Foreclosures rocket by 32% in Las Vegas after rip-off prices and Trump boycotts triggered slump in tourist city
In Clark County, 200 default notices were filed in June, an increase of 32 percent from the same month last year, a research report from the University of Nevada 's Lied Center for Real Estate found.
Default notices are filed after a property owner falls behind on their mortgage payments and indicates the start of the foreclosure process.
'With high interest rates, global economic uncertainty over tariffs, and a reduction of tourism in Southern Nevada, the local housing market has started to show some signs of distress,' the report said.
Approximately 1,290 notices of default were filed in Clark County in the first six months of this year, up 28 percent from last year, according to the research report.
A majority of the default notices are from single-family homes, nearly 1,035 filings, followed by 133 from townhome owners and 83 condo owners.
Research director for the Lied Center, Nicholas Irwin, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that the increase in filings is concerning, considering that Sin City has been suffering from a major tourism slump.
He said that Las Vegas' unemployment rate is higher than the national average and warned of 'turbulent times ahead' for the local economy.
The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) has also sounded the alarm on a steep decline in tourism and its negative impacts on the area.
'Some of the decisions that our administration has made around international relations has caused a drop in tourism,' LVCVA president Steve Hill said at a recent board of directors meeting, reported Fox 5.
'That has happened for Canada. Our international visitation is actually pretty flat, but that is making up for the 20-plus percent drop in tourism from Canada, which is our largest international source of visitation. That matters and we are having to overcome that.'
Since his return to the White House, Trump quickly launched a hostile attack on the country and threatened to make it America's '51st state' if it did not submit to his tariff demands.
With Canadians making up a large part of all tourism to Sin City, Trump's antagonism towards its residents may have played a role.
A decrease in visitors from the north has also had negative impacts on business at Las Vegas' Harry Reid International Airport.
The number of airline passengers arriving at Sin City's main airport is forecasted to continue to plummet by almost 100,000 per day, a new report warned.
Capacity rates at Harry Reid International Airport are forecast to drop dramatically in the second half of 2025, according to LVCVA.
The grim outlook is due to a decline in visitors from Canada, along with maintenance issues with the airport's second-largest airline, experts said.
They warned that the number of inbound passengers will plunge by around 95,000 seats per day for the rest of the year.
The worrying prediction represents a 2.3 percent fall from 2024 numbers, according to the report by Ailevon Pacific Aviation Consulting, which was commissioned by the city's tourism board.
Workers across several industries in the tourist city claim tipping in the city has plunged by as much as 50 percent.
Service workers are blaming a sharp drop in visitors, which they say has left them with fewer customers and lower pay.
Some are pointing fingers at Trump, saying his presidency has led to a drop in international visitors, while some say the real problem is Vegas itself.
The city only welcomed 3.39 million visitors in March, down almost eight percent from 3.68million in February.
April saw just over 3.3 million visitors, a drop of 5.1 percent from last year. Hotels were 82.9 percent full the same month, compared with 85.3 percent in March 2024.
Midweek occupancy recorded a decline of 2.5 percent in the same period, despite more than half a million people attending conferences there.
And in June, there was a reported 11.3 percent drop in visitors compared to June 2024, while international travel to the city has fallen 10 percent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut after blow from Starmer's trade deal with Trump
The UK's largest bioethanol plant is to close after being dealt a body blow by Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump. The owner of the Vivergo plant in Hull, owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is to close with the loss of 160 jobs, just hours after the government said it would not fund an industry rescue package. The first redundancies will be made on Tuesday. The government's decision creates uncertainty over a further 4,000 jobs in the industry's supply chain including farmers and hauliers. Bioethanol is a petrol substitute produced from agricultural products. Vivergo opened a redundancy programme in June. At that point the government appointed talks with the company, more than a month after ABF warned that the US trade deal was an 'existential threat' allowing US producers, for the first time, to compete litre-by-litre under a new duty free agreement for American ethanol. ABF and Ensus, the owner of the other major bioethanol plant in the UK, said the US deal would have a huge knock on effect in farming for wheat farmers who supplied their plants, as well as the UK's lead in clean fuels. A spokesperson for ABF said on Friday: 'It is deeply regrettable that the government has chosen not to support a key national asset. We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. We initiated and led talks with government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the government's own green industrial strategy.' ABF had warned the US trade deal, hailed as a triumph for Starmer, was a killer blow because it scrapped tariffs on a quota of 1.4bn litres of imports from the US, the exact size of the UK production, as part of the agreement with Trump in May. The US trade deal was a victory for the car industry which had tariffs slashed from 27.5% to 10%. The steel industry is still facing 25% tariffs but the UK government is hoping these will be scrapped through ongoing negotiation. Government sources said they had to prioritise the 320,000 jobs in auto, steel and aerospace and added that the ethanol plants had faced financial problems before the US deal. Sources in the National Farmers' Union believe that Trump's negotiators had said that in exchange for slashing tariffs on cars and steel it wanted US farmers to have access to either the British pork or ethanol industries. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion A spokesperson for the department for business and trade said it had taken 'the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces'. ABF said the decision was 'deeply regrettable' accusing the government of having 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber' and the opportunity to 'lead the world' on clean fuels. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'This is a shortsighted decision that totally disregards the benefits the domestic bioethanol sector will bring to jobs and energy security.'
