Trump tariff order on movies leaves film industry flummoxed
The entertainment industry reacted with a mixture of alarm and bafflement on Monday after President Donald Trump said he would put a 100% tariff on all movies produced outside the U.S. but issued few details on just how such a levy would work.
Trump's Sunday announcement was the latest in his series of levies and threats on various global industries in an effort to boost industrial activity in the United States. But his trade policy, a combination of tariffs, rollbacks and investigations that could lead to more import taxes, has sapped consumer and business confidence due to their confusing implementation and left many businesses in limbo.
Tariffs on movies might prove more difficult to implement than even the highly integrated North American automobile industry.
The White House said on Monday that it had not made any final decisions on foreign film tariffs, but noted how Hollywood film production sharply declined from the previous year.
Trump did not say whether the duties will apply to films on streaming platforms as well as theatrical releases, nor did he detail whether tariffs would be based on production costs or box office revenue. It also was not clear whether productions split between the United States and other countries — such as the "James Bond" or "Mission: Impossible" films — would be hit with a graduated series of levies or be fully or partially exempt.
"There is too much uncertainty, and this latest move raises more questions than answers," said PP Foresight analyst Paolo Pescatore. "It doesn't feel like something that will happen in the short term as everyone will be grappling to understand the whole process. Inevitably, costs will be passed on to consumers." Trump in January appointed Hollywood veterans Jon Voight, Sylvester Stallone and Mel Gibson to bring the industry back "bigger, better and stronger than ever before," and said on Sunday he wants more movies made in America.
The uncertainty sent shares of media companies down across the board on Monday, as it raised fears that such a move would sharply raise costs for Hollywood studios and roil the global entertainment industry. The tariffs, if implemented, could particularly hurt Netflix as the streaming pioneer relies on global production to produce content for international audiences. Its shares were down about 1.5% in afternoon trading. Disney, Warner Bros Discovery and Universal-owner Comcast were little changed. Stocks of theater operators such as Cinemark and IMAX were down 3.5% and 3.3%, respectively. IMAX declined to comment, while others did not respond to requests for comment.
A man walks past movie posters at an AMC theater in Montebello, California, on Monday. |
AFP-JIJI
Hollywood has been pressing for tax incentives to boost output in Los Angeles, the movie industry's historic home, as the glitzy hub of cinema. Studios over the years have shifted production to locations such as the U.K., Canada and Australia to take advantage of generous tax credits and lower labor costs.
Most of this year's Oscar best picture nominees were filmed outside the U.S., and a survey among studio executives over their preferred production locations for 2025 to 2026 by ProdPro showed that the top five choices were all elsewhere.
Still, tariffs would put further pressure on an industry already reeling from cord-cutting and rising labor costs after the 2023 Hollywood strikes secured higher pay and broader benefits for writers and actors, and it is unclear whether it would accomplish the objective of boosting film production in the U.S.
"Raising the cost to produce movies could lead studios to make less content. There's also a risk of retaliatory tariffs against American content overseas," said Rosenblatt Securities analyst Barton Crockett. Hollywood is already in the crosshairs of China, which vowed last month to curb U.S. movie imports in retaliation for the latest broader tariffs. But analysts said the hit may be limited as box office returns from China have been declining.
Still, former senior Commerce official William Reinsch, a senior fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said retaliation against Trump's film tariffs would be devastating.
"The retaliation will kill our industry. We have a lot more to lose than to gain," he said, adding it would be difficult to make a national security or national emergency case for movies.
Analysts said enforcement would be difficult, as major media conglomerates could restructure operations to skirt the duties, producing content through foreign subsidiaries or licensing content across borders.
Trump's threat sparked concern across the global film industry.
Leaders in Australia and New Zealand, key locations for Marvel movies and "The Lord of the Rings," said they would defend local film industries.
British media union Bectu urged the government to protect the country's "vital" film sector, warning tens of thousands of freelance jobs were on the line.
Matthew Stillman, CEO of Prague-based Stillking Films, one of the biggest producers of U.S.-financed international content in Central and Eastern Europe, said the tariff threat risked derailing global production pipelines.
"The creation of business and market instability will also have an impact on any medium-term investment strategies as people will be uncertain about what the situation will be in three to five years," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
25 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump signs order doubling steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%
WASHINGTON -- U.S. tariffs on steel aluminum and steel are set to double to 50% on Wednesday, a levy the Trump administration says will safeguard the American steel industry from inexpensive imports. On Tuesday evening, U.S. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation for the tariff hike -- up from 25% announced in March -- to take effect on Wednesday at 12:01 a.m. U.S. Eastern time. The U.K. is exempt from the increased levy.
Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
Europeans concerned U.S. will withdraw support from NATO; Americans should be, too
By John Deni The United States has long played a leadership role in NATO, the most successful military alliance in history. The U.S. and 11 other countries in North America and Europe founded NATO in 1949, following World War II. NATO has since grown its membership to include 32 countries in Europe and North America. But now, European leaders and politicians fear the United States has become a less reliable ally, posing major challenges for Europe and, by implication, NATO. This concern is not unfounded. President Donald Trump has repeatedly spoken of a desire to seize Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark, a NATO member. He has declared that Canada, another NATO member, should become 'the 51st state.' Trump has also sided with Russia at the United Nations and said that the European Union, the political and economic group uniting 27 European countries, was designed to 'screw' the U.S. Still, Trump – as well as other senior U.S. government officials – has said that the U.S. remains committed to staying in and supporting NATO. For decades, both liberal and conservative American politicians have recognized that the U.S. strengthens its own military and economic interests by being a leader in NATO – and by keeping thousands of U.S. troops based in Europe to underwrite its commitment. Understanding NATO The U.S., Canada and 10 Western European countries formed NATO nearly 80 years ago as a way to help maintain peace and stability in Europe following World War II. NATO helped European and North American countries bind together and defend themselves against the threat once posed by the Soviet Union, a former communist empire that fell in 1991. NATO employs about 2,000 people at its headquarters in Brussels. It does not have its own military troops and relies on its 32 member countries to volunteer their own military forces to conduct operations and other tasks under NATO's leadership. NATO does have its own military command structure, led by an American military officer, and including military officers from other countries. This team plans and executes all NATO military operations. In peacetime, military forces working with NATO conduct training exercises across Eastern Europe and other places to help reassure allies about the strength of the military coalition – and to deter potential aggressors, like Russia. NATO has a relatively small annual budget of around US$3.6 billion. The U.S. and Germany are the largest contributors to this budget, each responsible for funding 16% of NATO's costs each year. Separate from NATO's annual budget, in 2014, NATO members agreed that each participating country should spend the equivalent of 2% of its gross domestic product on their own national defense. Twenty two of NATO's 31 members with military forces were expected that 2% threshold as of April 2025. Although NATO is chiefly a military alliance, it has roots in the mutual economic interests of both the U.S. and Europe. Europe is the United States' most important economic partner. Roughly one-quarter of all U.S. trade is with Europe – more than the U.S. has with Canada, China or Mexico. Over 2.3 million American jobs are directly tied to producing exports that reach European countries that are part of NATO. NATO helps safeguard this mutual economic relationship between the U.S. and Europe. If Russia or another country tries to intimidate, dominate or even invade a European country, this could hurt the American economy. In this way, NATO can be seen as the insurance policy that underwrites the strength and vitality of the American economy. The heart of that insurance policy is Article 5, a mutual defense pledge that member countries agree to when they join NATO. Article 5 says that an armed attack against one NATO member is considered an attack against the entire alliance. If one NATO member is attacked, all other NATO members must help defend the country in question. NATO members have only invoked Article 5 once, following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the U.S., when the alliance deployed aircraft to monitor U.S. skies. A wavering commitment to Article 5 Trump has questioned whether he would enforce Article 5 and help defend a NATO country if it is not paying the required 2% of its gross domestic product. NBC News also reported in April 2025 that the U.S. is likely going to cut 10,000 or more of the nearly 85,000 American troops stationed in Europe. The U.S. might also relinquish its top military leadership position within NATO, according to NBC. Many political analysts expect the U.S. to shift its national security focus away from Europe and toward threats posed by China – specifically, the threat of China invading or attacking Taiwan. At the same time, the Trump administration appears eager to reset relations with Russia. This is despite the Russian military's atrocities committed against Ukrainian military forces and civilians in the war Russia began in 2022, and Russia's intensifying hybrid war against Europeans in the form of covert spy attacks across Europe. This hybrid warfare allegedly includesRussia conducting cyberattacks and sabotage operations across Europe. It also involves Russia allegedly trying to plant incendiary devices on planes headed to North America, among other things. A shifting role in Europe The available evidence indicates that the U.S. is backing away from its role in Europe. At best – from a European security perspective – the U.S. could still defend European allies with the potential