Key witness identified in Bersatu Armada exco death threat case, say police
Dang Wangi police chief ACP Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman said investigations found that the victim did not know the suspect who allegedly threatened to kill him.
He said two witnesses have been called so far, and their statements were recorded to assist in the investigation.
"Police have also identified a key witness in this case, who will be called in to have a statement recorded. We believe this witness could provide crucial information in identifying those involved and shedding light on the motive behind the threats made against the complainant,' he said in a statement on Saturday (July 5).
However, he said, so far, no arrests have been made against any individuals in connection with the case.
He said police are actively working to identify the suspect and are investigating the case from all possible angles, while also prioritising the safety of the complainant.
"The case is being investigated under Section 507 of the Penal Code for criminal intimidation by anonymous communication,' he added.
"The public with any relevant information is urged to contact investigating officer Insp Pang Wei Keong at 013-208 2391 or the head of the District Criminal Investigation Division DSP Rosdi M. Husin at 013-392 0694,' he said.
Earlier reports said that Armada exco Na'im Brundage claimed he had received death threats, including threats of being splashed with acid by unknown individuals.
He lodged a police report out of concern for his own safety and that of his family.- Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Unemployed man sentenced to death for murder of 3-year-old girl in Langkawi
KUALA LUMPUR : The Alor Setar High Court has sentenced an unemployed man to death for the murder of a three-year-old girl whose body was dumped in a forested area at Gunung Raya, Langkawi, six years ago. Justice Evawani Farisyta Mohammad meted out the sentence on Ramlan Abdul Rashid, 44, after finding him guilty of murdering Nur Aisyah Aleya Abdullah at a hospital staff quarters in Langkawi between 9 am and 10 am on Feb 23, 2019, under Section 302 of the Penal Code. In her written judgment, published on the judiciary's website on July 31, the judge said the victim died from injuries sustained after being beaten and abused by the accused over a prolonged period, an act the court regarded as a grave offence. "The accused showed no humanity when he disposed of the child's body in a forested area at Gunung Raya, Langkawi, without according it proper rites as required by religion. "The court also finds that the accused displayed neither remorse nor repentance throughout the trial," she said. She said evidence from a chemist confirmed that the skull and two teeth found in the said area belonged to the biological daughter of the complainant, who is also the victim's mother. "The victim was an innocent young child placed in the care of the accused, who, as an adult, should have protected her," she added. According to the prosecution's case, in November 2018, the victim's mother and her daughter moved into the staff quarters occupied by the accused and his wife, a nurse, and stayed there for about two months. During that period, the victim's mother left the child in the care of the accused daily while she worked at a food stall. In January 2019, the accused arranged for the complainant to stay at a hostel provided by her workplace, while the victim remained with him at the staff quarters. However, in Feb 2019, the victim's mother failed to locate her daughter during a visit to the accused's home and lodged a police report. The accused claimed he had entrusted the girl to another person but refused to disclose the individual's identity or whereabouts. Police interrogation led to the discovery of the victim's skull and two teeth in a forested area of Gunung Raya, Langkawi, in March 2019.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
‘Introduce diversion policy for children with minor violations'
PETALING JAYA: The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) has urged the government to swiftly introduce a formal diversion policy for children in conflict with the law, following the high-profile case of a 14-year-old student remanded for assaulting a teacher. The student, who was reprimanded for skipping a physical education class, allegedly punched and threatened the teacher at a secondary school in Kajang. A video of the incident has since been widely shared on social media, sparking public outrage and renewed debate over juvenile justice. While condemning the violence and affirming support for the teacher, Suhakam Children's Commissioner Dr Farah Nini Dusuki stressed the importance of responding to such cases in ways that uphold a child's dignity, rights and potential for rehabilitation. 'Violence in any form is unacceptable. 'Every teacher and student has the right to a safe learning environment,' she said in a statement. 'But children, no matter the offence, are still entitled to protection under the Child Act 2001 and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.' Farah Nini called for a diversion mechanism that redirects minors accused of non-violent or minor offences away from the criminal justice system, and into community-based programmes focused on education, counselling and behavioural support. 'This isn't about avoiding accountability – it's about moving towards a system of restorative justice that is proven to be more effective and humane,' she said. 'Without this, we risk criminalising children and exposing them to lifelong stigma, rather than addressing root causes like trauma, neglect or mental health challenges.' She also reminded media outlets and the public that Section 15 of the Child Act prohibits revealing any identifying details of children involved in legal proceedings, warning that public speculation and vilification may breach the law and further harm the child. The 14-year-old student pleaded guilty in the Magistrates' Court on July 30 to a charge under Section 323 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing hurt. Sentencing is scheduled for Sept 11, pending a social report from the Welfare Department. Suhakam said the incident should serve as a wake-up call for systemic reform in schools, urging the Education Ministry and administrators to strengthen proactive behavioural support systems, ensure access to mental health services and equip teachers with conflict resolution tools. 'The question is whether schools are prepared to deal with emotional and behavioural issues before they escalate,' said Farah Nini. 'We must invest in preventive, child-centred approaches that serve the best interests of all parties – students, teachers and the wider community.' Kajang police confirmed that the student had struck the 29-year-old teacher and issued threats in front of witnesses. A report was filed later that evening, leading to the student's arrest and two-day remand.