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Democrats introduce joint resolution to end Trump's ‘lawless' DC takeover
Democratic lawmakers have introduced a joint resolution aimed at ending what they call Trump's unlawful and unprecedented move to federalize the Metropolitan police department (MPD) in Washington DC. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking member of the House judiciary committee, DC's non-voting House delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and representative Robert Garcia, ranking member of the House committee on oversight and government reform introduced the resolution on Friday, invoking the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973. The resolution states that Trump has not demonstrated the existence of any special emergency conditions that would warrant the federalization of the police force. In the Senate, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland will sponsor the resolution. 'The only emergency here is a lawless president experiencing a growing public relations emergency because of his close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his stubborn refusal to release the Epstein file despite his promise to do so,' said Raskin in a statement shared with the Guardian. The Home Rule Act of 1973 states that DC residents have the authority to govern their local affairs, including by electing a mayor and local council members. But because DC is considered a 'federal district' rather than a state, the president and Congress (where DC residents have no voting representatives) are given the legal ability to manage local laws and local tax dollars. Under the act, the president has limited power to temporarily take over the DC police department for 'federal purposes' under 'special conditions of an emergency'. On Monday, Trump signed an executive order granting himself direct control of the MPD in a highly controversial and suspected premeditated move. But lawmakers argue that the special conditions have not been met and that Congress has the authority to end such emergency control through a joint resolution. According to the joint resolution's sponsors, the president has attempted to rationalize his decision to place local police under federal control and increase militarization of the city by pushing a misleading account of DC's crime rate, which has actually declined for two consecutive years and recently hit its lowest point in three decades. 'President Trump's incursions against DC are among the most egregious attacks on DC home rule in decades,' said Norton. 'DC residents are Americans, worthy of the same autonomy granted to residents of the states … No emergency exists in DC that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the DC Police for federal purposes, as required by law.' Lawmakers say that his actions have worsened public safety by blocking DC's access to $1bn in locally generated funds intended for police, fire, emergency services and other safety programs. Additionally, the resolution notes that Trump has removed or reassigned many of DC's prosecutors, creating a backlog in criminal cases and delaying justice for victims. He also pardoned or granted clemency to nearly 1,600 people involved in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol in 2021, including hundreds found guilty of assaulting law enforcement officers.
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Trump heads to Alaska summit with Putin, says he wants Ukraine ceasefire 'today'
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE/MOSCOW, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Donald Trump said he wanted to see a ceasefire "today" as he headed to Alaska on Friday for a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin to help end the deadliest war in Europe since World War Two. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who was not invited to the talks, and his European allies fear Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict and recognising - if only informally - Russian control over one fifth of Ukraine. Trump sought to assuage such concerns as he boarded Air Force One, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial swaps. "I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: "I want to see a ceasefire rapidly... I'm not going to be happy if it's not today... I want the killing to stop." The U.S. and Russian presidents are due to meet at a Cold War-era air force base in Alaska's largest city at around 11 a.m. (1900 GMT) for their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House. Trump hopes a truce in the 3-1/2-year-old war will bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. For Putin, the summit is already a big win that he can portray as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow is retaking its rightful place at the top table of international diplomacy. Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitriev described the pre-summit mood as "combative" and said the two leaders would discuss not only Ukraine but the full spectrum of bilateral relations, Russia's RIA news agency reported. Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He said that if Friday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be even more important than his encounter with Putin. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said a three-way summit would be possible if the Alaska talks bore fruit, Interfax news agency reported. Peskov also said Friday's talks could last 6-7 hours and that aides would take part in what had been expected to be one-to-one meetings. Zelenskiy said the summit should open the way for a "just peace" and three-way talks that included him but added that Russia was continuing to wage war on Friday. A Russian ballistic missile earlier struck Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, killing one person and wounding another. "It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelenskiy wrote on the Telegram messaging app. The Kremlin said Putin would arrive in Alaska at 11 a.m. (1900 GMT) and would be met at his plane by Trump. "He is a smart guy, been doing it for a long time but so have I... We get along, there's a good respect level on both sides," Trump said of Putin. He also welcomed Putin's decision to bring a lot of businesspeople with him to Alaska. "But they're not doing business until we get the war settled," he said, repeating a threat of "economically severe" consequences for Russia if the summit goes badly. One source acquainted with Kremlin thinking said there were signs that Moscow could be ready to strike a compromise on Ukraine given that Putin understood Russia's economic vulnerability and costs of continuing the war. Reuters has previously reported that Putin might be willing to freeze the conflict along the front lines, provided there was a legally binding pledge not to enlarge NATO eastwards and to lift some Western sanctions. NATO has said that Ukraine's future is in the alliance. Russia, whose war economy is showing signs of strain, is vulnerable to further U.S. sanctions - and Trump has threatened tariffs on buyers of Russian crude, primarily China and India. "For Putin, economic problems are secondary to goals, but he understands our vulnerability and costs," the Russian source said. Putin this week held out the prospect of something else he knows Trump wants - a new nuclear arms control accord to replace the last surviving one, which is due to expire next February. The source familiar with Kremlin thinking said it looked as if the two sides had been able to find some common ground. "Apparently, some terms will be agreed upon... because Trump cannot be refused, and we are not in a position to refuse (due to sanctions pressure)," said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity. Putin has said he is open to a full ceasefire but that issues of verification must first be sorted out. One compromise could be a truce in the air war. Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. It is unclear how that guarantee could work. Ukrainians who spoke to Reuters in central Kyiv on Friday were not optimistic about the summit. "Nothing good will happen there, because war is war, it will not end. The territories - we're not going to give anything to anyone," said Tetiana Harkavenko, a 65-year-old cleaner.
