PA speaker tosses disqualification bid of 26 MPAs into judicial arena
Speaker Punjab Assembly, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, has declared inadmissible the applications submitted by treasury lawmakers seeking the disqualification of 26 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MPAs suspended for alleged abusive and violent conduct. Instead, he advised the petitioners to obtain a declaration from a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction before approaching the Speaker again.
Speaker Khan made the decision under Rule 210(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997. The 26 PTI lawmakers had been suspended following their disruption of Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's speech on 27 June.
In his detailed ruling, the Speaker stated, 'Though serious legal and constitutional violations, including breach of constitutional oath, have been alleged by the applicants, these violations first need to be established in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction before I could decide whether a question of qualification has arisen in terms of Article 63(2) of the Constitution and refer the question to the Election Commission of Pakistan.'
Read More: Punjab speaker moves to disqualify 26 MPAs
He further added, 'The people are the source of all power, and through their vote, they confer trust—not to be undone without the gravest reasons. To disqualify a representative is not merely to silence a voice—it is to disenfranchise people. For an elected House is not only a chamber of laws; it is the echo of the people's will. That voice must not be silenced.'
Speaker Khan rejected the reliance placed by applicants on precedents such as the Panama Papers case and related jurisprudence under Articles 199 and 184(3), calling such comparisons 'not maintainable for constitutional and democratic reasons.'
He warned that entertaining such petitions would erode the freedom of speech within the House and effectively nullify the opposition's role. Citing Article 19, he emphasised that robust—even abrasive—debate is protected, 'subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by law,' which are outlined in assembly rules, not by threats of permanent disqualification.
He said, 'Let the welfare of the people be the supreme law. The Assembly must remain a forum where dissent is voiced, not extinguished. The electorate is best served when the House disciplines disorder internally while preserving the electorate's chosen representation.'
Highlighting the need for improved legislative performance, the Speaker noted that many members lack awareness of assembly rules, legislative procedures, and the effective use of standing committees. He stressed the importance of targeted training to ensure the Assembly upholds parliamentary supremacy and serves the public interest.
'As elected representatives, we must legislate responsibly, put an end to political victimisation, and work together to uphold the supremacy of the people's Assembly and protect our democracy,' he said.
Calling for inter-party dialogue in the spirit of the Charter of Democracy, he said, 'Political parties are the true guardians of democracy. There should be meaningful dialogue among all parties on the effective functioning of the Assembly to ensure that it serves the interests of the people and remains a forum for genuine debate and cooperation.'
Also Read: Punjab speaker agrees to dismiss references against suspended PTI MPAs
Speaker Khan strongly criticised certain constitutional provisions, particularly Articles 62, 63, and the defunct Article 58(2)(b), labelling them as relics of authoritarian regimes.
'These provisions, imposed by dictators such as General Zia-ul-Haq, have historically been weaponised to unjustly target elected politicians. We must end this vicious cycle. The Panama Case must not become another tool like Article 58(2)(b), or we risk falling into a nihilistic cycle where we repeat the same mistakes,' he said.
He warned against disqualifications based on mere allegations or technicalities, which violate the presumption of innocence and erode parliamentary legitimacy.
Citing past examples such as the Public Representative Offices Disqualification Act of 1949 and the Elective Bodies Disqualification Order (EBDO) of 1959, he said such 'backdoor tools' have consistently served non-democratic elements, often with political parties complicit.
He termed the Panama case a 'show trial' and said its use as a precedent undermines constitutional rights to political association and representation under Article 17.
'This destructive chain must be broken,' he said. 'The very fact that the Constitution has been exploited this way means such challenging questions can be—and have been—raised.'
He concluded by vowing to uphold parliamentary rule and the principles of representative democracy:
'During my tenure as Speaker, I will work to uphold parliamentary rule and the principles of representative constitutional democracy, as envisioned by our great Islamic Republic's founding fathers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
PTI on streets!
