logo
Anthropic's quiet edge in the AI talent war

Anthropic's quiet edge in the AI talent war

Mint5 days ago
The war for top AI talent is hitting frenzied new heights among giants like Meta and OpenAI. But it's turning out that Anthropic, maker of the popular Claude models, is the place many engineers would rather work.
New research from venture firm SignalFire shows that the startup is increasing its engineering organization faster than those competitors and more. The $170 billion AI company is hiring engineers 2.68 times faster than it's losing them. That number is 2.18 for OpenAI, 2.07 for Meta and 1.17 for Google.
To be sure, we shouldn't expect established players like Meta and Google to grow as fast as the young upstarts, SignalFire said, but Anthropic's retention advantage does stand out, especially in Silicon Valley, where recruitment efforts have hit a new peak.
Meta's drive this summer to staff its 'Superintelligence Labs" unit sparked the most recent round of talent raids with Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg often making personal offers to top tier AI talent at places like at OpenAI as well as Anthropic, Google DeepMind and Apple.
Anthropic Chief Executive Dario Amodei said he won't match salaries for sky-high offers that come in from Meta, saying to do so would be unfair to the equally talented engineers who weren't targeted. Amodei made the comments on an episode of the Big Technology Podcast that aired last week. And yet, employees are still staying, he said.
So far, Zuckerberg has hired at least two employees from the startup—Joel Pobar and Anton Bakhtin—both of whom previously spent multiple years working at Meta.
But Amodei said he talked to some employees who turned down Meta's offers, saying they 'wouldn't even talk to Mark Zuckerberg."
He added, 'What they are doing is trying to buy something that cannot be bought. And that is alignment with the mission."
Anthropic was founded in 2021 by former OpenAI employees who wanted to build AI with a greater emphasis on safety and using the technology for good.
That unique mission and culture has been a huge draw for AI job seekers, according to Heather Doshay, a partner at SignalFire. While most AI companies pour huge investments into guardrails, Anthropic is uniquely outspoken about it, she said.
'I talk to a lot of candidates in the market in my job. And if I ask any candidate, what is the dream company you have at this point? Anthropic is named more often than anyone else," Doshay said.
Anthropic said it credits its commitment to safety, the quality of its research and its team of top researchers as reasons that talent chooses to go there.
In many ways, OpenAI still has an advantage when it comes to public awareness. (ChatGPT is to AI as Kleenex is to tissues, Doshay said.) But the coding capabilities of Anthropic's Claude models have long been extremely popular among the developer community—the group that makes up this talent market.
Michael Shamos, Distinguished Career Professor in the School of Computer Science and Director of the M.S. in Artificial Intelligence and Innovation at Carnegie Mellon University, said there are many factors that play into any candidate's decision on which offer to accept.
Salary is a major one, but if there's not a huge order of magnitude of difference in compensation packages, mission and culture become bigger considerations. So do the recent technology advancements of a given company.
To some degree, Shamos said, 'I think it's cyclic. If Claude is the hottest LLM right now, then people want to work for Anthropic. When GPT-5 comes out, it's going to be OpenAI again." Nor should the bigger players be discounted, he said.
A Google spokesperson said its attrition rates remain very low, and it is attracting leading AI talent, including researchers and engineers who come from top rival labs. Meta and OpenAI didn't comment.
SignalFire's Doshay said, 'Obviously there are going to be, you know, many more miles in this marathon to come. And so it's anyone's game."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From Reels to Returns: How digital platforms are shaping India's financial decisions
From Reels to Returns: How digital platforms are shaping India's financial decisions

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

From Reels to Returns: How digital platforms are shaping India's financial decisions

Digital Content Is Changing the Way Indians Buy Financial Products The Digital Majority in Financial Journeys Short Videos, Big Impact Creators Over Celebrities Women Taking the Lead in Financial Decisions The Role of Business Messaging Once driven by branch visits, printed advice columns, and word-of-mouth recommendations, India's financial decision-making is undergoing a rapid transformation. A new study shows that short-form videos, creator-led content, and online communities are becoming key sources of information for everything from loans to investments signalling a shift in how Indians discover, evaluate, and purchase financial decades, financial decisions in India were shaped by in-person consultations, expert newspaper columns, and advice from trusted circles. That picture is changing rapidly. A new IPSOS study, From Feeds to Financial Futures, commissioned by Meta , finds that Indians are increasingly turning to short-form videos, online communities, and digital creators for guidance on everything from loans to survey covered more than 2,000 respondents aged 25–45 in Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Kolkata, all current or prospective buyers of financial products. Its findings reveal a significant digital shift in the path to financial services being a traditionally offline industry, six of eight touchpoints in the buying journey are now digital. Meta platforms account for roughly half of these digital touchpoints. More than half of financial services consumers view personal finance and investing content on Instagram or influence is consistent across all stages of the decision-making funnel: 81% of respondents used Meta platforms during the discovery stage, 79% during evaluation, and 83% at the point of purchase. For loans, investments, insurance, and savings, the digital presence remains strong, with more than three-quarters of users relying on it in each products are often complex, but the study suggests they no longer require long-form explanations to connect with audiences. Short-form formats — particularly Instagram Reels and Facebook videos — are emerging as powerful tools to simplify jargon and build half of the respondents said they depend on Instagram (57%) or Facebook (53%) for making informed financial choices. These bite-sized videos are demystifying topics like mutual funds, credit scores, and insurance policies, often in under a dynamics are shifting. While celebrity endorsements still have influence, the report notes growing consumer preference for relatable, peer-like voices. Seventy-five percent of respondents trust financial podcasts, and 67% turn to influencers and subject matter experts for guidance. Authenticity, relatability, and clarity are emerging as key drivers of engagement and to traditional assumptions, women are increasingly taking independent control of their finances. The study found that nearly 80% of female respondents make their own financial decisions. Women also spend more time than men on Instagram and WhatsApp and almost as much time on Facebook, signalling the importance of these platforms as spaces for both knowledge and is proving integral to the financial services journey. Forty-four percent of respondents use it during discovery, 50% during evaluation, and 48% when making a purchase. On average, financial services consumers spend 56 minutes a day on the app, making it a key channel for personalised communication and conversational commerce in the sector.

