain in 2025, with a rating of 75 out of 100. Its customer satisfaction score has gone down since 2024, which begs the question: What is going wrong at Denny's? According to Consumer Affairs, which has more than 400 ratings and reviews of the 24/7 diner, customers agree on a few main problem areas when it comes to dining at Denny's. In particular, customers take issue with the long wait times and inconsistent service quality. Some customers note that it took more than an hour to be seated, while others claim their waitress all but ignored them, despite the restaurant not being all that busy. Even delivery drivers try to avoid Denny's for their lengthy wait times. One DoorDash driver took to Reddit to say, "I normally don't take Denny's for the simple fact that 9/10 orders there aren't ready. It's only when it's super slow or a really good offer, I'll go there." Buffalo Wild Wings Buffalo Wild Wings is known for its Sports Bar atmosphere, chicken wings, and all-you-can-eat appetizers, but the chain has also earned an unfortunate reputation for having abysmal service and inconsistent food quality. Like any other chain, the service quality varies by location. As one customer explained so eloquently on Reddit, "It all depends on the location. Most are trash. A few are not". According to Comparably, which compares restaurant competitors based on how likely customers are to recommend the place to a friend, this restaurant boasts a low score of -31 (yes, negative) on a scale from -100 to 100. That's lower than Wingstop, Applebee's, and even Hooters. Wing-lovers do not play around when it comes to their chicken wings, and with such inconsistent experiences across the board, it comes as no surprise that customers are not completely satisfied with Buffalo Wild Wings. And to top things off, prices are only going up, adding insult to injury for dissatisfied consumers, with some complaining that prices are excessive for the quality and portion sizes. Chili's Chili's has received a lot of online attention on TikTok for its Triple-Dipper, which accounts for over a tenth of its total sales. Despite the rise, fall, and recent resurgence of Chili's, the chain seems to be dropping in customer satisfaction compared to previous years, proving you can't believe everything you see on TikTok. Based on the ACSI, the chain has dropped a couple of points between 2024 and 2025, and more than half of the customer ratings on Consumer Affairs are 1-star reviews. Many reviews report food quality issues, with customers complaining that many of their meals lacked flavor, were burnt, had unexpected spice, and more. Some have reported issues like potato soup that arrived without potatoes, reminiscent of baby food. Similarly, the restaurant has served chicken quesadillas that were severely lacking in chicken. The overall consensus is that the food quality just doesn't match the price, and with so many other chains to choose from, customers may start turning to more affordable options. IHOP The International House of Pancakes seems to be having a management issue. Since 1958, the family-friendly breakfast chain has been known for its fluffy golden pancakes, but according to customer reviews, it's becoming known for something else entirely. While some customers online have positive things to say about the food, there are several menu items you'll probably want to avoid at IHOP. Not to mention, many reviews from various IHOP locations claim the service is extremely poor and that bad management seems to be at the root of the issue. Of 352 reviews on Consumer Affairs, 60% of them are 1-star ratings, with many of them related to inconsistent food quality. Customers have complained about receiving egg white omelets that were brown, and being served undercooked eggs that were so cold, they didn't even melt the cheese on top of them. Other patrons were met with cold coffee, brown avocado, and incorrect food orders. Several consumers noted an heir of unprofessionalism from management, with little regard for customer satisfaction, despite the company's claims that food will always be served with a smile. Red Robin Red Robin's CEO announced in March 2025 that the burger chain would be considering closing 70 underperforming store locations because of decreased revenue and foot traffic. Perhaps consumer sentiment has something to do with the losses the chain is seeing in recent years. According to more than 99,000 customer reviews on Yelp, Red Robin has a severe customer satisfaction issue, mostly for its food quality, service, and wait time. Customers have recounted experiences where waitstaff didn't check tables while they were dining, and even ignored attempts to get their attention. Some have also noticed a significant decrease in the quality and portion sizes of the food, noting a distinct burnt taste on things like burgers they once enjoyed. In fact, several customers recall the burger served at Red Robin 10 years ago being large and tasty, while it's thinner and drier today. Applebee's Applebee's has a reputation for providing pretty good value compared to some of its fast casual dining competitors, like Chili's, but customers are deeply unsatisfied with wait times, rude staff, and subpar food quality. Customers speculate that shrinkflation is to blame for the change in quality over the years. On Consumer Affairs, one customer from Minneapolis shared their recent 1-star experience, saying, "The last few times the prices have went up drastically and the portions have been really suffering for size," saying that they'd settled for ordering a salad and were still hungry when they left. Multiple patrons recount experiences where they walked into a nearly empty Applebee's and were still met with long wait times and rude waitstaff, contributing to an overall underwhelming and negative dining experience. And it appears the food quality is not up to par either. In a Reddit thread titled, "What is the Worst Chain Restaurant," one commenter said, "I'm convinced their kitchen is comprised entirely of microwaves," while another even suggested that they pick up something better from 7-11. Golden Corral Golden Corral has long been known as the endless buffet with a diverse food selection. With everything from soup, salad, and pastas to steak, seafood, and desserts, there's a little something for everyone. However, the overwhelming consensus online is that the chain is a quantity-over-quality type of dining experience. Most consumers agree that the Golden Corral lost its appeal after childhood, when an all-you-can-eat experience was novel and exciting. Customers lament the mass-produced food and claim the buffet started going even further downhill when they expanded the menu to additional styles of food. One customer on Reddit explained, "It was pretty good before they tried to diversify and add things like Mexican cuisine. The steak, macaroni, sliders, etc. are pretty good, but things like enchiladas sucked". Others were even less charitable, highlighting the poor food quality and lack of seasoning, with one saying, "I just appreciate their honesty in naming the place after a livestock feeding station." Cracker Barrel Cracker Barrel's Southern homestyle comfort food is not enough to satisfy customers, with one patron on Reddit going so far as to say that, "Cracker Barrel isn't really selling good food. It's selling nostalgia," which might explain why some older customers do return to the Southern-style chain. Even the chicken-fried steak, which this chain is known for, is inconsistent, with mushy breading and bland flavor. There are several menu items you should probably avoid at Cracker Barrel, but poor food quality isn't the only problem. The chain has built a reputation for poor service and cleanliness as well, with one customer recounting a time when water was dripping from the ceiling onto their table. Many customers have experienced poor service and extremely long wait times from waitstaff who ignored tables and forgot drink refills. On Yelp, one patron even complained that the "workers did not show proper hygiene" by coughing on the food. Like many other chains, food service varies based on location, but patrons appear to have similar complaints about locations all over the country. TGI Friday's TGI Friday's is credited with popularizing happy hour with its bar-centric casual dining experience and menu with a variety of specialty cocktails. It's often a venue for events like birthday parties, anniversaries, with its casual vibe and lively music. While it has a reputation for welcoming waitstaff and a friendly atmosphere, though, the inconsistent food quality and long waiting times deter many people. Together with the number of restaurants closing, that may actually spell disaster for TGI Friday's. Soggy French fries, bare ribs, old lettuce, over-fried chicken strips, and bitter Alfredo are among the complaints from customers online. Many also find their food being served cold or the waitstaff delivering the entirely wrong order to their table. TGI Friday's is known for being slightly chaotic, but customers who try to subvert the chaos by ordering online don't seem to have luck either. On multiple occasions, customers have received entirely the wrong order when ordering with delivery apps like Uber and DoorDash, likely due to the chaotic atmosphere of the restaurant. Hungry for more? Sign up for the free Daily Meal newsletter for delicious recipes, cooking tips, kitchen hacks, and more, delivered straight to your inbox. Read the original article on The Daily Meal. Solve the daily Crossword