US lifts bounties on senior Taliban figures including interior minister Sirajuddin Haqqani
Haqqani, who previously admitted to orchestrating the 2008 attack on Kabul's Serena Hotel that killed six people, including American citizen Thor David Hesla, no longer appears on the U.S. State Department's Rewards for Justice website.
According to Interior Ministry spokesman Abdul Mateen Qani, the U.S. government revoked the bounties on Sirajuddin Haqqani, Abdul Aziz Haqqani, and Yahya Haqqani. 'These three individuals are two brothers and one paternal cousin,' he told The Associated Press.
The Haqqani network, originally founded by Jalaluddin Haqqani, rose to prominence as one of the most lethal arms of the Taliban following the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.
The group has been linked to a series of high-profile attacks on the Indian and U.S. embassies, the Afghan presidency, and other targets, and has also been accused of engaging in extortion, kidnappings, and other criminal activities.
Zakir Jalaly, a Foreign Ministry official in Kabul, said the U.S. decision to lift the bounties — coming just days after the release of American prisoner George Glezmann — signaled a thaw in bilateral relations.
'Both sides are moving beyond the effects of the wartime phase and taking constructive steps to pave the way for progress,' Jalaly said. 'The recent developments in Afghanistan-U.S. relations are a good example of pragmatic and realistic engagement.'
Shafi Azam, another official, welcomed the move as the beginning of normalization, noting the Taliban's recent assertion of control over Afghanistan's embassy in Norway as further evidence of diplomatic progress.
Since taking power in August 2021, the Taliban have struggled with global isolation, worsened by their sweeping restrictions on women and girls.
Only a few countries, including China and Qatar, have formally or informally engaged with the Taliban diplomatically. The U.S. has also maintained indirect channels of communication.
Despite being under United Nations sanctions since 2007, Sirajuddin Haqqani has traveled internationally in the past year. These trips, made with U.N. clearance, were his first abroad since the Taliban's return to power.
Haqqani has also voiced rare public criticism of the Taliban's decision-making process, highlighting internal divisions within the group's leadership. — Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
Putin praises Trump's peace efforts and floats potential nuclear deal at Alaska summit
MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin praised the Trump administration's 'energetic' efforts to stop the war in Ukraine and hinted that Moscow and Washington could strike a deal on nuclear arms control during their summit on Friday in Alaska. In his first public comments since US President Donald Trump announced the Alaska summit, Putin on Thursday chaired a meeting of senior Russian officials at the Kremlin to brief them on the state of play in negotiations with the US on Ukraine. 'The current American administration... is making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict,' Putin said. In his brief remarks, Putin said the summit with the US aims to 'create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, as well as in Europe, and in the world as a whole.' He suggested this broader peace can be achieved if, in the 'next stages' of discussions with the US, 'we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons.' Although it was not clear what kind of deal Putin referred to, most strategic weapons treaties between the US and Russia have covered nuclear weapons, or nuclear-capable missile US and Russia agreed to limit their arsenals of nuclear arms under the New START treaty, which came into force in 2011. Under the agreement, both countries had seven years to meet defined limits on the number of deployed intercontinental-range nuclear weapons they can have. The treaty, however, is due to expire in February a sign of unease between the two countries, Trump this month said he ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned near Russia, in response to what he said were 'highly provocative' remarks by Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's former president and the current deputy chairman of its Security is prone to erratic outbursts on social media – often raising the specter of nuclear conflict – but Trump said he made the decision 'in case these these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.'Also on Thursday, Yury Ushakov, Putin's foreign policy aide, shared more details about the plans for Friday's summit, saying the presidents will first have a one-on-one conversation, with the help of interpreters, before continuing talks over a business aide said the talks will focus on the war in Ukraine, as well as the prospects of cooperation between Russia and the US in trade and economic issues. After the talks, the presidents will hold a joint press conference, he will be one of five members on Russia's negotiating team, along with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Kirill Dmitriev, a senior negotiator and head of Russia's sovereign wealth and Europe have not been invited to the summit, raising fears Kyiv could be forced into unwanted to get Trump's ear one last time before he sits down one-on-one with Putin, European leaders on Wednesday held a call with the US Europeans struck a cautiously upbeat note after the meeting, claiming that Trump had been sympathetic to their calls for an immediate ceasefire, and that Ukraine must have a seat at the table in future negotiations. — CNN
