logo
Why China's car and tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

Why China's car and tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

TimesLIVEa day ago

'God's Eye' on the cheap
Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts said. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model.
BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000 (R532,220). The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500 (R736,210).
According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105 (R37,342). That compares to $2,360 (R41,863) for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimated.
Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the US, A2MAC1 estimated. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm said. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said.
BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SA's first full EV courier service launches in Gauteng
SA's first full EV courier service launches in Gauteng

TimesLIVE

time26 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

SA's first full EV courier service launches in Gauteng

The decision to use EVs aligns with Staniland's background in tech and smart systems. 'I wanted to portray the right brand image and an EV conveys that perfectly. We did research as to possible options and settled on BYD. The company is a rival for Tesla and is available in SA. The Dolphin has a unique appearance, a hi-tech interior and a very good range, more than 400km, on a full charge. Using EVs has made us more efficient all around.' The BYD Dolphin units used by XPress have been modified for courier use. 'There is plenty of space in the Dolphins as we had them customised. We removed the passenger and rear seats, essentially turning them into little panel vans. Our drivers seem to really enjoy driving the cars. They have a sense of pride that shows in their appearance and the level of courtesy shown to clients.' XPress also incorporates a proprietary feature called Bring It, enabling customers to send parcels by scanning a QR code on the spot. 'All our drivers are also trained on our proprietary software to accept parcels on the spot via our Bring It service. This allows clients to simply scan a QR code to send a parcel there and then, and to remove unnecessary paperwork and admin, which is pretty unique in SA.' Staniland said the initial rollout has shown strong potential and the company is planning to expand. 'The rollout has proven this is a viable concept, even if SA is slow to widespread EV adoption. We are in talks to offer the XPress service in Durban, Cape Town and Nelspruit. We are also considering adding BYD Seagulls for intra-city deliveries. But it's still early days for this exciting new business,' he said.

Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new aircraft tariffs
Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new aircraft tariffs

TimesLIVE

time26 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new aircraft tariffs

Five nations and the EU, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, have urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial aircraft and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed. Airlines and aircraft manufacturers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of $75bn (R1.32-trillion) for the US industry. The documents made public by the US commerce department bared concerns about the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the EU. 'As reliable trading partners, the EU and US should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field', it added. Trump has imposed tariffs of 10% on nearly all aircraft and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, US manufacturer Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for aircraft and parts. 'The US should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the UK,' Boeing told the commerce department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported $1.45bn (R25.7bn) in aircraft parts, a 10th of the total, to the US. The EU said it took US exports of aircraft worth about $12bn (R212.72bn), while exporting about $8bn (R141.82bn) of aircraft to the US. In early May, the commerce department launched a 'section 232" national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'US tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100% domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing US content in its aircraft over the past decade and its newest models, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88% domestically-sourced content'. The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding US aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defence sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying: 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilise, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'

Chinese carmakers vow to make supplier payments within 60 days as backlash grows
Chinese carmakers vow to make supplier payments within 60 days as backlash grows

TimesLIVE

time3 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Chinese carmakers vow to make supplier payments within 60 days as backlash grows

Major Chinese car manufacturers have pledged to make payments to suppliers within 60 days, responding to a recent outcry from steelmakers over long payment times and regulatory pressure as the backlash against a brutal price war grows. Chinese authorities issued new rules in March that require big companies to settle most payments with suppliers within 60 days that became effective on June 1. However, suppliers had been worried there were loopholes for the rules to be circumvented. Carmakers issuing pledges on Wednesday included companies such as BYD and Chery and smaller players such as Xpeng and Xiaomi. State-owned Guangzhou Automobile Group and FAW Group made their pledges on Tuesday night. The pledges come after China's industry ministry summoned carmakers to a meeting last week where they were told to put an end to a punishing price war and excessive competition, factors which have put tremendous pressure on the industry's supply chain. Even so, the China Iron and Steel Association felt compelled to publish a statement on Tuesday that said steel companies were struggling with little profit margin and mounting liquidity pressure as some carmakers have been asking for price cuts of more than 10% since last year and delaying payments by months. The association also asked Chinese carmakers to learn from the steady and healthy partnerships Japanese carmakers have with their suppliers, which leave a certain amount of profit for suppliers and ensure product quality and innovation. Yang Hongze, chair of Autolink, a supplier of intelligent vehicle technologies, said he welcomed the pledges but would like more clarity from carmakers about whether payments would be made in cash or commercial paper, and what would be considered the start date for the 60-day period to pay. "It is a pleasant but difficult change for the industry to move towards a healthy development and grow together," he said. Tension has been high in China's car industry as the price war which began in early 2023 has shown little sign of abating. In May, Great Wall Motor chair Wei Jianjun worried openly about the deepening price war. He said the industry had its own version of property developer Evergrande, which was liquidated last year after a major debt crisis, though he did not mention a specific car company. This month, Chinese car dealers called on carmakers to stop offloading too many cars on dealerships, saying the intense price war was damaging their cash flow, driving down their profitability and forcing some to shut.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store