
The Barbell Advantage: Positioning for stability and opportunity in Indian fixed income
With signs of slowing labour markets, muted inflation pressures, and the potential for up to three cuts before the end of the year, this marks a clear pivot from the Fed's long pause since December 2024.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play this game for 1 minute and see why everyone is addicted.
Panzer.Quest
Undo
Whenever US yields have moved materially, Indian bond yields have tended to react, largely via sentiment and capital flows.
Previous easing cycles in the US have often led to benign moves in Indian yields, though the scale and speed vary depending on domestic conditions.
Right now, the global shift towards easing, if sustained, can encourage flows into emerging market debt such as India's — a factor that can help anchor local yields, especially in the absence of major fiscal shocks.
Live Events
Domestically,
Indian bonds
have held up in the face of global volatility. The RBI has already front-loaded policy easing since February, cutting the repo rate by a cumulative 100 basis points to 5.50%.
This was complemented by large liquidity support, with a further 100 basis point CRR cut to be phased in from September to November, adding approximately INR2.5 lakh crore of liquidity into the banking system.
Inflation has been running below the 4% target, with CPI in July printing at just 1.55%, though the RBI's projections point towards a gradual climb, crossing 4% in early 2027.
Growth forecasts remain steady at 6.5% for FY26, supported by rural consumption recovery and government-led
capital expenditure
.
As many market participants have also observed, the local yield curve has steepened in recent months, especially between the 10-year and 15-year maturities, as limited 10-year supply and cautious sentiment have pushed intermediate yields higher.
Ultra-long bonds have been relatively more stable. This steepening has occurred even though the underlying global and domestic macro backdrop arguably favours a constructive duration view.
For fixed income investors, the next 12–18 months seem to offer opportunities at both ends of the maturity spectrum. In the near term,
credit spreads
in high quality corporate bonds remain stable and attractive.
Pairing 1–5 year AAA-rated corporate bonds with short-duration accrual strategies can deliver steady income while benefiting from the downward drift in short-term rates as CRR cuts inject liquidity.
This part of the portfolio plays defence while locking in yields that may compress further.
The other leg of positioning is to maintain core exposure to
long-duration government bonds
, particularly in the 14–15-year segment and selectively at the very long end.
The steepening at the longer end seems to be overdone relative to fundamentals, and a normalisation of sentiment or moderation in supply could see spreads compress.
If Fed easing and global growth softness push US and Indian yields lower, this part of the book stands to benefit from capital gains.
Together, this barbell approach — accrual-oriented short duration plus strategic long duration — aligns with an outlook where local rates are near the end of their easing cycle but global conditions remain supportive for bonds.
The RBI may hold through October and consider one final 25 basis point cut in December, but even without it, abundant liquidity and anchored inflation expectations should keep yields well-supported.
Risks remain — from renewed inflation pressures, higher long-bond supply, or global shocks — but the balance of probabilities favours a stable to stronger bond market backdrop.
Investors, therefore, can use the current steepness in parts of the curve to add duration selectively while earning carry from shorter corporate exposures.
It's a patient strategy for a cycle that appears closer to its bottom in India yet is still in its early stages globally.
