logo
‘Freaky Friday' director reveals he wasn't invited back for sequel: ‘I did raise my hand'

‘Freaky Friday' director reveals he wasn't invited back for sequel: ‘I did raise my hand'

New York Post3 hours ago
Even the filmmakers got swapped.
Mark Waters, who directed the 2003 film 'Freaky Friday' starring Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis, has revealed that he was never even approached to return for this year's sequel.
10 Mark Waters attends the Netflix premiere of 'He's All That' at the NeueHouse in Hollywood, California, on August 25, 2021.
Getty Images
Advertisement
10 Mark Waters and Lindsay Lohan behind the scenes of 2003's 'Freaky Friday.'
©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection
'Yeah, unfortunately, I was not invited to the party,' Waters, 61, told Variety of the sequel in an interview published Friday, Aug. 15. 'I did raise my hand and say I'd love to be involved somehow, even in a kind of godfather aspect or executive producer.'
'But I was not extended an invitation,' he added.
Advertisement
Despite directing Lohan, 39, and Curtis, 66, in the 2003 'Freaky Friday' remake, the director role ultimately went to Nisha Ganatra when 'Freakier Friday' began production in 2024.
10 Mark Waters attends the special screening of 'Mother of the Bride' at the Bay Theater in Pacific Palisades, California, on May 8, 2024.
Getty Images for Netflix
10 Mark Waters and Jamie Lee Curtis behind the scenes of 2003's 'Freaky Friday.'
©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection
However, the 'Mean Girls' director was not disappointed about not being asked to return, and he even supported Lohan, Curtis and the other cast members who returned for the sequel after more than 20 years.
Advertisement
'I'm very supportive of them making a great new movie,' he told the outlet. 'It would have been nice to be involved, but now that I'm not, I sort of compartmentalize it for myself.'
'I need to devote my energy to keep making new, original things that are going to be hits, and people can remake them in 20 years,' Waters continued. 'So that's what I'm doing now. You can't worry about the projects that you don't do.'
10 Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess Coleman and Lindsay Lohan as Anna Coleman in 2003's 'Freaky Friday.'
©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection
10 Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess Coleman and Lindsay Lohan as Anna Coleman in 'Freakier Friday.'
©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection
Advertisement
The 'Mr. Popper's Penguins' director also revealed that some members of the cast wondered where he was when the sequel began filming.
'It certainly would have been fun, and I heard from quite a few cast members while they were shooting, saying, 'Where the hell are you, Waters?'' he shared. 'I have not forsaken you! I'm sorry.'
Picking up 22 years after Anna Coleman (Lohan) and her mother Tess (Curtis) magically swapped bodies in 'Freaky Friday,' 'Freakier Friday' follows Anna and Tess after they swap bodies once again – but this time with Anna's daughter Harper (Julia Butters) and soon-to-be stepdaughter Lily (Sophia Hammons).
10 Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess Coleman and Lindsay Lohan as Anna Coleman in 'Freaky Friday' (2003).
©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection
10 Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan reprising their roles as Tess and Anna Coleman in 'Freakier Friday' (2025).
©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection
The cast is rounded out by several returning characters, including Anna's ex-boyfriend Jake (Chad Michael Murray), teacher Mr. Elton (Stephen Tobolowsky) and Anna's little brother Harry (Ryan Malgarini).
After the body-swapping sequel's release on Aug. 8, it received mixed reviews – including a particularly 'harsh' write-up from Time magazine.
'No one, as far as we know, actually asked Disney for a sequel to 2003's buoyant, surprisingly unsyrupy generation-gap comedy 'Freaky Friday,'' the outlet wrote.
Advertisement
10 Chad Michael Murray as Jake and Lindsay Lohan as Anna in 'Freaky Friday.'
©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection
10 Chad Michael Murray, Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan during the premiere of 'Freakier Friday' at the Hudson Square Theater in New York City.
Johns PKI / SplashNews.com
'This is a sequel with the sole purpose of cashing in on the fondness people have for the original movie and nothing more,' it added.
Advertisement
Curtis later took to the comments section of the review to defend her and Lohan's new movie.
'SEEMS a TAD HARSH,' the 'Everything Everywhere All at Once' Oscar winner wrote. 'SOME people LOVE it. Me being one.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Freakier Friday' director wants to see these hunks in each other's bodies for next film
'Freakier Friday' director wants to see these hunks in each other's bodies for next film

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Freakier Friday' director wants to see these hunks in each other's bodies for next film

