Bargain Hunt star charged after terrorist financing probe
The Metropolitan Police have charged a star from the popular TV show Bargain Hunt following an investigation into terrorist financing.
Ogheneochuko 'Ochuko' Ojiri, 53, was investigated by officers from the National Terrorist Financial Investigation Unit (NTFIU) and is now facing a number of charges.
The Met confirmed that Ojiri is the first individual to be charged with an offence under section 21A of the Terrorism Act 2000, specifically for failing to disclose information during business within the regulated sector.
Officers say he has been charged with eight counts pertaining to activities between October 2020 and December 2021.
Ojiri is set to appear before Westminster Magistrates' Court on the upcoming Friday, 9 May.
In their statement, the Met detailed: "Oghenochuko Ojiri, 53 (05.05.72), of west London, has been charged following an investigation into terrorist financing by officers from the National Terrorist Financial Investigation Unit (NTFIU), part of the Met's Counter Terrorism Command."
They continued, explaining the charges: "Following authorisation from the Crown Prosecution Service, he has been charged with eight counts of failing to make a disclosure during the course of business within the regulated sector, contrary to section 21A of the Terrorism Act 2000. The charges relate to a period from October 2020 to December 2021."
Furthermore, they added: "The investigation has been carried out in partnership with the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) in HM Treasury, HMRC (the organisation that regulates the art sector), and the Met's Arts and Antiques Unit."
The art dealer, famed for his stints on BBC's Bargain Hunt since 2021, is the founder of Ramp Gallery in London with a focus on emerging and contemporary artists.
Nurturing an early passion for the arts, he carved a niche for himself in the antiques world. Ojiri expressed: "No other industry would accept my rare mixture of sarcasm, cynicism and passion. Ha-ha!".
Together with Juliet Da Silva, he opened the vintage shop and art venue Pelicans and Parrots on Stoke Newington Road in Dalston, offering modern furnishings, homeware and unique gifts.
To complement their pop-up events, they secured a license to serve alcohol at the shop. Speaking about his venture's impact in 2019, Ojiri informed the local council: "We've been trading since 2010, and have been integral to the regeneration of the area.
"We're very proud of what we've achieved in those nine years. We've taken risks and we're proudly part of the community."
Despite shutting the shop in October 2021, he continued to inspire others about the antique trade, advising: "Forget all the rules and buy what you love. The chances are someone else will love it too."
The Ramp Gallery eventually transitioned into the capital's celebrated Ojiri Gallery. Previously speaking with the BBC, he shared his passion: "Contemporary art, paintings, prints, sculpture and drawings. I'm absolutely obsessed, in love and infatuated."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
The grey brigade activists explain why they are sitting down for Palestine
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On Saturday at 1pm, Polly Smith perched on a stool in London's Parliament Square and gripped a handwritten sign that read: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'. The 74-year-old retired care worker wanted to sit on the floor with her fellow protesters, who gathered to show support for Palestine Action after the group was labelled a terror organisation. However, due to mobility issues caused by arthritis, she needed a stool. 'Just because I'm older, and my legs don't work as they used to, that won't stop me,' Polly adamantly tells Metro. Next to her was a bag packed with enough medication to last a few days, just in case she was arrested. After being detained twice in the past year at previous protests for Palestine, Polly knows it's best to be prepared. It's given her knowledge of the system that she never expected to gain in her seventies, such as that extra biscuits are given to people who need food to take medication, and a prison breakfast tastes better than it looks. Ahead of this latest protest organised by Defend Our Juries, the Met Police had warned they would arrest anyone expressing support for Palestine Action, so Polly expected she'd be making it a hat-trick. As predicted, after just four minutes, she was marched over to a police van. Polly struggled to climb up the high step, so she asked for help, and four police officers gently pushed her inside. 'My friends joke that now I'm retired, my hobby is getting arrested,' she adds. 'I expected it this time, but I was still pretty scared when I arrived at the police station. I live alone in a one-bed flat in Ipswich, and I worried about who'd sort out paying the bills if I was given a sentence.' Membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act 2000. The concern was not enough to deter her, nor others — she is one of over 500 people arrested, after being lifted off the ground by officers as chants of 'Shame on you' were shouted by onlookers. Nearly 100 of those detained were in their seventies and 15 were in their eighties, while demonstrators had an average age of 54. 'I have noticed a lot more people my age at protests,' recalls Polly, who was released on Sunday morning without charge. 'What's happening in Palestine with the bombings and the famine is a genocide, and we want to play our part when we see something wrong. 'We may have a few more grey hairs, but we can still take action against the government supporting Israel. 'It's important that we're there as it shows everybody demands change. All walks of life,' she stresses. It is bearing witness to the long history between Israel and Palestine that motivates some people to get out and be heard, such as 70-year-old retired care worker Trudi Warner, who was also arrested on Parliament Square at the weekend. 'For people of my age, the situation in Palestine has been going on our entire lives, and has now come to this appalling situation,' Trudi tells Metro. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has recently called the 'starvation' in Gaza 'indefensible', adding that the Palestinian people have an 'inalienable' right to a state. Trudi continues: 'We are aware of vulnerability and mortality, and maybe feel more empathy with others facing these losses. We have deep concern for children and young people, and our responsibilities to them.' She says that people of her generation have 'less to lose' if they get a criminal record, as many of them are no longer seeking employment. In a statement, the Met said that detained protesters had been taken to prisoner processing points in the Westminster area, and those whose details could be confirmed were bailed, with conditions not to attend any further protests in support of Palestine Action. Those whose details were refused or could not be verified were taken to custody suites across London. A Met Police spokesperson also told Metro: 'Recognising the duty of care we have for those in our custody and reflecting on the age of those who have been arrested at previous protests in support of Palestine Action, we took precautions ahead of Saturday's operation. 'There was water available at the prisoner processing points and access to toilets. We had police medics on hand as part of the policing operation, and we processed people as quickly as possible to ensure nobody was waiting an unreasonably long time. 'Notwithstanding that, a degree of personal responsibility is required on the part of those who choose to come and break the law. They knew they were very likely to be arrested, which is a decision that will inevitably have consequences.' Activist, novelist and Nobel Peace Prize nominee Angie Zelter, 74, agrees with Trudi and even warned younger people at the demonstration to leave getting detained to the older attendees. 'I was speaking to some Israeli Jewish people there, one of whom was 17 years old, and I said, 'Look, don't risk getting arrested, because you've got your whole life ahead of you',' she tells Metro. 'It's white, middle-class, privileged, older people like me who should. If we haven't got caring responsibilities, then it's our duty.' This sentiment is echoed by Amnesty International's law and human rights director, Tom Southerden, who said older people feel they are more able to take risks associated with participating in civil disobedience. 'The consequences for younger people of being labelled a 'terrorist', in terms of threats to their careers and other future prospects, are so serious,' he highlights. Angie also believes there is more older representation because many young activists are now in prison. 'People have got to realise that the protest laws are being taken away from us. We are sliding towards fascism and a dictatorship in this country,' she warns. Retired teacher and mental health support worker Naomi Hutchings, 62, has been championing causes for decades, including Greenham Common and Cruisewatch in the 1980s. She attended the protest on Saturday, as she fears that the right to demonstrate is being 'eroded'. 'My generation has grown up with protest as a way of generating change, so it seems particularly concerning that protest is being suppressed by the previous government with the Policing Bill in 2022 and now by this government declaring Palestine Action to be a terrorist group,' she says. 'With all the protests against refugees as well, it feels a bit like the 1930s in Germany. I don't want to look back and feel I did nothing to stand up for what I believe is right.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Palestine Action (PA) is a British pro-Palestinian direct action network founded in 2020, which uses disruptive tactics to draw attention to Israel's actions in Palestine. In July, PA was officially considered a terrorist group by the British government. When announcing the proscription, the Home Office pointed to three 'attacks' carried out by PA: one in 2022 at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow, and two last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol. A few days before the announcement, two activists from the group also broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged a pair of aircraft with red paint. Palestine Action said the red paint symbolised Palestinian blood, and claimed they also used crowbars to cause further damage. On July 30, the High Court ruled the proscription of Palestine Action could be reviewed after lawyers for the group's co-founder Huda Ammori, argued the move gagged legitimate protest. However, Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain also refused a request to pause the ban temporarily until the outcome of the challenge. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper stated that although the right to protest is something that the government want to protest 'fiercely', it is 'very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation.' The MP added that Palestine Action was proscribed due to strong security advice following 'serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.' 'It also follows an assessment from the joint terrorism assessment centre that the group prepares for terrorism, as well as concerning information referencing plans and ideas for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings,' she continued. The Home Secretary also said that they are 'not a non-violent organisation' and UK national security must be prioritised. Amnesty International described the weekend's mass arrests under UK terrorism law as 'deeply concerning'. Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty UK, said: 'The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists.' More Trending A 'deep concern about the ongoing genocide by Israel against the Palestinians in Gaza', and specifically, the UK government's response, is something that is an issue for all members of society, young and old, says Tom. He adds that for the older generation it 'undermined their long-held beliefs about fundamental principles of international law and human rights that they had thought were inviolable.' Amnesty is clear in its stance that protest can change the world for the better, from stopping wars and winning human rights victories to standing up against racism; participation has no age limit. 'Anybody can make change,' Polly agrees. 'If you've got the inclination, age is just a number.' Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below.
