logo
NexGen Cloud Raises $45 Million In Series A Funding

NexGen Cloud Raises $45 Million In Series A Funding

Forbes09-04-2025

Enterprises the world over are looking for data center capacity
As the artificial intelligence (AI) boom has swept round the world over the past two years, the space has largely been dominated by US technology businesses. In London, however, growth at an entrepreneurial UK AI company has also been gathering pace. Today, NexGen Cloud will announce it has raised $45 million of new funding, valuing the company at just over $350 million.
NexGen was founded in 2020, initially focusing on blockchain applications, but rapidly pivoting into cloud solutions for AI. The company's revenues totalled only $3 million in 2023, the year after its shift of emphasis, but grew almost seven times' last year to reach $20 million. 'We deliver cloud in the way it's meant to be delivered,' says Youlian Tzanev, one of NexGen's co-founders and now its chief strategy officer.
In essence, NexGen gives its customers access to the computing power they need to perform tasks such as training and developing large language models for generative AI applications. The company rents space and power in established data centers, enabling customers to secure time on GPUs, the machines that are vital to powering AI.
Customers use NexGen's Hyperstack platform as their way into this power. The cloud-based solution means they don't have to build their own infrastructure to support their work with AI. 'Enterprises are looking for a solution that is simple and easy to use,' adds Tzanev. 'And as their AI projects develop and grow, they need something they can scale up quickly.'
Demand is growing rapidly. Data from SNS Insider suggests the market for GPU as a service was worth only $3.3 billion globally in 2023 but will be worth $34 billion by 2032 – growth of almost 30% a year.
Naturally, this acceleration has seen competitors target the market. The big names in cloud computing – including AWS, Microsoft and Google – are all present, but SNS Insider also points to a range of other players – including the likes of Vultr, Linode and Lambda Labs.
Nevertheless, NexGen is convinced it can carve out a space for itself. It points to the merit of building a European-native cloud AI business, given the growing regulation of the sector. Local providers may be better placed to cope with European regulation – both in the European Union and the UK – on data privacy and management, for example.
The business also sees partnerships as critical to expansion, pointing to alliances with firms such as cloud marketplace Shadeform. 'NexGen has been an incredibly reliable partner as we've scaled our cloud marketplace,' says Shadeform's CEO, Ed Goode.
In time, NexGen hopes that customers using it for AI development will opt to host other data and activity via its cloud service. 'If we can deliver the most complex cloud solutions successfully, we'll be trusted to host other storage,' Tzanev explains.
Tzanev believes the cloud solutions market is on the verge of a significant change. 'It's been something of a monopolistic market, dominated by a handful of giant US technology companies,' he says. 'There was a time when the feeling was that 'no-one gets fired for hiring AWS, say', but now people are exploring other options.'
Many enterprises are focused on usability and scalability, as well as price, Tzanev argues. He points to NexGen's team of technical specialists, who provide troubleshooting advice and support on performance and optimisation, as one possible source of competitive advantage.
Certainly, the business appears to be getting traction with customers, particularly in Europe. Current clients include organisations such as Red Hat, Ingenix.AI, Tyne, and ArchiLabs. At the latter company, Brian Bakerman, CEO, says it switched to Hyperstack based on its 'support and pricing'; ArchiLabs switched to NexGen for 'GPU-accelerated cloud' after working with competitors in the market, he explains.
The company's strategy for the next year and beyond focuses on developing partnerships that enhance access to and delivery of AI-compute services. It has plans for further improvements to its infrastructure services and for the launch of new products that make it easier for enterprises to integrate AI across the entire development cycle. One particular priority is dedicated virtual machines, giving customers greater control over privacy and data security.
Today's fund-raising will help in this regard, giving NexGen greater balance-sheet strength and supporting its technology roll-out as it continues to add GPU capacity. The company's Series A round gives it a post-raise valuation of $354 million, with the funding primarily sourced from family trusts and high-net-worth individuals, led by Moore & Moore Investment Group.
It's an important raise, both for NexGen itself, and for UK technology companies, which have often struggled to raise scale-up finance. 'Funding is tighter in Europe than in the US, with liquidity in short supply,' says Tzanev. 'The upside of that is that it forces us to keep proving ourselves.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia rally persists: What worries this analyst about AI trade
Nvidia rally persists: What worries this analyst about AI trade

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia rally persists: What worries this analyst about AI trade

