Mission Impossible theme composer Lalo Schifrin dies aged 93
Schifrin's sons, William and Ryan, confirmed his death.
The Argentine won four Grammys and was nominated for six Oscars, including five for original score for the movies: Cool Hand Luke; The Fox; Voyage of the Damned; The Amityville Horror; and The Sting II.
'Every movie has its own personality. There are no rules to write music for movies,' Schifrin told the Associated Press in 2018.
'The movie dictates what the music will be.'
Schifrin also wrote the grand finale musical performance for the World Cup in Italy in 1990, in which the Three Tenors: Placido Domingo, Luciano Pavarotti and Jose Carreras; sang together for the first time.
The work became one of the biggest sellers in the history of classical music.
Born Boris Claudio Schifrin to a Jewish family in Buenos Aires, where his father was the concertmaster of the philharmonic orchestra, Schifrin was classically trained in music, in addition to studying law.
After studying at the Paris Conservatory, where he learned about harmony and composition from composer Olivier Messiaen, Schifrin returned to Argentina and formed a concert band.
Jazz great Dizzy Gillespie heard Schifrin perform and asked him to become his pianist, arranger and composer.
In 1958, Schifrin moved to the United States where he performed and recorded with famous names including Ella Fitzgerald, Stan Getz, Dee Dee Bridgewater and George Benson.
He also moved into writing music for television and Hollywood movies.
In 2018, he was given an honorary Oscar statuette, which was presented to him by Clint Eastwood.
In addition to his sons, he is survived by his daughter, Frances, and wife, Donna.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Graziadaily
an hour ago
- Graziadaily
The Big Bush Revival - Here's Why Everyone's Obsessed With Pubic Hair
Over the years, your relationship with your pubes has no doubt evolved. You probably started your hair removal journey in your teens with an old razor nicked from your dad that you used to dry-shave your bikini line. Then you might have aged up to Veet's small wax strips, taking several minutes to muster the courage to yank off each section. Eventually, you upgraded to a salon, bravely progressing through the menu with each appointment. Our personal journey with our pubes is always changing and so too are the trends. In the last year, pubes have incited widespread discussion for both their excess and their absence. Earlier this year at the Grammys, Bianca Censori graced the red carpet with her husband Kanye West in a fur coat that she then dropped, revealing absolutely nothing underneath. Technically, she was wearing a thin sheer dress but calling it clothes is like calling clingfilm a blindfold. Noticeable was Bianca's lack of pubes; she had gone for a Hollywood wax, which involves removing the whole lot. The response to Censori's move was predominantly negative, with many people commenting that the juxtaposition of a fully clothed Kanye next to her made the whole thing feel weirdly controlling. The Hollywood was not exempt from the conversation – the lack of hair felt doll-like and infantilising. Her pubes were making a statement and people didn't like it. While hair removal can be traced all the way back to Cleopatra, who liked to remove all her body hair with sugar wax, modern depilation trends have tended to follow the popularisation of swimsuits. As bikinis got smaller the need for less and less hair followed. And in the '90s – when high-leg bikini briefs were the epitome of cool beachwear – the Brazilian wax (where just a small 'landing' strip or triangle on the mons pubis remains) rose in popularity, subsequently encouraged by Carrie Bradshaw getting one in Sex And The City (albeit accidentally and apparently horrified to be left with so little hair down there). Fast forward to today and – say what you will about Censori – the Hollywood is now the most popular wax option in most salons. Beauty bookings app Ruuby has seen a 13% uptick in Hollywood waxes compared to 2024. The Hollywood has notably – and unfortunately – found favour with another group. Many podcast bros have shared that they 'require' a woman to have hairless nether regions and this has been one of the driving factors behind a counter trend in pubes – the big bush. Trending last year on social media was 'full bush in a bikini'. What started with a viral Etsy review that encouraged people to embrace their natural hair developed into a rallying cry across TikTok and Instagram, urging users to resist societal pressure to remove hair and instead embrace the natural plumage of their pubage. And the bush made a splash in fashion too when Maison Margiela's models walked the catwalk wearing merkins for the brand's spring 2024 couture show, with Björk then modelling the look on the front cover of Scandinavian Vogue. A Hollywood may be popular but in Hollywood itself it seems a big bush is in fashion. For those rocking pubic hair, it's not in spite of the disgust of a certain type of man but because of it. There's something powerful and sexy about so proudly rejecting a beauty standard. And within this trend is a growing number of people who are customising their hairiness – women who shave their arms but have a bush like a forest. Or those with a monobrow and hairy pits who keep it bald between their legs. 