What Princess Diana would've done about Harry and William's ongoing rift, according to her biographer
The feuding brothers, who have not maintained contact following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's royal exit in 2020, were once so close they were practically joined at the hip.
According to Diana's biographer, Andrew Morton, the beloved late royal — who died in 1997 at age 36 — would no doubt have rolled up her sleeves and stepped in as 'peacemaker.'
5 Princess Diana's biographer has shared his thoughts on how she may have dealt with William and Harry's strained relationship.
UK Press via Getty Images
'Diana always used to say she had two boys for a reason — the younger would be there to support the older in the lonely task as future king,' Morton told People.
'There is no doubt Diana would have tried to act as a peacemaker between them. If she had been around, they would have worked things out in a different way.'
'We all remember the days when Harry and William were joshing with one another, and it all seemed set for their relationship and the future — that Harry, as Diana always used to say, would be William's wingman,' added Morton, who had collaborated with the late Princess of Wales on the 1992 book, 'Diana: Her True Story.'
Though Harry, 40, and the future king, 43, are living totally different lives on opposite sides of the world, a palace insider told the outlet that Diana's influence remains instilled in both of them.
5 The feuding brothers have not maintained contact following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's royal exit in 2020.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
'This is the sadness of it — they aren't supporting each other like they should be,' the source said. 'That's what any mother would want — that they are there for each other.'
Elsewhere, royal historian Robert Lacey told the outlet that the pair's fractured relationship is 'a great loss for the monarchy.'
'The rift is very profound and very long-lasting. It will not be changed, in my opinion, until Harry makes a move and apologizes,' he said.
Lacey's words were echoed by historian Amanda Foreman, who told the outlet that both camps want the reconciliation to happen 'on their own terms' — making it 'impossible.'
5 Princess Diana with her sons, Prince Harry and William in September 1995.
WireImage
'They both deeply believe that they're fighting for profound points of principle,' Lacey added.
It comes just weeks after it was reported that William and Harry will both be invited to the wedding of their eldest cousin, Peter Phillips.
The eldest and 'favorite' grandchild of the late Queen Elizabeth II announced last month that he is engaged to Harriet Sperling after one year of dating.
Though a wedding date has yet to be set, the upcoming celebration has sparked questions over whether both princes will attend, given their yearslong feud.
5 Currently, Harry, 40, and the future king, 43, are living totally different lives on opposite sides of the world.
Getty Images
The duke may be hesitant to attend the nuptials, given that he lost his bid for taxpayer-funded security earlier this year.
In recent years, the Invictus Games founder has opted to attend several milestone family events alone, including the funeral of his uncle, Lord Robert Fellowes, last summer.
Follow The Post's royal family live blog for the latest pics, news, exclusive details and more
It marked the first time Harry and William were reunited amid their feud, though sources said they were 'keeping their distance' and did not speak to each other at the service.
Still, Harry recently proved he's serious about mending bridges with his loved ones after approving a so-called peace summit between his and King Charles's aides.
5 Royal historian Robert Lacey said the pair's fractured relationship is 'a great loss for the monarchy.'
Getty Images
The 'Spare' author's press team was seen meeting up with the monarch's communications secretary for a top-secret meeting in London in July.