Nvidia (NVDA) climbs higher, hitting fresh record highs. However, the artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaker and its "Magnificent Seven" peers have underperformed other AI-related names in the S&P 500 (^GSPC), like Palantir (PLTR), Vistra (VST), and Dell (DELL). Wall Street Horizon head of corporate event research, Christine Short, tells Market Domination host Josh Lipton, Yahoo Finance anchor Julie Hyman, and Yahoo Finance Markets Reporter Josh Schafer that it's competition with Chinese AI companies that she worries could threaten the AI play. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Green all over the place, Christine, we just keep grinding higher here. What do you make of it? Yeah, look, investor appetite is there, right? AI enthusiasm has returned. We just talked about Nvidia. Um, I think there were some whispers today about is this, you know, signifying a bubble here? Is this .com 2.0 with Nvidia being at almost record highs here? And if you look at what analysts are saying, and I know we're going to hear from one, you know, that covers Nvidia here soon, um, no one's saying that this is overvalued. I think many are actually saying that we're still undervalued here on Nvidia because we haven't quite priced in AI and the impact on productivity. We heard from CEO of Salesforce today, Mark Benioff, saying that 30 to 50% of their workload is now done by AI. And we've seen a slew of companies cut, you know, positions because of AI, whether it be Salesforce or CrowdStrike, Klarna, so, or, or Duolingo, who's actually going to be more discreet about hiring because of AI. So I don't think we've, we've folded in the full impact. The one concern I have, and maybe it's not so much a concern, but what I'm watching is competition from Chinese AI companies. There was a great report in Datatrack Research earlier in the week that just showed the valuations are so much more appetizing on some of those Chinese AI names versus, you know, the US ones. And the returns have actually been higher for those names. So that's one area that I'm watching is, is the competition between us and those Chinese AI names. Josh, you know, Julie mentioned it briefly, but I want to get double tap on it. The mag 7 names, Josh, those giants, right? How have they been working? Yeah, yeah, Josh. So I have a visual representation over here on our big board, right, of sort of some of what Julie was talking about. And what I'm looking at here is just performance since the April 8th low. Uh, most of these stocks here are all in the top 20 of the S&P 500. They're all AI tied. So I looked at sort of an AI basket of stocks, right? You have Oracle, Broadcom, Dell, AMD, NRG, as Julie mentioned, Vistra, which is sort of an AI power play, and Palantir. What's interesting is all of the mag 7 have underperformed them, right? So Nvidia's up about 60% at a new high. Really the rest of these companies have come up about 25, 30% maybe from the bottom. Apple hasn't really gone anywhere. And Christine, I guess the question this sort of brings me to for you is just, is the next AI trade going to continue to be the broadening out of this trade into cloud computing, into energy, into some of the other chip names, or is that, is that sort of where it feels like this trade is headed as we go through kind of the second half of 25? Yeah, I think we, we are already seeing that broadening out. There's a lot of liquidity in the market, and I think what surprised me the most is how quickly we've rebounded from that April low. And it just goes to show the appetite, the enthusiasm amongst, you know, all of tech. So not just within the AI space, but there is liquidity there. There was cash on the sidelines for quite a while. And now, you know, many of those investors bought the dip, and now we're seeing it rip.

Senate parliamentarian requests AI moratorium be rewritten in ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate parliamentarian requests AI moratorium be rewritten in ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time19 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate parliamentarian requests AI moratorium be rewritten in ‘big, beautiful bill'

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has asked Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to rewrite the controversial artificial intelligence (AI) provision in President Trump's tax package, a source familiar with the conversations told The Hill. Cruz and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee, met with the Senate parliamentarian Wednesday night, the source said, during which the parliamentarian expressed concerns the provision may violate the Senate's reconciliation procedural rules. Under its current language, the provision bans states from regulating AI models and systems if they want access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment in federal funding. The Senate Commerce Committee said the current language, which narrowed a previous version this week, 'makes clear the optional $500 million state AI program would not affect participating state's tech-neutral laws, such as those for consumer protection and intellectual property rights. But Democrats argue the bill would still impact $42 billion in broadband funding and not comply with the Senate's Byrd Rule, which prohibits provisions from making drastic policy changes. The parliamentarian's request comes just days after she first approved the provision last weekend. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to advance Trump's legislative agenda while averting the Senate filibuster. To do this, the Senate parliamentarian's approval of the provisions is needed for a simple majority vote. When reached for comment, Cruz's communications director Macarena Martinez said the office would not comment on 'private consolations with the parliamentarian.' 'The Democrats would be wise not to use this process to wishcast in public,' Martinez told The Hill. Despite the previous changes to the language, the provision is expected to receive pushback from a handful of Republicans. Republican Sens. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) told The Hill they are against the provision, while Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said he is willing to introduce an amendment to eliminate the provision during the Senate's marathon vote-a-rama if it is not taken out earlier. Some Republicans in the House are also coming out against the measure as a way to advocate for states' rights. A group of hard-line conservatives argued in a letter earlier this month to Senate Republicans that Congress is still 'actively investigating' AI and 'does not fully understand the implications' of the technology. This was shortly after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) confirmed she would be a 'no' on the bill if it comes back to the House with the provision included. 'I am 100 percent opposed, and I will not vote for any bill that destroys federalism and takes away states' rights, ability to regulate and make laws when it regards humans and AI,' she told reporters earlier this month. It has also received criticism from some Republican state leaders, like Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who warned in a Washington Post op-ed that the measure 'would have unintended consequences and threatens to undo all the great work states' have done for AI protections.

