Trump's trade war about to cost Americans 1.8% more in the short term, Yale analysis finds
According to a new study from the Yale Budget Lab, the new Trump tariffs combined with existing import taxes will cause consumers to pay an overall effective tariff rate of 18.6 percent, the highest tariff level for U.S. imports since 1933.
While Trump has frequently claimed that the tariffs are being paid by foreign nations as an entry fee for access to the American economy, they are actually import taxes typically paid by American importers and passed on to consumers, often in the form of higher prices.
The Yale study found that prices will rise on average by 1.8 percent 'in the short run,' with the latest tariffs imposed by Trump set to disproportionately hit consumer purchases of clothing and textiles.
For example, shoes and apparel will become 39 and 37 percent more expensive in the short run, the study found.
The new tariffs include a whopping 50 percent tax on Indian imports, plus 35 percent taxes on goods from Laos, Switzerland, and Iraq.
Everyday items ranging from coffee to Toyotas, home furnishings to Gap jeans, are expected to become more expensive as companies adjust their prices to counteract the impact of tariffs. While the president has asked companies to absorb any increases in costs, many cannot forever.
Here are some of the goods expected to cost more:
Alcohol
Consumers of French, Italian or Spanish wines, Scotch whiskey, and aperitifs such as Aperol, can expect to see the price of their favorite alcoholic beverage rise due to the 15 percent tariff on the European Union.
The E.U. is a major exporter of wines and spirits to the U.S. In 2024 alone, the E.U. accounted for $3.4 billion worth of imported spirits.
Despite pleas from the beverage industry, the president's trade deal did not create exemptions for alcohol, which will likely drive up the price of imported wine or liquor – either in stores or restaurants.
'Without productive negotiations reducing reciprocal tariffs on wine and spirits, American wine retailers anticipate a significant decline in sales on top of the already difficult market, as well as significant job losses and subsequent business closures,' Tom Wark, the executive director of the Association of Wine Retailers, said.
A letter to the president from the Toast Not Tariffs Coalition, a group of 57 associations representing the U.S. alcohol industry and related industries, said tariffs on the E.U. could result in 25,000 American job losses, and nearly $2 billion in lost sales.
Diageo, the maker of Guinness, Bailey's, Johnnie Walker, and more, said the company expects to see a $200 million slump as a result of the tariffs.
Cars and car parts
Already, consumers have seen cars and car parts become more expensive over the last few months as a result of Trump's tariffs because the U.S. relies heavily on its trading partners for auto parts.
Cox Automotive, an industry service and technology provider, expects the sticker price of vehicles to rise anywhere from 4 to 8 percent by the end of the year. That means the average car price would be above $50,000.
While the president struck several deals with countries, many of them still make imported vehicles more expensive.
Imported cars from the U.K., such as Range Rovers, are subject to a 10 percent tariff.
Japan, which sells more cars to the U.S. than any other country, is facing a 15 percent tariff rate, which is expected to cause major disruption.
Toyota said on August 7 it expects a $9.5 billion profit loss for the year.
"It's honestly very difficult for us to predict what will happen regarding the market environment," Takanori Azuma, Toyota's head of finance, said.
But given that many car parts are imported from Japan, the tariffs are likely to hurt U.S. carmakers as well.
General Motors projects a $4 billion loss, Stellantis, the maker of Jeep, said it anticipates tariffs will add $1.7 billion in expenses, and Ford, which builds more cars in the U.S. than any of its rivals, said it expects tariffs to cause a $2 billion loss this year.
Clothing
Clothing is expected to see one of the most significant price increases, and much of it comes from countries in Asia.
Vietnam, one of the largest exporters of appear to the U.S., has agreed to a 20 percent tariff. Brands such as Nike, Adidas, Zara, and Gap manufacture much of their clothing in Vietnam. While many can absorb some of those costs, even raising prices 10 percent would make a $65 pair of shoes $71.50, without tax.
Bjorn Gulden, the CEO of Adidas, said the tariffs 'will directly increase the cost of our products for the U.S.'