Sinar Daily
5 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Dear parents, take bullying seriously: Legal steps you can take immediately
WHEN a child is bullied, every second counts and waiting for authorities can mean waiting too long. Legal experts are urging parents to take immediate action themselves, using existing laws to protect their children before harm escalates. The case of 13-year-old Zara Qairina, who endured repeated bullying, has amplified calls for parents to intervene without delay. Former Child Rights Chairperson of the Bar Council, Kokila Vaani Vadiveloo, said families have more legal tools at their disposal than they might realise. "Parents often believe they must wait for police action or school intervention, but that is not true. There are immediate legal steps that can protect the child's safety and well-being right away," Kokila said. The most critical first step is evidence gathering. Kokila emphasised that detailed documentation can make or break a case. "Record every incident which is dates, times, names and witnesses. Preserve text messages, social media posts, photographs and medical reports. If there are injuries, obtain an official medical report immediately,' she advised. According to her, such documentation not only strengthens legal claims but also ensures the matter is taken seriously by schools and institutions. Kokila further said parents should submit a formal written complaint to the school administration or principal, demanding a written response. "If the school does not act, escalate to the board of governors, the Education Ministry or district education offices. Keep a paper trail of every letter and reply," Kokila said. She also encouraged parents to request access to their child's school records and any incident reports to assess whether proper procedures were followed. Even without immediate police involvement, Kokila said parents have access to legal protections designed to safeguard the victim and deter further harm. Kokila explained that the law provides several avenues for urgent relief, which can be pursued directly through the courts. "Applications for protection or restraining orders can be filed at a magistrate's court. Civil suits can also be considered against the bully, the school, or responsible adults for negligence. These steps are independent of any criminal investigation," she added. Former Child Rights Chairperson of the Bar Council, Kokila Vaani Vadiveloo, said families have more legal tools at their disposal than they might realise. Photo: Canva The Esha Clause: A Turning Point in Bullying Laws Malaysia's recent Esha Clause, named after social media influencer Rajeswary Appahu, known as Esha, who died following severe cyberbullying, has strengthened protections for victims. Under Section 507D(2) of the Penal Code, anyone whose harassment or bullying provokes a person to harm themselves or commit suicide can face up to 10 years in prison, a fine, or both. 'The Esha Clause addresses the psychological damage of bullying, holding perpetrators accountable even if their intent is not proven. This is especially important in cases like Zara's, where the emotional toll is severe,' Kokila said. Malaysia's decriminalisation of attempted suicide in 2023 means victims will no longer face punishment, shifting focus to mental health support and accountability for perpetrators. 'If Zara had taken her own life, the legal focus would be on whether bullying contributed. Families could pursue wrongful death or negligence claims against individuals or institutions that failed to act,' Kokila said. Other countries such as Singapore, the UK, New Zealand and Australia have adopted similar approaches, pairing legal accountability with mental health care. While legal avenues are critical, Kokila also sees value in preventive measures. 'In New Zealand, family group conferences allow victims, bullies, and families to resolve conflicts under professional guidance. These programmes have reduced repeat offences and addressed underlying causes,' she said. Commenting further, former Malaysian Bar president Salim Bashir highlighted the urgent need for comprehensive legal measures to address bullying, pointing out that Malaysia still lacks a dedicated anti-bullying statute. Despite this gap, he stressed that existing laws under the Penal Code, tort law and other provisions can still offer protection and remedies to victims. 'Bullying whether physical, verbal or online can have devastating consequences. It is not confined to bruises and physical injuries; emotional and psychological trauma can be equally severe. While a dedicated anti-bullying law would certainly help to define and address the problem more holistically, victims are not without legal recourse,' Salim said. He explained that under current law, cases involving bodily harm can be prosecuted under provisions of the Penal Code dealing with causing hurt or criminal intimidation. On the civil side, Salim pointed out that victims can commence tort actions, particularly claims for assault or negligence. 'A civil suit in court can be filed if it can be shown that the defendant owed a duty of care to the victim, that the harm was foreseeable and that the injury whether physical, emotional or reputational, resulted directly from the defendant's conduct,' he explained.