A Word, Please: ‘The Beyoncé of grammar' and why AI still needs writers
A Word, Please: ‘The Beyoncé of grammar' and why AI still needs writers

Los Angeles Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

A Word, Please: ‘The Beyoncé of grammar' and why AI still needs writers

At a time when people refuse to believe doctors, journalists and anyone who says we went to the moon, everyone accepts the AI industry's claims about AI. It's genius. It's going to revolutionize life as we know it. It's going to render all us workers obsolete so we'll be unemployed and homeless but at least we'll be wowed by TikToks of Jennifer Lawrence talking through Steve Buscemi's face. First on the chopping block, they say: editors and writers. Like me. To check the ETA of my bleak future, I asked ChatGPT to write a grammar book in the style of June Casagrande. The software cheerily obliged, promising to 'channel my inner June Casagrande and create a grammar book that's fun, fierce, and friendly — just like 'Grammar Snobs Are Great Big Meanies.'' Minus the cash advance for me, of course. Minus even the cover price of two books I wrote that another AI program literally stole, according to an Atlantic magazine database. The ChatGPT book begins: 'Let's face it: grammar has trust issues. Not because it's sneaky or complicated — though we'll admit, it has its moods — but because you were probably introduced to it by someone who thought diagramming sentences was a fun Friday activity. Spoiler alert: it wasn't.' Smooth, well-structured, accessible. At first, the writing seems impressive. But wait, 'trust issues'? ChatGPT meant that people don't trust grammar, which itself is a little off. But to 'have trust issues' means to be incapable of trusting others. So the first sentence doesn't make sense. The word 'complicated' is also odd. Being complicated doesn't undermine trust, exactly. 'Spoiler alert' means something you have yet to learn, not something you learned decades ago. Then there's 'we'll admit.' Who's 'we'? This isn't an article in a sassy magazine in which the writer is speaking on behalf of the editorial staff. This is a book by just one author — an author who has written five books and more than 1,000 columns without once writing in the plural first person. (Nice job channeling me, ChatGPT.) 'We' appears a lot in the first few pages, like after saying grammar has a bad reputation, adding: 'We're going to clear that up.' Then, while talking about the voice in your head that makes you fear grammar, adding: 'To that voice we say: shut up.' Check every book on your shelf and you probably won't find a single one written in the plural first person — and definitely not if the book has just one author. Then, this 'intelligence' gets even less intelligent by switching to the singular first person a few pages later: 'I'm going to give you the tools you need.' ChatGPT's manuscript contained lots of illogical statements, like the example sentence 'My cat screams at 3 a.m.,' the assertion that verbs are 'the Beyonce of grammar' (with no explanation why) and, my favorite, this bit about comma splices: 'Grammar says, 'not today, Satan.'' ChatGPT got facts wrong, too. It said the 'are' in 'We are never getting back together' is a linking verb. It's not. It's an auxiliary verb. I could go on. But in the middle of writing this column, and I swear this is true, I was given a freelance assignment to revise a short video script written by AI and to 'make it sound more natural.' The script wasn't just unnatural sounding. It was illogical, misguided and utterly clueless about what to focus on. It boasted at length about an AI writing program that could take 'P.R. pitches' and instantly transform them into newspaper articles. That might sound great to P.R. firms making the pitches, but this script was promoting a technology to benefit newspapers and their readers — oblivious to the fact that journalism doesn't mean printing whatever P.R. firms want. I rewrote the whole script, emphasizing the important work reporters do and how the new AI tools could support their journalism. The editor who assigned me the project wrote back, 'Your version is SO GOOD' (emphasis hers). I'm still reeling from the irony. A human writer did an objectively better job than AI at writing advertising copy to promote … an AI writing program. So the next time you hear tech billionaires boasting about AI products destined to change life as you know it, remember their own words: Not today, Satan. June Casagrande is the author of 'The Joy of Syntax: A Simple Guide to All the Grammar You Know You Should Know.' She can be reached at JuneTCN@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store