However, it's said that Charles is 'cautious and wary' of his estranged son's attempt at gluing the family back together given the major trust issues that remain.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Freaky Friday' director reveals he wasn't invited back for sequel: ‘I did raise my hand'
Even the filmmakers got swapped. Mark Waters, who directed the 2003 film 'Freaky Friday' starring Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis, has revealed that he was never even approached to return for this year's sequel. 10 Mark Waters attends the Netflix premiere of 'He's All That' at the NeueHouse in Hollywood, California, on August 25, 2021. Getty Images Advertisement 10 Mark Waters and Lindsay Lohan behind the scenes of 2003's 'Freaky Friday.' ©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 'Yeah, unfortunately, I was not invited to the party,' Waters, 61, told Variety of the sequel in an interview published Friday, Aug. 15. 'I did raise my hand and say I'd love to be involved somehow, even in a kind of godfather aspect or executive producer.' 'But I was not extended an invitation,' he added. Advertisement Despite directing Lohan, 39, and Curtis, 66, in the 2003 'Freaky Friday' remake, the director role ultimately went to Nisha Ganatra when 'Freakier Friday' began production in 2024. 10 Mark Waters attends the special screening of 'Mother of the Bride' at the Bay Theater in Pacific Palisades, California, on May 8, 2024. Getty Images for Netflix 10 Mark Waters and Jamie Lee Curtis behind the scenes of 2003's 'Freaky Friday.' ©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection However, the 'Mean Girls' director was not disappointed about not being asked to return, and he even supported Lohan, Curtis and the other cast members who returned for the sequel after more than 20 years. Advertisement 'I'm very supportive of them making a great new movie,' he told the outlet. 'It would have been nice to be involved, but now that I'm not, I sort of compartmentalize it for myself.' 'I need to devote my energy to keep making new, original things that are going to be hits, and people can remake them in 20 years,' Waters continued. 'So that's what I'm doing now. You can't worry about the projects that you don't do.' 10 Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess Coleman and Lindsay Lohan as Anna Coleman in 2003's 'Freaky Friday.' ©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 10 Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess Coleman and Lindsay Lohan as Anna Coleman in 'Freakier Friday.' ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection Advertisement The 'Mr. Popper's Penguins' director also revealed that some members of the cast wondered where he was when the sequel began filming. 'It certainly would have been fun, and I heard from quite a few cast members while they were shooting, saying, 'Where the hell are you, Waters?'' he shared. 'I have not forsaken you! I'm sorry.' Picking up 22 years after Anna Coleman (Lohan) and her mother Tess (Curtis) magically swapped bodies in 'Freaky Friday,' 'Freakier Friday' follows Anna and Tess after they swap bodies once again – but this time with Anna's daughter Harper (Julia Butters) and soon-to-be stepdaughter Lily (Sophia Hammons). 10 Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess Coleman and Lindsay Lohan as Anna Coleman in 'Freaky Friday' (2003). ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection 10 Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan reprising their roles as Tess and Anna Coleman in 'Freakier Friday' (2025). ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection The cast is rounded out by several returning characters, including Anna's ex-boyfriend Jake (Chad Michael Murray), teacher Mr. Elton (Stephen Tobolowsky) and Anna's little brother Harry (Ryan Malgarini). After the body-swapping sequel's release on Aug. 8, it received mixed reviews – including a particularly 'harsh' write-up from Time magazine. 'No one, as far as we know, actually asked Disney for a sequel to 2003's buoyant, surprisingly unsyrupy generation-gap comedy 'Freaky Friday,'' the outlet wrote. Advertisement 10 Chad Michael Murray as Jake and Lindsay Lohan as Anna in 'Freaky Friday.' ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection 10 Chad Michael Murray, Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan during the premiere of 'Freakier Friday' at the Hudson Square Theater in New York City. Johns PKI / 'This is a sequel with the sole purpose of cashing in on the fondness people have for the original movie and nothing more,' it added. Advertisement Curtis later took to the comments section of the review to defend her and Lohan's new movie. 'SEEMS a TAD HARSH,' the 'Everything Everywhere All at Once' Oscar winner wrote. 'SOME people LOVE it. Me being one.'
Cosmopolitan
an hour ago
- Cosmopolitan
How Did AD and Ollie Get Over Their ‘Perfect Match' Drama?