PTI is kick-starting a new political agitation from today, marking the two years of incarceration of former PM Imran Khan. That the opposition party is on a weak pitch - as it stands divided due to its internal differences and is pushed to the wall by the government - is for all to see. It will thus be a horrendous task for the party to mobilise a sizeable crowd and make its presence felt on the streets. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is understood to lead the movement and there isn't much certainty as to how Punjab and the federal capital's populace will respond, as they have been a victim of lethal crackdown in the past. This dizziness has apparently compelled PTI to chalk out a smart strategy wherein workers and supporters plan to "block roads, share their political heart and disperse peacefully". To what extent it succeeds in building a momentum of change through this 'guerilla campaign' is anybody's guess, but taking into account the vibrancy of the party on social media, it is set to create ripples and give a tough time to the coalition dispensation that is out to exterminate the opposition. The PTI has already launched a mass campaign as far as its overseas strength is concerned, and its media blitz in the Western capitals is making a qualified anti-government impact. The whirlpool tour of Khan's sons to the US, seeking their father's release, has galvanised the necessary sparks and their proposed visit to Pakistan is in need of being watched. Little is known about the role of the six-party opposition alliance, TTAP, in the protest. But what is certain is that the pestering instability is pushing the country to the cliff, and this new phase of revulsion will have its toll. The outcome rests in talking it out, and it's high time for the authorities to engage with the PTI. Many of its demands are worth accepting, like release of all prisoners, including Imran Khan, and provision of due political space. Will someone stand up and be counted from the corridors of power to usher in a thaw?
Express Tribune
2 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
PHC moved against JCP judges' removal
The federal government's move to remove senior puisne judges of High Courts from the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) following the 26th Constitutional Amendment has been challenged in the Peshawar High Court (PHC). A writ petition, filed by Advocate Zarak Arif Shah through Advocate Ali Gohar Durrani, contends that the removal of senior puisne judges from the JCP membership violates the Constitution. The petition names the Judicial Commission of Pakistan and the Ministry of Law and Justice as respondents. According to the petition, the federal government, following the 26th Amendment, altered Article 175(2), replacing the position of the senior puisne judge on the JCP with the head of a newly proposed "constitutional bench." Consequently, on January 27, 2025, the JCP issued a notification terminating the membership of senior puisne judges in the commission. The petitioner argues that this change effectively excludes all senior puisne judges from High Courts across the country from participating in the JCP and claims this action is unconstitutional. The petition points out that under Article 175A, the change is only enforceable once constitutional benches are formally established under Article 202A, a process that has yet to occur. The petition further contends that until these constitutional benches are constituted, the existing role of senior puisne judges in the JCP must remain intact. It argues that the move contradicts not only the letter and spirit of the 26th Amendment but also fundamental provisions of the Constitution, including several clauses from the 1973 Constitution and subsequent amendments. The petitioner emphasized that a truly independent judiciary requires judges of superior courts to be involved in judicial appointments, rather than allowing the executive to dominate the process.
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Section 144 imposed in Rawalpindi ahead of PTI protest
Listen to article Authorities in Rawalpindi have imposed Section 144 across the district, banning all public gatherings, motorcycle pillion riding, and rallies from August 4 to August 10, citing security concerns ahead of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) August 5 protest. The Deputy Commissioner's office issued a formal notification on Monday, stating that the restrictions are aimed at maintaining law and order during a sensitive period. According to the notification, 'There will be a complete ban on political gatherings, rallies, and processions in Rawalpindi district. Pillion riding on motorcycles will also be prohibited from August 4 to 10.' The notification also prohibits the display of arms and the use of loudspeakers in public spaces. Any attempt to remove official roadblocks placed on major thoroughfares will result in legal action, officials warned. The administrative clampdown comes amid PTI's continued mobilisation efforts despite ongoing political and legal challenges. The party has not officially announced a rally in Rawalpindi, but authorities appear to be taking preventive measures. It is worth noting that after a series of failed protests, the PTI founder has once again decided to demonstrate street power to campaign for the rule of law and the release of imprisoned party leaders and workers. However, the party appears divided on key policy matters, with dissenting voices increasingly surfacing in public. Days ahead of its planned protest on August 5, the PTI is facing a widespread crackdown, with party leaders going into hiding, workers reporting home raids and several bank accounts reportedly frozen. Party leaders and workers allege that police across Punjab have intensified efforts to suppress the protest by launching a campaign of intimidation. Many party workers lament that since August 1, police have been knocking on doors, forcing workers to sign affidavits promising not to participate in the protest. The raids have led to panic within PTI ranks, with multiple leaders choosing to go underground to avoid arrest. Party sources claim that the "door-knocking" campaign has expanded rapidly over the past few days. In addition to the pressure tactics on the ground, several reports have emerged of financial restrictions being imposed on PTI leadership. The bank account of Hafiz Zeeshan Rasheed, a senior PTI office-bearer in Punjab, has reportedly been frozen, one of many such cases, according to the party.