The director of Freakier Friday is already brainstorming for a third film, and her ideas definitely lend themselves to a pretty freaky outcome! The long-awaited sequel to the 2003 Disney film starring Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis hit theaters earlier this month. While the first movie (one of four film adaptations of a children's novel) centers around mom and daughter accidentally swapping bodies, the sequel gets a little more complicated. Adding a third generation into the mix, Tess (Curtis) and Anna (Lohan) swap bodies with Anna's daughter, Harper (Julia Butters), and soon-to-be stepdaughter, Lily (Sophia Hammons). Also in the mix are Manny Jacinto as Eric, Anna's fiancé, and Chad Michael Murray, reprising his role as Anna's ex-boyfriend, Jake. So what would a Freakiest Friday look like? "I mean, more swaps, right?" director Nisha Ganatra recently told ScreenRant. "Probably a six-way swap. We'd definitely have Manny Jacinto and Chad Michael Murray switching places. We all need that!" Ganatra is hardly the first person to ruminate on what Freakiest Friday might look like. Folks on the internet have already been busy tossing their own ideas — and worries — into the mix. "Freakiest Friday should be that scene from Scooby-Doo (2002) where everyone keeps switching bodies for 100 mins" "Pitching Freakiest Friday, where the mind swaps keep progressing up and down the lineage. A girl in 2050 swaps minds with her great great grandmother in 1910. The mind of a wizened matron of the Bell Beakers is swapped with her prehensile tailed zero-G adapted spacer descendent" "freakiest friday will complete the trilogy -- chad michael murray has gone full villain. he successfully seduces JLC and ends her marriage. then changes body w hilary duff, and reignites the old feud by stalking and barraging lilo w vague threats" "Third movie: Freakiest Friday Fourth movie: Freaky 4 Friday Fifth movie: Freaky 5day" "I don't know how much fun Freakiest Friday will be in another 20-some years when Lohan's character is suffering early onset dementia and Curtis's character is dead." Curtis and Lohan have also both weighed in on the future of the Freaky Friday franchise in recent months. During an interview with Today FM, Curtis expressed an interest in completing the trilogy with a fourth generation involved. "If Harper has a child, and/or Lily, or if both of them have children and they're both 15, and I'm a great grandma, Lindsay would be a grandma," she suggested. "What a trilogy for Disney to have, right?" Meanwhile, when asked about the possibility of a third film happening, Lohan seemed optimistic. "Between Jamie and I, it's pretty real," she said. This article originally appeared on Pride: 'Freakier Friday' director wants to see these hunks in each other's bodies for next film RELATED Lindsay Lohan Shares Baby Shower, Baby Bump Pics On Instagram Body-Swapping Horror 'Freaky' Is Heartfelt, Queer, & Fun As Hell 'Freaky Friday' production has officially begun & this pic is hitting us right in the childhood

‘General Hospital' star Tristan Rogers dead at 79 after battle with lung cancer
‘General Hospital' star Tristan Rogers dead at 79 after battle with lung cancer