Saudi Gazette
9 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Chemistry on trial: How a professor tried to convince a court she didn't kill her husband
DELHI — "Are you a chemistry professor?" the judge asked. "Yes," Mamta Pathak replied, clasping her hand in a respectful namaste. Draped in a white sari, glasses perched on her nose, the retired college teacher stood before two judges in a courtroom in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, speaking as if delivering a forensic chemistry lecture. "In the post-mortem," she argued, her voice trembling but composed, "it is not possible to differentiate between a thermal burn and an electric burn mark without proper chemical analysis." Across the bench, Justice Vivek Agarwal reminded her, "The doctor who conducted the post-mortem said there were clear signs of electrocution." It was a rare, almost surreal moment — a 63-year-old woman, accused of murdering her husband by electrocution, explaining to the court how acids and tissue reactions revealed the nature of a burn. The exchange, caught on video during her April hearing, went viral in India and stunned the internet. But in the court, no amount of expert-like confidence could undo the prosecution's case — a spouse murdered and a motive rooted in suspicion and marital discord. Last month the High Court dismissed Mamta Pathak's appeal and upheld her life sentence for the April 2021 murder of her husband, Neeraj Pathak, a retired physician. While Pathak mounted a spirited, self-argued defence — invoking gaps in the autopsy, the insulation of the house, and even an electrochemical theory — the court found the circumstantial evidence conclusive: she had drugged her husband with sleeping pills and then electrocuted him. In court, Mamta, a mother of two, had peered over a stack of overflowing case files, leafing through them before she grew animated. "Sir, electric burn marks can't be distinguished as ante-mortem [before death] or post-mortem [after death]," she argued quoting from a forensics book. "How did they [doctors] write it was an electric burn mark in post-mortem [report]?". Microscopically, electrical burns look the same before and after death, making standard examination inconclusive, say experts. A close study of dermal changes may reveal whether a burn was ante — or post-mortem, according to one paper. An impromptu exchange on chemical reactions followed, with the judge probing her on laboratory processes. Mamta spoke about different acids, explaining that distinctions could be made using an electron microscope — something not possible in a post-mortem room. She tried to walk the judge through electron microscopy and different acids. Three women lawyers in the background smiled. Mamta ploughed on — she said she had been studying law in prison for a year. Flipping through her tabbed files with stickers and quoting from forensic medicine books, she pointed to alleged gaps in the investigation — from the unexamined crime scene to the absence of qualified electrical and forensic experts at the scene of the crime. "Our house was insured from 2017 to 2022, and inspections confirmed it was protected against electrical fire," she said. Mamta told the court that her husband had high blood pressure and heart disease. She stated the actual cause of death was narrowing and "calcification of his coronary arteries due to old age". She also suggested he may have slipped and sustained a hematoma, but no CT scan was conducted to confirm this. Neeraj Pathak, 65, had been found dead at the family home on 29 April 2021. The autopsy ruled electrocution as the cause of death. Days later, Mamta had been arrested and charged with murder. Police had seized an 11-meter electric wire with a two-pin plug, and CCTV footage from the couple's house. Six tablets of a sleeping pill were recovered in a strip of 10. The postmortem report cited cardiorespiratory shock from electrical current at multiple sites as the cause of death, occurring 36 to 72 hours before the autopsy conducted on 1 May. "But they didn't find my fingerprints on the strip of tablets," Mamta told the judges. But her arguments quickly unravelled, leaving Judges Agarwal and Devnarayan Sinha unconvinced. For nearly four decades, Mamta and Neeraj Pathak had lived a seemingly orderly middle-class life in Chhatarpur — a drought-prone district of Madhya Pradesh known for its farms, granite quarries, and small businesses. She taught chemistry at the local government college; he was the chief medical officer at the district hospital. They raised two sons — one settled abroad, the other, sharing a home with his mother. Neeraj retired voluntarily in 2019 after 39 years as a government doctor and then opened a private clinic at home. The incident happened during the pandemic. Neeraj was showing Covid symptoms and kept to the first floor. Mamta and her son, Nitish, stayed downstairs. Two staircases from the ground floor linked Neeraj's rooms to the open gallery and waiting hall of his private clinic, where half a dozen staff bustled between the lab and the medical store. The 97-page judgment stated that Mamta reported finding her husband Neeraj unresponsive in his bed on 29 April, but did not inform a doctor or the police until 1 May. Instead, she took her elder son to Jhansi — over 130km away — without clear reason, according to the driver, and returned the same evening. She claimed ignorance about how he died when she finally alerted the police. Beneath this silence lay a troubled marriage. The