Other countries that are high producers of clothing face significant tariffs as well. Bangladesh has a 20 percent tariff, while Indonesia and Cambodia both face a 19 percent tariff.
India, also a large producer of apparel, faces a steep tariff of 25 percent and Trump has threatened to increase that to 50 percent by the end of August if the country does not stop importing Russian oil.
While the U.S. also imports a large portion of clothing from China, which is still negotiating a trade deal, Trump's decision to get rid of the de minimis exemption will make it more costly for consumers to purchase cheap clothing from stores like Shein or Temu.
Coffee
The U.S. relies heavily on Brazil to import coffee for the 165 million people who need their daily caffeine fix, but Trump's 50 percent tariff threatens the long-term availability and price of the drink.
"When people go to their local coffee shop, whether it's Starbucks or something else, by and large they will likely be buying some form of Brazilian coffee," Monica de Bolle, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told NPR.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's pick to lead economic data agency floats ending monthly jobs report
President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has proposed ending releasing the aency's closely watched jobs report each month. Conservative economist EJ Antoni, a longtime critic of the bureau, floated the idea in an interview with Fox News on Monday, the same day that Trump officially announced him as his pick to lead the BLS. The idea raised new alarm over the agency's future and the reliability of its statistics, which are used by political leaders, investors and everyday Americans to get a sense of how the world's richest country is faring. Trump fired its former leader this month after the agency reported a sharp slowdown in jobs growth. Trump accused the commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, of having "rigged" the numbers - a claim that was widely rejected by economists. They likewise panned his pick of Antoni, saying his economic commentary was rife with basic mistakes. After Fox published its interview online on Tuesday, an economist who has advised Republicans in the past posted: "Senators who vote to confirm Antoni are voting to essentially eviscerate the BLS and its jobs data." "The articles and tweets I've seen him publish are probably the most error-filled of any think tank economist right now," Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow at another conservative think tank, the Manhattan Institute, also wrote on social media. Antoni, a federal budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation, is a longtime critic of the BLS. He has called its statistics "phoney baloney" and last year urged the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) "to take a chainsaw to the BLS". In the Fox interview, he said the jobs report, which includes the country's unemployment rate, the number of jobs created over the last month, and other data, was unreliable. "It's a serious problem that needs to be fixed immediately," Antoni told FOX Business. "Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data," he added.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Floats Deal to Let Nvidia's Blackwell Chips Into China -- With a 50% Power Cut
President Donald Trump has signaled he may be open to letting Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) ship a toned-down version of its most advanced Blackwell AI chip to China if the company trims its capabilities by 30% to 50%. The comment comes shortly after Trump confirmed an unusual arrangement already in place for Nvidia's less-powerful H20 chip, which allows exports to China in exchange for a 15% revenue share paid directly to the US government. Advanced Micro Devices will follow the same formula for its MI308 chip, according to a person familiar with the matter. Nvidia has not commented on the president's remarks. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The potential deal for Blackwell would mirror Trump's broader push to secure financial returns for the US in exchange for loosening certain export restrictions a strategy that could influence how American companies negotiate market access in China. While Trump didn't outline a specific timeline, he suggested Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang could soon meet with him to discuss a negatively enhanced Blackwell variant. If approved, the move could mark a shift in how high-end US chip technology is selectively offered abroad. Nvidia's Blackwell chips are the backbone of today's most powerful AI systems but remain off-limits to China under current US rules. Both Nvidia and AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) have taken revenue hits as tighter controls limited exports to older models on par with domestic Chinese alternatives products that have struggled to gain traction. Nvidia has already said it is developing another China-specific chip and will seek approval to sell it. The company noted that further cutting back its Hopper-based H20 chip is no longer viable, suggesting a modified Blackwell could be the clearest path to regaining momentum in one of the world's largest AI markets. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio


San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's takeover of D.C.'s police force isn't just another diversion from Jeffrey Epstein
It can be tempting to view President Donald Trump's meandering, deeply dishonest press conference on Monday as just the latest 'hey-look-a-squirrel!' distraction meant to divert the nation's attention from his involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein matter. Flanked by members of his cabinet, Trump invoked Section 743 of the Home Rule Charter, which permits him to send in the National Guard for a fixed period, and announced federal troops would be seizing control of the Washington, D.C., police force to address what he called a 'crime emergency.' Like many in his party, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., saw an ulterior motive for Monday's action. 'In another transparent ploy to distract America from his coverup of the Epstein file, Donald Trump now wants to militarize the District of Columbia,' Raskin said in a written statement, 'to attack crime and clean up graffiti in the capital city despite the fact that crime is at a 30-year low in Washington and graffiti seems to be pretty sparse.' Whether intentionally or not, Trump has indeed mastered the art of diversion. During his press conference, for instance, he bounced from D.C. crime to his forthcoming summit with Vladimir Putin, to tariffs on Chinese imports, to transgender athletes, to his own real estate experience. But his longstanding desire to deploy federal troops in blue state cities to bend them to his will should not be discounted as mere sleight of hand. 'Local 'youths' and gang members, some only 14, 15, and 16-years-old, are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent Citizens, at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released. They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now!' Trump explained in a comically hyperbolic post on Truth Social last Tuesday, explaining his rationale, adding, 'The most recent victim was beaten mercilessly by local thugs.' That recent victim was a 19-year-old Department of Government Efficiency employee, in case you were wondering what crime got Trump out of the golf cart this morning. To be clear, we're all against these ugly crimes, of course, and under the D.C. charter, sending in the National Guard isn't illegal. It's just ridiculously performative and profoundly unnecessary when you stop to realize that Justice Department data backs Raskin's assertion that crime in the district has hit a 30-year low, Data, of course, is beside the point for Trump. Just as his administration is busily rewriting federal scientific assessments that contradict Trump's view that climate change is a 'hoax,' declining violent crime rates in liberal-run cities are an inconvenient truth that doesn't square with his vision of a Washington that has been 'taken over by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Trump's not-at-all hidden fantasy has been to become, to be charitable, something of an authoritarian. And the D.C. deployment is yet another dictatorship cosplay warm-up exercise. Under the Home Rule Charter, Trump's order expires in 30 days, but it remains to be seen whether he'll abide by it. After all, in apparent violation of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, 250 National Guard troops he deployed are languishing around Los Angeles. Of course, Trump's newfound enthusiasm for mobilizing the Guard is in stark contrast to his delay in doing so on Jan. 6, 2021, the same day he suggested Vice President Mike Pence deserved assassination by the mob Trump had summoned to block the transfer of power. But that was then. 'We have other cities also that are bad. Very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is,' he said. 'We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore there.' Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said on X that 'Trump's raw authoritarian power grab in DC is part of a growing national crisis … He's playing dictator in our nation's capital as a dress rehearsal as he pushes democracy to the brink.' As his cabinet minions looked on, knowing they were props in yet another Trump late-night comedy fodder bit, Attorney General Pam Bondi dutifully executed Dear Leader's orders. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth seemed to relish the expanded marching orders. Only FBI Director Kash Patel briefly seemed to go off-script when he correctly noted that murder rates in the U.S. 'are plummeting.' Facts may not matter in the White House briefing room, but they could still matter in court. California's lawsuit against the Los Angeles troop deployment proceeded in San Francisco on Monday, where the state is arguing that the Trump administration doesn't have the right 'to execute or assist in the execution of federal law or any civilian law enforcement functions by any federal agent or officer.' During her own Monday press conference, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser struck a low-key response to the takeover of her police department, calling the action 'unsettling.' Oh, it's unsettling all right, just as it was in L.A, and this shock-and-awe arrival of U.S. troops could soon be coming to a blue state city near you. As Trump's long-winded presser drew to a close, some reporters shouted out questions about Epstein. By then, the president was already on his way out of the briefing room.