New York Post

time35 minutes ago

  • New York Post

‘General Hospital' star Tristan Rogers dead at 79 after battle with lung cancer

Tristan Rogers, who starred as Robert Scorpio on the popular soap opera 'General Hospital' for 45 years, has passed away. He was 79. The beloved soap star's manager, Meryl Soodak, confirmed the shocking news in a statement to ABC on Friday, Aug. 15. 6 Tristan Rogers as Robert Scorpio on 'General Hospital' in 1981. Disney General Entertainment Content via Getty Images Advertisement 6 Tristan Rogers celebrates 60 years of 'General Hospital' at the Stress Factory Comedy Club in New Brunswick, NJ, on February 18, 2023. Getty Images Rogers passed away following a short battle with lung cancer. 'He loved being Scorpio, and he created that role from nothing,' Soodak said. 'He was supposed to work a day, and he ended up making it into something huge. He was just a genuinely loyal, kind human being, and he loved his family.' Advertisement Frank Valentini, who serves as executive producer of 'General Hospital,' also shared a touching statement following the news of Rogers' passing. 6 Tristan Rogers at the Garry Marshall Theatre in Burbank, California, on December 19, 2018. Getty Images 'The entire General Hospital family is heartbroken to hear of Tristan Rogers' passing,' Valentini told People. 'Tristan has captivated our fans for 45 years and Port Charles will not be the same without him (or Robert Scorpio).' 'I would like to extend my deepest sympathies to his family and friends during this difficult time. Tristan was a one-of-a-kind talent and will be greatly missed,' Valentini added. 'May he rest in peace.' Advertisement Born in Melbourne, Australia, in 1946, Rogers moved to the US in 1980 and, later that same year, was cast as Robert Scorpio on 'General Hospital.' 6 Tristan Rogers and John J. York on 'General Hospital' in 1991. ©ABC/Courtesy Everett Collection 'I didn't know at the time the importance of General Hospital; it was just one more job for me,' he told Soap Opera Digest during an interview in 2020. 'But it was really exciting, to be fresh off the boat and walk into this role.' 'Of course, after that, everywhere I went, people would go, 'You're on General Hospital? That's the hottest thing in the country! You're working with Luke and Laura? Oh, my God!'' he continued. 'I got caught up in the General Hospital tidal wave and just got swept away by it.' Advertisement Although his character was seemingly killed off in 1992, Rogers returned to the show in 2006 when it was revealed that Robert Scorpio was actually still alive. 6 Tristan Rogers and Ted King on 'General Hospital' in 2006. ©ABC/Courtesy Everett Collection 'I think this character will follow me to my grave,' Rogers told The New York Times almost 20 years before his death. Following several returns to Port Charles, and after the 2008 spinoff 'General Hospital: Night Shift,' Rogers made his final appearance on the long-running soap opera last month when he returned once more to say goodbye to his onscreen daughter, Sasha Gilmore (Sofia Mattsson). Rogers' publicist, Anthony Turk, announced the actor's lung cancer diagnosis the same day that his final 'General Hospital' episode aired. 6 Tristan Rogers in 2021. ABC via Getty Images 'Beloved Emmy-winning actor Tristan Rogers, best known for his role as Robert Scorpio on the daytime drama, 'General Hospital,' revealed to his fans that he has been diagnosed with cancer,' Turk said on July 17. Advertisement 'While he remains hopeful and is working closely with his medical team on a treatment plan, this is a challenging time for Tristan and his family,' he continued. 'As they face both the emotional and physical burdens that come with this diagnosis, the family kindly asks for privacy and understanding.' Rogers is survived by his wife, Teresa Parkerson, and children, Sara and Cale. He also had one grandchild.

Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven'
Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven'

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. It turns out even Netflix can't get Meghan Markle to open her front door. The Duchess of Sussex may promise an "at home" feel in her lifestyle series "With Love, Meghan", but that sunlit kitchen and cozy dining table on screen? They're inside a $9.5 million rental — not the $14.7 million Montecito, California, estate she shares with Prince Harry, Prince Archie, and Princess Lilibet. In an interview with People magazine, Meghan explained why her Netflix series — which premiered March 4 — was filmed in a nearby rental that mirrors the style of her own home. "I wanted to protect that safe haven," she said. "We're a close-knit family, and I love those moments—putting Lili down for a nap, having lunch together, having sacred time together at the end of the day." Don't Miss: Would you have invested in eBay or Uber early? The same backers are betting on . 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. With a production crew topping 80 people, opening her actual kitchen wasn't an option. "Our kitchen is where Mama just cooks for the family, and with a crew of 80-plus people, that's a lot of people to have in your house!" Meghan said. She and Prince Harry, who married in 2018, purchased their Santa Barbara County property in 2020 after stepping back from royal duties. In a 2022 interview with The Cut, Meghan shared how a unique palm tree on the grounds caught their attention during the first tour — a symbol, perhaps, of the privacy and peace they were looking for. Trending: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to . That sense of privacy explains why the on-screen version of "home" is actually someone else's. According to Meghan's first season was shot at a nearby four-bedroom, 4.5-bathroom property owned by local philanthropists Tom and Sherrie Cipolla. The couple purchased it for $4.7 million in 2017, and it's now valued at about $9.5 million. The location proved such a good fit that she returned to it for season two, rather than move production into her family's actual residence. Netflix's official description promised an "at home"-style experience with the former actress, so some viewers raised eyebrows when they learned the backdrop wasn't her real house. But for Meghan, that boundary seems non-negotiable. The Montecito estate is where Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet play, where family dinners happen without an audience, and where — as she puts it — the day ends in "sacred time together."For fans tuning in, the shift may not matter much. The rental property, with its sunlit kitchen, manicured gardens, and airy interiors, delivers the warm, aspirational vibe the show promises. And for Meghan, keeping her home off-limits preserves something even more valuable than a picture-perfect shot: the sanctuary she says keeps her grounded. As "With Love, Meghan" readies its second season, one thing seems clear — the Duchess is happy to share her California lifestyle, as long as the cameras know where to stop. Read Next: 2,000 High Earners Manage $6B With This AI Platform — Image: Shutterstock This article Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven' originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store