threat of its nuclear weapon arsenal. The U.S. has significantly more nuclear weapons than any Western European country, but it is not clear that this is enough to deter Russia without the clear presence of large numbers of American troops in Europe, especially given that Moscow continues to perceive the U.S. as NATO's most important and most powerful member. For this reason, significantly downsizing the number of U.S. troops in Europe, giving up key American military leadership positions in NATO, or backing away from the alliance in other ways appears exceptionally perilous. Such actions could increase Russian aggression across Europe, ultimately threatening not just European security but America's as well. Maintaining America's leadership position in NATO and sustaining its troop levels in Europe helps reinforce the U.S. commitment to defending its most important allies. This is the best way to protect vital U.S. economic interests in Europe today and ensure Washington will have friends to call on in the future. John Deni is Research Professor of Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational Security Studies, U.S. Army War College. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. External Link © The Conversation
Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
Trade war cuts global economic growth outlook: OECD
The global economic outlook 'is becoming increasingly challenging' following Trump's tariff blitz, the OCED warns By Ali BEKHTAOUI The OECD slashed its annual global growth forecast on Tuesday, warning that U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs blitz would stifle the world economy -- hitting the United States especially hard. After 3.3-percent growth last year, the world economy is now expected to expand by a "modest" 2.9 percent in 2025 and 2026, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development said. In its previous report in March, the OECD had forecast growth of 3.1 percent for 2025 and 3.0 percent for 2026. Since then, Trump has launched a wave of tariffs that has rattled financial markets. "The global outlook is becoming increasingly challenging," said the OECD, an economic policy group of 38 mostly wealthy countries. It said "substantial increases" in trade barriers, tighter financial conditions, weaker business and consumer confidence, and heightened policy uncertainty will all have "marked adverse effects on growth" if they persist. The OECD downgraded its 2025 growth forecast for the United States from 2.2 percent to 1.6 percent. The world's biggest economy is expected to slow further next year to 1.5 percent. Trump, who has insisted that the tariffs would spark a manufacturing revival and restore a U.S. economic "Golden Age", posted on his Truth Social platform before the OECD report's publication: "Because of Tariffs, our Economy is BOOMING!" The OECD holds a ministerial meeting in Paris on Tuesday and Wednesday. U.S. and EU trade negotiators are expected to hold talks on the sidelines of the gathering after Trump threatened to hit the European Union with 50-percent tariffs. The Group of Seven advanced economies is also holding a meeting focused on trade. "For everyone, including the United States, the best option is that countries sit down and get an agreement," OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira said in an interview with AFP. "Avoiding further trade fragmentation is absolutely key in the next few months and years," Pereira said. Trump imposed in April a baseline tariff of 10 percent on imports from around the world. He unveiled higher tariffs on dozens of countries but has paused them until July to allow time for negotiations. The U.S. president has also imposed 25-percent tariffs on cars and now plans to raise those on steel and aluminium to 50 percent on Wednesday. In the OECD report, Pereira warned that "weakened economic prospects will be felt around the world, with almost no exception". He added that "lower growth and less trade will hit incomes and slow job growth". The outlook "has deteriorated" in the United States after the economy expanded by a robust 2.8 percent last year, the report said. The effective tariff rate on U.S. merchandise imports has gone from two percent in 2024 to 15.4 percent, the highest since 1938, the OECD said. The higher rate and policy uncertainty "will dent household consumption and business investment growth", the report said. The OECD also blamed "high economic policy uncertainty, a significant slowdown in net immigration and a sizeable reduction in the federal workforce". While annual inflation is expected to "moderate" among the Group of 20 economies to 3.6 percent in 2025 and 3.2 percent in 2026, the United States is "an important exception". U.S. inflation is expected to accelerate to just under four percent by the end of the year, two times higher than the Federal Reserve's target for consumer price increases. The OECD slightly reduced its growth forecast for China -- which was hit with triple-digit U.S. tariffs that have been temporarily lowered -- from 4.8 to 4.7 percent this year. Another country with a sizeable downgrade is Japan. The OECD cut the country's growth forecast from 1.1 percent to 0.7 percent. The outlook for the eurozone economy, however, remains intact at one-percent growth. "There is the risk that protectionism and trade policy uncertainty will increase even further and that additional trade barriers might be introduced," Pereira wrote. "According to our simulations, additional tariffs would further reduce global growth prospects and fuel inflation, dampening global growth even more," he said. © 2025 AFP