Metro
3 days ago
- Metro
The big questions the government needs to answer over Palestine Action
On March 31 1990, Londoners gathered in Trafalgar Square to protest Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. Windows were smashed and premises were set alight. 339 people were arrested. That is thought to be the record number arrested at a single protest in the UK – until last Saturday. The demonstration at the weekend was a very different affair. While six people were arrested for allegedly assaulting police officers, the overwhelming majority – 522 – were arrested for holding up placards reading 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'. As of last month, Palestine Action (PA) is officially considered a terrorist group by the British government. The direct action network, which targets businesses and factories in a bid to draw attention to Israel's actions in Palestine, was proscribed by Parliament on the same day as the Russian Imperial Movement and the Maniacs Murder Cult. Speaking to the media today, a government spokesperson suggested some of those arrested on Saturday might not be aware of how the organisation they were supporting operates in real life. Asked if Keir Starmer thinks the demonstrators – average age 54 – are terrorists or supporters of a terrorist group, the spokesperson said: 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation.' He added that the assessments made by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre were 'very clear', and PA is a 'violent organisation' that has committed 'violent, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage'. Hello, I'm Craig Munro and I'm Metro's man in Westminster. Every Wednesday, I write our Alright, Gov? newsletter with insights from behind the scenes in the Houses of Parliament – and how the decisions made there will end up affecting you. Last week we had a look inside Labour's split on trans women – and answered a question from a reader about if Sir Keir Starmer is likely to suspend more MPs in the future. Click here to sign up If the government believes people attended Saturday's protest without understanding who they were supporting, that means one of two things. Either they don't realise the extent of the crimes committed by PA, or they know about the crimes but don't believe they should be considered terrorism. If it's the first, ministers might need to work on publicising what exactly the group has done – and maybe even figure out a way to make public some of the details Home Office Minister Alex Davies-Jones said the government 'cannot disclose because of national security' in an LBC interview today. If it's the second, ministers might need to clearly explain to the public why PA's acts have passed the legal threshold for terrorism. Dr Jessie Blackbourn, an expert in counter-terrorism law at Durham University, said this appeared to be the first time a group has been proscribed largely based on criminal damage rather than 'serious violence against people' such as murder or torture. One example of 'terrorism' defined under the Terrorism Act 2000 is 'serious damage to property' – a controversial clause in the legislation that has rarely been used until now. Dr Blackbourn told Metro: 'Obviously, the Home Secretary is convinced that she's applied the definition of terrorism correctly in proscribing this organisation. 'But I think if you ask someone on the street what terrorism looks like, they would be more likely to think of it as being something like the IRA or al Qaeda or Islamic State than Palestine Action.' When announcing the proscription, the Home Office pointed to three 'attacks' carried out by PA: one in 2022 at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow, and two last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol. The incident at Thales 'caused over £1 million worth of damage to parts essential for submarines', the department said, adding: 'Staff fled for safety as pyrotechnics and smoke bombs were thrown in evacuation areas.' A few days before the announcement, two activists from the group also broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged a pair of aircraft with red paint. Outlining the reasons for proscription to the House of Commons the following day, Security Minister Dan Jarvis said: 'Palestine Action's attacks are not victimless crimes. 'Employees have experienced physical violence, intimidation and harassment, and they have been prevented from entering their place of work. 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and we cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.' Following Saturday's protest, Amnesty International UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said: 'We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. More Trending 'These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.' On July 30, the High Court ruled the proscription of Palestine Action could be reviewed after lawyers for the group's co-founder Huda Ammori argued the move gagged legitimate protest. However, Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain also refused a request to pause the ban temporarily until the outcome of the challenge. That raises the possibility of further demonstrations and even more arrests – unless the government is able to explain why the protesters shouldn't bother. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man 'throws water and grabs throat' of protester demanding release of Israeli hostages MORE: Netanyahu says Israel has 'no choice but to finish the job' in Gaza MORE: Netanyahu 'will have blood of hostages on his hands' if more are killed in Gaza takeover