'Young consumers are moving away from all-or-nothing grooming. Instead, it's about choosing where and how to groom,' says Artina Rianberg, product innovation specialist at vegan hair removal and bodycare brand Estrid. And it's not just what you have but how you get there. In 2024, laser hair removal became the UK's most searched-for non-surgical aesthetic treatment. At Strip (the 'hair removal experts') the team has seen its Hollywood laser treatment bookings jump by 18% in one year, with Brazilian treatments increasing by 23%. And it's not just women: male Brazilian laser treatments more than doubled over the past year. As for those not opting for permanent hair removal, modes of at-home maintenance are likewise evolving. Disposable razors have gone the same way as plastic straws as consumers opt for more sustainable brands and subscription services, such as FFS Beauty and Estrid. And many women are more aware of the 'pink tax'-the added cost of buying products marketed to women – so are making a play for 'manscaping' shavers. Much like our clothes or the hair on our head, our pubes are more than a fashion choice. Whether we realise it or not, they make a statement – they can signal the kind of person you are, the values you keep and even the kind of partner you don't want near your bush (or lack thereof). Flora Gill is a journalist who has written for GQ, Sunday Times, ST Style, ST Magazine, Telegraph, Radio Times, Grazia, Evening Standard and Air Mail. Follow her @floraegill
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Should violent abuser Chris Brown be playing Hampden Stadium?
This missed opportunity to have a meaningful dialogue about accountability comes at a time when Glasgow is in the throes of a deepening crisis for women's safety. Instances of domestic abuse are up by 41 per cent, rapes increased by 41 per cent, and sexual assault has risen by 28 per cent, according to the most recent data from the Safe Glasgow Partnership. Every time I hear Chris Brown's name, I think back to a camera at the Grammys in 2009 panning to two empty seats, their vacancy eerie and unsettling. I think of how a young Rihanna's eyebrows are gently knitting together, holding back tears while her swollen face, black and blue, is photographed after her boyfriend, then 19, punched her repeatedly while driving a Lamborghini. Many of his fans will tell you that Rihanna has forgiven him, and so should we. Or 'seriously, the Rihanna thing happened like 15 years ago and he has apologised a million times'. But the violent incidents and string of allegations only started with Rihanna; they didn't end there. A documentary released last year, Chris Brown: A History of Violence, details the seemingly endless controversies, including numerous accusations of alleged sexual assault and a rape allegation. In 2017, Brown's ex-girlfriend Karrueche Tran filed a restraining order, alleging that the singer repeatedly harassed her, punched her, and threatened to kill her and her friends. Brown kicked off his Breezy Bowl XX tour in Manchester earlier this week, a month after he was arrested in the city for an alleged bottle attack at the Tape nightclub in Mayfair in 2023. He spent a week in HMP Forest Bank, whom he thanked for being 'really nice' before performing to around 20,000 fans on Sunday night. Team Breezy, as his fans are known, are fiercely loyal. They will claim that Brown is Michael Jackson reincarnated, that he is the "king of R&B". They will wax lyrical about separating art from the artist. But we are living in an era with more music than ever before. It's easier to make, listen to, and discover. Something like 120,000 new tracks are uploaded to streaming services each day, according to a Luminate report from 2023. That is to say, the world is not short of options. Listening to Chris Brown is a choice. Glasgow Women's Aid said in a statement that Chris Brown 'should not be welcome in Glasgow' and asked what his concert says about our priorities. 'Time and time again, we see the entertainment industry turn a blind eye to abuse when profit is involved. Venues and sponsors claim to stand against violence against women but continue to hand a mic to men who harm.' The voluntary organisation called on promoters and venues to consider the impact of whom they choose to platform. They also said that fans should reflect on what they are supporting with their money and that politicians should have more of a voice when it comes to performers who have been charged with violent crimes. 'Abuse should have consequences,' they added. 