(The author is Managing Director and Head of Investment Strategy & Solutions, Waterfield Advisors.)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Apple rings up record run in India's phone exports amid US tariff threat
Listen to This Article Amid tariff disruptions and the threat of 50 per cent duties on Indian exports to the US, smartphone exports have once again broken records. In the four-month period from April to July 2025-26 (FY26), exports touched the $10 billion mark, up 52 per cent from $6.4 billion in the same period of 2024-25 (FY25), according to industry estimates. Apple Inc has led the charge despite concerns that it might slow its expansion in India. Its iPhone exports rose 63 per cent to $7.5 billion in April–July this year, compared with $4.6 billion a year ago. Apple's three vendors — Foxconn,


Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Otter AI secretly recording private conversations on Zoom, GMeet, Microsoft Zoom and other platforms; claims lawsuit
Image credit: A lawsuit filed in the US has alleged that AI-powered transcription and note-taking tool, , has been "deceptively and surreptitiously" recording private conversations from platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. The class-action suit claims the company uses these recordings to train its popular transcription service, Otter Notebook , without getting permission from the participants. The lawsuit, which was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that the AI tool does not obtain consent from meeting attendees to record the same. It even fails to notify them that these recordings are being shared with Otter, the lawsuit highlights. The lawsuit accuses the company of doing this to "derive financial gain,' a practice that allegedly violates state and federal privacy laws. It seeks to represent other users in California whose conversations were unknowingly shared with Otter. 'In fact, if the meeting host is an Otter accountholder who has integrated their relevant Google Meet, Zoom, or Microsoft Teams accounts with Otter, an Otter Notetaker may join the meeting without obtaining the affirmative consent from any meeting participant, including the host. What Otter has done is use its Otter Notetaker meeting assistant to record, transcribe, and utilize the contents of conversations without the Class members' informed consent,' the lawsuit noted. According to a report by NPR, Otter's privacy policy openly states that it trains its AI using meeting transcripts, but only after users give 'explicit permission' by checking a box that allows Otter and third parties to process private conversations 'for training and product improvement purposes.' However, the lawsuit argues that many users are still misled. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo In recent months, Otter has faced renewed privacy concerns as its use in workplaces continues to grow. The company says around 25 million people now rely on its AI transcription tools, which have processed over 1 billion meetings since its launch in 2016. What users said about Otter secretly recording work meetings The plaintiff, Justin Brewer, who is a resident of San Jacinto, claims that his privacy was 'seriously violated' after discovering that Otter had recorded a confidential conversation without his knowledge. Other Users have shared negative experiences on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit regarding Otter's automated recording features. In one reported case from last year, an AI researcher and engineer alleged that Otter had recorded a Zoom meeting with investors. The user also claimed that the AI tool later sent him a transcript containing 'sensitive, confidential details' of a discussion that took place after he had left the call. According to him, those disclosures contributed to a failed business deal. Similarly, another user complained about using Otter to interview a Uyghur human rights activist and later learning that the company shares user data with third parties. This raised concerns that governments, including China's, may try to access transcripts of conversations with dissidents. Otter has stated it does not share data with foreign governments or law enforcement agencies. On Reddit, other users have reported that Otter sometimes joins meetings automatically when linked to workplace calendars, recording conversations without explicit consent. The lawsuit highlights this issue, noting that while Otter typically asks a meeting host for permission to record when an account holder joins, it does not automatically seek approval from all participants. However, Otter claimed that it anonymises meeting audio before using it to train AI, but the lawsuit challenges this claim, citing a lack of public details on the process. 'Upon information and belief, Otter's deidentification process does not remove confidential information or guarantee speaker anonymity,' the lawsuit further argued. Nvidia H20 Chips for China: What's Really Going On? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dealer fined for selling defective cellphone
Dharwad: The Dharwad District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission has rapped a cellphone manufactuing company for selling a defective handset to a customer. Neeta, a resident of Karwar Road in Hubballi, had purchased a Samsung cellphone for Rs 20,300 from the authorised Samsung dealer Sri Tirumala Tele World, Hubballi. Within 2-3 days of purchase, the gadget started developing problems such as hanging and display issues. Neeta told the dealer about the issue and sought a replacement. However, the dealer refused, even though the customer had not used it further, and had kept it with her in the same condition. With no other option left, Neeta sent a legal notice. But even then, the dealer allegedly ignored her grievance. Stating that such conduct amounted to deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, Neeta filed a case before the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission. After a detailed inquiry, the commission headed by retired judge Ishappa Bhute and member Vishalakshi Bolashetti observed that documentary evidence clearly showed the phone had developed hanging and display defects within 2-3 days of purchase, which amounted to a manufacturing defect. The commission further noted the complainant had purchased the mobile for Rs 20,300 for her daily use and convenience, but it became non-functional within just 2-3 days, and the opposite party neither repaired it nor replaced it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Highest Paying Degrees For 2025 Best Paying Degrees | Search Ads Learn More Undo This amounted to deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act. Considering all these aspects, the commission directed the company to repair the complainant's cellphone within one month of the order, failing which, it has to refund Rs 20,300 with 8% interest to the complainant. Additionally, the company should pay Rs 25,000 as compensation for inconvenience and mental agony, and pay Rs 10,000 towards litigation costs, the commission ordered. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.