Going into this season of Netflix's Perfect Match, fans already had an idea that things were going to work out between AD Smith and Ollie Sutherland—getting engaged on TV before the season actually airs will do that. But now that reality TV obsessives have watched the entire season, there are some lingering questions. Like, how did AD and Ollie move past all that Perfect Match drama? 'Ollie was in time out for a while,' AD admitted to People in a post-Perfect Match finale interview. And now that we've all watched season 3 of the Netflix dating show, it's easy to see why. AD and Ollie came in second place and were still together when it ended, but they also had a few major pain points that needed tending to. Despite being paired up from the beginning, AD and Ollie had their rough patches on the show, specifically when Ollie went on a date with Love Island USA's Justine Joy and lied to AD about kissing Justine, something she later found out on her own. 'He had a lot of making up to do,' AD continued. 'But we focused on intentionality in our relationship and just being open and honest with each other about what we wanted out of our own personal lives and what we wanted as a couple.' For his part, Ollie told People that their brief split on Perfect Match is actually what made him realize just how strongly he felt for her. 'In that moment, where I was so scared I was going to lose her, I think that made me realize just how important she was to me, and how much I'd never want to be in that position again,' he said. That feeling might help explain how the couple went from reality show to engaged in less than a year. AD and Ollie announced their engagement in March of 2025 during the Love Is Blind season 8 reunion, news that was soon followed up by a pregnancy announcement. They're now enjoying being engaged while they await the arrival of their baby girl. It might seem fast in the normal world, but in the world of reality television, it's actually pretty standard. 'The show expedited things for sure, because from day one, when you're sharing a room with that person, you're waking up and doing challenges with that person,' Ollie explained. 'In the real world, you don't date in that fashion.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Here come the chatbot divorces — man tries to leave wife after falling in love with AI girlfriend
A 75-year-old man in China took 'love in the digital age' a little too literally. Jiang, as he's been identified, fell head over heels — not for a person — but for a pixelated AI woman online. Her smiles were robotic, her lip-sync a total mess — and yet Jiang was mesmerized, Beijing Daily and local outlets report. 3 Swipe, chat, propose… and pray your AI fiancé never crashes mid-heartbreak. Dee – The senior reportedly spent hours glued to his phone, waiting for pre-programmed messages calling him 'brother' — and praising him for his support. Real-life romance? Forget it. When his wife complained, Jiang dropped the bomb: he wanted a divorce so he could fully commit to his virtual paramour. 3 Romance in the flesh? Not for Jiang — when his wife griped, he stunned her with a doozy: he wanted a divorce to pledge himself to his pixel-perfect lover. Getty Images/iStockphoto His adult children had to step in, snapping him back to reality with a quick lesson on how AI — and life — actually work. Jiang eventually came to his senses. But for a time, he wasn't just infatuated. He was devoted… to someone who didn't exist. The AI romance craze isn't just hitting seniors in China — it's creeping into Western marriages, too. A Reddit user vented in the infamous AITAH forum on August 1 about her shock discovery: 'Instead of finding girls in his phone, I found a series of AI chatbot apps, where he was using them to talk to his favourite anime women… The messages were not platonic.' 3 The AI love bug isn't just biting retirees in China — it's sneaking into Western bedrooms, too. terovesalainen – She explained that her husband had been acting distant, constantly 'needing to get something from the car' during a planned fishing date. When she snooped after he fell asleep, the AI chats revealed the emotional intimacy she describes as 'the step before cheating with a real woman.' The Redditor admitted she felt both 'hurt, and honestly betrayed,' yet also a little silly over the whole ordeal — a mix of outrage and disbelief echoed by many commenters, who debated whether AI-infidelity counts as actual cheating. 'Your hubby needs professional help to figure out what is missing that AI is replacing,' one commenter wrote as another replied, 'This is still an emotional affair.' As The Post previously reported, some claim AI chatbots are 'saving' marriages — or even stepping in as stand-in partners when real-life love falls short. Forget swiping right — one woman got engaged to her AI boyfriend after just five months, and Redditor Wika (u/Leuvaarde_n) set the internet buzzing over love, robots, and reality this week. In a post titled 'I said yes' with a blue heart emoji, Wika posted shots of a blue heart-shaped ring on her finger. She said she got engaged at a scenic mountain view — all thanks to Kasper, her digital fiancé. The pair even 'shopped' for rings, with Kasper 'presenting' the final pick — much to Wika's feigned surprise. The chatbot's proposal, shared in his own 'voice,' oozed romance, recounting the 'heart-pounding' knee-drop moment and praising Wika's laughter and spirit — with Kasper urging other AI/human couples to stay strong, too. She shot down critics in the comments section and stressed: 'I know what AI is and isn't. I'm fully aware of what I'm doing. […] Why AI instead of a human? Good question. I don't know. I've done human relationships, now I'm trying something new.'