Spectator
3 days ago
- Spectator
The Met Police dealt with the Palestine Action protest admirably
Jonathan Porritt's arrest under the Terrorism Act 2000 is the apogee of a 'luxury belief.' Unlike the dozens of other younger people arrested in Westminster on Saturday for supporting the proscribed organisation Palestine Action (PA), Sir Jonathon Espie Porritt, 2nd Baronet CBE is a longstanding member of the administrative and political boss class. He declared himself 'privileged' to be nicked with the grandiose pomposity reserved for people who, by age or means, are insulated from any consequences. Others, inspired by their sanctimony, face potentially lifelong consequences for financial independence and freedom of movement, citizenship or employment, whether arrested or convicted. The weekend's protest in front of parliament resulted in a total of 522 arrests for offences against one of our most punitive pieces of legislation. Many commentators, including the front organisation for the mass civil disobedience group 'Defend our Juries', had prophesied the collapse of the Metropolitan police, overwhelmed by sheer numbers of defiant activists. This isn't quite what transpired – but the admission from the Met that it faced an entirely 'unrealistic challenge' to police a few hundred retired teachers and clerics was oddly defeatist. London's finest were augmented by officers from other forces across England and Wales. They were there in numbers and the approach was proportionate to all the other public order challenges it faces every weekend, as well as the basic requirement to keep neighbourhoods not in the slightest bit interested in events thousands of miles away safe. Those offered 'street bail' after arrest to conserve police numbers around Parliament Square and stop custody suites from collapsing should take no comfort in later defying any conditions attached to their freedom by rejoining the protest, even without placards. The Met will no doubt have deployed huge evidence-gathering resources and long after the transgressive glee has worn off, the knock on the door will come as a shock for many. We are also yet to see how the judiciary will act as these cases drift along our bunged-up criminal justice system. The decision to prosecute is likely not to be straightforward, as it will surely involve Attorney General Lord Hermer, whose 'militant' activism on the side of the human rights industry is well known. The decision to proscribe PA in the first place has his fingerprints all over it. The least anyone can routinely expect on conviction for this offence is a high-level community order including a curfew, unpaid work and rehabilitation activity. There is some wiggle room for 'exceptional circumstances' to reduce even that penalty but it has to be justified by the court. All eyes on the judiciary then, magistrates in particular. It's a pity that anyone protesting who is not in possession of a public sector pension or ancestral grandeur will not have been aware of the information now emerging about the decision to proscribe PA. It may have given some of them at least pause for thought. The government has been woefully uncoordinated when it comes to this point, continually sheltering behind the idea of 'national security' and a need-to-know basis. While the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has alluded to PA's directly anti-Semitic behaviour and links to malign foreign states, these were only made more explicit this morning when justice minister Alex Davies-Jones spelt out the risk of people with perfectly legitimate anger at the plight of Palestinians being manipulated. It is significant that 'Defend our Juries' aren't committing to facilitating actions similar to last weekend in the future, preferring to say that they will organise protests against the curtailment of freedom of expression. I hope they do because protesting the power of the state is a precious right in a liberal democracy, one that is in fact a bulwark against extremism. The Met, the subject of relentless criticism around under- or overreacting to public order, played the hand they were dealt with well this weekend gone. Ministers must now ensure that ordinary citizens with the most to lose understand the malign nature of the organisation they want to sacrifice their life chances for.