'Glasgow is better than this.' I have been trying to unpack where it is I stand with this. Am I disappointed in DF Concerts for promoting Brown's gig? Or the tens of thousands of fans in the city and beyond who line his pockets with their ticket purchases? Or the political elites who have turned a blind eye to Brown while claiming Kneecap 'crossed a line'? Should someone pull the plug on the gig? What does that mean for free speech? Nearly every woman that I know, myself included, has been on the receiving end of men's sexual violence in some form or another. In terms of severity, these incidents vary greatly. Because formal institutions like the police and the courts have a history of failing survivors of abuse, the desire to hold someone to account in any way possible can be intoxicating. When it has happened to me, I have felt blinded by my desire to get justice and crippled by gut-wrenching feeling that it will never happen. Part of the problem is that as woman, what was meant to be our big movement, our big moment, went horribly wrong. Whitewashing everything with the same hashtag (#MeToo) had a flattening effect. It painted someone dog-whistling at you on the street with the same brush as rape. It also made us hyper-aware of what would be considered appropriate or inappropriate, and sometimes people got it wrong. But it seems like now, the middle has fallen out. And some people are so sick of walking on eggshells that they have just decided to give up thinking about these things altogether. Since the #MeToo movement there has been a cultural shift, a regression. Misogyny is creeping back into the mainstream. It often feels like a scary and hostile time to be a woman. I think part of this comes down to stripping nuance out of situations, which has in turn resulted in a chilling effect where it becomes so loaded to talk about something on a deeper level that we just stopped talking about it at all. Cancel culture is an illusion. It flattens complex situations, which in turn can strip someone of the opportunity to learn and grow. And while I don't believe in cancel culture, I do believe in accountability culture. And Brown does not come across to me as someone who has ever learned from his violent and disgusting mistakes. Chris Brown's stadium show is a great opportunity to have a conversation about what we as a city think is acceptable behaviour. And the silence speaks volumes. Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1
Scotsman
7 hours ago
- Scotsman
Soccer Aid 2025: who won the charity match
Soccer Aid lived up to expectations with a 9 goal thriller at Old Trafford 👀 Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Soccer Aid took place at Old Trafford this year. The line-ups included Wayne Rooney, Carlos Tevez and more. But did England win or was it the World XI? Carlos Tevez rolled back the years with a stunning performance during Soccer Aid this year. The Argentine legend helped inspire the World XI to victory in the charity match. First started back in 2008, it has become a firm fixture in ITV's TV calendar. For 2025, it brought together a mix of football legends and celebrities for a memorable night at Old Trafford. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wayne Rooney, Aaron Lennon and Jill Scott were joined by the likes of The Last of Us' Bella Ramsey and YouTube favourite Angryginge for the match last night (June 15). See the full line-up here. But who actually won Soccer Aid this year? Here's all you need to know: Who won Soccer Aid - was it England or the World XI? World XI won Soccer Aid 5-4 after a winning goal from presenter Big Zuu | AFP via Getty Images After a thumping victory in last year's edition of the charity match, England came into the 2025 game at the Theatre of Dreams hoping to make it two wins in a row. However it was not to be - as Carlos Tevez inspired the World XI to a comeback victory. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The match started in dream fashion with Wayne Rooney opening the scoring after just 1 minute. Toni Duggan extended the lead just before half-time - making it 2-0 to England. However Carlos Tevez changed the game in the second half and scored three goals in just 10 minutes to make it 3-3 - after Jermaine Defoe added a third for England. Defoe restored England's lead in the 65th minute, but Tevez struck again four minutes later to make it 4-3 and again in the 73rd minute to make it four all. TV star Big Zuu scored the winner for World XI in the 84th minute - making it 5-4 and completing the turn around. It adds to his win in Netflix's Celebrity Bear Hunt earlier in the year. What was your favourite moment from Soccer Aid this year? Let me know by email: . Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Who scored the goals at Soccer Aid? England: Wayne Rooney (1), Toni Duggan (45+1), Jermaine Defoe (55, 65) World XI: Carlos Tevez (59, 60, 69, 73), Big Zuu (84). One fan wrote on social media: 'Carlos Tevez scoring 4 in 20 minutes in a charity match is hilarious. That's a man who doesn't know the meaning of the word friendly and I love it.' Have you got a story you want to share with our readers? You can now send it to us online via YourWorld at . It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.