judges highlighted longstanding marital discord, with the couple living apart and Mamta suspecting her husband of infidelity. On the morning of the day he died,, Neeraj had called an associate, alleging that Mamta was "torturing him," locking him in a bathroom, withholding food for days, and causing physical injuries. He also accused her of taking cash, ATM cards, vehicle keys, and bank fixed deposit documents. Pleading for help, Neeraj's son contacted a friend who alerted the police, who then rescued the retired doctor from what was described as "Mamta's custody". The couple had even lived apart in recent times, adding weight to the court's doubts. Mamta had told the court she was the "best mother," presenting a birthday card from her children as proof. She also showed photos of herself feeding her husband and snapshots with family. Yet, the judges were unmoved. They noted that such tokens of affection didn't erase motive — after all, a "doting mother" can also be a "suspicious wife," they said. Fifty minutes into her deposition, after parrying questions and defending herself against the court's doubts, Mamta's composure faltered for the first time. "I know one thing... I did not kill him," she said, her voice trailing off. At another moment, she confessed, "I can't take this very much more." Trying to ease the tension, Judge Agarwal remarked, "You must be used to this... you must be taking classes for 50 minutes in college." "Forty minutes, sir. But they are small children," Mamta said. "Small children in college? But your designation is assistant professor," the judge pressed. "But they are kids, sir," she replied. "Don't tell us such stories," Judge Agarwal interrupted sharply. Mamta fought not just as a defendant, but as a teacher turning the courtroom into a chemistry lab — hoping to prove her innocence through science. Yet in the end, the cold facts proved stronger than her lessons. — BBC
Saudi Gazette
9 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Humanitarian groups call on Israel to end 'weaponization of aid' in Gaza
JERUSALEM — More than 100 organizations have signed a joint letter calling on Israel to stop the "weaponisation of aid" into Gaza, as "starvation deepens". Humanitarian groups, including Oxfam and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), say they are increasingly being told they are "not authorized" to deliver aid, unless they comply with the stricter Israeli regulations. Groups risk being banned if they "delegitimize" the state of Israel or do not provide detailed information about Palestinian staff, the letter says. Israel denies there are restrictions on aid and says the rules, introduced in March, ensure relief work is carried out in line with Israel's "national interests". According to the joint letter, most major international non-governmental organisations (NGO) have been unable to deliver a single truck of lifesaving supplies since 2 March. They say Israeli authorities "have rejected requests from dozens of non-governmental organisations to bring in lifesaving goods", citing the new rules. More than 60 requests were denied in July alone. Aid groups' inability to deliver aid has "left hospitals without basic supplies, children, people with disabilities, and older people dying from hunger and preventable illnesses", the statement said. Sean Carroll, CEO of American Near East Refugee Aid (Anera), said: "Anera has over $7 million worth of lifesaving supplies ready to enter Gaza – including 744 tons of rice, enough for six million meals, blocked in Ashdod just kilometers away". The new guidelines introduced in March update the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked. Registration can be rejected if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the democratic character of Israel or "promotes delegitimisation campaigns" against the country. "Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity," Israel's Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli told the Agence France-Presse news agency. "Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate," added Chikli. Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam Policy Lead, said Israel had rejected more than $2.5m (£1.8m) of goods from entering Gaza. She added: "This registration process signals to INGOs that their ability to operate may come at the cost of their independence and ability to speak out." The warning comes as Israel steps up its bombardment of Gaza City, in preparation for a plan to take control of the city. Israel says it will provide humanitarian aid to civilian populations "outside the combat zones", but has not specified whether that aid would be delivered by the Israel and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Israel says the system is necessary to stop Hamas stealing aid, an accusation Hamas denies. The UN this month reported that 859 Palestinians had been killed near GHF sites since May, a figure the GHF denies. In the joint statement, Aitor Zabalgogeazkoa, MSF emergency coordinator in Gaza, said that the "militarised food distribution scheme has weaponised starvation". The secretary-general of MSF, Chris Lockyear, told the BBC that GHF was a "death trap", and the humanitarian situation in Gaza was "hanging on by a thread". Hamas's 2023 attack killed about 1,200 people in Israel, with 251 seized and taken into Gaza as hostages. Israel's offensive has since killed nearly 62,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. It says that 235 people including 106 children have also died due to starvation and malnutrition. — BBC