Is Sam Altman gearing up to take on Musk's Neuralink? Report says...
Is Sam Altman gearing up to take on Musk's Neuralink? Report says...

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Is Sam Altman gearing up to take on Musk's Neuralink? Report says...

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed Musk, who left OpenAI after his failed attempt to take over the company in 2018, has long been critical of the firm. Image Credit: Reuters Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs, according to the Financial Times. The venture is said to be seeking funding at a potential $850 million valuation, with some capital possibly coming from OpenAI's own ventures arm. Sources told TechCrunch that talks remain early and OpenAI has not committed to participating, meaning the terms could still change. Merge Labs is reportedly collaborating with Alex Blania, head of Tools for Humanity, the company behind Altman's iris-scanning digital ID project. The new company would compete directly with Elon Musk's Neuralink, which is developing brain implants to help people with severe paralysis control devices using thought alone. Neuralink, founded in 2016 and valued at $9 billion after a June fundraising round, is currently running human trials. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The concept of 'the merge'— humans integrating with technology— has long fascinated both Musk and Altman. In a 2017 blog post, Altman wrote that the merge 'has already begun' and predicted humans would become 'the first species ever to design our own descendants.' The idea predates Silicon Valley's current fixation on artificial general intelligence and ties back to earlier visions of 'the singularity.' The two tech leaders, once OpenAI co-founders, have since become open rivals. Musk left the organisation in 2018, and the relationship has soured, with the pair trading public barbs on X this week. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed, and a new front in their escalating competition. Elon Musk vs Sam Altman Elon Musk and Sam Altman were once co-founders of OpenAI, but their relationship broke down after Musk left in 2018. Since then, they have become rivals, running competing AI companies: Musk's xAI and Altman's OpenAI. The feud has played out both in business and in public spats. Musk has criticised OpenAI's direction and tried to buy it back, while Altman has pushed ahead with commercial growth. This week, tensions escalated when Musk accused Apple of favouring OpenAI's ChatGPT in the App Store. Altman responded by accusing Musk of manipulating X to benefit his own ventures. Their rivalry now spans technology, influence, and personal reputation, with both positioning themselves as leaders in the race to shape the future of AI. With inputs from agencies

Apple denies favouring ChatGPT after partnership claims, rejects Elon Musk's allegation that App Store hinders rivals
Apple denies favouring ChatGPT after partnership claims, rejects Elon Musk's allegation that App Store hinders rivals

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Apple denies favouring ChatGPT after partnership claims, rejects Elon Musk's allegation that App Store hinders rivals

Apple has rejected allegations from Elon Musk that its App Store discriminates against competitors, insisting the platform is free and fair of bias, according to a BBC report. The remarks come after the Tesla and X chief threatened legal action, accusing Apple of making it 'impossible' for apps to rival ChatGPT-maker OpenAI in the store. Musk's criticism followed his renewed clash with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, whom he labelled a 'liar' after Altman accused him of using X to 'benefit himself and his own companies'. The dispute marks the latest escalation in a long-running feud between the two tech leaders, who co-founded OpenAI before Musk's departure from the firm. In a statement to the BBC, Apple said: 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria.' Apple entered into a partnership with ChatGPT in June 2024 but has denied any preferential treatment. The company noted that other AI tools, including DeepSeek and Perplexity, have reached top positions in App Store rankings since then. Musk, however, continued to criticise the company online, questioning why neither X nor its AI chatbot Grok featured in the App Store's 'Must Have' section. He pointed out that X ranked as the number one news app globally and Grok was fifth among all apps, while ChatGPT topped the UK's free app chart. Official rankings show Grok in third place and X absent from the top 40. Meanwhile, tensions between the xAI chief and Sam Altman escalated further, as the public spat unfolded against the backdrop of legal proceedings in the United States. This week, District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers allowed OpenAI's claims against Musk to proceed to trial, including accusations of a 'years-long harassment campaign' involving public remarks, social media activity, court filings, and what the company describes as a 'sham bid' for its assets. The trial is expected to intensify tensions in a rivalry that has persisted for over a decade, stemming from Musk's belief that OpenAI abandoned its original founding principles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store